Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2020-04-15
12:24:54 sean-k-mooney i had already adressed the other feedback but i also dont want to reporpose specs/feature if noone will end up using it
12:26:06 gibi sean-k-mooney: totally agree with you. I suggest to wait from alex_xu's response about it
12:26:23 gibi until that it is yet another unfinished feature
12:26:23 openstack Launchpad bug 1863889 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Revert resize problem in neutron-tempest-dvr-ha-multinode-full" [Medium,Confirmed]
12:26:23 bauzas gibi: fwiw, I'm about to confirm a gate issue https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1863889
12:26:32 gibi bauzas: I've just confirmed it
12:26:32 bauzas no need to keep it 'new'
12:26:37 bauzas ah lol
12:26:43 gibi and tagged
12:26:54 bauzas we're fighting over the same list :p
12:26:58 gibi bauzas: I will go and look at the bug list from the top to avoid such conflict
12:27:14 bauzas take the semaphore if you want :p
12:27:29 bauzas gibi: I personnally look at this query ordered by age https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New&orderby=-datecreated&start=0
12:27:35 gibi I think the list is long enough that we can eat it from two different direction
12:28:07 gibi do you walk that list from the top?
12:28:07 bauzas gibi: I could also briefly look at the 'in-progress' recent bugs that haven't been triaged yet
12:28:19 bauzas gibi: I do, because $regression check
12:28:29 gibi ok, then I will go from the bottom
12:28:37 bauzas old bugs that are more than 1 year old aren't really important so close to RC1
12:28:52 bauzas gibi: well, I stopped triaging for a while and I'm seeing the same bugs
12:28:56 bauzas good luck with that
12:29:37 bauzas gibi: no, please, keep looking at the top list, I'll do something else with bugs that is important close to RC1
12:30:12 bauzas gibi: like i said, I've stopped a couple of times some bugs that were in progress and were crucial because they were fixing a regression
12:30:30 bauzas we were just missing them since someone proposed a patch and didn't yell it
12:30:39 gibi bauzas: OK. I will look at the top for the next 30 minutes, then I have to jump on a call
12:30:59 bauzas as soon as someone proposes a patch, then the related bugs disappear from our radara
12:30:59 gibi I will let you know when I released the semaphor
12:31:02 bauzas radar*
12:31:19 gibi bauzas: yes, good point. If you have a good query for those bugs then please share
12:31:31 bauzas gibi: easy peasy, sec
12:34:00 bauzas gibi: https://frama.link/Z-EVGtyx
12:34:55 bauzas enjoy the list, 112 potential regressions :p
12:35:25 bauzas maybe 20 if we only consider the last 6 months
12:36:08 bauzas those bugs are in general written by developers who found a bug
12:36:34 bauzas whether the issue is new (hence a regression) or always existing, that's the crux of the problem :)
12:38:37 openstack Launchpad bug 1872385 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "delete sub resource provider in tree" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to Wenping Song (wenping1)
12:38:37 bauzas gibi: like, first case https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1872385
12:39:06 bauzas yay...
12:40:22 bauzas gibi: we don't have yet ussuri-rc-potential tag ?
12:40:35 sean-k-mooney not offically but im already using it
12:40:42 sean-k-mooney i was going to go update the tags
12:41:13 sean-k-mooney sorry not the rc on i am using the backport potential one
12:41:20 bauzas sean-k-mooney: just saying https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=ussuri-rc-potential
12:41:30 bauzas sean-k-mooney: that's different
12:41:35 sean-k-mooney yes it is
12:41:49 bauzas sean-k-mooney: you shouldn't use this tag (backport) yet
12:41:50 sean-k-mooney the cyborg bug is not an rc candiate
12:41:57 sean-k-mooney so i notice that both were missing
12:44:15 bauzas sean-k-mooney: sorry I don't get you ?
12:44:52 gibi bauzas: I did not needed the tag yet
12:45:09 gibi bauzas: I thought it is created when first needed
12:45:12 sean-k-mooney from https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+manage-official-tags
12:45:25 gibi bauzas: is there another way to pre-create a tag?
12:45:29 sean-k-mooney i have moved ussuri-backport-potential to offical
12:45:50 sean-k-mooney but i cant add ussuri-rc-potential for some reason
12:46:11 bauzas gibi: no, you just use it on purpose but then you can promote it 'official'
12:46:14 gibi me neither
12:46:29 bauzas gibi: it will then raise the visibility
12:46:39 gibi OK
12:46:40 bauzas hold on, doing it for one bug
12:47:07 bauzas gibi: there https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=ussuri-rc-potential
12:47:25 gibi thanks
12:47:26 bauzas gibi: look at the right panels, you can see the list of tags
12:47:41 bauzas and there is one link for 'edit official tags'
12:47:55 slaweq gibi: thx a lot for checking this grenade issue
12:47:57 sean-k-mooney https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+manage-official-tags
12:47:58 bauzas which leads to https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+manage-official-tags
12:48:04 bauzas jinx
12:48:16 gibi OK, thanks I made it official
12:48:21 bauzas and then, I'm adding ussuri-rc-potential to the left list
12:49:08 gibi slaweq: I hope melwitt has some future ideas. she looked a lot at this bug
12:49:59 bauzas sean-k-mooney: gibi: the ussuri-backport-potential is mostly used for knowing whether it's a good backport candidate after GA
12:50:12 sean-k-mooney bauzas: yep i know
12:50:24 bauzas but we should iterate over the list of ussuri-rc-potential before and after RC1
12:50:43 bauzas until we get 0 candidates
12:50:46 sean-k-mooney bauzas: i wanted to also flag that this was not intended to be fixed in the rc
12:50:57 bauzas the -backport tag ? yes
12:51:03 bauzas was that a question ?
12:51:30 bauzas like I said earlier "(14:49:59) bauzas: sean-k-mooney: gibi: the ussuri-backport-potential is mostly used for knowing whether it's a good backport candidate after GA"
12:51:32 sean-k-mooney yep im going to be reuploading it later today but i do not intend the patch to merge untill after ussuri is released then ill backport it
12:51:35 bauzas *after GA*
12:55:32 bauzas sean-k-mooney: a cyborg patch you mean ? I'm confused again :)
12:57:44 gibi bauzas: I'm releasing the bug lock for now, need to jump on a call
12:58:18 bauzas gibi: ack
13:08:50 openstack Launchpad bug 1863038 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Nova need to consider ironic node as 'host'" [Undecided,New]
13:08:50 gibi sean-k-mooney: do you have a feeling about https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1863038 ? For me it seems that the routed network feautre was never considered ironic in the first place.
13:10:48 bauzas routed networks aren't a thing yet, right?
13:13:40 gmann stephenfin: chekcing..
13:16:07 gibi bauzas: it works, in a narrow case
13:16:17 bauzas kk
13:16:21 gibi bauzas: when a port is pre-create with ip_allocation=deferred config
13:16:22 bauzas I missed that then
13:16:46 gibi for that case there was no need for nova change
13:17:19 gibi iff every network has a segment for every compute
13:18:24 gibi but overall you are right there is no real, good, tested routed net support in nova
13:22:06 gmann stephenfin: replied. please check
13:22:18 gmann stephenfin: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/662968/9
13:23:10 bauzas gibi: ahah, now I understand why I never heard of this as 'implemented'
13:23:18 bauzas it was all proxied to neutron then
13:23:22 bauzas gotcha

Earlier   Later