Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2019-03-07
20:07:15 dansmith that was around the time of the great systemdification of devstack, and because sdague
20:07:17 dansmith so really fishy
20:07:26 dansmith but sounds like something is broken to me
20:08:05 mnaser ok ill try to ping doug
20:09:19 dansmith I don't really agree with the assertion made in the commit message of that
20:09:33 dansmith because it assumes that we're only a long-lived service if we've daemonized ourselves
20:09:59 dansmith mnaser: also note that systemd can handle self-daemonizing services, so it depends on how your particular unit is running nova-compute too
20:11:08 mnaser dansmith: yeah, afaik we use type=simple so it's the "run in foreground mode forever" model
20:11:15 dansmith ack
20:11:46 openstackgerrit Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: Dont' wait for VIF plugging during revert resize https://review.openstack.org/639396
20:12:09 dansmith mnaser: assume you don't have a bug open for this yet right?
20:19:22 mriedem someone should uh, put some time into figuring out what to do about this old ass statement https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/compute/resource_tracker.py#L1380
20:19:47 mnaser bug
20:19:53 mnaser gah ctrl+f doesnt exist i guess
20:25:56 openstackgerrit Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova master: Integration tests using gabbi-tempest https://review.openstack.org/613386
20:26:57 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Remove unused context parameter from RT._get_instance_type https://review.openstack.org/641792
20:41:05 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Separate methods to free claimed and allocated devs https://review.openstack.org/616120
21:10:47 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Update usage in RT.drop_move_claim during confirm resize https://review.openstack.org/641806
21:13:34 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Update usage in RT.drop_move_claim during confirm resize https://review.openstack.org/641806
21:16:09 mikal Given the sudden burst of interest in the privsep patches, is it worth asking for a FFE?
21:17:45 mriedem nope
21:17:54 mikal Fair enough.
21:18:04 mikal I wont rush to deal with new review comments then.
21:19:31 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Set min=0 for block_device_allocate_retries option https://review.openstack.org/641770
21:19:57 mriedem mikal: i don't mean to be terse, we just have 2 weeks to rc1 and a lot of other stuff to focus on.
21:20:38 mikal mriedem: sure. So I'll just go back to pottering along at my own pace and being mildly surprised when something merges.
21:24:24 mriedem efried: i'm not sure how i feel about linking to release-specific docs
21:24:30 mriedem since those are only published for so long
21:27:10 efried mriedem: responded. I'm fine either way, hence the +2.
21:27:23 efried mriedem: Add 'h' in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/641770/ and I'm +2 there too.
21:32:24 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Set min=0 for block_device_allocate_retries option https://review.openstack.org/641770
21:33:52 mriedem dansmith: jaypipes: looks like the nova-grenade-live-migration playbook change screwed up mel's series in the gate, so i'm going to rebase and re-approve, just fyi
21:34:19 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add user_id column to the instance_mappings table https://review.openstack.org/633349
21:34:20 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Populate InstanceMapping.user_id during migrations and schedules https://review.openstack.org/638574
21:34:20 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add user_id field to InstanceMapping https://review.openstack.org/633350
21:34:21 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add online data migration for populating user_id https://review.openstack.org/633351
21:38:45 mriedem artom: replied in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/641806/
21:38:49 mriedem but good questions
21:41:55 mriedem this RT code dealing with adding/removing usage from flavors during a resize is way too f'ing magical
21:42:11 mriedem and i've done too much staring at it while working on the cross-cell resize stuff
21:42:34 mriedem it also *loves* to fail silently
21:42:41 mriedem SBD
21:42:47 dansmith mriedem: ack
21:45:53 openstackgerrit Adam Spiers proposed openstack/nova master: Add detection of SEV support from QEMU/AMD-SP/libvirt on AMD hosts https://review.openstack.org/633855
21:46:11 openstackgerrit Adam Spiers proposed openstack/nova master: Add new "supports_amd_sev" capability to libvirt driver https://review.openstack.org/638680
21:51:38 jaypipes mriedem: ++
21:51:46 jaypipes mriedem: and thank you
22:15:39 cfriesen is it a known issue that during a resize/migrate the resource audit will choke trying to find the instance disk on the source node?
22:25:29 mriedem i think so
22:25:38 mriedem i've tried to whack that mole before
22:27:53 mriedem cfriesen: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/Icec2769bf42455853cbe686fb30fda73df791b25
22:28:36 mriedem cfriesen: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1774249 is the resize sister to that
22:28:37 openstack Launchpad bug 1774249 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "update_available_resource will raise DiskNotFound after resize but before confirm" [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to Vladyslav Drok (vdrok)
22:29:19 mriedem vdrok: are you working on a fix for ^?
22:37:38 openstackgerrit Adam Spiers proposed openstack/nova master: Use assertXmlEqual() helper for all XML comparison tests https://review.openstack.org/641852
22:41:38 cfriesen anyone else run into issues with unstack.sh hanging in neutron_ovs_base_cleanup?
22:44:24 cfriesen I had to repeatedly ctrl-C it and rerun it...it was like it wasn't realizing that the command had finished
22:47:25 gmann mriedem: lyarwood FYI: tempest-slow (voting) and tempest-multinode-full(n-v) are running on stable branch gate also - http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-March/003604.html
22:48:15 mriedem cfriesen: unstack is not maintained as far as i know
22:48:33 mriedem gmann: yeah i saw that email but hadn't parsed it yet
22:49:23 gmann mriedem: ssh issue has been fixed on stable branch which i talked to you few days back. now all good and they are running on stable branch too
22:49:41 mriedem what was the ssh issue?
22:50:40 gmann few of the backport fixes - passwordless ssh with stack between nodes
22:59:16 mriedem prepare for impact
22:59:51 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add functional recreate test for bug 1818914 https://review.openstack.org/641521
22:59:53 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Improve CinderFixtureNewAttachFlow https://review.openstack.org/639382
22:59:53 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Fix ProviderUsageBaseTestCase._run_periodics for multi-cell https://review.openstack.org/641179
22:59:53 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Update usage in RT.drop_move_claim during confirm resize https://review.openstack.org/641806
22:59:53 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Remove unused context parameter from RT._get_instance_type https://review.openstack.org/641792
22:59:53 openstack bug 1818914 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Hypervisor resource usage on source still shows old flavor usage after resize confirm until update_available_resource periodic runs" [Low,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1818914 - Assigned to Matt Riedemann (mriedem)
22:59:54 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add InstanceAction/Event create() method https://review.openstack.org/614036
22:59:54 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add Migration.cross_cell_move and get_by_uuid https://review.openstack.org/614012
22:59:55 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add TargetDBSetupTask https://review.openstack.org/627892
22:59:55 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add Instance.hidden field https://review.openstack.org/631123
22:59:56 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Execute TargetDBSetupTask https://review.openstack.org/633853
22:59:56 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add CrossCellMigrationTask https://review.openstack.org/631581
22:59:57 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add prep_snapshot_based_resize_at_dest compute method https://review.openstack.org/633293
22:59:57 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add can_connect_volume() compute driver method https://review.openstack.org/621313
22:59:58 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add PrepResizeAtDestTask https://review.openstack.org/627890
22:59:59 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add PrepResizeAtSourceTask https://review.openstack.org/627891
22:59:59 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add nova.compute.utils.delete_image https://review.openstack.org/637605
22:59:59 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add prep_snapshot_based_resize_at_source compute method https://review.openstack.org/634832
23:00:00 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Add finish_snapshot_based_resize_at_dest compute method https://review.openstack.org/635080
23:01:17 mriedem Last commands done (39 commands done)
23:01:18 mriedem oh yeah
23:04:36 efried cfriesen: ...assertRaises as context manager, or you can assign from it - see https://review.openstack.org/#/c/633227/5/nova/tests/unit/compute/test_compute_mgr.py@8390
23:13:22 cfriesen I just ran unstack.sh and then stack.sh and now nova-compute is complaining that placement says it can't make a RP record because the resource provider name already exists (but the uuid is different)
23:14:13 cfriesen http://paste.openstack.org/show/747432/
23:31:48 vdrok mriedem_away: yeah patch is here https://review.openstack.org/#/c/571410/ just not shown in the big
23:31:59 vdrok *bug
23:36:48 efried mriedem_away: I don't see an os-brick release. Shouldn't there be one?
23:36:54 efried melwitt, dansmith, jaypipes: ^ ?
23:37:17 dansmith I dunno, does it change much?
23:37:41 dansmith I would have expected it to mostly be on its own release schedule, whenever it needs
23:42:21 efried dansmith: It's a non-client lib, type thing. And at least one significant change: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/635530/
23:43:59 efried jungleboyj: thoughts ^
23:45:50 dansmith yeah I dunno, but figure the cinder peeps are probably on top of it
23:46:03 efried dansmith: When I say not released, I mean not even proposed.
23:46:23 efried I guess I'll do it and add jungleboyj. If not needed, won't go. No harm.
23:48:05 efried it's a subsidiary of nova, not cinder, right?

Earlier   Later