| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2019-09-27 | |||
| 13:51:34 | dansmith | mriedem: I think I'm +2 on all the +2able things in stein | |
| 13:51:42 | dansmith | mriedem: (re: your mention from the meeting yesterday) | |
| 13:51:55 | openstackgerrit | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Reduce scope of 'path' query parameter to noVNC consoles https://review.opendev.org/685194 | |
| 13:52:22 | mriedem | dansmith: ack | |
| 13:53:11 | mriedem | lyarwood: if you're about can you hit these? https://review.opendev.org/#/q/project:openstack/nova+branch:stable/stein+status:open+label:Code-Review=2 | |
| 13:55:13 | mriedem | dansmith: can you hit https://review.opendev.org/#/c/680871/ and https://review.opendev.org/#/c/676498/ for rocky? | |
| 13:55:27 | artom | mriedem, you saw ya.wang's review on that NUMA fix? | |
| 13:55:34 | dansmith | I've got the rocky set up right now, are those two more important? | |
| 13:56:07 | mriedem | more important? | |
| 13:56:28 | mriedem | the former is a long-standing issue for baremetal instances, the latter is an lxc thing which is low priority | |
| 13:56:33 | mriedem | lxc+py3 | |
| 13:56:38 | mriedem | artom: not yet | |
| 13:56:41 | dansmith | mriedem: meaning you pointed me at two rocky reviews, just wondering if I can hit those when I get to them in the rocky queue or if I should do those first for some reason | |
| 13:56:42 | mriedem | artom: does it work? | |
| 13:56:48 | artom | mriedem, yeah, tl;dr, he's +1 | |
| 13:56:51 | mriedem | dansmith: oh, they're just ready | |
| 13:56:53 | dansmith | mriedem: or were you just spoon-feeding me? | |
| 13:56:54 | mriedem | meaning already merged in stein | |
| 13:57:07 | mriedem | yes, pureed stable food | |
| 13:57:37 | mriedem | artom: +2 | |
| 13:57:46 | mriedem | yaawang: thanks for testing https://review.opendev.org/#/c/684409/ | |
| 13:57:57 | artom | yaawang, yep, much appreciated :) | |
| 14:05:20 | efried | stephenfin: done. Do you have any paste savvy? | |
| 14:05:35 | efried | dansmith: or you? | |
| 14:05:37 | stephenfin | very little, unfortunately | |
| 14:05:43 | dansmith | not really, no | |
| 14:05:50 | dansmith | I'm always mystified by that stuff | |
| 14:06:12 | efried | damn and blast | |
| 14:07:12 | dansmith | what is the question? | |
| 14:07:16 | efried | google seems clueless as well | |
| 14:07:29 | efried | dansmith: this https://review.opendev.org/#/c/685181/ | |
| 14:08:03 | dansmith | is this a thing we want to do? | |
| 14:08:15 | efried | tldr version discovery endpoints shouldn't require auth, but I don't know how to make /v2.1 use a different paste composite from /v2.1/$everything_else without enumerating $everything_else | |
| 14:08:25 | dansmith | like, should I be able to probe vexxhost to figure out what version it's running with no credentials? | |
| 14:08:31 | efried | absolutely | |
| 14:08:49 | efried | the root discovery documents (everywhere) are already unauth'd | |
| 14:09:22 | efried | but at least nova, cinder, and neutron are broken in this same way, requiring auth for the versioned discovery docs (which are simply subsets of the root one) | |
| 14:09:35 | dansmith | sure, but the microversion available indicates what level of code is running | |
| 14:10:31 | efried | The version discovery process that ksa uses (currently) assumes you can probe both the root and the versioned discovery URIs without auth. | |
| 14:11:27 | dansmith | ack, it just seems like getting into actual details of the system should require auth, but I'm not an expert obviously | |
| 14:11:37 | efried | yeah, it's not really details of the system | |
| 14:11:55 | efried | In theory I agree it would seem as though that process could just rely on the root discovery doc, since it's just a superset of the versioned ones. | |
| 14:12:08 | dansmith | available microversion is totally details of the system | |
| 14:12:08 | efried | but I think perhaps the problem is that the service catalog is set up with the versioned endpoint | |
| 14:12:37 | efried | okay, point is we've already decided that's okay to expose, because it's in the root discovery doc (I think, /me confirms...) | |
| 14:13:18 | efried | <snip> "version": "2.79" <snip> | |
| 14:13:18 | efried | curl http://192.168.218.28/compute/ | |
| 14:13:18 | efried | yeah: | |
| 14:13:56 | efried | "perhaps the problem is that the service catalog is set up with the versioned endpoint" shouldn't actually be a problem, which is the point. | |
| 14:14:45 | efried | mordred is working on a hacked up workaround for this in ksa and/or sdk to bridge the gap, but we (nova and the other services running afoul of this) really need to fix it in our APIs. | |
| 14:27:51 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: ec2: Move ec2utils functions to their callers https://review.opendev.org/662505 | |
| 14:27:52 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Remove 'Debug' middleware https://review.opendev.org/662506 | |
| 14:38:31 | efried | kashyap: thank you for the thorough response on the ML ++ | |
| 14:39:54 | kashyap | efried: No problem. I'll let Manuel file the bug | |
| 15:10:18 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: test cleanup: Remove skipIf test decorator https://review.opendev.org/685375 | |
| 15:33:50 | efried | dansmith: are you aware of a reason we don't use oslotest.base.BaseTestCase in nova? | |
| 15:34:18 | efried | or stephenfin ^ | |
| 15:34:29 | stephenfin | I'm not sure | |
| 15:34:36 | stephenfin | I'd guess just legacy | |
| 15:34:44 | stephenfin | nova is olllld | |
| 15:34:55 | dansmith | nova pre-dates oslo, so yeah something like that | |
| 15:36:45 | efried | cool, Ima go clean that up. | |
| 15:37:02 | dansmith | is there a reason? | |
| 15:37:49 | efried | tech debt reduction? | |
| 15:38:04 | dansmith | what's the tech debt here? | |
| 15:38:26 | efried | We have copies of half a dozen fixtures and are duplicating the setup steps for them. | |
| 15:38:38 | efried | Output capture, logging, timeout, tempdir... | |
| 15:38:55 | dansmith | we have copies of those in our fixtures? | |
| 15:38:58 | efried | yes | |
| 15:39:36 | dansmith | okay, the actual oslotest base doesn't seem to have much in it, but copies fo the fixtures make sense to squash | |
| 15:41:52 | mriedem | dansmith: this is a fix for a race in the numa live migration series (that came up in the ML), probably good to get in for an rc2 if we have one https://review.opendev.org/#/c/684409/ | |
| 15:43:21 | dansmith | mriedem: hrm, do we call that method from anywhere else other than the periodic? | |
| 15:43:54 | dansmith | "accepted" could be considered to be non-terminal and thus "in progress" | |
| 15:44:19 | dansmith | oh, I see it's removing accepted | |
| 15:44:28 | mriedem | right, the ~ is confusing, | |
| 15:44:31 | mriedem | it's only used by the RT, | |
| 15:44:36 | mriedem | there is another method below that is used by the API | |
| 15:44:44 | mriedem | migration_get_in_progress_by_instance | |
| 15:44:58 | mriedem | that will still filter out 'accepted' state migrations | |
| 15:44:59 | dansmith | okay, so this is querying for finished migrations we need to clean up | |
| 15:45:20 | mriedem | which? | |
| 15:45:35 | dansmith | the one we're changing | |
| 15:45:35 | mriedem | migration_get_in_progress_by_instance was written for the 2.23 change in the api to list in-progress live migrations that can be cancelled for force-completed | |
| 15:46:00 | mriedem | the one we're changing is used by the RT to track incoming/outgoing migrations so we claim/don't drop resource claims on the source/dest host | |
| 15:46:00 | dansmith | yeah, I mean the host-n-node one here | |
| 15:46:06 | dansmith | right | |
| 15:47:42 | dansmith | so we need to backport that to stable/train to be ready for rc2? | |
| 15:48:52 | mriedem | yeah, i haven't checked yet if we have a stable/train set of patches up, but we probably do | |
| 15:49:00 | dansmith | the branch is there | |
| 15:49:28 | mriedem | yar https://review.opendev.org/#/q/project:openstack/nova+status:open+branch:stable/train | |
| 15:50:20 | openstackgerrit | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova stable/train: Stop filtering out 'accepted' for in-progress migrations https://review.opendev.org/685387 | |
| 15:50:31 | dansmith | mriedem: ^ | |
| 15:52:04 | dansmith | biab | |
| 15:56:07 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: test cleanup: Use oslotest's Timeout fixture https://review.opendev.org/685389 | |
| 15:56:19 | efried | dansmith: there's one for e.g. ^ | |
| 15:58:20 | dansmith | ack | |
| 15:58:29 | mriedem | huh, interestingly enough, we don't set a migration.status during _post_live_migration before just marking the migration 'completed', meaning a user could attempt to abort/force-complete a live migration after the guest is transferred and we're in post-processing | |
| 15:58:41 | mriedem | it will probably fail, but we shouldn't even make that an option | |
| 15:58:51 | artom | dansmith, thanks for the train backport (sorry, laptop was rebooting/installing updates) | |
| 16:00:21 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/python-novaclient master: Stop silently ignoring invalid 'nova boot --hint' options https://review.opendev.org/684762 | |