Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2019-11-30
16:57:10 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: nova-net: Remove references to nova-net service from tests https://review.opendev.org/686818
16:57:15 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: docs: Blast final references to nova-network https://review.opendev.org/696498
16:57:23 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: nova-net: Remove final references to nova-net from functional tests https://review.opendev.org/696499
18:13:11 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Rename 'nova.network.security_group.neutron_driver' -> 'nova.network.security_group' https://review.opendev.org/696746
18:13:12 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Remove unnecessary 'neutronv2' prefixes https://review.opendev.org/696776
19:16:46 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/stein: Add --instance option to heal_allocations https://review.opendev.org/693200
19:16:52 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/stein: Add BFV wrinkle to TestNovaManagePlacementHealAllocations https://review.opendev.org/693201
19:16:58 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/rocky: Nova compute: add in log exception to help debug failures https://review.opendev.org/693009
20:13:58 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Add negative test for cross-cell finish_resize failing https://review.opendev.org/643451
20:14:05 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: libvirt: Remove 'enable_hairpin' https://review.opendev.org/696500
22:30:09 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Add negative test for prep_snapshot_based_resize_at_source failing https://review.opendev.org/669013
#openstack-nova - 2019-12-01
00:51:52 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: libvirt: Remove vestigial nova-network support https://review.opendev.org/696501
00:51:58 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: hyperv: Remove vestigial nova-network support https://review.opendev.org/696502
02:04:57 eandersson mriedem https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/compute/manager.py#L2075
02:05:15 eandersson This code path can also raise an Eventlet Timeout exception
02:05:29 eandersson Which wouldn't be caught and leads to a UnboundLocalError
02:06:22 eandersson Since eventlet.Timeout is based on BaseException and not Exception.
02:07:00 eandersson http://paste.openstack.org/show/786939/
02:08:59 eandersson Probably almost impossible to hit that timeout, but still :p
06:17:55 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/nova master: Imported Translations from Zanata https://review.opendev.org/694717
07:50:08 openstackgerrit Adit Sarfaty proposed openstack/nova master: Avoid fetching metadata when no subnets found https://review.opendev.org/679247
#openstack-nova - 2019-12-02
09:10:02 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: WIP libvirt: Use virDomainBlockCopy to swap volumes with >= 5.10.0 https://review.opendev.org/696834
09:59:06 openstackgerrit Dirk Mueller proposed openstack/nova master: Remove rootwrap filters for nova network https://review.opendev.org/696844
10:11:41 openstackgerrit Guo Jingyu proposed openstack/nova master: WIP:Drop unreliable host_aggregate_map https://review.opendev.org/696851
10:36:16 openstackgerrit Guo Jingyu proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Proposal for a safer noVNC console with password authentication https://review.opendev.org/623120
11:12:56 stephenfin sean-k-mooney: Hit https://review.opendev.org/#/c/689861/ and it's predecessor, FYI. Sorry for the delay
11:46:27 sean-k-mooney ah cool ill address the comments on that today
11:46:31 sean-k-mooney thanks
11:48:39 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: by the way you realise that i did the test refactor before you started yours right. and that i cant depend you your refactor because i need to backport this which is why i orginally asked you to base your refactor on top of that series
11:49:26 sean-k-mooney i can drop the new base class and go back to the other _wait_for_state_chage but i can use any of your refactoring or ill have to undo all of it when i backport
12:00:00 sean-k-mooney * i can't use
12:31:23 stephenfin sean-k-mooney: Yup, but I don't think it's a massive deal that '_wait_for_state_change' behaves oddly on stable branches, given that there's plenty of tests using it
12:33:47 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: Revert "nova shared storage: rbd is always shared storage" https://review.opendev.org/682523
12:33:55 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Rename _is_storage_shared_with to _is_path_shared_with https://review.opendev.org/693337
12:39:44 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: ya im using the fake notifier too so i can also use the notifer to wait for the completeion events too so its fine ill rework them later today
12:49:34 sean-k-mooney gibi: johnthetubaguy do either of ye feel comfrotable reviewing pci code
12:59:45 stephenfin sean-k-mooney: Can I say no to that? ^ :P
13:07:31 sean-k-mooney you can but you already reviewed the patch and said yes :)
13:07:50 sean-k-mooney also i said comfortabley not do you like reviewing pci stuff :)
13:11:03 sean-k-mooney i also feel like i missed a chance to use "no take backsies" but that might date me a little
13:14:38 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/os-traits master: Add 'TYPE_PLOOP' image type. https://review.opendev.org/696435
13:15:17 efried stephenfin: I fixed that link ^ -- do you want to confirm real quick before I send it?
13:24:21 sean-k-mooney the ploop image type is only used by parallel/openvz containers rights
13:25:10 efried No idea, but it's on the list, so we should have a trait for it.
13:25:41 efried (and by "no idea", I mean your sentence has at least three words I don't know)
13:25:42 sean-k-mooney ya it is https://wiki.openvz.org/Ploop/format
13:26:04 sean-k-mooney and yes we should have a trait for it
13:26:18 efried sounds like a euphemism for a particular type of turd to me <shrug>
13:28:07 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Reusable RequestGroup.add_{resource|trait} https://review.opendev.org/696380
13:28:07 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Process requested_resources in ResourceRequest init https://review.opendev.org/696354
13:28:08 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Use string suffixes and provider mappings https://review.opendev.org/696418
13:28:16 efried stephenfin, gibi: fixed the unit test on the bottom one ^
13:34:26 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/os-traits master: Add 'TYPE_PLOOP' image type. https://review.opendev.org/696435
14:23:17 gibi efried: I'm +2 on the bottom patch
14:23:25 efried thanks gibi
14:23:34 gibi thanks for starting this work
14:23:42 gibi you are solving some of my todos :)
14:23:47 efried does the strategy seem sane to you wrt the requester_id <=> group ID?
14:24:12 gibi efried: yeah, that step is what I had in my mind
14:24:17 efried great
14:25:30 gibi efried: I'm a bit affraid the replacement of fill_provider_mapping with the mapping from the a_c response. Theortically it should work I just hope there will not be too much complication
14:25:42 efried we'll see :)
14:26:03 efried gibi: I think the most complicated bit might be revert_resize
14:26:12 gibi yes, that is the type of surgery that better do that plan
14:26:19 efried By that time the original mappings might be long gone
14:26:33 efried ...unless we persist them in the RequestSpec...?
14:26:49 gibi efried: in case of revert_resize we can either start using multiple port binding for resize which is hard but nice, or persist the mapping somewhere
14:27:01 gibi if we go to the later then I would persist it to the Migration object
14:27:29 gibi as the migration object has the proper lifecycle for this type of data
14:27:37 gibi the RequestSpec lives longer
14:41:25 sean-k-mooney gibi: i would like to move to useing multiple port bindings for resize for what its worth
14:41:38 sean-k-mooney gibi: we will be using it for cross cell resize
14:41:58 sean-k-mooney so i think it makes sense to just use it always for resize/cold migrate
14:46:02 sean-k-mooney efried: gibi when ye have time could yet take a look at https://review.opendev.org/#/c/674072/ and maybe https://review.opendev.org/#/c/695118/
14:47:31 sean-k-mooney ill be going on vacation in 2 weeks but i have a 4 patches i really want to get merged if i can before i do those are two of them and im resping the other two now
14:49:56 efried stephenfin, lyarwood: thoughts on bug tagging here? https://review.opendev.org/#/c/682594/
14:51:41 efried sean-k-mooney: that might be a bit out of my bailiwick, but I'll give it a try.
14:53:01 stephenfin looking
14:53:32 lyarwood efried: yeah that's fair, I can also address the nits before we merge this afternoon
14:53:41 efried okay
14:53:48 lyarwood efried: I think I was trying to avoid any suggestion that this was the only fix required here
14:53:58 stephenfin Your call. I could go either way. I'm guessing it was left that way since mriedem has a better albeit not backportable fix
14:54:04 stephenfin yup
14:54:28 efried right, I'm looking at it from the perspective of stable, where if we don't Closes-Bug on this patch, there will never be a "fix".
14:54:58 efried I guess if you really want, we could keep this one Related-Bug and switch it to Closes-Bug on the backports
14:55:07 efried can't believe there's not a precedent for something like this.
14:56:03 lyarwood Yeah not that I recall but I'd be okay with that from a stable point of view
14:56:15 lyarwood related on master, closes on stable that is
14:56:23 sean-k-mooney well does it actully fix the bug
14:56:30 sean-k-mooney or just make it less bad
14:56:58 openstack Launchpad bug 1844296 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Stale BDM records remain in the DB after n-api to n-cpu RPC timeouts during reserve_block_device_name" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to Lee Yarwood (lyarwood)
14:56:58 sean-k-mooney ye are talking about https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1844296 right
14:57:15 sean-k-mooney and this patch https://review.opendev.org/#/c/682594/
14:57:25 lyarwood sean-k-mooney: yeah, it cleans up after one type of failure, it doesn't stop the failure from happening.
14:57:38 sean-k-mooney ah i see
14:57:51 sean-k-mooney so its treating the symtoms not the cause
14:58:11 lyarwood sean-k-mooney: yeah and very specific symptoms at that.
14:58:47 sean-k-mooney you could make it partial-bug if you plan to try and fix it someother way on master in a follow up patch
14:59:19 lyarwood ah yeah I forgot about partial
14:59:21 lyarwood that might do

Earlier   Later