Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2019-01-14
15:57:55 jaypipes belmoreira: rock on :)
16:11:30 adrianc sean-k-mooney: working on the nits, PS will be uploaded by tommorow
16:12:38 adrianc sean-k-mooney: left to deal with several on the indirect implementation commit and ill upload
16:13:05 sean-k-mooney ok ill wait untill you have uploaded it so to rebase
16:13:25 artom sean-k-mooney, I'm around
16:13:33 artom cfriesen, nothing posted yet, working on it
16:13:35 adrianc sean-k-mooney: thanks
16:13:55 artom sean-k-mooney, just because I don't say anything, doesn't mean I'm not here ;)
16:13:59 cfriesen artom: cool, thanks.
16:21:29 sean-k-mooney artom: ah lurking in the backgound. sneaky :)
16:23:21 artom sean-k-mooney, I mean, it's sort of what everyone does by default, no?
16:26:10 sean-k-mooney artom: ya true but i usually say hi in the morning
16:27:51 artom sean-k-mooney, maybe I'll start doing that :)
16:29:39 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Reject interface attach with QoS aware port https://review.openstack.org/570078
16:29:40 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Create RequestGroup from neutron port https://review.openstack.org/625941
16:29:40 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Reject networks with QoS policy https://review.openstack.org/570079
16:29:41 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Include requested_resources to allocation candidate query https://review.openstack.org/625942
16:29:43 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Transfer port.resource_request to the scheduler https://review.openstack.org/567268
16:29:44 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Calculate RequestGroup resource provider mapping https://review.openstack.org/616239
16:29:44 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Extend RequestGroup object for mapping https://review.openstack.org/619527
16:29:45 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Pass resource provider mapping to neutronv2 api https://review.openstack.org/616240
16:29:45 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Fill the RequestGroup mapping during schedule https://review.openstack.org/619528
16:29:46 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Recalculate request group - RP mapping during re-schedule https://review.openstack.org/619529
16:29:49 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Send RP uuid in the port binding https://review.openstack.org/569459
16:29:50 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Test boot with more ports with bandwidth request https://review.openstack.org/573317
16:29:51 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Remove port allocation during detach https://review.openstack.org/622421
16:29:52 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Record requester in the InstancePCIRequest https://review.openstack.org/625310
16:29:52 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Refactor PortResourceRequestBasedSchedulingTestBase https://review.openstack.org/624080
16:29:53 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Add pf_interface_name tag to passthrough_whitelist https://review.openstack.org/625311
16:29:54 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Extend NeutronFixture to return port with resource request https://review.openstack.org/630719
16:29:54 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Ensure that bandwidth and VF are from the same PF https://review.openstack.org/623543
16:29:55 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Reject server create with port having resource request https://review.openstack.org/630721
16:29:55 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Read port resource request from Neutron https://review.openstack.org/630720
16:29:56 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Reject migrate with port having resource request https://review.openstack.org/630723
16:29:56 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Reject resize with port having resource request https://review.openstack.org/630722
16:29:57 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Reject unshelve with port having resource request https://review.openstack.org/630725
16:29:57 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Reject evacuate with port having resource request https://review.openstack.org/630724
16:31:07 sean-k-mooney hehe i takeit you have resovled all the merge conflits
16:32:18 gibi sean-k-mooney: not just that, but make it so that the new external behavior is only active in a new microversion (which still needs to be added on the top)
16:32:35 gibi mriedem: ^^ fyi
16:33:07 sean-k-mooney gibi: cool and for the old micro version dose it ignore the request or reject
16:33:36 gibi sean-k-mooney: today it rejects. Ignoring the request leads to some hard to manage edge cases that I added to the etherpad
16:34:02 gibi sean-k-mooney: like create a server with a new microversion so there is port allocation but then migrate it with an old microversion
16:34:49 sean-k-mooney ok well we can disucss those on the call i guess
16:34:59 gibi sean-k-mooney: yes, definitely
16:35:11 sean-k-mooney on blance that might be safer but we need a failly big upgrade impact section to call it out
16:35:24 sean-k-mooney did you choose a time by the way
16:35:36 gibi sean-k-mooney: I still have to talk to mlavalle about it
16:35:56 gibi sean-k-mooney: as the last proposed time, Tuesday, does not seem to work any more
16:36:19 mlavalle gibi: will get back to you in ~30 mins
16:36:27 gibi mlavalle: OK, no worries
16:36:36 sean-k-mooney ok cool ill try and be there but i also dont need to be so ill keep an eye out on the ml
16:37:04 gibi sean-k-mooney: i will post to the ML in any case
16:38:09 gibi sean-k-mooney: btw if we go with the reject solution in nova, we can still turn off sending the resource request in neutron. That way we can get back the true legacy behavior, i.e. no resource request in the port et all
16:39:41 sean-k-mooney gibi: im not quite sure how you neutron would know when to do that. are you suggesting a config opion for it?
16:40:19 gibi sean-k-mooney: yes, it is config driven in this WIP patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/627978/
16:40:58 gibi sean-k-mooney: it turned out that neutron api extensions are not selectively loaded but loaded by the service plugin
16:41:22 gibi sean-k-mooney: but everything in the neutron code is ready to make an api extension like our resource request selectively loaded
16:42:01 sean-k-mooney ah cool. so if you have stien neutron and rocky nova or older you would set the config option to disable it
16:42:48 sean-k-mooney gibi: well there are selectivly loaded in that you have to enable the service plugin or extentinon in the neutron.conf or in the agent/ml2_conf.ini
16:43:04 gibi sean-k-mooney: if you have stein neutron and rocky nova then nova does not check the resource request at all. if you have stein neutron and stein nova, but you want to go back to the legacy behavior then you can turn off the extension in neutron
16:43:31 gibi sean-k-mooney: as far as I know if you enable a service plugin then it loads every extension of that plugin
16:44:47 sean-k-mooney ok so its not that granular in say enable ingress qos only you can either enable qos or not
16:45:02 gibi sean-k-mooney: yes, as far as I understand
16:45:28 sean-k-mooney and you get all the qos oplicys or none today. i honestly did not look quite that closely at least not in a few years
16:47:03 gibi sean-k-mooney: I've never looked into it deeply. I rely on rubasov's and lajoskatona's neutron experties
16:48:07 ade_lee hi all -- we have a grenade test that keeps failing due to an error which is related to volume attachment. Is there anyone here that knows about how nova volume attach works and can help?
16:49:33 jangutter moshel, lennyb: I suspect the OVS_HW_offload CI is having some issues. Would you be able to check it?
16:50:48 ade_lee specifically, we're running into an error where we try to write to a volume before its ready --
16:51:33 ade_lee we do wait for cinder to show the volume as being "in-use", but that seems to be insufficient.
16:51:59 ade_lee what would we wait for to ensure that the volume is ready for use?
16:52:09 ade_lee and the instance knows about it.
17:01:04 stephenfin bauzas: I think you need to submit those gantt reviews by yourself, as it's just yourself and johnthetubaguy that have access. melwitt is OK with us retiring it
17:01:23 bauzas stephenfin: WDYM ?
17:01:28 bauzas fast-approving ?
17:01:33 stephenfin yup
17:02:15 stephenfin bauzas: Pretty much everyone else is no longer working on OpenStack https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/253,members
17:02:16 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: well you can submit the change and bauzas and johnthetubaguy can approve
17:02:31 mdbooth Are folks aware that openstack-placement isn't listed in either requirements or test-requirements, btw?
17:02:47 stephenfin mdbooth: Neither is neutron, I'd imagine
17:03:05 mdbooth stephenfin: How's it supposed to be installed?
17:03:12 stephenfin They're all applications rather than libraries. You don't list applications in requirements.txt
17:03:32 mdbooth stephenfin: We pull in placement in functional
17:03:33 stephenfin If you're DevStack, usually by cloning the repo locally?
17:03:41 mdbooth Functional tests don't work
17:03:42 stephenfin Oh, then that's different
17:03:55 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: it should be in test-requiremetns if its needed to run the tests
17:04:24 stephenfin sean-k-mooney: Yup. It shouldn't be required to run tests though, otherwise we now have integration tests
17:04:38 stephenfin mdbooth: Then I can't offer any more info. Sorry for the noise :)
17:05:35 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: we import the test fixture form placement now so we can share it between nova and placement i think
17:05:36 mdbooth https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/tests/functional/fixtures.py#L19
17:05:49 sean-k-mooney cdent: ^ you would know better then i
17:06:18 cdent in the gate, it is happening a a result of tox-siblings
17:06:27 openstackgerrit Jan Gutter proposed openstack/nova master: Convert vrouter legacy plugging to os-vif https://review.openstack.org/571325
17:06:31 jangutter mriedem: would you be able to remove your procedural -2 from ^^ (a tag has been made!)
17:06:32 mdbooth Sounds cosy
17:07:19 sean-k-mooney cdent: how would you run tox locally to get the same effect. just pip install placement after the fact?
17:07:27 cdent one mo
17:08:02 cdent sean-k-mooney, mdbooth : look at the functional job def in tox.ini
17:08:21 cdent placement is installed explicitly for functional only because unit tests should not know about placement

Earlier   Later