| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2020-02-18 | |||
| 19:55:08 | sean-k-mooney | but ya if i sit down tomorow i shoudl be able to hack a job together to do at least some testing | |
| 20:04:56 | umbSublime | Hi, this isn't a question about nova specificaly, but I'm asking here becasue i know many of you have attended openstack events. I'm re-starting the openstack-meetup group in my area and wanted to know if we can use the Openstack logo. It sayd here https://www.openstack.org/legal/openstack-restricted-use-logo-guidelines/ that we nee written permission. Is this enforced ? | |
| 20:06:12 | umbSublime | The company I am working for is hosting the event and want to know if it's OK to come up with a "<Insert company name> loves <openstacklogo>" flyers/stickers/wtv | |
| 20:19:37 | efried | umbSublime: If I were trying to find an official answer, I would start with fungi or diablo_rojo | |
| 20:20:01 | efried | If they don't know off the top, they're one degree from the people who do. | |
| 20:30:31 | fungi | indeed, as efried surmises, i am not authorized to provide an official answer, but https://www.openstack.org/brand/ is the page you want and mentions the e-mail address to contact | |
| 20:30:36 | fungi | umbSublime: ^ | |
| 20:30:59 | fungi | under "OpenStack Community Organizers & Non-Commercial Use" | |
| 20:31:54 | fungi | though also directs you to https://www.meetup.com/pro/osf | |
| 20:32:33 | fungi | which suggests a different contact e-mail... i'm pretty sure both of those end up in the same queue with the same folks looking at them either way | |
| 20:33:44 | fungi | the communitymgr@ address is intended more for topics related to user groups, while the events@ address is more for folks wanting to put on an openinfra days or openstack days or similar conference | |
| 20:50:56 | umbSublime | efried, fungi thanks! | |
| 20:58:49 | fungi | you're welcome | |
| 21:41:01 | umbSublime | fungi, Just to confirm that I understand correctly https://www.openstack.org/brand/, If my group is already listed in https://www.meetup.com/pro/osf , I should be good to use the web-badge logos? Should I validate with one of the MLs or is this sufficient | |
| 21:44:54 | fungi | umbSublime: that's how i interpret it, but i'm not well-versed in this so if you're in doubt you might e-mail for clarification just to be sure | |
| 21:51:21 | umbSublime | fungi, will do, thanks again! | |
| 21:52:00 | fungi | any time | |
| 21:59:36 | abaindur | Not really a nova question, but the #openstack-dib channel seems to have disappeared... | |
| 21:59:44 | abaindur | anyone know the purpose of this script? | |
| 21:59:46 | abaindur | https://github.com/openstack/diskimage-builder/commit/00d853e5fde8fe5549177bad7957be5f9699f63c | |
| 21:59:51 | abaindur | https://github.com/openstack/diskimage-builder/commit/5bed4a6d5e0e037a41931a840c4399e844631cfb | |
| 22:00:15 | abaindur | The generic dhcp-interface@.service template, and the dhcp-all-interfaces.sh script? | |
| #openstack-nova - 2020-02-19 | |||
| 01:37:10 | openstackgerrit | Luyao Zhong proposed openstack/nova master: support live migration with vpmems https://review.opendev.org/687856 | |
| 01:37:10 | openstackgerrit | Luyao Zhong proposed openstack/nova master: address specific resources cleanup issue https://review.opendev.org/699148 | |
| 02:35:52 | openstackgerrit | Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Use tempest-full-py3 as base job https://review.opendev.org/708548 | |
| 04:15:21 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: Reject boot request for unsupported images https://review.opendev.org/707738 | |
| 08:16:27 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: thanks. I will try to set up something with a fake cyborg driver. So if you have patches to the driver then I could use it as well | |
| 08:37:18 | openstackgerrit | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova stable/train: Reject boot request for unsupported images https://review.opendev.org/708577 | |
| 08:37:48 | openstackgerrit | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova stable/stein: Reject boot request for unsupported images https://review.opendev.org/708578 | |
| 08:39:09 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: trivial: Use recognized extra specs in tests https://review.opendev.org/708435 | |
| 08:39:10 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add microversion 2.82, extra spec validation https://review.opendev.org/708436 | |
| 08:39:10 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add framework for extra spec validation https://review.opendev.org/704643 | |
| 09:37:09 | lyarwood | Morning all, https://review.opendev.org/#/c/708126/ - any non-RH cores able to review this? Looking to close it out and backport if possible. | |
| 09:37:49 | lyarwood | stephenfin: ah so you're also trying to land on 2.82, is there any etiquette around multiple changes trying to land on the same microversion between M2 and M3? | |
| 09:38:02 | lyarwood | stephenfin: for context https://review.opendev.org/#/c/701430/ | |
| 09:38:44 | stephenfin | lyarwood: whoever gets there first? :) | |
| 09:38:54 | lyarwood | stephenfin: ack, may the best change win | |
| 09:39:13 | stephenfin | -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 | |
| 09:39:22 | lyarwood | lol | |
| 09:39:22 | stephenfin | sorted. | |
| 09:39:29 | lyarwood | MINE MINE MINE | |
| 09:49:27 | gibi | lyarwood: put https://review.opendev.org/#/c/708126/ into my review queue | |
| 09:49:47 | lyarwood | gibi: awesome thank you | |
| 09:58:35 | stephenfin | bauzas: Want to help me close out my oldest review today? :) https://review.opendev.org/#/c/399653/ | |
| 09:59:10 | gibi | lyarwood, stephenfin, rosmaita: I have one question regarding the release notes https://review.opendev.org/#/c/708126/3/releasenotes/notes/absolutely-non-inheritable-image-properties-85f7f304fdc20b61.yaml@19 | |
| 09:59:12 | kashyap | stephenfin: Wonder if I can borrow your rST eyes for a quick once-over for a QEMU upstream doc: https://kashyapc.fedorapeople.org/qemu_v4.2.0-1300-g5da20ed7e3_docs/system/qemu-cpu-models.html | |
| 09:59:58 | kashyap | stephenfin: Reading from the bottom, do you find the QEMU / libvirt examples with bullet / sub-bullet combo ugly? | |
| 10:00:32 | kashyap | Or "unclean", or "inelegant", or "un-rST" or ... | |
| 10:00:57 | stephenfin | gibi: Replied. It was done in change https://review.opendev.org/#/c/707738/ | |
| 10:01:37 | stephenfin | kashyap: you mean the "Syntax for configuring CPU models" section? | |
| 10:01:46 | kashyap | stephenfin: Exactly | |
| 10:02:19 | stephenfin | Yeah, I tend to refrain from bullet points in favour of definition lists or simply sub-titles | |
| 10:02:27 | stephenfin | though the former wouldn't work here | |
| 10:03:21 | stephenfin | For things like the "Important CPU features for AMD x86 hosts" section though, definitely definition lists for the flags, IMO | |
| 10:03:30 | kashyap | stephenfin: I'll turn them into sub-titles, then. | |
| 10:03:41 | gibi | stephenfin: thanks. I see now. I'm +A | |
| 10:03:50 | stephenfin | kashyap: | |
| 10:03:53 | stephenfin | definition term | |
| 10:04:00 | stephenfin | definition definition | |
| 10:04:09 | stephenfin | no newlines between the two | |
| 10:06:00 | kashyap | stephenfin: I see, okay, you suggest that for the CPU features for AMD|Intel hosts. (I'll ACK your review in the QEMU commit message, of course.) | |
| 10:09:25 | bauzas | stephenfin: oh sorry, missed your ping | |
| 10:17:51 | bauzas | stephenfin: call it a deal | |
| 10:22:00 | brinzhang | A follow up patch of bp/support-delete-on-termination-in-server-attach-volume | |
| 10:22:02 | brinzhang | https://review.opendev.org/#/c/680655/ | |
| 10:22:38 | brinzhang | Anyone can review this? It has been pushed for a long time | |
| 10:35:50 | openstackgerrit | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova stable/rocky: Reject boot request for unsupported images https://review.opendev.org/708608 | |
| 10:38:13 | openstackgerrit | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova stable/queens: Reject boot request for unsupported images https://review.opendev.org/708609 | |
| 10:50:52 | gibi | brinzhang: it would be nice to get gmann and or takashi vote on that followup as that fixes their comments | |
| 10:51:40 | brinzhang | gibi: yes, thanks | |
| 10:53:25 | brinzhang | gibi: and that update gmann and takashi's comments, so I think it would be ok now, and in PS4, they are all +1 for that :) | |
| 10:55:39 | gibi | brinzhang: I see takashi's +1 but I only see -1 from gmann. anyhow I queued that path for review on my side | |
| 10:56:22 | stephenfin | bauzas: Reviewed https://review.opendev.org/#/c/670112/ - just two changes requested and I'm happy | |
| 10:56:33 | brinzhang | gibi: yeah, thanks, I was already fixed gmann's comments, and wait for gmann check for that | |
| 10:56:59 | brinzhang | gmann: please check again https://review.opendev.org/#/c/680655/9 | |
| 11:03:06 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Avoid PlacementFixture silently swallowing kwargs https://review.opendev.org/701754 | |
| 11:05:05 | stephenfin | bauzas: Got another suppppper easy one here for you https://review.opendev.org/#/c/706466/ | |
| 11:19:13 | openstackgerrit | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova stable/stein: Make RBD imagebackend flatten method idempotent https://review.opendev.org/708615 | |
| 11:19:41 | openstackgerrit | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova stable/rocky: Make RBD imagebackend flatten method idempotent https://review.opendev.org/708616 | |
| 11:19:59 | openstackgerrit | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova stable/queens: Make RBD imagebackend flatten method idempotent https://review.opendev.org/708617 | |
| 11:20:30 | openstackgerrit | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova stable/stein: Make RBD imagebackend flatten method idempotent https://review.opendev.org/708615 | |
| 11:24:56 | openstackgerrit | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova stable/stein: Make RBD imagebackend flatten method idempotent https://review.opendev.org/708615 | |
| 11:25:02 | lyarwood | gah, I need to repost some of these, sorry! | |
| 11:25:31 | openstackgerrit | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova stable/rocky: Make RBD imagebackend flatten method idempotent https://review.opendev.org/708616 | |
| 11:25:47 | openstackgerrit | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova stable/queens: Make RBD imagebackend flatten method idempotent https://review.opendev.org/708617 | |
| 11:25:51 | lyarwood | okay done, lyarwood-- | |
| 13:06:29 | stephenfin | lyarwood: Question for you at https://review.opendev.org/#/c/706897/2/nova/virt/images.py@53 | |
| 13:32:10 | mnaser | dansmith: the backfilling issue is confirmed to be resolved, just did it against a cloud with ~450kish records in instances table | |
| 13:32:20 | mnaser | so it didnt try to backfill the hidden value | |
| 13:58:30 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: Absolutely-non-inheritable image properties https://review.opendev.org/708126 | |
| 13:58:40 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: tests: Validate huge pages https://review.opendev.org/399653 | |
| 14:34:13 | bauzas | stephenfin: ack for the placement audit review and thanks, will look | |
| 14:36:29 | bauzas | stephenfin: and I added a better explanation in https://review.opendev.org/#/c/706466/ | |
| 14:36:38 | bauzas | that won't be in the commit msg but okay | |
| 14:44:12 | dansmith | mnaser: sweet, that's been backported and released now so hopefully nobody else will hit it | |
| 14:44:18 | dansmith | mnaser: thanks for being the front line :) | |
| 14:49:06 | mnaser | dansmith: yep, thanks for helping out in nailing down the root cause. I appreciate it. | |
| 14:49:16 | dansmith | np | |
| 14:56:27 | openstackgerrit | Dongcan Ye proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Check the guest support UEFI https://review.opendev.org/685678 | |
| 15:07:50 | lyarwood | stephenfin: ack thanks, I'll reply shortly | |