Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2020-01-13
16:27:24 sean-k-mooney huaqiang: good night o/
16:31:11 efried huaqiang: to be clear, I'm saying don't *require* it from the end user. I would prefer not to expose it, but if doing so (as optional) makes something significantly easier, I won't object to it.
17:06:00 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Remove extra instance.save() calls related to qos SRIOV ports https://review.opendev.org/702261
18:02:50 artom I can never remember this, what's the order of assertEqual(expected, actual)?
18:12:24 dansmith expected,actual
18:17:37 mriedem fyi https://github.com/testing-cabal/testtools/blob/master/testtools/testcase.py
18:19:17 mriedem just your friendly neighborhood lurker
18:20:29 artom Are we... are we like crack to you?
18:21:09 mriedem just eating lunch
18:21:14 mriedem my artom sense went off
18:21:29 artom Aww, you have a sense for me
19:01:02 efried someone should
19:01:19 efried <tsssss>
20:15:37 openstackgerrit Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: Functional tests for NUMA live migration https://review.opendev.org/672595
20:15:39 openstack bug 1845146 in OpenStack Compute (nova) train "NUMA aware live migration failed when vCPU pin set" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1845146 - Assigned to Dan Smith (danms)
20:15:39 openstackgerrit Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: NUMA LM: Add func test for bug 1845146 https://review.opendev.org/687404
20:15:45 artom *finally*
20:19:48 sean-k-mooney oh its stacked ...
20:35:45 efried dustinc: You have a couple of notes in https://review.opendev.org/#/c/676522/ about needing more UT coverage. Is that still true?
20:35:54 efried (I haven't dug in yet to verify)
20:41:00 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Add NovaEphemeralObject class for non-persistent objects https://review.opendev.org/702049
20:55:54 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Update provider config spec for identification conflicts https://review.opendev.org/693414
21:10:18 dustinc efried: I thought it was good and I just forgot to remove the note, but I checked again just to be sure and actually found another scenario I want to write a test for..
21:10:47 efried dustinc: I just finished reviewing the code side and found some things that need to be fixed anyway.
21:11:32 dustinc I have to step away for a few minutes, but I will check it out in a few. Thanks!
21:13:09 efried no hurry
#openstack-nova - 2020-01-14
02:37:46 openstackgerrit Dustin Cowles proposed openstack/nova master: Provider Config File: Functions to merge provider configs to provider tree https://review.opendev.org/676522
02:37:47 openstackgerrit Dustin Cowles proposed openstack/nova master: Provider Config File: Enable loading and merging of provider configs https://review.opendev.org/693460
02:48:19 openstackgerrit Dustin Cowles proposed openstack/nova master: Provider Config File: Enable loading and merging of provider configs https://review.opendev.org/693460
02:48:19 openstackgerrit Dustin Cowles proposed openstack/nova master: Provider Config File: Functions to merge provider configs to provider tree https://review.opendev.org/676522
06:27:35 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Populate 'updated_at' when aggregate is updated https://review.opendev.org/580271
07:47:18 openstackgerrit sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: Libvirt: report storage bus traits https://review.opendev.org/666914
08:00:25 brinzhang gibi: are you around?
08:20:04 openstackgerrit Alexandre arents proposed openstack/nova master: Avoid allocation leak when deleting instance stuck in BUILD https://review.opendev.org/702368
08:46:43 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Add support for stable device rescue https://review.opendev.org/700812
08:46:43 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: virt: Provide block_device_info during rescue https://review.opendev.org/700811
08:46:44 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: WIP api: Introduce microverion 2.82 allowing boot from volume rescue https://review.opendev.org/701430
08:46:44 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: WIP compute: Report COMPUTE_BFV_RESCUE and check during rescue https://review.opendev.org/701429
08:46:45 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: WIP libvirt: Support boot from volume instance rescue https://review.opendev.org/701431
08:47:23 lyarwood alex_xu: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/694063/ - I'm looking for some non-RH nova-specs core review on this if you have time today, ^ PoC code posted above.
08:47:25 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add action event fault details https://review.opendev.org/699669
09:06:13 openstackgerrit waleed mousa proposed openstack/os-vif master: [Follow Up] OVS DPDK port representors support https://review.opendev.org/665965
09:44:16 openstackgerrit Iury Gregory Melo Ferreira proposed openstack/nova master: Add ironic hypervisor doc https://review.opendev.org/701998
09:56:13 gibi lyarwood, dansmith: I'm ok with https://review.opendev.org/#/c/694063/ but there are precedence in nova (support move ops with qos ports) not to add api microversions. So I want to double check with you about it before +ait
10:04:09 brinzhang gibi: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/699669/ I was updated this patch, add the decription of the new policy, if you have time please review again :)
10:05:48 gibi brinzhang: ack, will look
10:09:09 brinzhang gibi: thanks~
10:25:11 gibi brinzhang: I'm +2 on the instance action spec
10:25:14 gibi thanks for the update
10:26:03 brinzhang gibi: cool, thanks ^^
11:13:19 openstackgerrit Arnaud Morin proposed openstack/nova master: Force refresh of instance info cache on event https://review.opendev.org/702394
11:18:33 stephenfin bauzas: Can you send this on its way, please? https://review.opendev.org/#/c/695733/
11:26:29 alex_xu lyarwood: got it
11:29:39 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Spec: Ussuri: Encrypted Emulated Virtual TPM https://review.opendev.org/686804
11:30:46 luyao stephenfin: Could you look at spec 'support live migration with vpmem'? https://review.opendev.org/#/c/695863
11:31:19 stephenfin luyao: I can, but not today. Could you ask me again tomorrow?
11:31:56 luyao stephenfin: OK, thanks at advance. :)
11:42:33 alex_xu lyarwood: gibi https://review.opendev.org/#/c/694063/7/specs/ussuri/approved/virt-bfv-instance-rescue.rst@76
12:14:29 etingof o/ do we have a JSON schema for whatever is exposed through Nova metadata service? I am particularly interested in network_data.json
12:15:34 openstackgerrit Luyao Zhong proposed openstack/nova-specs master: support live migration with virtual persistent memory https://review.opendev.org/695863
12:23:54 sean-k-mooney dansmith: efried i deployed https://review.opendev.org/#/c/699554/2 and installed the required version fo the sdk and cyborg client
12:24:07 sean-k-mooney it looks like there are still issue however http://paste.openstack.org/show/788372/
12:25:37 sean-k-mooney it looks like everything on the placement side is fine but its failing to boot a vm with "AttributeError: \'RequestSpec\' object has no attribute \'root_required\'\n\n'"
12:31:24 huaqiang hello stephenfin. I hope you enjoyed your vacation
12:32:21 huaqiang I also want to invite your to review https://review.opendev.org/#/c/668656/
12:34:26 huaqiang we have had some disscution especially on how to create a mixed instance, and Alex have put those dicussion links to the update of the spec
12:34:34 huaqiang I hope to get your comments.
12:37:00 gibi alex_xu: responded. If you are OK with the microversion then feel free to +A, I will +A myself if lyarwood or dansmith state that the microversion is intentional
12:39:15 lyarwood gibi / alex_xu ; apologies just back from a long lunch, yeah it's intentional, I'll add a comment now.
12:39:25 gibi lyarwood: cool thanks
12:47:13 brinzhang This bug fix is ready to review, if you have free time, please review https://review.opendev.org/#/c/580271/
12:48:59 openstack bug 1663456 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Field 'updated_at' always 'None' when show aggregate" [Low,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1663456 - Assigned to Brin Zhang (zhangbailin)
12:48:59 brinzhang it's bug 1663456
12:54:07 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Boot from volume instance rescue https://review.opendev.org/694063
12:54:19 lyarwood ^ addressed the commit nit btw
12:55:34 sean-k-mooney dansmith: efried: ok so the cyborg series just need to be rebased on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/699050/
12:56:31 sean-k-mooney well that is merges so rebaseing on master would be enough
13:00:24 gibi lyarwood: +Ad the spec
13:00:31 gibi lyarwood: thanks for the confirmation
13:03:07 lyarwood gibi: awesome thanks :)
13:19:56 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: can you review this when you get a chance https://review.opendev.org/#/c/701601/
13:34:33 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Boot from volume instance rescue https://review.opendev.org/694063
13:48:08 stephenfin huaqiang: As with luyao, if you can ask me again tomorrow I'll try get to it. Too much to do today :(
13:57:27 lyarwood efried: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/694033/ - The spec for this has now merged if you're able to look again today, thanks in advance.
14:01:49 stephenfin sean-k-mooney: done
14:04:04 huaqiang stephenfin: Understand. Don't worry. I will connect you later :)
14:04:18 stephenfin cool, thanks :)
14:16:34 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: nova-net: Remove unused nova-network objects https://review.opendev.org/697156
14:16:35 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Remove now unnecessary nova-network workaround https://review.opendev.org/702440
14:17:30 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: nova-net: Remove now unnecessary nova-net workaround https://review.opendev.org/702440
14:17:39 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: nova-net: Remove unused nova-network objects https://review.opendev.org/697156
14:18:58 stephenfin gibi: I addressed your comments in https://review.opendev.org/#/c/696516/ Think you could revisit at some point?
14:19:57 stephenfin gibi: Also, I think I addressed mriedem's concerns on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/696745/ but we can have dansmith look at it to make sure (since he was of the same opinion), if that helps
14:40:41 openstackgerrit sean mooney proposed openstack/os-vif master: [DNM]test composing devstack_local_conf sections https://review.opendev.org/702446
14:41:57 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: if ^ works ill squash it into the previous patch but im not sure that we can split devstack_local_conf defination across the job inheritance or if we can if that extends to the post-config: section too
14:42:09 sean-k-mooney so i expect that might fail
14:45:25 stephenfin ack
14:46:06 ganso this spec exists https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/allow-disabling-cpu-flags but I don't see it handling previously existing VMs, only newly created VMs so that they get the correct flags set in the instance XML. Is there any work in-progress to minimize the impact around this? or any known workaround besides having to edit every instance XML manually?
14:46:06 ganso Hello folks. I have a question about the impact of security vulnerability upgrades to previously existing VMs. I have a customer that after upgrading the kernel to a newer version that supressed cpu flags ended up not being able to turn their VMs back on because qemu wouldn't allow unless the flags are specifically disabled in the XML. I believe this is something we will see happen several times in the future so it will be a recurrent impact. I see
14:47:12 stephenfin ganso: kashyap might be able to help you with that, if they're around ^

Earlier   Later