Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2019-01-18
21:11:19 fried_rice mriedem: I don't think so, no.
21:11:24 fried_rice they were gonna, soon.
21:23:23 openstackgerrit Paul-Emile Element proposed openstack/nova master: Add emulated TPM support to Nova https://review.openstack.org/631363
21:42:47 mriedem fried_rice: ok done
21:42:54 mriedem i will have to review the rest of the series next week
22:25:25 fried_rice mriedem_away: Thanks. There's more to the series, if you can. But in particular the top patch (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/620711/) is right near some of the report client singleton stuff you did.
22:46:53 fried_rice leakypipes: a moment of your time?
22:47:40 fried_rice On this RMD thing, I agree as written it's way overblown and crosses a number of lines in the sand.
22:48:13 fried_rice However, I think there are some nuggets of possibilities in there if it is scaled way back and framed in terms of the architecture we've got in place (and forthcoming).
22:52:33 fried_rice - standard resource classes for just the hard guaranteed minimums, e.g. MIN_LL_CACHE_MB and MIN_MEMORY_BW_MBYTES_SEC
22:52:33 fried_rice So like:
22:52:33 fried_rice - spawn can pass RMD the allocation information to get the real resources attached to the VM
22:52:33 fried_rice - flavor can contain resource requests for those resource classes in the same way it does today
22:52:33 fried_rice - update_provider_tree creates inventory in appropriate providers for ^ (for Train, since we don't have numa modeling, "appropriate providers" == the compute node RP) based on querying RMD or whatever
22:54:19 fried_rice None of this dynamic allocation BS; no "burst max" values; communication with RMD via something other than a REST interface to a new service (like via a special file system; maybe I'm misunderstanding, but I think that's a thing).
22:54:36 fried_rice Effectively it's just enabling a couple of new resource classes, plain and simple.
#openstack-nova - 2019-01-19
04:22:27 openstackgerrit Hesam Chobanlou proposed openstack/nova master: unused images are always deleted (add to in-tree hper-v code) https://review.openstack.org/628793
18:21:56 lvdombrkr hello folks
18:22:10 lvdombrkr trying inject root password to instance
18:22:14 lvdombrkr nova config
18:22:35 lvdombrkr inject_password = True
18:22:35 lvdombrkr inject_partition = -1
18:22:35 lvdombrkr hw_disk_bus_model=virtio-scsi
18:22:35 lvdombrkr cpu_mode = host-passthrough
18:22:35 lvdombrkr [libvirt]
18:22:38 lvdombrkr inject_key = True
18:22:55 lvdombrkr but when booting instance get errir on nova logs:
18:23:09 lvdombrkr 2019-01-19 17:46:09.189 8 WARNING nova.virt.disk.api [req-1de3da23-d4a9-4b6a-bc34-38382d3923d9 a083e68210b6444e8acb66c40d79960b 01ee870b0de94b79a93d49fb43e0784b - default default] Ignoring error injecting data into image <LocalFileImage:{'path': u'/var/lib/nova/instances/ef82f997-2024-4cf0-ac40-0be30b47ba7b/disk', 'format': 'qcow2'}> (Please change permissions on /boot/vmlinuz-4.20.0-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64 to 0x644): LibguestfsCannotReadKernelinject_p
18:23:09 lvdombrkr artition: Please change permissions on /boot/vmlinuz-4.20.0-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64 to 0x644
18:23:17 lvdombrkr any ideas how to reslove it?
23:03:31 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Cleanup soft (anti)affinity weight multiplier options https://review.openstack.org/628205
#openstack-nova - 2019-01-20
02:12:34 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Add microversion to expose virtual device tags https://review.openstack.org/631948
#openstack-nova - 2019-01-21
02:01:02 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova master: Don't call begin_detaching when detaching volume from sheveld vm https://review.openstack.org/624959
02:01:20 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova master: Add support matrix for Delete (Abort) on-going live migration https://review.openstack.org/625781
03:51:48 openstackgerrit Yikun Jiang proposed openstack/nova master: Per aggregate scheduling weight https://review.openstack.org/628163
07:03:04 openstackgerrit Sagar Waghmare proposed openstack/nova master: Added new repo https://review.openstack.org/632031
08:46:14 openstackgerrit Bhagyashri Shewale proposed openstack/os-resource-classes master: Add PCPU standard resource class https://review.openstack.org/631711
08:53:32 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/gantt master: Retire gantt https://review.openstack.org/630138
08:53:45 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/python-ganttclient master: Retire python-ganttclient https://review.openstack.org/630154
12:01:42 openstackgerrit sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: Add free for claimed, allocated devices https://review.openstack.org/616120
12:01:42 openstackgerrit sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: Libvirt: do not set mac when unplugging macvtap vf https://review.openstack.org/624842
12:01:43 openstackgerrit sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: Allow per-port modification of vnic_type and profile https://review.openstack.org/607365
12:01:43 openstackgerrit sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: Add get_instance_pci_request_from_vif https://review.openstack.org/619929
12:01:44 openstackgerrit sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: SR-IOV Live migration indirect port support https://review.openstack.org/620115
12:01:45 openstackgerrit sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] libvirt: auto detach/attach sriov ports on migration https://review.openstack.org/629589
12:05:01 openstackgerrit sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: Libvirt: do not set mac when unplugging macvtap vf https://review.openstack.org/624842
12:05:02 openstackgerrit sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: Allow per-port modification of vnic_type and profile https://review.openstack.org/607365
12:05:02 openstackgerrit sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: Add free for claimed, allocated devices https://review.openstack.org/616120
12:05:03 openstackgerrit sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: SR-IOV Live migration indirect port support https://review.openstack.org/620115
12:05:03 openstackgerrit sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: Add get_instance_pci_request_from_vif https://review.openstack.org/619929
12:05:04 openstackgerrit sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] libvirt: auto detach/attach sriov ports on migration https://review.openstack.org/629589
12:38:54 openstackgerrit Rodolfo Alonso Hernandez proposed openstack/os-vif master: Add test to check os_vif.internal.command.ip.exists https://review.openstack.org/632077
12:52:51 openstackgerrit Rodolfo Alonso Hernandez proposed openstack/os-vif master: Cleanup device at the end of 'test_iproute_object_closes_correctly' test https://review.openstack.org/629112
12:57:47 ralonsoh jaypipes, hi. I added the cleanup to avoid leaving any device created in the system if the test goes wrong
13:02:55 jaypipes ralonsoh: morning! :)
13:03:22 jaypipes ralonsoh: was I correct though, that line 183/4 is doing that delete?
13:03:58 ralonsoh jaypipes, yes, the device is being deleted in this line, but this cleanup is just for precaution
13:04:10 jaypipes ralonsoh: the delete of the link itself should be done with an addCleanup() call, but AFAICT, the self._del_device() is ensuring that the other device(s) are deleted appropriately, right?
13:04:36 jaypipes ralonsoh: sure, since the _delete_device() method is idempotent, it won't hurt.
13:05:35 ralonsoh jaypipes, yes, that's the point
13:09:09 jaypipes ralonsoh: ack, ok, I'll push it through.
13:10:04 jaypipes ralonsoh: done
13:10:21 ralonsoh jaypipes, thanks!
13:15:30 sean-k-mooney so looking at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/629112/4..5/os_vif/tests/functional/internal/command/ip/test_impl_pyroute2.py we are just being extra safe by registering both cleanup function
13:15:40 sean-k-mooney ralonsoh: jaypipes ^
13:16:50 ralonsoh sean-k-mooney, yes, to ensure, in case of any problem, we delete both devices
13:16:50 openstackgerrit Natal Ngétal proposed openstack/nova master: [Configuration] Clean up .gitignore references to personal tools https://review.openstack.org/632086
13:16:53 sean-k-mooney ralonsoh: jaypipes that said wont hte device created on line 193 actully be called test_dev_9.100 as it is a vlan100 subport
13:17:14 sean-k-mooney actully i guess that is just a convention
13:17:26 sean-k-mooney it will actully be called test_dev_9
13:17:29 sean-k-mooney ok
13:17:49 ralonsoh sean-k-mooney, well yes, and the same in test_add_vlan
13:18:38 sean-k-mooney ya if we were using ifconfig the dev.vlan name would be required i think but since we are using ip link to create them we are free to call them whatever we like
13:21:58 sean-k-mooney ill need to resping the change to the release repo so ill pick up the 4 patch in that chain when i do for the 1.14.0 release
13:24:38 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: are you to quckly review some os-vif changes. im +2 on all of them but could you take a look at them https://review.openstack.org/#/c/631829/3
13:24:51 sean-k-mooney *are you free
13:40:25 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/os-resource-classes master: Add PCPU standard resource class https://review.openstack.org/631711
13:52:14 edleafe I know we skipped one conference; can't remember which
13:52:32 edleafe wrong window
13:55:46 efried n-sch meeting in 5 minutes in #openstack-meeting-alt. Expect it to be a short one.
14:03:26 openstackgerrit Natal Ngétal proposed openstack/nova master: [Configuration] Clean up .gitignore references to personal tools https://review.openstack.org/632086
14:37:50 sean-k-mooney jaypipes: thanks for the +w i forgot stephenfin is on PTO today
14:38:41 jaypipes sean-k-mooney: no problemo.
14:46:32 gibi mriedem: hi, I see that jaypipes already +2 the ensure consumer status check but I have a question in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/631671/7/placement/cmd/status.py@51
14:49:20 mriedem gibi: so a consumer record for allocations but no generation?
14:49:24 mriedem i don't think that's possible...
14:49:34 mriedem the consumer generation would start at 0 if it's new
14:50:12 gibi mriedem: based on your docstring I felt that you wanted to detect this case as well with the query but I don't think that the current query detects that
14:50:31 mriedem the consumers table defaults generation to 0 so as long as there is a consumers table record, i think it has a generation
14:50:55 gibi mriedem: OK, then I just overreacted. thanks for the explanation
14:51:09 mriedem np
14:52:50 mriedem gibi: while you're here, and you've been on the per-aggregate weights patch, i had a usage/behavior question about one of the weighers which you might have an opinion https://review.openstack.org/#/c/628163/12/nova/tests/unit/scheduler/weights/test_weights_compute.py@95
14:54:30 mriedem i'd ask dan but he's out this week
14:57:02 mriedem stephenfin: easy cleanup patch on which you have context https://review.openstack.org/#/c/628205/
14:57:36 sean-k-mooney mriedem: stephenfin is on PTO today he will be back tomorrow
14:58:28 mriedem ah yes MLK day in ireland...
14:58:46 sean-k-mooney no he just took today off
14:58:56 sean-k-mooney i think he was at a gig over the weekend or something
15:00:38 gibi mriedem: looking...
15:01:29 sean-k-mooney actully he may been skying the cleanups make sense to me.

Earlier   Later