| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2020-04-20 | |||
| 12:12:03 | bauzas | gibi: ack thanks | |
| 12:12:21 | bauzas | brinzhang: if you want, ping me tomorrow for discussing about something about reviews | |
| 12:12:36 | bauzas | brinzhang: (UTC+2 here) | |
| 12:40:16 | gibi | bauzas: will there be a FUP for the comments from lyarwood in https://review.opendev.org/#/c/712118/ ? | |
| 12:40:47 | bauzas | gibi: haven't seen them yet | |
| 12:41:15 | bauzas | gibi: FWIW, in https://review.opendev.org/#/c/712118/ like I said in a comment, this change is no longer needed for https://review.opendev.org/#/c/712741/ | |
| 12:42:14 | gibi | bauzas: will you then remove it from the series? | |
| 12:42:21 | bauzas | gibi: for the comment nits, sure I can do it in a FUP | |
| 12:42:41 | gibi | bauzas: yes, comment nits are totally FUPable but if the whole patch is not needed then it is even better | |
| 12:42:41 | bauzas | gibi: we can merge it since I already provided a ML thread for out-of-tree drivers maintainers | |
| 12:43:11 | bauzas | gibi: or wait, I'll rebase this one on top of https://review.opendev.org/#/c/712741/ and just provide a new revision for the nits | |
| 12:43:22 | bauzas | will be done in 1 min | |
| 12:43:29 | gibi | but then the allocation would be an unused param | |
| 12:43:31 | gibi | isn't it? | |
| 12:46:19 | bauzas | gibi: for finish_revert_migration() yes | |
| 12:46:31 | bauzas | gibi: to clarify, I'll just provide the new series | |
| 12:46:58 | bauzas | and people can discuss on the opportunity to merge https://review.opendev.org/#/c/712118/ if nothing uses the new param or not | |
| 12:47:14 | gibi | bauzas: OK, I will check the new series | |
| 12:47:57 | bauzas | gibi: should be done in 5 mins, just verifying unittests and functests because of a minor merge conflict | |
| 12:49:18 | gibi | cool | |
| 13:00:02 | francoisp | gibi hello, we would need an external reviewer (outside of RH) to check on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/669674/ , would you have time to have a look? | |
| 13:00:12 | bauzas | gibi: excellent concern FWIW https://review.opendev.org/#/c/712741/6/nova/tests/functional/libvirt/test_vgpu.py@45 | |
| 13:03:32 | gibi | francoisp: based on a recent agreement you only need to keep the two company rule for high impact changes, anything that | |
| 13:03:35 | gibi | involves a microversion, service version, rpc version, or database | |
| 13:03:36 | gibi | migration. | |
| 13:03:45 | gibi | francoisp: but sure I will look at that bugfix | |
| 13:04:50 | gibi | bauzas: honestly I failed to prove that it can actaully cause any problem but if you can add someting to the setUp to reset the test object level variable that could scratch my itch | |
| 13:04:52 | openstackgerrit | Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Allocate mdevs when resizing or reverting resize https://review.opendev.org/712741 | |
| 13:04:53 | openstackgerrit | Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Pass allocations to virt drivers when reverting resize https://review.opendev.org/712118 | |
| 13:05:12 | francoisp | thanks very much gibi | |
| 13:05:36 | gibi | francoisp: for reference http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-March/013553.html | |
| 13:07:29 | lyarwood | gibi: I asked for additional review outside of RH in francoisp's case as that change impacts all callers to cinder across all virt drivers. | |
| 13:07:42 | francoisp | ok thanks gibi, that makes sense, otherwise you would get overwhelmed | |
| 13:07:53 | gibi | lyarwood: I see that is reasonable | |
| 13:22:38 | bauzas | gibi: if you don't mind reapplying your +2 on the vgpu resize change given the only change was due to a merge conflict resolution https://review.opendev.org/#/c/712741/6..7 | |
| 13:27:35 | gibi | bauzas: done. and thanks for writing the prelude | |
| 13:27:45 | bauzas | ta | |
| 13:31:26 | gibi | francoisp, lyarwood: +A-d the cinder retry | |
| 13:32:25 | francoisp | ok great, thank you gibi | |
| 13:32:48 | lyarwood | yup thanks gibi | |
| 13:37:43 | openstackgerrit | jayaditya gupta proposed openstack/nova master: Support for --force flag for nova-manage placement heal_allocations command https://review.opendev.org/715395 | |
| 13:47:29 | nightmare_unreal | mriedem: thanks for the review :) As you have suggested I have made changes accordingly but I am still facing 1 issue. It seems the allocated ram ( bogus ram) won't change if you call heal allocation with force flag or without force flag :/ I have added comments for it https://review.opendev.org/#/c/715395/10 | |
| 13:47:30 | nightmare_unreal | Thanks | |
| 14:05:25 | gmann | melwitt: stephenfin gibi seems like johnthetubaguy is not online. how we should proceed on these last bits to merge as 23rd is hard string freeze - https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:bp/policy-defaults-refresh+status:open | |
| 14:06:29 | gibi | gmann: I'm on a call I will ping back in an hour | |
| 14:06:48 | gibi | but overall I can try to spend 1 hour on those today | |
| 14:08:41 | gmann | gibi: thanks | |
| 14:26:55 | openstackgerrit | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova-specs master: move implemented spec for train https://review.opendev.org/706276 | |
| 14:27:50 | openstackgerrit | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova-specs master: move implemented spec for train https://review.opendev.org/706276 | |
| 14:29:53 | mriedem | nightmare_unreal: that's the point of the feature, correct? if it's not working you're going to need to debug it. | |
| 14:30:05 | mriedem | but that's why i asked for that kind of test | |
| 14:31:42 | nightmare_unreal | yeaah | |
| 14:35:23 | openstackgerrit | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova-specs master: move implemented spec for ussuri https://review.opendev.org/721278 | |
| 14:40:53 | kashyap | lyarwood: Hey, do you have the reproducer for that 'q35' thing on Ubuntu? | |
| 14:41:26 | kashyap | Ah, you updated this morning | |
| 14:42:43 | kashyap | Okay, it looks like a nudge. (Because, I don't see any 'diff' b/n 3..4: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/708701/3..4/.zuul.yaml) | |
| 15:02:15 | lyarwood | kashyap: sorry was hacking away on something downstream | |
| 15:02:25 | lyarwood | kashyap: I've just rebased that today to see if it still reproduces | |
| 15:02:36 | lyarwood | kashyap: I don't have anything written up, I only manually reproduced it before. | |
| 15:02:37 | kashyap | lyarwood: No problem; I asked on the change | |
| 15:02:44 | kashyap | (I don't count on instant responses :)) | |
| 15:33:43 | gibi | gmann: I'm +2 on the remaining policy changes. | |
| 15:48:07 | gmann | gibi: thanks. should i revise this as per comment if you are online and can re+2 - https://review.opendev.org/#/c/720129/7 | |
| 16:00:58 | gibi | gmann: if you respin it then I can re +2 | |
| 16:01:13 | gibi | gmann: but I might be slower during my evening | |
| 16:01:26 | gmann | gibi: cool. dojng | |
| 16:01:28 | gmann | doing | |
| 16:01:35 | gibi | cool | |
| 16:10:05 | openstackgerrit | Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Add docs and releasenotes for BP policy-defaults-refresh https://review.opendev.org/720129 | |
| 16:10:43 | gmann | gibi: ^^ | |
| 16:10:52 | gibi | looking | |
| 16:12:05 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Add docs and releasenotes for BP policy-defaults-refresh https://review.opendev.org/720129 | |
| 16:12:26 | gibi | just fixed a missing verb in the same sentence ^^ | |
| 16:12:28 | gibi | but +2 | |
| 16:19:00 | gmann | thanks | |
| 17:17:41 | stephenfin | gibi: If you can hit https://review.opendev.org/717884 https://review.opendev.org/719100 and https://review.opendev.org/720042 then we're done with policy, afaict | |
| 17:18:09 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova stable/train: libvirt: Calculate disk_over_committed for raw instances https://review.opendev.org/718964 | |
| 17:36:34 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: Add retry to cinder API calls related to volume detach https://review.opendev.org/669674 | |
| 18:06:48 | openstackgerrit | Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Fix the followup comment of policy doc https://review.opendev.org/721322 | |
| 18:18:43 | artom | gmann, wait, are we trying to land that policy doc before RC? | |
| 18:19:03 | artom | Didn't mean to sabotage that - but then my -1 carries less weight than gibi's +2, so :) | |
| 18:23:07 | gmann | artom: yeah before RC. I am fixing your comment in follow up along with stephenfin comments -https://review.opendev.org/721322 | |
| 18:24:00 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: Introduce scope_types in servers attributes Policies https://review.opendev.org/719729 | |
| 18:33:57 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: Add new default roles in servers attributes policies https://review.opendev.org/719730 | |
| 18:34:03 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: Add test coverage of existing remaining servers policies https://review.opendev.org/720104 | |
| 18:34:11 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: Introduce scope_types in remaining servers Policies https://review.opendev.org/720106 | |
| 18:34:19 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: Add new default roles in remaining servers policies https://review.opendev.org/720116 | |
| 18:54:06 | openstackgerrit | Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Fix the followup comment of policy doc https://review.opendev.org/721322 | |
| 18:54:43 | gmann | stephenfin: artom i fixed the policy doc comment in followup, please check - https://review.opendev.org/#/c/721322/ | |
| 19:13:54 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: Fix follow up comments on policy work https://review.opendev.org/717835 | |
| 19:17:01 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: Pass allocations to virt drivers when resizing https://review.opendev.org/589085 | |
| 19:56:48 | mnaser | sean-k-mooney: sorry to ping you here but i don't know what other channelt o find you in -- happy to hear your thoughts on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/720107/3 :) | |
| 19:57:53 | sean-k-mooney | mnaser: im usally in nova,neuton,plamcent,kolla and somethim infra or oslo | |
| 19:58:08 | sean-k-mooney | but ya ill take a look now | |
| 19:58:13 | mnaser | sean-k-mooney: fair :) whois showed a lot less than those today :P | |
| 19:58:27 | sean-k-mooney | whois sean-k-mooney | |
| 19:59:12 | sean-k-mooney | i has a few but ya so container images | |
| 19:59:15 | sean-k-mooney | fun | |
| 20:00:23 | sean-k-mooney | im not sure that its fair to describe kolla image as like system image e.g. lxc style but they are not that light weight either | |
| 20:04:30 | zigo | What's blocking this backport patch ? https://review.opendev.org/#/c/711233/ | |