| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2019-08-08 | |||
| 17:44:51 | sean-k-mooney | :) yes that is always an option | |
| 17:45:17 | openstackgerrit | Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Add test coverage of existing admin_actions policies https://review.opendev.org/657698 | |
| 18:25:22 | sean-k-mooney | by the way anyone recognise what package these deprecation warning come from | |
| 18:25:24 | sean-k-mooney | http://paste.openstack.org/show/755668/ | |
| 18:25:41 | sean-k-mooney | im guessing oslo somthing | |
| 18:26:35 | sean-k-mooney | https://github.com/openstack/oslo.service maybe | |
| 18:28:49 | sean-k-mooney | oh its form the openstack sdk | |
| 18:29:53 | sean-k-mooney | and mriedem fixed it 6 days ago https://github.com/openstack/openstacksdk/commit/799bd0a773fb082c1a45262922d87630abc9bd30 | |
| 18:48:06 | mriedem | yeah, would be nice to get that released, mordred ^ | |
| 18:48:18 | mriedem | otherwise we should add a warnings filter to squash that noise from our test logs | |
| 18:49:05 | mordred | mriedem: I have a release request in the releaseteam queue | |
| 18:49:17 | mordred | mriedem: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/674660/ | |
| 18:49:17 | mriedem | cool | |
| 18:56:50 | efried | mriedem: gate failures are killinme, any problem if I fast approve those two patches to add logs and skip the test? | |
| 18:59:02 | mriedem | efried: i'm assuming dansmith or melwitt could hit these? https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:bug/1839515+status:open | |
| 19:00:11 | dansmith | it hath been done | |
| 19:00:16 | mriedem | danke | |
| 19:00:39 | efried | thanks dansmith | |
| 19:03:53 | mriedem | should see this drop off once that skip merges http://status.openstack.org/elastic-recheck/#1839515 | |
| 19:06:09 | mriedem | mordred: +1 on that release request - could have probably been 0.32.1 given the contents but not a big deal when you're <1.0.0 | |
| 19:08:10 | mordred | mriedem: yeah - but numbers are cheap too :) | |
| 19:15:32 | openstackgerrit | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP:U] support pci numa affinity policies in flavor and image https://review.opendev.org/674072 | |
| 19:17:06 | tbachman | mriedem: Ben Affleck in “The Accountant” | |
| 19:17:56 | dansmith | hah | |
| 19:19:09 | mriedem | tbachman: i thought of that movie too | |
| 19:19:13 | tbachman | heh | |
| 19:19:20 | mriedem | and my neighbor who won't make eye contact | |
| 19:19:21 | mriedem | and is a CPA | |
| 19:19:30 | tbachman | steer clear of them | |
| 19:56:51 | mriedem | lordy test_verify_created_server_ephemeral_disk sometimes takes 5 minutes | |
| 19:57:43 | sean-k-mooney | is that a functional test? | |
| 19:58:13 | sean-k-mooney | or i guess proably a tempest senario test given the lenght | |
| 19:58:15 | mriedem | tempest | |
| 19:58:19 | mriedem | it's not a scenario test, api test | |
| 19:58:29 | mriedem | should probably be a scenario test | |
| 19:58:38 | sean-k-mooney | or at least in the slow set | |
| 19:58:43 | mriedem | gmann: what do you think about dropping the --serial for running scenario tests serially in tempest-integrated-compute ? | |
| 19:58:57 | mriedem | looking at https://logs.opendev.org/78/658478/16/check/tempest-integrated-compute/33847ea/controller/logs/stackviz/#/stdin/timeline?test=tempest.scenario.test_network_basic_ops.TestNetworkBasicOps.test_hotplug_nic there are only 2 scenario tests that get run | |
| 19:59:53 | mriedem | hmm, why aren't things like test_stamp_pattern and test_volume_boot_pattern running in there? | |
| 20:00:13 | mriedem | nvm | |
| 20:00:13 | mriedem | oh b/c it's marked slow | |
| 20:01:27 | sean-k-mooney | any tests that ssh into a vm shoudl be grouped under senario but ya i guess it could be filtered out | |
| 20:01:47 | mriedem | sean-k-mooney: that's the way things used to be long ago, | |
| 20:01:56 | mriedem | qa team enabled run_validation in api tests quite awhile ago, | |
| 20:02:02 | mriedem | so a lot of the api tests are also ssh'ing into guests | |
| 20:02:14 | sean-k-mooney | well run validation is different | |
| 20:02:23 | sean-k-mooney | in that its optional | |
| 20:02:23 | mriedem | run_validation == enable ssh | |
| 20:02:39 | mriedem | sure, but it's basically on by default in tempest runs in the gate | |
| 20:02:41 | sean-k-mooney | e.g the test shoudl still be runale without it | |
| 20:02:47 | sean-k-mooney | ya | |
| 20:04:28 | mriedem | we should probably disable ssh validation in the nova-next job | |
| 20:04:50 | mriedem | we already get that in tempest-full and tempest-slow | |
| 20:05:16 | sean-k-mooney | well its realy jsut intened to prevent race conditions | |
| 20:05:46 | sean-k-mooney | e.g. in senario tests it can help with cases were you need to wait for the guest os to start before you proceed with the test | |
| 20:05:55 | mriedem | i don't think we're talking about the same thing | |
| 20:06:17 | sean-k-mooney | that is what the validation was ortinglly for as far as i knew | |
| 20:06:18 | mriedem | are you thinking of the nova vif_plugging_* options? | |
| 20:06:26 | sean-k-mooney | no | |
| 20:06:54 | mriedem | tempest uses it for all kinds of shit https://github.com/openstack/tempest/search?q=CONF.run_validation&unscoped_q=CONF.run_validation | |
| 20:08:25 | sean-k-mooney | yes but if i rememebr correctly it was originally added to make test pause on server create until you could ssh in | |
| 20:09:15 | sean-k-mooney | this was need for running tempst against ironic clouds | |
| 20:09:20 | donnyd | is the lxc driver for nova still functional? | |
| 20:09:31 | sean-k-mooney | am kind of | |
| 20:09:40 | sean-k-mooney | it was broke for 2 years | |
| 20:09:46 | sean-k-mooney | and got fixed recnetly | |
| 20:10:00 | sean-k-mooney | as in like a month ago | |
| 20:10:14 | sean-k-mooney | but we have not ci so maybe? | |
| 20:10:44 | donnyd | I see someone asking about lxd on the ml and was going to ask if we could point them at lxc instead... but figured i should ask the state of it first | |
| 20:11:40 | sean-k-mooney | cannoical are stoping developing nova-lxd and i dont think tere was much of a comunity outside of them maintaining it | |
| 20:12:06 | sean-k-mooney | the nova libvirt/lxc backend has little use or testing as far as i know | |
| 20:13:02 | mriedem | i'd be surprised if the lxc driver didn't shit the bed under normal usage | |
| 20:13:12 | donnyd | LOL mriedem | |
| 20:13:34 | sean-k-mooney | donnyd: the reason it was broken for ~2years was we change the args to mount | |
| 20:13:36 | mriedem | honestly, i tried getting a ci job going for that thing years ago and something would fail during server delete and it would just snowball and fail everything | |
| 20:13:39 | donnyd | seriously, that made me laugh harder than I should have | |
| 20:13:43 | mriedem | nbd mount issues from what i remember | |
| 20:14:30 | mriedem | donnyd: we could easily get a simple ci job setup for it which just runs a simple create/delete server scenario | |
| 20:14:35 | mriedem | and see what explodes | |
| 20:14:45 | donnyd | I have seen a couple lxd requests come across the ml recently and was curious to the state of it. | |
| 20:15:02 | mriedem | since nova-lxd isn't in tree it's not really our concern | |
| 20:15:05 | mriedem | our == nova | |
| 20:15:14 | donnyd | yea, makes sense | |
| 20:15:31 | mriedem | but yeah, as soon as someone kills support for something everyone comes out of the weeds | |
| 20:15:33 | donnyd | rather point them to something in tree anyways | |
| 20:15:40 | mriedem | "i was just about to go production!" | |
| 20:15:49 | sean-k-mooney | for what its worth i do like lxc. and it would actully be nice for developement and testing | |
| 20:16:14 | donnyd | I use them all the time for statefully things | |
| 20:16:36 | mriedem | osc is still all lxc right? | |
| 20:16:42 | mriedem | it's kolla that uses docker? | |
| 20:16:45 | donnyd | I think OSA is | |
| 20:16:49 | sean-k-mooney | im a bad conter person and jsut use docker for statefull things because i now how it works and can bend it to my will | |
| 20:16:50 | mriedem | yeah sorry, osa | |
| 20:16:58 | donnyd | yea, kolla, 3O | |
| 20:17:00 | sean-k-mooney | mriedem: kolla use docker yes | |
| 20:17:14 | sean-k-mooney | and osa used to support lxc for contol plane | |
| 20:17:52 | donnyd | I am pretty sure it still uses lxc, but i am not an osa expert so don't beat me too badly if they switched to docker | |
| 20:17:58 | sean-k-mooney | so osa used to install the compute nodes to bare metal but allow you to install the controler services in lxc | |
| 20:19:43 | donnyd | It would be great if we could get our CI to use LXC... at least for my shabby little cloud. I could probably do more | |
| 20:21:08 | sean-k-mooney | the first intel nfv ci was interesting... it used docker(pre 1.0) with the lxc backend to spin up super privaldges contaienr with which we then ran devstack in | |