Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2019-10-03
19:30:21 mriedem gmann: with the down cell stuff, we return a partial set of information about an instance based on the api db
19:30:29 mriedem https://docs.openstack.org/api-guide/compute/down_cells.html
19:30:57 gmann yeah which is from show method. so true for GET /servers/<server-id>
19:31:14 mriedem the down cell func tests were not using a fixture that returned security groups properly
19:31:20 mriedem stephen's patch exposes that
19:31:36 mriedem anyway, as i said in https://review.opendev.org/#/c/685927/2/nova/tests/functional/test_servers.py@1264 i think it's just a matter of a docs fix for down cell
19:31:39 mriedem tssurya: ^
19:32:19 mriedem gmann: fwiw it's also possible to test this stuff in devstack, here is a guide https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/contributor/testing/down-cell.html
19:32:49 gmann but Show never return sec grp so my point was inconsistent response between SHow and detail
19:33:09 mriedem ah yeah
19:33:11 mriedem fair point
19:33:23 mriedem well, changing that now would be a new microversion
19:33:47 gmann yeah, same i was thinking whether it is worth to fix or just doc update work fine.
19:33:58 gmann doc update works fine i think
19:34:02 mriedem fix it with a new microversion? i don't think it's worth it
19:34:07 mriedem agree
19:34:26 mriedem if you want to know security groups for a server in a down cell, you can get them from neutron directly
19:34:57 gmann true.
19:34:58 efried dansmith: Does the db migrationy thingy get backported?
19:35:07 efried ...is it for train or ussuri
19:35:10 efried I'm confused...
19:35:14 mriedem ussuri,
19:35:19 mriedem it's in case we backport a db migratoin to train
19:35:22 dansmith efried: it's for U
19:35:23 dansmith backporting it would defeat the purpose
19:35:26 mriedem rare, but it's happened
19:35:53 efried k, just confused by the stein one that was proposed in train and its message says stein.
19:36:11 dansmith proposed in train for stein backports
19:36:17 dansmith like this is proposed in u for train backports
19:36:30 efried rite.
19:36:36 efried thanks
19:42:20 mriedem gmann: 1846559
19:42:23 openstack bug 1846559 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Handling Down Cells in nova - security_groups can be in the response for GET /servers/detail" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1846559
19:42:23 mriedem oops, bug 1846559
19:42:52 gmann thanks
19:43:46 sean-k-mooney if you use nova network instead of neutron you will get the security grous too
19:44:45 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: nova-net: Remove explicit 'USE_NEUTRON = True' https://review.opendev.org/685937
19:44:53 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: docs: Document how to revert, confirm a cold migration https://review.opendev.org/664396
19:45:00 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: docs: Update resize doc https://review.opendev.org/665412
19:45:13 mriedem sean-k-mooney: no you wont
19:45:36 sean-k-mooney there is a delta in the beahviro for server show that stephenfin found
19:45:40 mriedem because in a down cell case, the security groups for nova net are in the cell db, which is down, so this is at best going to have None as a value https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/867401e575d2b27b9bc63ceda41cd85233545cd5/nova/api/openstack/compute/views/servers.py#L607
19:45:58 mriedem sean-k-mooney: you mean the thing that gmann and i were just talking about for 10 minutes above?
19:46:23 sean-k-mooney i need to scoll back but it was not related to down cells
19:46:56 sean-k-mooney aparent show will retrun the security group with nova networks
19:47:26 sean-k-mooney that is what stephenfin told me he found when remvoing the nova networks code
19:48:07 mriedem and it will with neutron too
19:48:19 mriedem if the instance isn't in a down cell
19:48:45 gmann sean-k-mooney: you mean this one - https://review.opendev.org/#/c/684335/2//COMMIT_MSG@10
19:48:58 gmann that was missing in Fixture
19:49:04 sean-k-mooney oh no it was the neutron fixture https://review.opendev.org/#/c/685927/
19:49:10 gmann yeah
19:49:18 sean-k-mooney ok never mind then
19:49:25 mriedem sean-k-mooney: and that's specifically because of the 2.69 down cell test
19:49:29 mriedem which is the wrinkle
19:50:09 sean-k-mooney ok so the fixture emulated the down cell behavior uncondtionally
19:51:15 sean-k-mooney ok im going to grab something to eat o/ back in a while
21:04:40 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: nova-net: Migrate 'test_availability_zone' functional tests https://review.opendev.org/684332
21:04:53 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: nova-net: Migrate 'test_floating_ip_pools' functional tests https://review.opendev.org/684333
21:19:00 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add 'Core Liaison' spec process https://review.opendev.org/685857
21:19:19 efried dansmith, mriedem, gmann_afk, sean-k-mooney, stephenfin: etc etc ^
21:24:20 mriedem make way
21:25:28 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: FUP to I4d181b44494f3b0b04537d5798537831c8fdf400 https://review.opendev.org/676231
21:25:28 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: FUP to I30916d8d10d70ce25523fa4961007cedbdfe8ad7 https://review.opendev.org/676228
21:25:29 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add PrepResizeAtDestTask https://review.opendev.org/627890
21:25:29 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add prep_snapshot_based_resize_at_dest compute method https://review.opendev.org/633293
21:25:30 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add prep_snapshot_based_resize_at_source compute method https://review.opendev.org/634832
21:25:30 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: FUP for I66d8f06f19c5c631e33208580428aa843abb38d2 https://review.opendev.org/678951
21:25:31 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add finish_snapshot_based_resize_at_dest compute method https://review.opendev.org/635080
21:25:31 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add PrepResizeAtSourceTask https://review.opendev.org/627891
21:25:32 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add FinishResizeAtDestTask https://review.opendev.org/635646
21:25:33 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Plumb allow_cross_cell_resize into compute API resize() https://review.opendev.org/635684
21:25:33 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Execute CrossCellMigrationTask from MigrationTask https://review.opendev.org/635668
21:25:34 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Handle target host cross-cell cold migration in conductor https://review.opendev.org/642591
21:25:34 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Start functional testing for cross-cell resize https://review.opendev.org/636253
21:25:34 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Filter duplicates from compute API get_migrations_sorted() https://review.opendev.org/636224
21:25:35 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Validate image/create during cross-cell resize functional testing https://review.opendev.org/642592
21:25:36 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add negative test for cross-cell finish_resize failing https://review.opendev.org/643451
21:25:36 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add zones wrinkle to TestMultiCellMigrate https://review.opendev.org/643450
21:25:37 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Refresh instance in MigrationTask.execute Exception handler https://review.opendev.org/669012
21:27:22 mriedem gibi: stephenfin: i rebased the cross cell series ^ to move some of the FUPs that were outside the series back into the fold and toward the bottom. that might mean some things that were previously +2ed might have changed slightly but hopefully not much.
22:14:37 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Add reserved schema migrations for Ussuri https://review.opendev.org/686411
22:51:52 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Migrate old style volume attachments on nova-compute startup https://review.opendev.org/549130
23:51:45 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: nova-net: Migrate 'test_availability_zone' functional tests https://review.opendev.org/684332
#openstack-nova - 2019-10-04
00:28:04 openstackgerrit Jing Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] Default mem_page_size to small for pinned instances https://review.opendev.org/686079
00:36:53 SonPham Hi. Any way to create live-snapshot with keep process
01:13:24 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Remove cells v1 and extension commands and APIs https://review.opendev.org/686516
02:47:12 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: api-ref: Fix security groups parameters https://review.opendev.org/686517
03:56:26 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: api-guide: Fix available info in handling down cells https://review.opendev.org/686520
07:11:15 bauzas good morning Nova
07:25:34 gibi bauzas: good morning!
10:14:57 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: nova-net: Migrate 'test_floating_ip_pools' functional tests https://review.opendev.org/684333
10:16:12 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: nova-net: Migrate 'test_quota_sets' functional tests https://review.opendev.org/684334
10:20:56 openstack Launchpad bug 1846559 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Handling Down Cells in nova - security_groups can be in the response for GET /servers/detail" [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to Takashi NATSUME (natsume-takashi)
10:20:56 stephenfin Is this displaying oddly for anyone else? https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1846559
10:27:11 kashyap stephenfin: Yeah, it is odd
10:29:09 kashyap stephenfin: Not just that, but also blueprints are displayed oddly, too
10:32:31 kashyap sean-k-mooney: To check if a guest is using multiqueues looking for 'queues' / 'vhost' bits in the XML should suffice I guess?
10:37:16 kashyap I'd say so
12:02:26 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Remove @safe_connect from put_allocations https://review.opendev.org/686579

Earlier   Later