Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2020-04-10
20:46:43 gmann yeah but seems this causing it https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/28324e6aa7f1286e92c4e3292c57b9df24309cc8/.zuul.yaml#L57
20:47:16 melwitt fyi the gate bug on "timed out waiting for response from cell" will still hit some failures until we merge the stable/train fix. because it can currently fail on the old side of grenade
20:48:01 melwitt oh hm ...
20:48:12 gmann ohk, is it happening all time i mean timeout ?
20:48:43 gmann i can try override-checkout to fix it fast and then debug why stable/train not used for required-projects
20:49:02 melwitt no it is only sometimes. it's just I was confused at first when I saw the logstash still was having new hits. and I realized we would have to merge fix on stable/train too in order to see all hits stop
20:49:33 melwitt since it is grenade running both stable/train and then upgrade, and then run master
20:50:33 melwitt ok, cool. well, besides that I don't know why the functional test job should need openstack/placement. oh, maybe for the openstack/placement test fixtures?
20:51:23 gmann ok.
20:56:16 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova stable/train: Use placement stable branch version for functional py2 job https://review.opendev.org/719105
20:56:18 gmann melwitt: ^^ let's see if that fix
20:57:07 melwitt cool thank you! I will keep 👀 on it
20:57:07 melwitt cool thank you! I will keep 👀 on it
20:58:00 melwitt also noting that if this is the recommended way to do it (by -infra) then we will need to fix all of our stable branches I would think
20:58:21 melwitt actually I will ask them to look and confirm
20:59:56 gmann yeah, required-project on stable branch should use stable version
21:04:29 artom Have we considered just removing placement from required projects? The error is from cloning it, not using it. Why are we using placement in func jobs?
21:05:36 artom I guess 787bb336065 is why...
21:17:02 melwitt artom: there's more info in -infra, but this is some explanation https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/stable/train/tox.ini#L76
21:19:28 dansmith artom: we use it for the fixture in func tests, IIRC
21:29:26 melwitt yeah, tl;dr is we use it for the fixtures, and we don't want to install it for literally every test env, only func test envs, so we have to handle it in tox.ini
21:30:32 gmann melwitt: dansmith is it too bad to hav placement installed for unit test case - https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/stable/train/tox.ini#L83
21:30:54 gmann if no then having it in test-requirement.txt is much better solution
21:32:30 melwitt yeah, I have no idea really
21:34:14 gmann because we cannot solve stable branch and local run things without having constrain in tox.ini which need update on every placement new version
21:34:40 melwitt unless we do the thing you suggested earlier right, just prescribe the zuul version
21:35:03 gmann we can solve it for stable branch in generic way without need of update evrytime but local env run require manual handling of right version
21:35:08 gmann yeah
21:35:18 melwitt oh, so that's the snag. I see
21:36:55 gmann that work if we leave local run case which will be only case where we want to run functional tests for stable fix locally.
21:37:24 gmann which should be min cases ?
21:37:44 melwitt well, I think it's pretty normal to run them locally for a stable backport. I do
21:38:35 gmann ok
21:39:11 melwitt I guess so far I'm thinking,if test-requirement.txt would be the idea solution, we would have to maintain version ranges for that per stable branch anyway. and if we're doing that anyway, doing it in tox.ini isn't any worse, like clarkb said
21:40:20 gmann true. and having unused placement installed for unit test is not so bad
21:40:51 gmann i prefer that for simplicity of maintenance
21:40:53 melwitt well, I was thinking we do it in tox.ini at first and have a wider talk about putting into test-requirements.txt
21:41:02 gmann hummm
21:41:39 gmann in tox we need to update our-self on every branch but test-requirements.txt is automatic
21:41:40 melwitt I dunno, I just don't want to make that decision with just a couple of us I guess
21:42:39 melwitt oh, so you're saying we wouldn't have to do a version range in test-requirements?
21:44:09 gmann yeah, that will be handled by upper-constraint file. - https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/stable/train/tox.ini#L18
21:44:29 melwitt and clark said in tox.ini we get tox-siblings, but that doesn't do the same thing?
21:47:21 gmann ah you mean just have lower cap and then tox-siblings take zuul version to use
21:47:38 gmann let me try that.
21:47:42 melwitt "I" don't mean it, just trying to repeat what clarkb said
21:49:10 melwitt I don't understand this stuff hardly at all
21:49:47 gmann that should work i think. let me push that also in train gate and see
21:52:55 gmann melwitt: btw, keypair policy series is ready - https://review.opendev.org/#/c/718621/4
21:53:28 gmann and quota class -https://review.opendev.org/#/c/719100/
21:55:02 melwitt ok. if it gets too ugly, then I guess we just put into test-requirements
21:55:08 melwitt cool, thanks
22:04:31 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova stable/train: Use placement stable branch version for functional job https://review.opendev.org/719105
22:05:03 gmann melwitt: let's see if that work fine. I will propose it from master then backport
22:05:19 gmann ^^
22:05:42 melwitt ack
22:08:57 eandersson Before I forget. I know someone mentioned that they had a custom patch to expose numa pinning over api.
22:09:09 eandersson Is that something someone can share? :D
22:09:17 eandersson Also, what is the status of moving some of that to the placement api?
22:10:00 melwitt nothing in the placement api yet, nothing in progress
22:10:18 melwitt let me see if I can find the numa topo over api proposal
22:10:33 eandersson I remember someone... probably years ago mentioned that they changed the api to expose it in a custom patch :D
22:10:36 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Add new default roles in servers policies https://review.opendev.org/662971
22:10:38 eandersson thanks melwitt
22:11:02 eandersson We have a use case where we might need it, and thinking either a custom patch and then maybe (no promise) try to help upstream for placement
22:11:15 eandersson or a custom api outside of nova
22:12:04 melwitt ok, looks like that landed https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:bp/show-server-numa-topology+(status:open+OR+status:merged) in train with microversion 2.78
22:12:41 melwitt https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/reference/api-microversion-history.html#id71
22:12:49 eandersson Awesome!
22:13:03 eandersson We can just back-port that until we can upgrade to Train.
22:26:53 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova stable/train: Use placement stable branch version for functional job https://review.opendev.org/719105
22:34:21 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova stable/train: Reset the cell cache for database access in Service https://review.opendev.org/718934
22:40:06 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Add new default roles in os-evacuate policies https://review.opendev.org/708237
22:46:19 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Pass the target in os-services APIs policy https://review.opendev.org/676688
22:53:29 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/python-novaclient master: Microversion 2.87 - Stable device boot from volume rescue https://review.opendev.org/714956
22:55:24 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Use placement stable version for functional job https://review.opendev.org/719115
23:09:11 gmann melwitt: it worked - https://review.opendev.org/#/c/719105/
23:12:41 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Pass the target in os-services APIs policy https://review.opendev.org/676688
23:13:22 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Pass the actual target in server group policy https://review.opendev.org/717176
23:13:42 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Add new default roles in server group policies https://review.opendev.org/717175
23:14:13 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Add new default roles in server group policies https://review.opendev.org/717175
23:14:27 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Fix servers policy for admin_or_owner https://review.opendev.org/718501
23:14:38 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Add test coverage of existing server policies https://review.opendev.org/718348
23:14:52 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Introduce scope_types in servers Policies https://review.opendev.org/662968
23:15:08 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Add new default roles in servers policies https://review.opendev.org/662971
23:25:21 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Use placement stable version for functional job https://review.opendev.org/719115
23:29:27 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Use placement stable version for functional job https://review.opendev.org/719119
23:38:16 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova stable/train: Use placement stable version for functional job https://review.opendev.org/719120
23:40:26 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova stable/stein: Use placement stable version for functional job https://review.opendev.org/719121
23:42:17 gmann melwitt: dansmith artom : pushed the functional tox fix changes from master till stein - https://review.opendev.org/#/q/I96bb9fcb55f2a4fc3aefa01db70b45740db166c8
23:44:37 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Add new default roles in server external events policies https://review.opendev.org/717168
23:44:56 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Pass the actual target in server external events policy https://review.opendev.org/717169
#openstack-nova - 2020-04-11
01:17:46 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Add test coverage of existing quota sets policies https://review.opendev.org/719128
02:08:32 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Add test coverage of existing quota sets policies https://review.opendev.org/719128
10:29:02 openstackgerrit Wenping Song proposed openstack/nova master: delete sub resource provider when delete resource provider https://review.opendev.org/719163
10:48:47 openstackgerrit OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/python-novaclient stable/ussuri: Update .gitreview for stable/ussuri https://review.opendev.org/719164
10:48:50 openstackgerrit OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/python-novaclient stable/ussuri: Update TOX/UPPER_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/ussuri https://review.opendev.org/719165
10:48:52 openstackgerrit OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Update master for stable/ussuri https://review.opendev.org/719166
10:48:55 openstackgerrit OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Add Python3 victoria unit tests https://review.opendev.org/719167
11:16:03 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: downgrade when host does not support capabilities https://review.opendev.org/697228

Earlier   Later