Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2020-03-12
19:00:23 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: [Trivial] Fix code comment of admin password tests https://review.opendev.org/711734
19:06:12 openstack melwitt: Error: Error getting bugzilla.redhat.com bug #1744079: NotPermitted
19:06:12 melwitt stephenfin: here's the bug ticket https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744079 says it's fixed, so need to look at what versions this is showing up in? maybe they just need to update or maybe a backport is missing like you said?
19:07:02 openstack melwitt: Error: Error getting bugzilla.redhat.com bug #1741782: NotPermitted
19:07:02 melwitt sorry that was a clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741782
19:09:57 kplant if i have a instance on say "compute-01" and virsh shows it there, but nova thinks it's on "compute-02" how can i fix that?
19:12:29 stephenfin melwitt: Yup, looks like this is the commit we need https://github.com/libvirt/libvirt/commit/c8007fdc5d2ce43fec2753cda60fb4963f55abd5
19:12:50 stephenfin $ git tag --contains c8007fdc5d2ce43fec2753cda60fb4963f55abd5 | head -1
19:12:52 stephenfin v5.10.0
19:15:20 melwitt stephenfin: hm that looks like it. but v5.10.0 doesn't match the fixed in versions on the rhbzs? I don't understand that
19:17:29 stephenfin backport, I'd say
19:17:41 melwitt cause according to that there should be a fix in the 4.5.x series too
19:17:47 melwitt yeah..
19:18:15 stephenfin okay, I definitely don't think we need to do anything here in nova so
19:18:51 stephenfin The bug's there. People can find it via their favourite search engine and annoy their vendors to backport the fix if needed
19:20:10 sean-k-mooney we cant rely on backport in downstream version upstream
19:20:21 melwitt yeah, agreed nothing to do in nova. I was trying to find some links to leave in the lp bug but I realize I don't know how upstream libvirt works, how to tell them what version etc
19:20:38 sean-k-mooney so until we can raise the min libvirt version to 5.10 we cant assume that commit is there
19:21:18 melwitt well, shouldn't upstream libvirt be backporting like we do for stable? or do they not do that
19:21:33 sean-k-mooney melwitt: upstream libvirt does not do backports
19:21:48 stephenfin I left some words. Hopefully they help
19:22:15 sean-k-mooney melwitt: which is why each os vendor needs to do it downstream which is annoying
19:22:23 melwitt dang
19:35:47 melwitt dansmith: I added you to this review bc it's updating code that has a NOTE with yo name on it https://review.opendev.org/705764
21:58:21 openstack bug 1844929 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "grenade jobs failing due to "Timed out waiting for response from cell" in scheduler" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1844929
21:58:21 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: try to get some debug info for bug 1844929 https://review.opendev.org/701478
#openstack-nova - 2020-03-13
00:32:07 openstackgerrit Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova master: ksa auth conf and client for Cyborg access https://review.opendev.org/631242
00:32:08 openstackgerrit Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova master: Create and bind Cyborg ARQs. https://review.opendev.org/631244
00:32:08 openstackgerrit Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova master: Add Cyborg device profile groups to request spec. https://review.opendev.org/631243
00:32:09 openstackgerrit Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova master: Compose accelerator PCI devices into domain XML in libvirt driver. https://review.opendev.org/631245
00:32:09 openstackgerrit Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova master: Pass accelerator requests to each virt driver from compute manager. https://review.opendev.org/698581
00:32:10 openstackgerrit Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova master: Enable hard/soft reboot with accelerators. https://review.opendev.org/697940
00:32:10 openstackgerrit Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova master: Delete ARQs for an instance when the instance is deleted. https://review.opendev.org/673735
00:32:11 openstackgerrit Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova master: Enable and use COMPUTE_ACCELERATORS trait. https://review.opendev.org/699554
00:32:11 openstackgerrit Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova master: Enable start/stop of instances with accelerators. https://review.opendev.org/699553
00:32:12 openstackgerrit Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova master: Block unsupported instance operations with accelerators. https://review.opendev.org/674726
00:32:12 openstackgerrit Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova master: Bump compute rpcapi version and reduce Cyborg calls. https://review.opendev.org/704227
00:32:13 openstackgerrit Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova master: Add cyborg tempest job. https://review.opendev.org/670999
00:53:44 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/stein: Fix os-keypairs pagination links https://review.opendev.org/711896
01:25:46 brinzhang gmann:hi
01:27:28 brinzhang gmann: I combined the os-instance-actions policy patch, and that has previous issue in cmd/test_policy https://review.opendev.org/#/c/706470/
01:27:49 brinzhang gmann: can you have a fast check ?
04:09:27 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Catch exception when use invalid architecture of image https://review.opendev.org/711363
04:52:21 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Microversion 2.83: Add volume-patch CLI https://review.opendev.org/712651
05:33:55 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Add new default roles in os-instance-actions policies https://review.opendev.org/706470
08:11:55 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Add SYSTEM_READER role to servers actions API https://review.opendev.org/706179
08:58:19 kashyap melwitt: stephenfin: Just caught up with that "lift the SCSI unit restriction" libivirt issue: I'm pretty damn sure it's fixed upstream _and_ for CentOS / RHEL
08:59:40 kashyap Okay, I see that stephenfin has pointed out the RHBZ
09:00:06 kashyap melwitt: stephenfin: It looks like Ubunutu Virt folks need to backport that patch series
12:48:27 mnaser has anyne seen this in nova's ci?
12:48:30 mnaser libvirt.libvirtError: Requested operation is not valid: format of backing image '/var/lib/nova/instances/_base/791111176e5cb97db82b0a71a670431f65838a05' of image '/var/lib/nova/instances/ff811290-bbb0-4d30-b1e7-ee9aec4913ee/disk' was not specified in the image metadata (See https://libvirt.org/kbase/backing_chains.html for troubleshooting)
12:48:51 mnaser OSA's jobs are failing with that and i wonder if its because the libvirt version with bionic is different... maybe
12:50:21 openstack bugzilla.redhat.com bug 1798148 in libvirt "Regression: Requested operation is not valid: format of backing image ... was not specified in the image metadata" [Unspecified,On_qa] - Assigned to pkrempa
12:50:21 mnaser i fonud this - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1798148
12:50:51 openstack Launchpad bug 1864020 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "libvirt.libvirtError: Requested operation is not valid: format of backing image %s of image %s was not specified in the image metadata (See https://libvirt.org/kbase/backing_chains.html for troubleshooting)" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to Lee Yarwood (lyarwood)
12:50:51 mnaser ok i see https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1864020
13:03:19 lyarwood mnaser: yeah that should be resolved now
13:05:13 mnaser lyarwood: cool, we are bumping our versions which should help with this in OSA. thanks for looking into it!
13:06:58 lyarwood mnaser: np, which jobs hit this in OSA btw? You need a very recent version of libvirt to hit this.
13:10:10 sean-k-mooney gibi: efried_gone https://review.opendev.org/#/c/676522/44/nova/compute/resource_tracker.py@1738 i think that adresses the duplicate resouce provider definitons in different yaml files
13:10:47 sean-k-mooney also is efried_gone gone permently now or will erric be back before he finishes his current role
13:17:12 gibi sean-k-mooney: i will look at the provider series next week. thanks for taking it over
13:17:48 sean-k-mooney gibi: no rush bar m3, i still need to adress the final patch and then look at the testing
13:18:11 sean-k-mooney i think i covered the main funcitonal changes already however
13:18:48 gibi sean-k-mooney: ack
13:19:18 gibi m3 is in 4 weeks
13:19:39 sean-k-mooney yep so no rush
13:19:49 gibi sh*t i have to fix up the qos series too til
13:20:18 gibi anyhow I expect a rush of reviews at m3 as usual
13:22:18 efried_gone sean-k-mooney: I'm gone gone. Spending maybe a few minutes a day paying attention to OpenStack stuff.
13:22:56 sean-k-mooney cool good to know. ill miss having you around
13:48:20 kashyap efried_gone: Was good knowing you; see you on the Other Side(tm).
13:48:49 kashyap And thanks for all the outstanding (as in, excellent, not "remaining") work! ;-)
13:49:11 kashyap mnaser: Hey, yes...
13:49:42 kashyap mnaser: That issue known due to a libvirt regression, as lyarwood got a patch merged to solve it in Nova -- which is the right thing to do _anyway)
13:50:05 kashyap mnaser: See this one:
13:50:32 stephenfin lyarwood, smcginnis: Think you folks could hit this backport from elod today? It fixes issues with failing tests seen in other backports :) https://review.opendev.org/#/c/712751/
13:50:36 kashyap mnaser: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/708745/ ("libvirt: Provide the backing file format when creating qcow2 disks")
13:50:44 kashyap mnaser: It's merged in master, Train backport in-progress.
13:50:45 stephenfin (like this one https://review.opendev.org/#/c/711670/)
13:51:02 kashyap Oh, lyarwood already answered it; silly me. I should read the scrollback in full before spamming the channel.
14:02:59 lyarwood kashyap: looking
14:03:04 lyarwood kashyap: ah this one
14:03:07 brinzhang stephenfin: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/712651/ could please check this patch of novaclient? I add a PATCH ``volume-patch`` CLI, debug it, and not found where is wrong
14:03:23 kashyap lyarwood: Yeah, sorry for the noise.
14:05:45 lyarwood stephenfin: ack I'll take a swing later today
14:10:28 stephenfin brinzhang: You need to add a 'patch_servers_1234_os_volume_attachments_Work' method to 'FakeSessionClient' in 'novaclient/tests/unit/v2/fakes.py'
14:11:04 stephenfin with a response mocking what you'd see from nova-api
14:13:17 brinzhang stephenfin: cools, thanks, yep, I will try, I missing that response in 'FakeSessionClient'
14:17:01 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: i cant cross link to source code form nova docs right
14:17:02 brinzhang stephenfin: thanks, I will complete its unit tests, and then update ^^
14:17:36 stephenfin sean-k-mooney: Only if the code is autodoc'd somewhere, and I think only the notifier stuff falls in that bracket
14:18:02 stephenfin I _think_ you should still be able to use e.g. :py:method:`nova.foo.bar` but it won't resolve to anything
14:18:05 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: ok in that case i think ill have to link to opendev/github
14:18:47 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: context is https://review.opendev.org/#/c/693460/18/doc/source/admin/managing-resource-providers.rst,unified@66
14:19:07 sean-k-mooney just trying to figure out how i would go ablout liking to the schem file for the provider.yaml validation
14:19:47 sean-k-mooney i think an external link is the only way to do it so ill figure out what the opendev path would be
14:19:49 stephenfin you could just '.. include' it
14:20:15 sean-k-mooney oh i didnt know you could do that am ill try
14:24:37 brinzhang johnthetubaguy: I resolved the os-instance-actions policy issue, and granular the GET API, pls review again. https://review.opendev.org/#/c/706470/

Earlier   Later