Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2020-05-14
19:38:39 NobodyCam no allocations so just a delete and restart fixed us right up
19:39:00 melwitt NobodyCam: np, glad to hear. ah good, I was hoping it would be the easy case :)
19:39:19 NobodyCam :)
19:46:38 openstackgerrit Andreas Jaeger proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Switch to newer openstackdocstheme and reno versions https://review.opendev.org/728270
19:46:58 openstackgerrit Andreas Jaeger proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Switch to newer openstackdocstheme and reno versions https://review.opendev.org/728270
19:53:12 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add packages required for pdf docs build to bindep.txt https://review.opendev.org/727898
20:11:46 gmann sean-k-mooney: change lgtm and not changing the API but i am not sure about mentioned use case of this API to refresh the cache. server external event API is for openstack services mainly. - https://review.opendev.org/#/c/702394/3
22:55:22 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM Try out running sphinx-build in parallel for releasenotes https://review.opendev.org/727429
#openstack-nova - 2020-05-15
00:05:40 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Configure latex_engine = 'xelatex' for pdf docs build https://review.opendev.org/727898
00:09:08 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Fix pep8 errors uncovered by flake8 3.8.1 https://review.opendev.org/728312
00:37:37 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Fix flake8 error from hacking <3.0.1 https://review.opendev.org/727589
00:44:12 gmann melwitt: we need this to be in to have right cap for hacking and flake8 - https://review.opendev.org/#/c/727347/1
00:44:19 gmann i thought it was merged
00:44:44 gmann but is doc job still failing ?
00:45:34 melwitt gmann: rechecking not gonna help, docs job still broken
00:46:11 melwitt it did merge but didn't stop the failure, I replied on the ML post
00:46:42 gmann i thought openstackdocstheme 2.1.0 fixed that on gate
00:47:06 melwitt 2.1.1 was intended to fix it but it did not work
00:47:35 melwitt my nova side fix is still proposed but now we have a chicken and egg with the pep8 job
00:47:56 melwitt I sent a ML post about that too a little while ago
00:48:29 gmann ah just saw, i think we can squash it with 727898
00:49:39 brinzhang gmann: the hacking verion should change to 3.1.0?
00:49:42 brinzhang right?
00:50:31 gmann brinzhang: yeah in your patch yes as it will fix the code together
00:50:57 brinzhang gmann: ok, update soon
00:51:53 melwitt I wonder if alex_xu is around
00:56:17 gmann melwitt: this should avoid doc failure - https://review.opendev.org/#/c/727943/4
00:56:44 melwitt gmann: it doesn't because 2.1.1 also fails
00:57:50 melwitt if you look in the docs job build logs, 2.1.1 is installed now
00:58:05 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Bump hacking min version to 3.1.0 https://review.opendev.org/727589
00:58:57 gmann melwitt: not sure why not complete revert that instead if backlist. PS1 was right revert - https://review.opendev.org/#/c/727943/1/upper-constraints.txt
01:00:11 brinzhang gmann: updated, I just only keep the hacking min version to 3.1.0, i.e. hacking>=3.1.0, please check
01:18:38 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Bump hacking min version to 3.1.0 https://review.opendev.org/727589
01:22:11 brinzhang gmann: do we need to continue merged hacking 3.0.1 https://review.opendev.org/#/c/727347/?
01:48:11 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Bump hacking min version to 3.0.1 https://review.opendev.org/727347
01:51:08 melwitt gmann: lol, what a day huh!
01:51:31 melwitt (gate stuff)
01:54:04 gmann :). I think we made little hurry to release new hacking.
01:55:49 gmann I vote is to move back openstackdocstheme to 2.0.2 as nova, cinder are hitting doc + pep8 and may be more projects but not checked
01:55:55 gmann *my vote
01:56:40 gmann asked in requirement channel, let's see if we can get any other fast way to unblock
01:56:51 melwitt yeah, I lean that way too
01:57:49 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Bump hacking min version to 3.1.0 https://review.opendev.org/727589
01:58:23 gmann because hacking is blacklist req so it cannot be controlled on single place (g-r side).
01:58:48 melwitt I see
02:08:37 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Bump hacking min version to 3.1.0 https://review.opendev.org/727589
02:35:23 melwitt gmann: do you plan to depends-on the roll back patch or did you want to try it out some other way?
02:36:07 gmann i can do that.
02:36:46 melwitt or could do a dummy patch
02:37:01 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Bump hacking min version to 3.0.1 https://review.opendev.org/727347
02:37:29 gmann melwitt: as it needs to re-run anyways. done ^^
02:37:43 melwitt yeah, I saw it had already failed the docs job
02:37:54 melwitt cool I'll keep an eye on it
03:13:50 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Configure latex_engine = 'xelatex' for pdf docs build https://review.opendev.org/727898
03:15:02 melwitt gmann: oh no, depends-on doesn't work for requirements changes??
03:15:05 melwitt still failing
03:15:10 melwitt and pulling in 2.1.1
03:19:19 gmann melwitt: yeah, we need to get requirement revert merge first
03:19:49 melwitt gmann: oh really? depends-on known not to work in this case? I didn't know that, guh
03:20:17 melwitt I thought we were going to be able to test if job passes with the requirement revert
03:43:18 gmann melwitt: left note on this to recheck after req patch merge - https://review.opendev.org/#/c/727347/3
03:43:45 melwitt gmann: cool, I've re-approved it so it's ready to go
03:44:16 gmann bauzas: stephenfin gibi ^^ whoever wake up early. this is req patch to merge first - https://review.opendev.org/#/c/728335/
03:44:21 gmann melwitt: thanks.
03:45:10 gmann going to bed...
03:45:47 melwitt k seeya
06:57:10 openstackgerrit Andreas Jaeger proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: Test openstackdocstheme master https://review.opendev.org/728372
07:01:18 gibi good morning nova
07:03:13 gibi gmann: I see melwitt rechecked it
07:03:14 melwitt gibi: yeah rechecked it just a little while ago, once that lands, our gate should be unblocked. fingers crossed nothing goes wrong
07:03:20 gibi gmann: I'm approving https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/policy-defaults-refresh-deprecated-apis as we agreed about it on yesterday's team meeting
07:18:51 bauzas good Friday Nova
07:24:33 bauwser there it is
08:05:33 kashyap bauwser: /me waves
08:56:11 openstackgerrit Andreas Jaeger proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: Test openstackdocstheme master https://review.opendev.org/728372
09:17:13 lyarwood stephenfin: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/676208/ - I'm onboard with using mypy just not adding it to the pep8 while it's still optional and not used outside of the libvirt driver.
09:17:29 lyarwood pep8 env*
09:19:24 stephenfin lyarwood: I originally had a separate mypy zuul job and tox target but when I proposed said zuul job against openstack-zuul-jobs, mordred noted that zuul simply integrated it into their pep8 target (or linters, I think they call it)
09:19:27 stephenfin hence why I did it that way
09:19:34 stephenfin where would be better?
09:25:35 lyarwood stephenfin: okay it might not be worth splitting hairs over this but given it's not widely used in openstack/nova yet it seems like overkill to run it everytime we run pep8
09:26:00 lyarwood stephenfin: I guess zuul is using it as standard across their codebase and that's why they've merged things
09:27:52 lyarwood stephenfin: if gibi and others are cool with it being in the pep8 env then I'll shut up and let it merge :)
09:29:04 gibi stephenfin, lyarwood: is it something that makes tox -e fast8 target significantly slower?
09:29:35 stephenfin it doesn't affect fast8, no
09:29:46 stephenfin and even for pep8, it takes seconds to run
09:29:55 lyarwood with a single file at the moment ;)
09:30:01 lyarwood but yeah it's little to no overhead
09:30:21 gibi pep8 takes minutes so additional seconds does not cause any pain for me
09:30:30 gibi so I'm OK to integrate it to the pep8 target
09:30:38 lyarwood ack thank s gibi
09:30:40 stephenfin three files two commits later!
09:30:44 gibi :D
09:31:01 lyarwood lol, we can always break it out again if it does become an issue
09:31:19 gibi agree ^^
09:31:30 stephenfin cool
09:31:36 brinzhang stephenfin: do I need to remove this sentence from the commit message? https://review.opendev.org/#/c/727589/8//COMMIT_MSG
09:31:44 stephenfin also, is it just me, or is Gerrit really slow this week?
09:31:55 stephenfin like, 'git review -d foo' takes minutes
09:31:55 lyarwood stephenfin: just you

Earlier   Later