Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2019-06-06
12:53:05 kashyap <paste>
12:53:06 kashyap 13:25 < abologna> hrw: that might be a bug rather than an actual limit, but there's a limit of 256 on... something? possibly devices, each pcie-root-port has 8 functions so that would be 31 to get to 256 devices
12:53:06 kashyap 13:23 < hrw> 29 == uefi dumps to shell instead of booting
12:53:06 kashyap 13:23 < hrw> ok. 28 pcie-root-port entries are maximum
12:53:10 kashyap 13:25 < abologna> hrw: except pcie-root-ports are of course devices themselves
12:53:13 kashyap 13:25 < abologna> hrw: and even after plugging in 28 pcie-root-ports some of pcie-root's slots and functions will be empty
12:53:16 kashyap 13:26 < hrw> will discuss that with our uefi developers ;D
12:53:19 kashyap </end-paste-spam>
12:53:40 sean-k-mooney ok so we should leave it at 28 and just set teh default to 28
12:53:40 kashyap [That snippet is from Feb 2018, BTW]
12:54:41 kashyap sean-k-mooney: I wondering if I should step into the rabbit hole to test with an AArch64 guest -- to see what is the current limitation?
12:55:24 kashyap sean-k-mooney: As abologna, the author of https://libvirt.org/pci-hotplug.html, seems to imply the 28 is not even a valid limit.
12:55:37 sean-k-mooney kashyap: proably not as we cant assume they are using a new version of qemu or whatever impose the 28 limit on arrch64
12:56:29 kashyap sean-k-mooney: The thing is, we're not sure that 28 is an _actual_ limit or not. Nobody seem to have confirmed.
12:57:06 sean-k-mooney if you want to grab a aarch64 guest image and test then sure
12:57:21 sean-k-mooney but we shoudl play it safe with the default
12:57:41 kashyap Yeah, let me do the test. I want to be sure.
13:07:37 stephenfin gibi: Any chance you could take a look at https://review.opendev.org/#/c/660774/ again today and hit me up if you need more info?
13:07:56 gibi stephenfin: give me an hour
13:08:01 stephenfin ta
13:08:03 gibi stephenfin: I'm on a meeting now
13:08:10 stephenfin All good. Thanks :)
13:22:13 kashyap Does anyone here (or know someone who) uses OpenStack on AArch64?
13:23:12 sean-k-mooney there are some folk from lenaro that hang out on the openstack-kolla irc form time to time
13:25:52 stephenfin kashyap: Might want to talk to tonyb
13:26:40 kashyap stephenfin: Yep, noted
13:27:05 kashyap sean-k-mooney: Yeah, I was looking for 'hrw'
13:29:11 kashyap sean-k-mooney: What a beast this whole PCIe saga is
13:30:47 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Remove 'Debug' middleware https://review.opendev.org/662506
13:32:38 sean-k-mooney kashyap: well its in good hands. we could just do nothing and leave it to the operator to configur the config for there needs which is what nova originally opted to do
13:33:08 sean-k-mooney but if there is a sane default then that is also a good outcome too
13:33:16 sean-k-mooney brb
13:33:30 kashyap sean-k-mooney: Yeah, indeed. But was just exclaiming about the general subtlety involved here...
13:41:32 lyarwood mriedem / efried ; https://review.opendev.org/#/c/663011/ - morning, if you have time to day I'm looking for some non-RH core review on this libvirt specific bugfix. There's a change on top of this that's testing the q35 machine type in the gate. I'm looking into the extend volume failure at the moment.
13:41:53 efried lyarwood: looking
13:52:26 efried lyarwood: Are you looking to backport this?
13:53:38 lyarwood efried: only to stable/stein
13:53:57 lyarwood and the last I checked it was still clean
13:53:59 lyarwood just
13:54:02 efried orly?
13:54:21 lyarwood yeah I know right
13:54:23 efried I thought I'd seen a bunch of twiddling of test_driver that seems unavoidable considering how many places you hit
13:55:29 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova stable/stein: libvirt: Use SATA bus for cdrom devices when using Q35 machine type https://review.opendev.org/663677
13:55:32 lyarwood ^ just to show I'm not making it up
13:57:13 stephenfin lyarwood: comments incoming on that, btw
13:57:16 stephenfin efried: too
13:57:21 lyarwood stephenfin: thanks
13:59:19 stephenfin lyarwood: done
13:59:54 stephenfin Apologies if you explored that idea already but I couldn't see any comments suggesting it
14:01:11 openstackgerrit Arnaud Morin proposed openstack/nova master: Refresh instance network info on deletion https://review.opendev.org/660761
14:02:05 efried lyarwood: It's early, but I think you changed the logic of the extracted method.
14:07:37 gibi exit
14:08:05 dansmith no
14:09:33 efried you can check out any time you like,
14:09:33 gibi :)
14:09:34 gibi sorry
14:09:34 efried but you can never leeeeaaave
14:10:07 dansmith efried: kinda infringing on mriedem's turf there buddy
14:10:15 gibi stephenfin: which test case was too brittle to change in https://review.opendev.org/#/c/660774 ?
14:11:10 stephenfin gibi:
14:11:11 stephenfin * brault (~brault@lfbn-1-9197-156.w86-238.abo.wanadoo.fr) has joined #openstack-nova
14:11:11 stephenfin * ttsiouts has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
14:11:11 stephenfin <efried> lyarwood: It's early, but I think you changed the logic of the extracted method.
14:11:11 stephenfin * tbachman (~tbachman@128.107.241.188) has joined #openstack-nova
14:11:12 stephenfin * ttsiouts (~ttsiouts@2001:1458:204:1::101:9145) has joined #openstack-nova
14:11:18 stephenfin damn you HexChat
14:11:27 stephenfin gibi: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/660774/3/nova/tests/unit/compute/test_compute.py@12875
14:11:49 tbachman stephenfin: accidental beep?
14:12:04 lyarwood efried: yeah you're right but I'm not sure the original logic was there tbh
14:12:04 stephenfin tbachman: Yup. Sorry for the noise
14:12:08 tbachman no worries!
14:12:18 lyarwood efried: that seems to suggest that the config would overwrite the image metadata
14:12:54 lyarwood efried: shouldn't it be (mach_type or libvirt_utils.get_default_machine_type(caps.host.cpu.arch))?
14:13:03 efried lyarwood: No, the image meta took first priority, then the config, then the caps (IIUC)
14:13:21 lyarwood ah that diff was all messed up on my screen
14:13:23 efried I don't know what it *should* be. I'm just parsing what it *was* vs what it is in your patch.
14:13:29 lyarwood ack thanks
14:15:16 efried ==> and the rest of the logic was in the `else`, so would be skipped and we go right to the return
14:15:16 efried mach_type = image_meta...
14:15:16 efried if image_meta... is not None:
14:16:21 lyarwood yup sorry the indentation was all messed up in gerrit so I missed that before
14:16:41 efried mach_type = get_default_machine_type... or mach_type <== i.e. get_default_machine_type gets priority here
14:16:41 efried and then the weirdness of:
14:16:41 efried mach_type = anotherthing
14:16:41 efried if caps.anotherthing
14:16:41 efried mach_type = onething
14:16:41 efried if caps.onething:
14:16:41 efried in the `else` we did:
14:17:05 efried This has struck me as pretty tough to follow every time I've looked at this method, so any refactor to make it more explicit would be welcomed :)
14:18:44 gibi stephenfin: OK. I don't think I should block your patch. We can revisit the removal of _resize() at a later point
14:19:19 gibi stephenfin: I will play a bit with that test case but I put a +2 on your patch
14:32:17 lyarwood stephenfin: okay, another way of doing this with less crazy passing of _host
14:32:43 lyarwood stephenfin: actually defining the two arch:machine_type configs we have in code here in nova.conf
14:33:17 lyarwood stephenfin: they are the only reason we need _host to fetch things anyway
14:33:39 stephenfin lyarwood: Left more comments there but probably easier discuss here
14:33:43 stephenfin Also, thanks gibi :)
14:33:54 stephenfin lyarwood: To which two configs do you refer?
14:35:10 lyarwood stephenfin: virt for fields.Architecture.ARMV7 & fields.Architecture.AARCH64
14:35:31 lyarwood stephenfin: and s390-ccw-virtio for fields.Architecture.S390 & fields.Architecture.S390X
14:35:44 stephenfin Gotcha. Yeah, it's weird that they're there

Earlier   Later