Posted	Nick	Remark
#openstack-nova - 2020-04-23
15:51:18	gibi	/o\
15:52:30	lyarwood	elod / melwitt: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/720587/ - I think this is ready right? We aren't waiting on actual failures to show up first in stable/stein?
15:53:11	openstackgerrit	Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova stable/stein: Make RBD imagebackend flatten method idempotent https://review.opendev.org/708615
15:53:20	kashyap	sean-k-mooney: Will respond in a few
15:53:57	sean-k-mooney	kashyap: no rush
15:53:59	kashyap	sean-k-mooney: lyarwood: So, I just double-confirmed with upstream QEMU: as I guessed, depsite KM-long threads, there's no agreement whether to not add new 'pc' variants or not -- it is strictly a RHEL-only decsion
15:54:31	kashyap	So, I'll add "suitable words"
15:54:31	kashyap	And also other long-term distributions (SUSE, et al)
15:54:33	kashyap	(In the end this spec might even not be needed ... but at least it allows to flesh out ideas)
15:55:18	sean-k-mooney	kashyap: yep. ill try to review it more properly on monday but at least it s place to collect and discuss the alternitives
15:56:46	kashyap	sean-k-mooney: Sure, yeah. It at least keeps the ideas in one place
15:58:00	openstackgerrit	Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: [Community goal] Update contributor documentation https://review.opendev.org/722391
15:58:07	openstackgerrit	Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/os-vif master: [Community goal] Update contributor documentation https://review.opendev.org/722392
15:58:14	openstackgerrit	Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova-specs master: [Community goal] Update contributor documentation https://review.opendev.org/722393
16:02:31	elod	lyarwood: according to logstash the failure disappeared, so maybe we could merge that now
16:04:53	melwitt	lyarwood: it is ready yes. tbh I'm surprised it's 100% gone from logstash bc I expected to see it on older branches (train and earlier). I wonder if logstash does only master branch only? I'm not sure
16:05:23	lyarwood	I thought it did all of the supported releases tbh
16:05:31	lyarwood	train and stein still are
16:05:38	melwitt	that's what I had thought too
16:05:46	lyarwood	but anyway lets merge that
16:05:48	melwitt	but I guess they get much less traffic
16:06:12	lyarwood	yup very true
16:41:07	lyarwood	melwitt / elod ; following up on the stable discussion in the meeting can you hit https://review.opendev.org/#/c/708578/
16:41:19	lyarwood	melwitt: can you also hit https://review.opendev.org/#/c/708615/
16:41:36	lyarwood	and I think we should be ready to cut a release once these have merged
16:41:47	melwitt	sure
16:41:50	lyarwood	many thanks
16:42:52	bauzas	lyarwood: I'll look at those stable/stein changes
16:44:36	lyarwood	thanks
16:46:05	gibi	bauzas: I will check back in couple of hours to update the RC1 release patch
16:46:20	bauzas	gibi: want me to do it this evening ?
16:46:40	gibi	bauzas: I will cover this. you covered the novaclient
16:46:46	bauzas	cool
16:46:48	gibi	loadsharing :)
16:48:03	bauzas	well, I'm a bit depressed by something with my house, so I would just turn into work to forget it :p
16:51:33	openstackgerrit	Merged openstack/nova-specs master: move implemented spec for train https://review.opendev.org/706276
16:56:46	openstackgerrit	Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: [Community goal] Update contributor documentation https://review.opendev.org/722391
17:16:11	openstackgerrit	Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/os-vif master: Fix doc build job for wanring turn into error https://review.opendev.org/722407
17:16:41	openstackgerrit	Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/os-vif master: [Community goal] Update contributor documentation https://review.opendev.org/722392
17:22:53	openstackgerrit	Merged openstack/nova master: FUP: Amend ussuri prelude to add docs for policy concepts https://review.opendev.org/722220
17:30:05	openstackgerrit	Kashyap Chamarthy proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Make Q35 machine type the default for x86 https://review.opendev.org/631154
18:06:57	openstackgerrit	Merged openstack/nova stable/train: Add retry to cinder API calls related to volume detach https://review.opendev.org/722142
18:12:26	openstackgerrit	Elod Illes proposed openstack/nova stable/stein: Reject boot request for unsupported images https://review.opendev.org/708578
18:41:03	artom	I've set one bug to fix released, because that's what it was, and another as wontfix, because while super impressive, it's just not a concern in practice.
18:41:17	artom	I've also looked at a dozen others, all of which have ended with "I have no idea"
18:55:26	artom	What's vmware's driver status?
18:56:43	artom	IIRC dansmith was talking about deprecating it? Do we have anyone working on it?
18:57:01	dansmith	we marked it as deprecated this cycle
18:57:06	dansmith	it'll be a few before we can remove it
18:57:21	artom	OK, so for a bugin that driver, it'd be fair to say wontfix?
18:57:35	artom	In order to set realistic exptectations?
18:57:55	dansmith	that's really for the owners of the driver to say I guess
18:58:14	dansmith	I would maybe mark it as triaged or whatever, if it looks valid and tag it so it's clearly vmware-related
18:58:35	dansmith	and maybe comment that it's unlikely to get fixed, but marking it as wontfix is probably too aggressive
18:58:46	artom	It's already tagged, I have no idea if it's valid, I'll leave it alone then
18:59:45	openstack	Launchpad bug 1800204 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "n-cpu.service consuming 100% of CPU indeterminately" [Undecided,Won't fix]
18:59:45	artom	And now you're making me doubt closing https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1800204 as wontfix
19:02:39	dansmith	I would argue that bugs that rely on intercepting the rpc message and changing it are not worth our time, yes
19:03:31	artom	\o/
19:33:05	openstackgerrit	Merged openstack/nova master: Revert "Temporarily skip TestNovaMigrationsMySQL" https://review.opendev.org/718630
20:21:51	gibi	bauzas: fyi updated the RC1 release patch
20:32:32	melwitt	gibi: is the prelude update in there too? sorry I don't see yet
20:32:42	melwitt	for the policy doc
20:34:17	melwitt	or wait, maybe I'm getting confused. cycle highlight updated with link... did we need an update to the prelude, I thought we were going to but maybe not really needed
20:41:05	melwitt	no I think I got confused with the cycle highlights. nevermind me
20:43:29	melwitt	we did update it https://review.opendev.org/722220 ok good
21:19:49	openstackgerrit	Merged openstack/nova stable/stein: Reset the cell cache for database access in Service https://review.opendev.org/720587
21:37:36	openstackgerrit	OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/nova stable/ussuri: Update .gitreview for stable/ussuri https://review.opendev.org/722518
21:37:42	openstackgerrit	OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/nova stable/ussuri: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/ussuri https://review.opendev.org/722520
21:37:46	openstackgerrit	OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/nova master: Update master for stable/ussuri https://review.opendev.org/722521
21:37:52	openstackgerrit	OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/nova master: Add Python3 victoria unit tests https://review.opendev.org/722523
22:00:27	gmann	melwitt: yeah both are updated.
23:04:55	openstackgerrit	Takashi Natsume proposed openstack/nova master: Add placeholder migrations for Ussuri backports https://review.opendev.org/722546
23:06:58	openstackgerrit	Merged openstack/python-novaclient master: [Community goal] Update contributor documentation https://review.opendev.org/722391
#openstack-nova - 2020-04-24
01:46:13	openstackgerrit	Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Update SPEC: Using PUT instead of PATCH API to update delete_on_termination https://review.opendev.org/722194
02:50:57	openstackgerrit	Kevin Zhao proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] CI: add tempest-integrated-compute-aarch64 job https://review.opendev.org/714439
02:54:16	openstackgerrit	Kevin Zhao proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] CI: add tempest-integrated-compute-aarch64 job https://review.opendev.org/714439
03:02:47	openstackgerrit	Takashi Natsume proposed openstack/nova master: Add placeholder migrations for Ussuri backports https://review.opendev.org/722546
06:02:48	openstackgerrit	Kevin Zhao proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] CI: add tempest-integrated-compute-aarch64 job https://review.opendev.org/714439
06:06:01	gibi	good morning
06:06:17	gibi	melwitt: thanks for checking the RC1 release patch
07:08:38	bauzas	good morning Nova
07:37:47	openstackgerrit	Kevin Zhao proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] CI: add tempest-integrated-compute-aarch64 job https://review.opendev.org/714439
08:04:57	bauzas	gibi: have you triaged some bugs ?
08:10:21	openstack	Launchpad bug 1738297 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Nova Destroys Local Disks for Instance with Broken iSCSI Connection to Cinder Volume Upon Resume from Suspend" [Undecided,New]
08:10:21	bauzas	lyarwood: permission to close this bug ? https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1738297
08:11:22	bauzas	looks to me that suspend after host reboot is not available (but there is a conf flag for resuming the guests upon reboot the reporter should use) and since nova no longer deletes the ephemeral files, I don't think there is anything to resolve
08:13:45	gibi	bauzas: nope, sorry
08:14:00	bauzas	okay it's weird then
08:14:10	gibi	bauzas: we lost bugs?
08:14:18	bauzas	I was seeing 50 open bugs this morning and now there are only 44
08:14:24	bauzas	6 just gone
08:14:32	gibi	interesting
08:14:35	bauzas	but meh, it's maybe PEBKAC
08:14:49	bauzas	anyway, moving on
08:15:03	gibi	I have a tab open with 52 new bugs
08:15:37	gibi	so we can compare
08:16:16	gibi	i haven refreshed that tab since last evening
08:16:38	bauzas	https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New
08:16:44	bauzas	^ gives me 44 opens

Earlier   Later