Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2019-09-11
18:42:03 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Do not query allocations twice in finish_revert_resize https://review.opendev.org/678827
18:44:36 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Allow resizing server with port resource request https://review.opendev.org/679019
18:52:00 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Extract pf$N literals as constants from func test https://review.opendev.org/680991
18:52:36 openstackgerrit Luyao Zhong proposed openstack/nova master: Retrieve the allocations early https://review.opendev.org/678450
18:52:37 openstackgerrit Luyao Zhong proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Enable driver discovering PMEM namespaces https://review.opendev.org/678453
18:52:37 openstackgerrit Luyao Zhong proposed openstack/nova master: Claim resources in resource tracker https://review.opendev.org/678452
18:52:38 openstackgerrit Luyao Zhong proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Support VM creation with vpmems and vpmems cleanup https://review.opendev.org/678455
18:52:38 openstackgerrit Luyao Zhong proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: report VPMEM resources by provider tree https://review.opendev.org/678454
18:52:39 openstackgerrit Luyao Zhong proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Enable driver configuring PMEM namespaces https://review.opendev.org/679640
18:52:39 openstackgerrit Luyao Zhong proposed openstack/nova master: Parse vpmem related flavor extra spec https://review.opendev.org/678456
18:52:40 openstackgerrit Luyao Zhong proposed openstack/nova master: objects: use all_things_equal from objects.base https://review.opendev.org/681397
18:52:40 openstackgerrit Luyao Zhong proposed openstack/nova master: Add functional tests for virtual persistent memory https://review.opendev.org/678470
18:54:34 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Improve dest service level func tests https://review.opendev.org/680998
18:56:52 eandersson Having an odd bug - a VM can't be rebuilt with a new image. Pretty sure placement is filtering out all the potential matches.
18:57:02 eandersson Rebuilding it with the same image works fine.
18:57:05 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Follow up for Ib50b6b02208f5bd2972de8a6f8f685c19745514c https://review.opendev.org/681490
18:57:41 mriedem eandersson: which release?
18:57:46 eandersson Running Rocky
18:57:58 eandersson Very latest stable/rocky
18:58:26 eandersson I see that the scheduler gets a single result, but it is failing on NUMA Topology.
18:58:32 mriedem we shouldn't be calling placement for rebuild https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/stable/rocky/nova/scheduler/manager.py#L126
18:58:46 eandersson > 'NUMATopologyFilter: (start: 1, end: 0)'
18:58:51 eandersson Ah bad assumption
18:58:53 mriedem https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1763766 ?
18:58:54 openstack Launchpad bug 1763766 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "nova needs to disallow resource consumption changes on image rebuild" [Medium,Triaged]
18:59:14 mriedem or https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1700412
18:59:15 openstack bugzilla.redhat.com bug 1700412 in openstack-nova "[RFE] Rebuild with a different image fails due to NUMATopologyFilter" [High,New] - Assigned to nova-maint
18:59:37 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Skip querying resource request if no qos port https://review.opendev.org/681513
18:59:46 eandersson Yep looks like it
18:59:52 dansmith yeah if the image is what causes it trouble,
19:00:07 dansmith it's likely the new numa topo filtering out the one host you're on
19:00:37 mriedem sean-k-mooney has to fix it and get that backported to queens
19:02:19 artom mriedem, it's not getting backported, but one of the things we discussed was making that RUN_ON_REBUILD flag we added way back when for the rebuild CVE configurable in some way
19:02:26 artom We kinda dreaded coming to upstream with that
19:02:49 sean-k-mooney dansmith: for the downstream issue yes its just the numa toploy filter filtering it out beacue tehre is no space for the rebuild
19:03:08 dansmith sean-k-mooney: I'm talking about eandersson's case
19:03:25 mriedem artom: we don't claim on rebuild so if the numa topo changes in the new image we won't claim for it properly,
19:03:33 sean-k-mooney ill read scollback
19:03:33 mriedem so you could just be kicking the error down to compute
19:03:43 sean-k-mooney mriedem: correct
19:03:54 artom mriedem, yeah, it wouldn't be a correct fix
19:04:04 sean-k-mooney we rebuild with the new image but old toplogy
19:04:23 mriedem sean-k-mooney: you mean in some downstream-only patch?
19:04:23 artom More of a candy we throw our customers on, like, 10 to placate them until they an upgrade to whatever release the un-backportable fix lands in
19:04:52 sean-k-mooney mriedem: no updstream if you trun off the numa toplogy filter to get passed it
19:05:03 sean-k-mooney when we rebuild but the toplogy change via the image
19:05:09 mriedem oh
19:05:14 sean-k-mooney we end up with the old numa toplogy and new image
19:05:29 sean-k-mooney so i want to put an upstream check to prevent that
19:05:38 sean-k-mooney and backport a config option to opt out
19:05:38 mriedem ok so hear me out,
19:05:44 mriedem the rebuild api takes new metadata for the server,
19:06:00 dansmith no
19:06:02 dansmith no
19:06:05 mriedem what if we have a skip_numa_topology_filter metadata that the user can pass in?!
19:06:09 mriedem and then the filter checks for that
19:06:11 dansmith noooooooooo
19:06:11 mriedem and it's great
19:06:13 mriedem problem solved
19:06:38 mriedem ok so the image takes random metadata,
19:06:39 mriedem so hear me out
19:06:57 mriedem os_skip_numa_filter_but_only_for_rebuild=true
19:07:04 mriedem we'll fix it in U
19:07:12 dansmith Well, officer, you should have heard what he was suggesting before I shot him... Hear me out...
19:07:23 mriedem that's justifiable homicide in some states
19:07:34 dansmith yeah
19:07:40 artom We fix it? No, U fix it
19:07:52 sean-k-mooney well the custromer has validated that tehy never us the image to change numa toplogy
19:07:53 mriedem get in line with bauzas and the bad jokes
19:08:03 sean-k-mooney so for them that skip on rebuild is valid
19:08:13 sean-k-mooney but i have aded https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1763766 to the downstrema bug
19:08:14 openstack Launchpad bug 1763766 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "nova needs to disallow resource consumption changes on image rebuild" [Medium,Triaged]
19:08:28 sean-k-mooney so what i am going to propose is i implemnt a check for that
19:08:44 sean-k-mooney and if and only if that passes we skip the numa toplogy filter
19:08:54 sean-k-mooney becasue not numa things changed
19:09:03 sean-k-mooney on rebuild only
19:09:54 sean-k-mooney and like the check we have to prevent numa migratio nwe can backport the saftey check for no resouce change on rebuild
19:10:17 sean-k-mooney and give peole a workaofund config option to disable it if they want to shot them selves in the foot
19:11:11 sean-k-mooney i have aslo said that if we dont fix it upstream im not fixing it downstream only
19:13:37 sean-k-mooney mriedem: dansmith does ^ sound fair. fixing https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1763766 is a prequisite for fixing https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1804502 safely
19:13:39 openstack Launchpad bug 1763766 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "nova needs to disallow resource consumption changes on image rebuild" [Medium,Triaged]
19:13:40 openstack Launchpad bug 1804502 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Rebuild server with NUMATopologyFilter enabled fails (in some cases)" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to David Hill (david-hill-ubisoft)
19:14:03 eandersson Would it be possible to add an option to allow rebuilds to re-schedule the VM?
19:14:23 eandersson something like openstack server rebuild <id> --migrate/reschedule/bla
19:14:28 sean-k-mooney like evauate
19:14:46 eandersson I can't reproduce this as well
19:15:26 sean-k-mooney rebuild is ment to be posiblein virt driver that dont support migration
19:16:29 sean-k-mooney there is noting in principal that would disallow a driver form having rebiuld be to a different host like a cold migration but it is not how its currelty impelmeted
19:16:49 sean-k-mooney we would have to change the noop claim to a move claim if the inplcem rebuild did not succesed
19:17:29 sean-k-mooney or expose it at the api like you suggest and make the resuling to a different host user contolerale
19:18:52 sean-k-mooney ingoring numa for a second since image can have tratis we need to check with placmenet in anycase to see it the traits on the new image are valid on the current host
19:20:44 sean-k-mooney eandersson: what is the behavior you would like to see
19:21:11 eandersson Better error message at least :p
19:21:40 eandersson But not sure what the ideal would be.
19:21:50 efried - the bottom where I'll flip from -2 to +2 when we're ready
19:21:50 efried - https://review.opendev.org/#/c/678455/ where I'll proxy a vote from sean-k-mooney
19:21:50 efried stephenfin, sean-k-mooney, luyao, alex_xu: I'm +2 on everything vpmem except:
19:21:53 eandersson Maybe just documentation on how to avoid this on image builds.
19:22:02 efried I'm now going to sleep.
19:22:06 eandersson It would be nice as an admin to have a way to fix it at least.

Earlier   Later