Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2019-08-15
17:15:45 artom aspiers, forgetting you exist, essentially ;)
17:15:49 aspiers haha
17:15:55 aspiers easily done
17:16:06 aspiers mriedem: yeah sadly that's probably gonna happen
17:16:33 efried cdent: ack. If we want to land this pretty much as-is, we just need unit/func test coverage in this patch. The rest can be FUPed.
17:16:34 aspiers Not 100% sure though. We have a policy of trying to stay as close to upstream as humanly possible, even on stable branches.
17:16:58 aspiers artom: let me know if I can help with anything from the distro angle
17:17:07 sean-k-mooney so do we but PMs have a different opipion on that when there are $$$$
17:17:22 artom aspiers, thank you :) Though we were just discussing dev/QE lag
17:17:36 artom aspiers, and how the RH QE is lagging behind upstream
17:17:55 artom So we'll do an RFE, and like a year later, we find out if never worked
17:18:07 artom (Only slightly exaggerating)
17:18:12 aspiers artom: well at least you do QE on upstream :)
17:18:21 artom aspiers, we don't, hence the lag
17:18:34 aspiers I mean eventually
17:18:40 artom By the time stuff's in our builds, it's been months, if not years
17:18:45 aspiers lag implies it happens eventually :)
17:18:53 aspiers If it never happens, that's infinite lag
17:19:09 aspiers although maybe I kinda just contradicted myself
17:20:04 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: API microversion 2.76: Add 'power-update' external event https://review.opendev.org/645611
17:20:09 mriedem dansmith: ^
17:35:11 dansmith mriedem: looks good
18:03:57 melwitt argh why does it do "An auth plugin is required to determine endpoint URL" when I'm using the PlacementFixture
18:04:17 efried melwitt: You need to use the sdk fixture :)
18:04:19 melwitt this is what happens when I don't use ServersTestBase
18:04:39 melwitt oh. ok
18:04:53 efried (as well as PlacementFixture, if what you're trying to do involves real placement calls)
18:05:32 melwitt the sdk fixture is in test.TestCase
18:06:15 efried melwitt: are you getting the error locally or in zuul?
18:06:49 efried zuul => rebase and recheck, since the u-c bump landed overnight.
18:06:49 efried locally => upgrade your ksa and sdk in your virtualenv
18:06:58 melwitt locally. I'm trying to change from deriving from ServersTestCase to just TestCase
18:07:07 melwitt ok
18:07:39 efried yeah, I bet it's because ksa and/or sdk in your venv is downlevel OR those are latest but you don't have the new fixture you merged last night.
18:10:23 melwitt I had just recreated my venv. but yeah let me just rebase again in case that helps. I can never remember how this works with pulling u-c
18:12:08 efried melwitt: If you recreated your venv without https://review.opendev.org/676707 then you might still have the old libs, I'm not actually sure.
18:12:27 efried .tox/$env/bin/pip show openstacksdk keystoneauth1
18:12:27 efried You can check with
18:13:14 efried ...and of course you'll want your change rebased against latest master to pick up last night's fixture change to accommodate that.
18:13:19 melwitt 0.34.0 and 3.16.0
18:13:49 efried those are latest, good; so you'll have a problem if your change is based earlier than the fixture commit from yesterday.
18:14:30 melwitt it is. thanks, rebasing now
18:14:30 efried ...and if all that is up to date, then it's a legit code problem :)
18:14:53 efried okay, cool, lmk if you still get errors of this ilk, I'm tracking closely.
18:15:00 melwitt thanks
18:16:43 openstackgerrit sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: Deprecate Aggregate[Core|Ram|Disk]Filters https://review.opendev.org/673496
18:16:47 sean-k-mooney melwitt: care to take a look at ^
18:17:23 melwitt no
18:17:25 melwitt jk
18:18:03 sean-k-mooney i would not blame you :P
18:18:35 sean-k-mooney but you more or less deprecated them with your mail post like 18 months ago but we never actully did
18:18:49 melwitt I feel attacked
18:19:02 melwitt yeah, I know. I'll look at it
18:19:44 sean-k-mooney cool im going to finish one last test and then call it a day
18:19:48 sean-k-mooney thanks
18:20:29 mriedem "no" was the correct answer
18:23:27 openstackgerrit Adam Spiers proposed openstack/nova master: Add and to config.py https://review.opendev.org/636318
18:23:28 openstackgerrit Adam Spiers proposed openstack/nova master: Enable booting of libvirt guests with AMD SEV memory encryption https://review.opendev.org/666616
18:23:28 openstackgerrit Adam Spiers proposed openstack/nova master: Apply SEV-specific guest config when SEV is required https://review.opendev.org/644565
18:32:49 openstackgerrit Adam Spiers proposed openstack/nova master: Fix libvirt driver tests to use LibvirtConfigCapsGuest instances https://review.opendev.org/674629
18:32:49 openstackgerrit Adam Spiers proposed openstack/nova master: Allow assertXmlEqual() to pass options to matchers.XMLMatches https://review.opendev.org/674628
18:32:50 openstackgerrit Adam Spiers proposed openstack/nova master: Provide HW_CPU_X86_AMD_SEV trait when SEV is supported https://review.opendev.org/638680
18:32:50 openstackgerrit Adam Spiers proposed openstack/nova master: Track libvirt host/domain capabilities for multiple machine types https://review.opendev.org/673151
18:32:51 openstackgerrit Adam Spiers proposed openstack/nova master: Add extra spec parameter and image property for memory encryption https://review.opendev.org/664420
18:32:52 openstackgerrit Adam Spiers proposed openstack/nova master: Add and to config.py https://review.opendev.org/636318
18:32:52 openstackgerrit Adam Spiers proposed openstack/nova master: Extract SEV-specific bits on host detection https://review.opendev.org/636334
18:32:53 openstackgerrit Adam Spiers proposed openstack/nova master: Enable booting of libvirt guests with AMD SEV memory encryption https://review.opendev.org/666616
18:32:53 openstackgerrit Adam Spiers proposed openstack/nova master: Apply SEV-specific guest config when SEV is required https://review.opendev.org/644565
18:43:18 mriedem sean-k-mooney: melwitt: i reviewed that deprecation patch (again)
18:43:24 mriedem more docs fun
18:44:49 mriedem melwitt: btw i missed that you split this all up https://review.opendev.org/#/c/640898/ - bug me next week to review that series; i wanted to play with it in devstack while reviewing, which i won't have time for today
18:45:42 sean-k-mooney mriedem: jsut looked ya i can fix up those issues and repin ill likely do it tomrrow however
18:46:02 melwitt mriedem: cool, will do. I'm gonna respin it to address tetsuro's comments, then I'll bug you next week
18:46:08 melwitt thanks
18:46:10 mriedem it's only ~8pm, you've got 5 more hours to put in sean
18:46:31 sean-k-mooney for once i started at 9 this moring
18:46:48 sean-k-mooney well 9 ish
18:58:20 mriedem what time do you usually start?
18:58:41 sean-k-mooney around 10:30 or 11
18:58:47 mriedem cripes
18:58:57 mriedem i could watch the price is right every day
18:59:52 sean-k-mooney and i usually take an hour or two break between around 6:30 ish and come back on line around 7 or 8 with the intent of finsih up before 8
18:59:55 sean-k-mooney *10
19:00:15 sean-k-mooney i often dont but that in theory is the plan
19:11:27 mriedem sean-k-mooney: vpmu comments as well https://review.opendev.org/#/c/671338/
19:12:02 artom He waved us good night on the internal channel
19:12:18 mriedem bah
19:12:25 mriedem i know he can't quite this early
19:14:00 mriedem https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsmY0tFJEIE
19:17:17 melwitt yessssss func test "OK"
19:17:43 artom mriedem, that's a very unhealthy relationship to have with a piece of software ;)
19:18:08 artom I suppose that could change in the future once AI becomes better
19:18:27 mriedem artom: i'll let you make the firmware joke here
19:19:37 artom You have to flash it.
19:19:47 mriedem HI-O
19:20:07 artom *finger guns*
19:26:36 efried mriedem: grenade jobs have been failing a lot today, any ideas?
19:28:45 mriedem linke me
19:28:47 mriedem *link
19:28:56 mriedem artom: trying to push the starlingx folk publicly as well

Earlier   Later