Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2019-10-03
19:31:39 mriedem tssurya: ^
19:32:19 mriedem gmann: fwiw it's also possible to test this stuff in devstack, here is a guide https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/contributor/testing/down-cell.html
19:32:49 gmann but Show never return sec grp so my point was inconsistent response between SHow and detail
19:33:09 mriedem ah yeah
19:33:11 mriedem fair point
19:33:23 mriedem well, changing that now would be a new microversion
19:33:47 gmann yeah, same i was thinking whether it is worth to fix or just doc update work fine.
19:33:58 gmann doc update works fine i think
19:34:02 mriedem fix it with a new microversion? i don't think it's worth it
19:34:07 mriedem agree
19:34:26 mriedem if you want to know security groups for a server in a down cell, you can get them from neutron directly
19:34:57 gmann true.
19:34:58 efried dansmith: Does the db migrationy thingy get backported?
19:35:07 efried ...is it for train or ussuri
19:35:10 efried I'm confused...
19:35:14 mriedem ussuri,
19:35:19 mriedem it's in case we backport a db migratoin to train
19:35:22 dansmith efried: it's for U
19:35:23 dansmith backporting it would defeat the purpose
19:35:26 mriedem rare, but it's happened
19:35:53 efried k, just confused by the stein one that was proposed in train and its message says stein.
19:36:11 dansmith proposed in train for stein backports
19:36:17 dansmith like this is proposed in u for train backports
19:36:30 efried rite.
19:36:36 efried thanks
19:42:20 mriedem gmann: 1846559
19:42:23 openstack bug 1846559 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Handling Down Cells in nova - security_groups can be in the response for GET /servers/detail" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1846559
19:42:23 mriedem oops, bug 1846559
19:42:52 gmann thanks
19:43:46 sean-k-mooney if you use nova network instead of neutron you will get the security grous too
19:44:45 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: nova-net: Remove explicit 'USE_NEUTRON = True' https://review.opendev.org/685937
19:44:53 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: docs: Document how to revert, confirm a cold migration https://review.opendev.org/664396
19:45:00 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: docs: Update resize doc https://review.opendev.org/665412
19:45:13 mriedem sean-k-mooney: no you wont
19:45:36 sean-k-mooney there is a delta in the beahviro for server show that stephenfin found
19:45:40 mriedem because in a down cell case, the security groups for nova net are in the cell db, which is down, so this is at best going to have None as a value https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/867401e575d2b27b9bc63ceda41cd85233545cd5/nova/api/openstack/compute/views/servers.py#L607
19:45:58 mriedem sean-k-mooney: you mean the thing that gmann and i were just talking about for 10 minutes above?
19:46:23 sean-k-mooney i need to scoll back but it was not related to down cells
19:46:56 sean-k-mooney aparent show will retrun the security group with nova networks
19:47:26 sean-k-mooney that is what stephenfin told me he found when remvoing the nova networks code
19:48:07 mriedem and it will with neutron too
19:48:19 mriedem if the instance isn't in a down cell
19:48:45 gmann sean-k-mooney: you mean this one - https://review.opendev.org/#/c/684335/2//COMMIT_MSG@10
19:48:58 gmann that was missing in Fixture
19:49:04 sean-k-mooney oh no it was the neutron fixture https://review.opendev.org/#/c/685927/
19:49:10 gmann yeah
19:49:18 sean-k-mooney ok never mind then
19:49:25 mriedem sean-k-mooney: and that's specifically because of the 2.69 down cell test
19:49:29 mriedem which is the wrinkle
19:50:09 sean-k-mooney ok so the fixture emulated the down cell behavior uncondtionally
19:51:15 sean-k-mooney ok im going to grab something to eat o/ back in a while
21:04:40 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: nova-net: Migrate 'test_availability_zone' functional tests https://review.opendev.org/684332
21:04:53 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: nova-net: Migrate 'test_floating_ip_pools' functional tests https://review.opendev.org/684333
21:19:00 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add 'Core Liaison' spec process https://review.opendev.org/685857
21:19:19 efried dansmith, mriedem, gmann_afk, sean-k-mooney, stephenfin: etc etc ^
21:24:20 mriedem make way
21:25:28 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: FUP to I4d181b44494f3b0b04537d5798537831c8fdf400 https://review.opendev.org/676231
21:25:28 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: FUP to I30916d8d10d70ce25523fa4961007cedbdfe8ad7 https://review.opendev.org/676228
21:25:29 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add PrepResizeAtDestTask https://review.opendev.org/627890
21:25:29 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add prep_snapshot_based_resize_at_dest compute method https://review.opendev.org/633293
21:25:30 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add prep_snapshot_based_resize_at_source compute method https://review.opendev.org/634832
21:25:30 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: FUP for I66d8f06f19c5c631e33208580428aa843abb38d2 https://review.opendev.org/678951
21:25:31 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add finish_snapshot_based_resize_at_dest compute method https://review.opendev.org/635080
21:25:31 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add PrepResizeAtSourceTask https://review.opendev.org/627891
21:25:32 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add FinishResizeAtDestTask https://review.opendev.org/635646
21:25:33 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Plumb allow_cross_cell_resize into compute API resize() https://review.opendev.org/635684
21:25:33 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Execute CrossCellMigrationTask from MigrationTask https://review.opendev.org/635668
21:25:34 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Handle target host cross-cell cold migration in conductor https://review.opendev.org/642591
21:25:34 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Start functional testing for cross-cell resize https://review.opendev.org/636253
21:25:34 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Filter duplicates from compute API get_migrations_sorted() https://review.opendev.org/636224
21:25:35 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Validate image/create during cross-cell resize functional testing https://review.opendev.org/642592
21:25:36 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add negative test for cross-cell finish_resize failing https://review.opendev.org/643451
21:25:36 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add zones wrinkle to TestMultiCellMigrate https://review.opendev.org/643450
21:25:37 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Refresh instance in MigrationTask.execute Exception handler https://review.opendev.org/669012
21:27:22 mriedem gibi: stephenfin: i rebased the cross cell series ^ to move some of the FUPs that were outside the series back into the fold and toward the bottom. that might mean some things that were previously +2ed might have changed slightly but hopefully not much.
22:14:37 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Add reserved schema migrations for Ussuri https://review.opendev.org/686411
22:51:52 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Migrate old style volume attachments on nova-compute startup https://review.opendev.org/549130
23:51:45 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: nova-net: Migrate 'test_availability_zone' functional tests https://review.opendev.org/684332
#openstack-nova - 2019-10-04
00:28:04 openstackgerrit Jing Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] Default mem_page_size to small for pinned instances https://review.opendev.org/686079
00:36:53 SonPham Hi. Any way to create live-snapshot with keep process
01:13:24 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Remove cells v1 and extension commands and APIs https://review.opendev.org/686516
02:47:12 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: api-ref: Fix security groups parameters https://review.opendev.org/686517
03:56:26 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: api-guide: Fix available info in handling down cells https://review.opendev.org/686520
07:11:15 bauzas good morning Nova
07:25:34 gibi bauzas: good morning!
10:14:57 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: nova-net: Migrate 'test_floating_ip_pools' functional tests https://review.opendev.org/684333
10:16:12 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: nova-net: Migrate 'test_quota_sets' functional tests https://review.opendev.org/684334
10:20:56 openstack Launchpad bug 1846559 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Handling Down Cells in nova - security_groups can be in the response for GET /servers/detail" [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to Takashi NATSUME (natsume-takashi)
10:20:56 stephenfin Is this displaying oddly for anyone else? https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1846559
10:27:11 kashyap stephenfin: Yeah, it is odd
10:29:09 kashyap stephenfin: Not just that, but also blueprints are displayed oddly, too
10:32:31 kashyap sean-k-mooney: To check if a guest is using multiqueues looking for 'queues' / 'vhost' bits in the XML should suffice I guess?
10:37:16 kashyap I'd say so
12:02:26 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Remove @safe_connect from put_allocations https://review.opendev.org/686579
13:26:25 mriedem stephenfin: i'm not sure what gmann wants to see happen here but i left some thoughts in the commit message https://review.opendev.org/#/c/685927/
13:35:11 mriedem takashin already posted fixes for the 2 docs bugs
13:43:04 mriedem gibi: efried: dansmith: shall i send this along or are we waiting for updates? https://review.opendev.org/#/c/686232/
13:43:16 mriedem looks like sean-k-mooney is +1 so i think i can put it to bed
13:43:31 mriedem or do we have a new rule about a majority of specs cores being on board with it?
13:44:08 efried no such rule yet, no. If we merge it I'll have to update the core liaisons patch to add that template section for this one. but go aheda.

Earlier   Later