| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2019-05-17 | |||
| 12:14:45 | aspiers | or if the instance got screwed up somehow, e.g. accidental rm -rf ;-) | |
| 12:15:18 | sean-k-mooney | yep if you instacne are vnfs it would be a neat way to do a software update | |
| 12:15:27 | sean-k-mooney | kindof like in k8s land | |
| 12:15:27 | aspiers | yep | |
| 12:15:45 | sean-k-mooney | e.g. just kill the pod and recreate with the latest version of it | |
| 12:17:54 | aspiers | right | |
| 12:18:21 | aspiers | so are you thinking to update https://review.opendev.org/#/c/643578 to split into two separate commands recreate/resurrect? | |
| 12:18:52 | aspiers | that would work for me, not sure what mriedem will think though | |
| 12:19:12 | aspiers | with both I'd prefer to avoid mentioning the word "migrate" anywhere | |
| 12:19:45 | aspiers | since "migrate" implies avoiding any significant change in state (except the location) | |
| 12:26:28 | aspiers | sean-k-mooney: BTW which timezone are you in? | |
| 12:26:52 | aspiers | I'm guessing somewhere in Ireland? | |
| 12:27:43 | sean-k-mooney | yes | |
| 12:27:57 | sean-k-mooney | im shannon on the west coast of ireland | |
| 12:27:59 | aspiers | nice | |
| 12:28:16 | sean-k-mooney | what timezone i am awake in is not alway the same as where im located | |
| 12:28:22 | aspiers | true for me too ;) | |
| 12:28:35 | aspiers | for some reason I still expect all nova devs to be in north america | |
| 12:28:54 | aspiers | I'm in London | |
| 12:29:32 | openstackgerrit | Gorka Eguileor proposed openstack/nova master: Use os-brick locking for volume attach and detach https://review.opendev.org/614190 | |
| 12:29:41 | aspiers | got a lot of family in Dublin but never been further west than there yet :-( | |
| 13:15:54 | efried | kashyap, aspiers: what's up now? | |
| 13:16:06 | kashyap | efried: It's a change of scenery :-) | |
| 13:16:14 | aspiers | efried: ah, you missed the almight bike osc shed ;-) | |
| 13:16:19 | kashyap | efried: SEV-related, uncontroversial SEV-related | |
| 13:16:27 | kashyap | Err | |
| 13:16:31 | aspiers | oh, that too | |
| 13:16:34 | kashyap | "SEV-related, uncontroversial infra patch" | |
| 13:16:55 | kashyap | aspiers: That's what I assumed efried meant, when he pinged both of us together :D | |
| 13:17:01 | efried | I refer to ==> 3:45:56 AM - kashyap: aspiers: I think your change is ready to merge. Let's check with efried (or stephenfin) when they're about. | |
| 13:17:13 | kashyap | Yep, I correctly guessed. | |
| 13:17:13 | aspiers | yeah, that one | |
| 13:17:32 | kashyap | It is this one: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/655268/ -- "Add infrastructure for invoking libvirt's getDomainCapabilities API" | |
| 13:18:12 | efried | Okay. This isn't really in my, ahem, "domain" of expertise | |
| 13:18:15 | efried | but I'll take a look. | |
| 13:19:30 | ganso | melwitt, dansmith, tonyb: Hi! could you please review https://review.opendev.org/#/c/659338 when you have some time available? Thanks in advance! =) | |
| 13:19:44 | aspiers | efried: it should be pretty simple and not require special expertise | |
| 13:22:05 | efried | aspiers, kashyap: Does this also have to do with video models? | |
| 13:22:19 | efried | https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/libvirt-video-device-models | |
| 13:23:10 | kashyap | efried: No, that getDomainCapabilities() isn't related to video models. | |
| 13:23:15 | efried | ight | |
| 13:23:29 | efried | I see video models in your fake xml, so... | |
| 13:23:46 | efried | uh, I thought I did... | |
| 13:24:00 | aspiers | I guess it could be a future way of detecting available video models? | |
| 13:24:01 | efried | yeah, there. (Chrome's text search has been way slow for me lately) | |
| 13:24:08 | aspiers | if anything needed to do that | |
| 13:24:19 | aspiers | but that's certainly not what's driving the change right now | |
| 13:24:20 | kashyap | efried: You're right -- they _are_ present, though. But not relevant in this context | |
| 13:24:24 | kashyap | Indeed, what aspiers said. | |
| 13:24:25 | efried | k | |
| 13:24:31 | aspiers | It's been driven by SEV and secure boot | |
| 13:24:46 | kashyap | efried: Nothing like jumping right into the bowels of libvirt when you wake up, is it? :D | |
| 13:24:55 | kashyap | s/wake up/get started/ | |
| 13:24:55 | aspiers | I haven't woken up yet | |
| 13:25:04 | kashyap | aspiers: Haha | |
| 13:25:09 | aspiers | I'm sure sean-k-mooney could comment on whether this change would be useful for that bp | |
| 13:25:14 | efried | something something bowels when I wake up in general | |
| 13:25:17 | kashyap | aspiers: You got attacked by ZombieLoad | |
| 13:25:33 | aspiers | efried: TMI X-D | |
| 13:25:47 | efried | no doubt | |
| 13:26:00 | aspiers | on the plus side, I actually managed to get out of bed before 9am for the first time since Denver | |
| 13:26:06 | kashyap | aspiers: It's definitely useful -- as that _allows_ querying for the models. | |
| 13:26:11 | aspiers | but getting out of bed doesn't imply waking up | |
| 13:26:16 | aspiers | kashyap: right | |
| 13:26:57 | kashyap | aspiers: Wauw, I thought it was just me, whose sleep cycle got completely botched since Denver. | |
| 13:27:05 | aspiers | nope | |
| 13:27:14 | efried | my sleep cycle has been fine, thank you. | |
| 13:27:15 | aspiers | mine's been botched ever since SUSECON :-( | |
| 13:27:27 | kashyap | aspiers: I kept thinking: "No, it can't be Denver, it's been more than 8 days") | |
| 13:27:38 | efried | Shanghai will be a different story | |
| 13:27:42 | aspiers | oh god | |
| 13:27:47 | kashyap | efried: Right, enjoy :D | |
| 13:27:50 | aspiers | funny thing is, I was fine for Sydney | |
| 13:27:59 | aspiers | but then I made sleep spreadsheets for that trip, and stuck to them religiously | |
| 13:28:21 | aspiers | and with that teaser hanging, I'm really off for lunch | |
| 13:29:52 | cdent | I got the jetlag so hard | |
| 13:30:19 | sean-k-mooney | aspiers: which change was that? | |
| 13:30:39 | efried | sean-k-mooney: We're asking whether https://review.opendev.org/#/c/655268/ might be relevant to https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/libvirt-video-device-models | |
| 13:30:57 | sean-k-mooney | efried: oh not really | |
| 13:30:59 | efried | k | |
| 13:31:05 | efried | aslo | |
| 13:31:09 | efried | also* | |
| 13:31:11 | sean-k-mooney | that is not reported in the capablities api | |
| 13:31:14 | efried | could you review that patch please? | |
| 13:31:19 | efried | :) | |
| 13:31:21 | sean-k-mooney | ya | |
| 13:31:23 | efried | thanks | |
| 13:32:16 | sean-k-mooney | actully it looks like it has been added since i last looked | |
| 13:32:21 | sean-k-mooney | so i guess i could use it | |
| 13:32:31 | sean-k-mooney | i had planned to just to version checks | |
| 13:32:56 | sean-k-mooney | basically reusing the tables we already have in the code | |
| 13:33:45 | sean-k-mooney | like this one https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/virt/libvirt/vif.py#L67-L100 | |
| 13:35:15 | sean-k-mooney | so for disk bus and video yes i can use it but vif models are not repored and it will have to use the table approach | |
| 13:35:59 | stephenfin | kashyap, efried, aspiers: I can take a look at that now. Was Bugzilla wrangling this morning | |
| 13:36:24 | kashyap | stephenfin: Completely understand; aspiers diligently worked through all the feedback. I can't punch any holes in the change | |
| 13:36:36 | sean-k-mooney | hum actully i will have to use both as it look that info is not there for older libvirt | |
| 13:36:47 | kashyap | stephenfin: And it's a _very_ useful infrastructure patch that helps other features as well. So that can be merged regardless of SEV | |
| 13:37:01 | kashyap | (Although, aspiers might be shaking his fist at me, as I said "regardless of SEV") | |
| 13:37:33 | sean-k-mooney | kashyap: aspiers wehre did the fake libvirt capablites xml come form? | |
| 13:37:48 | sean-k-mooney | aspiers: did you take it form you machine? | |