Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2019-03-08
05:17:47 openstackgerrit Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move adding vlans to interfaces to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/635436
05:17:47 openstackgerrit Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Privsep the ebtables modification code. https://review.openstack.org/635435
05:17:48 openstackgerrit Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move dnsmasq restarts to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/639280
05:17:48 openstackgerrit Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move iptables rule fetching and setting to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/636508
05:17:49 openstackgerrit Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move calls to ovs-vsctl to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/639282
05:17:49 openstackgerrit Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move router advertisement daemon restarts to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/639281
05:17:50 openstackgerrit Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move final bridge commands to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/639580
05:17:50 openstackgerrit Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move setting of device trust to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/639283
05:17:51 openstackgerrit Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: We no longer need rootwrap. https://review.openstack.org/554438
05:17:51 openstackgerrit Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Cleanup the _execute shim in nova/network. https://review.openstack.org/639581
05:17:52 openstackgerrit Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Cleanup no longer required filters and add a release note. https://review.openstack.org/639826
06:13:24 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova master: Should not skip volume_size check for bdm.image_id == image_ref case https://review.openstack.org/641282
06:33:56 openstackgerrit Chris Friesen proposed openstack/nova master: Add emulated TPM support to Nova https://review.openstack.org/631363
06:33:56 openstackgerrit Chris Friesen proposed openstack/nova master: Split up _is_storage_shared_with() in libvirt driver https://review.openstack.org/639933
06:34:13 cfriesen these are for testing, pls ignore: ^
06:36:07 openstackgerrit Chris Friesen proposed openstack/nova master: Add emulated TPM support to Nova https://review.openstack.org/631363
06:37:20 openstackgerrit Chris Friesen proposed openstack/nova master: Add emulated TPM support to Nova -- testcase test only https://review.openstack.org/641932
06:44:17 openstackgerrit Chris Friesen proposed openstack/nova master: Add emulated TPM support to Nova https://review.openstack.org/631363
06:44:17 openstackgerrit Chris Friesen proposed openstack/nova master: Split up _is_storage_shared_with() in libvirt driver https://review.openstack.org/639933
06:44:18 openstackgerrit Chris Friesen proposed openstack/nova master: Add support for resize and cold migration of emulated TPM files https://review.openstack.org/639934
09:11:18 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Use Selection object to fill request group mapping https://review.openstack.org/638711
09:43:12 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Use Selection object to fill request group mapping https://review.openstack.org/638711
09:45:22 aspiers kashyap: I'm intrigued in which ways is the term "domain" Xen-specific?
09:45:52 kashyap aspiers: libvirt's terminology of "domain" for a "guest" is a hold-over from Xen times.
09:45:52 aspiers AFAICS libvirt uses it everywhere
09:46:14 kashyap aspiers: Can you explain what is a "host domain"? :-)
09:46:34 aspiers Your point being that KVM doesn't have a dom0?
09:46:34 kashyap I mean, not being flippant. Just trying to put myself in an operator's shoes reading the log
09:46:37 kashyap Yep
09:46:55 kashyap "host hypervisor" is more generic
09:47:01 kashyap Not sure you agree :-)
09:47:18 aspiers No, it's a good point that operators read logs and are less likely to understand arcane libvirt / Xen terminology
09:47:34 aspiers I do agree
09:48:04 aspiers I was trying to adhere to libvirt terminology since that's what the code aligns with, but that's not as good for operators so I'll change it.
09:49:43 kashyap aspiers: Nod, I did notice you were being careful to use the correct terminology
10:20:21 openstackgerrit Adam Spiers proposed openstack/nova master: Add detection of SEV support from QEMU/AMD-SP/libvirt on AMD hosts https://review.openstack.org/633855
10:25:14 aspiers kashyap: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/633855/10..11/nova/virt/libvirt/host.py
10:25:46 kashyap Thank you
10:26:06 kashyap aspiers: Also, once again kudos for the very nice doc string
10:26:12 aspiers thanks :)
10:37:33 openstackgerrit Kashyap Chamarthy proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Use 'writeback' QEMU cache mode for Nova instances https://review.openstack.org/641981
10:37:33 openstackgerrit Kashyap Chamarthy proposed openstack/nova master: qemu: Make disk image conversion dramatically faster https://review.openstack.org/640781
10:48:22 kashyap stephenfin: Commented here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/640866/; it's a simple phrasing fix that removes any ambiguity whatsover, let's please do it?
11:08:02 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Use Selection object to fill request group mapping https://review.openstack.org/638711
11:28:20 sean-k-mooney did we kill force evacuate yesterday when we released python-novaclient
11:28:22 sean-k-mooney http://logs.openstack.org/65/607365/24/gate/nova-live-migration/0e40d39/job-output.txt.gz#_2019-03-08_07_40_10_653566
11:30:42 sean-k-mooney looks like we broke the nova-live-migration job
11:31:03 sean-k-mooney lets see if i can figure out where to fix that
11:37:07 bauzas sean-k-mooney: that's why we provided a major version
11:37:17 sean-k-mooney ya
11:37:21 sean-k-mooney i found the issue
11:37:38 sean-k-mooney https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/1554d35834a474514f827449bd7d4f1d2f0af1d6/gate/test_evacuate.sh#L64-L90
11:37:52 sean-k-mooney not really sure if i should just remove that or what
11:37:57 bauzas the force flag is no longer accepted
11:38:02 sean-k-mooney i know
11:38:04 bauzas unless you provide a specific microversion
11:38:10 sean-k-mooney we removed the api
11:38:25 sean-k-mooney ha i could use the old microverion yes
11:39:03 bauzas AFAIR, we still need to use the force flag or just using a specific aggregate for forcing to use a compute
11:39:06 sean-k-mooney ya ok ill do that and ill see if we can de evacuate with osc while ime at it
11:39:14 bauzas sean-k-mooney: thanks
11:43:59 openstackgerrit Adam Spiers proposed openstack/nova master: Use assertXmlEqual() helper for all XML comparison tests https://review.openstack.org/641852
11:44:35 aspiers stephenfin: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/641852/2..3/nova/test.py
11:48:12 sean-k-mooney dumb question but --os-compute-api-version is used to set the microverion right
11:48:31 sean-k-mooney wew dont use the term micro version in the help text
11:52:18 openstackgerrit sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: update gate test for removal of force evacuate https://review.openstack.org/641986
12:20:39 kashyap mdbooth: On the off-chance you have time today: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/641981/
12:20:54 kashyap FWIW, the code comment I wrote in there, I got it reviewed by Kevin Wolf of QEMU.
12:25:20 shilpasd smcginnis: Hi, need review for openstack/releases patch for masakariclient https://review.openstack.org/#/c/641988/1
12:25:43 shilpasd dtantsur: Hi, need review for openstack/releases patch for masakariclient https://review.openstack.org/#/c/641988/1
12:28:52 dtantsur shilpasd: hi, why do you want a review from me on that? I have no relationship to either releases or masakari (or nova)
12:30:03 shilpasd dtantsur: ohh, thanks for confirmation, please ignore the request
12:31:52 openstackgerrit Adam Spiers proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Re-approve AMD SEV support for Train https://review.openstack.org/641994
12:33:28 kashyap aspiers: s/Stein/Train/ in the commit message :-)
12:35:30 bauzas sean-k-mooney: yup, that's the field to use
12:39:19 aspiers kashyap: doh :)
12:39:42 openstackgerrit Adam Spiers proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Re-approve AMD SEV support for Train https://review.openstack.org/641994
12:48:17 shilpasd smcginnis: Thank you for workflow +1 for masakariclient https://review.openstack.org/#/c/641988/1
12:51:23 smcginnis shilpasd: No problem. Probably best not to use the nova channel to discuss release activities for masakari though. ;)
12:52:31 shilpasd smcginnis: ok, will take a note of it
13:11:47 cdent gibi: is the rest of the bandwidth resource provider expected to land or is it being kicked to train?
13:12:38 sean-k-mooney cdent: on monday i think there were only 3 patches left for stien
13:12:44 sean-k-mooney the rest was going to be in train
13:12:52 sean-k-mooney i dont know if we got those 3 in
13:13:44 sean-k-mooney https://review.openstack.org/#/c/636360/
13:13:50 cdent thanks sean-k-mooney. trying to make some notes about it in the pupdate
13:13:55 sean-k-mooney cdent: ^ that was the patch that enabled the feature i think]
13:14:51 sean-k-mooney so if i was following correctly we have landed enough for spwaning vms with bandwith request
13:15:05 sean-k-mooney all move opertaions are puntted to train
13:16:03 gibi cdent: the heal_allocation part is train (but will be backportad as that is a nova-manage extension). starts here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/637953
13:16:24 cdent thanks gibi
13:16:40 sean-k-mooney gibi: we are going to make this as compelte right https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/bandwidth-resource-provider
13:16:41 gibi cdent: there is two bug like things https://review.openstack.org/#/c/639608/
13:16:48 gibi cdent: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/638711/
13:16:54 sean-k-mooney and add a new spec/blueprint for the final bits for train?
13:17:08 gibi sean-k-mooney: I'm not sure, the original spec talked about serve move operations which was not finished (not even started) in Stein
13:17:29 gibi sean-k-mooney: I have to talk to melwitt and mriedem about the administration
13:17:39 sean-k-mooney sure
13:17:54 gibi cdent: and there is test coverage extension and refactor here https://review.openstack.org/#/c/641679/
13:18:03 sean-k-mooney but enough has lannded that wyou can boot a vm with a min bandwith request now?

Earlier   Later