Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2019-01-10
11:30:16 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Spec to implement vRouter HW offloads https://review.openstack.org/567148
11:30:18 openstackgerrit Kashyap Chamarthy proposed openstack/nova master: docs: Secure live migration with QEMU-native TLS https://review.openstack.org/629627
11:30:27 kashyap stephenfin: If you have a few minutes today, appreciate your rST (& general) eyes ^
11:30:38 stephenfin kashyap: Already done
11:30:42 stephenfin I think
11:30:51 kashyap Darn, did I _just_ miss your feedback?
11:31:04 stephenfin Think so
11:32:03 kashyap Ah, yes. I addressed a few; will address the rest
11:32:10 kashyap stephenfin: Before I go for lunuch
11:32:27 kashyap stephenfin: ... on that "has" vs. "have" -- I was referring to Dan's correction of my mistake at the top of the file
11:32:50 kashyap (So I was referring to )
11:32:58 kashyap s/to/to my own mistake/
11:34:01 kashyap stephenfin: Thanks for the comments
11:35:09 kashyap stephenfin: And yes -- the doc _does_ render; I built locally before pushing
11:35:32 stephenfin kashyap: render _correctly_?
12:23:27 jaypipes yonglihe: morning.
12:23:33 jaypipes yonglihe: or evening for you :)
12:23:44 jaypipes yonglihe: I'm close on the server group spec. will review shortly.
12:24:57 jaypipes yonglihe: you might want to reach out to gmann since he was -1 on the spec
12:29:52 jaypipes yonglihe: ok, re-reviewing. Ghanshyam's suggestions are very good. If you could make those small changes, I'll +W it.
12:29:57 jaypipes alex_xu: ^^
12:41:53 cdent jaypipes: you wanna kick https://review.openstack.org/#/c/629299/ in , make cfriesen happy
12:48:28 jaypipes cdent: reviewed.
12:48:36 cdent thanks
12:49:00 jaypipes cdent: I would like at the very least a more descriptive comment and a link to some docs.
12:49:09 cdent seems reasonable
12:49:19 jaypipes ty sir
12:50:20 cdent jaypipes: you might also have some thoughts on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/626055/ , which seems to be a "why aren't you using placement for this" spec
12:50:46 cdent of course given the date, I'm not sure it matters
12:51:50 jaypipes cdent: ack, thanks for the heads up, appreciated.
13:20:43 kashyap stephenfin: Yes, it does. Sorry, that's what I meant.
13:20:51 kashyap Let me show you a quick screenshot
13:22:38 kashyap stephenfin: Here: http://kashyapc.fedorapeople.org/TLS-rST-rendering-just-for-stephenfin.png
13:24:47 kashyap stephenfin: Ah, here is the official rendering: http://logs.openstack.org/27/629627/2/check/openstack-tox-docs/dc52e37/html/admin/secure-live-migration-with-qemu-native-tls.html
13:44:33 alex_xu jaypipes: let me ping yonglihe
13:44:42 yonglihe i'm here
13:44:48 yonglihe working on that
13:44:56 jaypipes heya :)
13:45:41 yonglihe hi, good morning
13:45:42 alex_xu hah, cool
13:49:18 stephenfin kashyap: Ah, all good so
13:49:25 stephenfin One thing I do spot is the note here http://logs.openstack.org/27/629627/2/check/openstack-tox-docs/dc52e37/html/admin/secure-live-migration-with-qemu-native-tls.html#performing-the-migration
13:49:35 stephenfin Indent _is_ off for that
13:49:44 stephenfin (presumably, anyway)
13:49:57 kashyap stephenfin: Ah, that's why it didn't render cleanly
13:50:00 kashyap Good catch
13:50:09 gibi nova meeting starts in 10 minutes in #openstack-meeting
13:51:19 kashyap stephenfin: On that ~~~ vs ---, I checked the existing pattern and went with it
13:51:26 stephenfin yup, agreed
13:51:31 stephenfin I did the same
13:51:32 kashyap stephenfin: Since we're going to "fix it", should I change it to ---?
13:51:43 stephenfin eh, we'll do it all at once, I suspect
13:51:46 stephenfin local consistency first
13:51:50 kashyap Or stay consistent for now, and do a bulk thingie later?
13:51:52 kashyap Yep
13:51:57 kashyap I'll let it be for now.
13:54:10 kashyap stephenfin: Please remind me again -- on using lower case "nova" vs. upper case?
13:54:44 stephenfin kashyap: https://docs.openstack.org/doc-contrib-guide/writing-style/openstack-components.html
13:56:33 kashyap stephenfin: It doesn't tell _why_
13:56:38 openstackgerrit Yongli He proposed openstack/nova-specs master: add 'show-server-group' spec https://review.openstack.org/612255
13:56:43 kashyap I think it's in the "Service Project Naming"
13:56:56 stephenfin kashyap: For that, you'll have to ask #openstack-doc. I don't actually recall
13:57:08 kashyap [quote]
13:57:09 kashyap The history of this decision is that the documentation contributors wanted the least amount of cognitive overhead when writing and reviewing. Learning rules about case can be difficult across multiple projects with hundreds of documentation contributors and thousands of changes and additions. Lowercase for project names as a rule is then easiest to review and enforce at this scale and growth
13:57:15 kashyap pattern.
13:57:17 kashyap [/quote]
13:57:29 kashyap So it's to lower the cognitive overhead, at the cost of "impure English". Yikes!
13:58:00 cdent why do you think nova should be uppered?
13:58:07 kashyap That's also part of concentration & focus: using the correct capitalization, punctuation, etc. at the right place
13:58:19 kashyap cdent: It's a proper noun
13:58:32 cdent not all proper nouns are upper cased
13:59:07 kashyap True, though. But in this case "intuition" says so :D
13:59:14 kashyap And "Nova" is a special noun
13:59:25 kashyap But anyway, I'll go with the rule, now that I know the history of it.
14:00:16 kashyap cdent: Random internet person says this: https://grammar.yourdictionary.com/capitalization/rules-for-capitalizing-proper-nouns.html
14:00:34 stephenfin kashyap: Where was that quote from?
14:00:49 cdent kashyap: my response to that is "meh" ;)
14:00:51 stephenfin You might add it to that page I linked, if you find the time
14:00:53 kashyap stephenfin: Ha! I read the doc buried in the doc -- https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/service-project-naming.html
14:01:12 stephenfin ahh
14:01:14 stephenfin cool :)
14:01:19 kashyap I wonder what else are we doing in the name of "lowering cognitive overhead". There's a time and place for it
14:01:26 kashyap But not with proper nouns. Haha
14:01:42 jangutter "openstack: The meeting name has been set to 'nova' " <---- shouldn't that be "OpenStack: The meeting name has been set to 'Nova' " ?
14:02:18 kashyap jangutter: Heh, there the bot is called 'openstack'; so in that context it's OK :D
14:03:09 jangutter kashyap: hehehe, it's just the Baader-Meinhof Phenomenon
14:04:34 jaypipes alex_xu: feel free to send https://review.openstack.org/#/c/612255/ along
14:04:55 openstackgerrit Maciej Jozefczyk proposed openstack/nova master: Add fill_virtual_interface_list online_data_migration script https://review.openstack.org/614167
14:06:34 alex_xu jaypipes: done
14:06:44 openstackgerrit Maciej Jozefczyk proposed openstack/nova master: Force refresh instance info_cache during heal https://review.openstack.org/591607
14:07:31 stephenfin bauzas: You think https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/libvirt-neutron-sriov-livemigration is something you could revisit today?
14:08:22 stephenfin and maybe jaypipes, for the first time? ^
14:08:44 stephenfin I ask because I have reviewed most of the implementation, and it's pretty straightforward. Also, it's a long time bugbear of mine
14:09:11 jaypipes ack. will get to that shortly stephenfin
14:09:19 stephenfin thank you sir
14:11:30 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova stable/queens: Fail to live migration if instance has a NUMA topology https://review.openstack.org/629597
14:19:17 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova-specs master: add 'show-server-group' spec https://review.openstack.org/612255
14:20:26 yonglihe alex_xu, Jay, thanks. Have a good one.
14:20:44 kashyap stephenfin: Is a single back-tick OK here: :oslo.config:option:`libvirt.live_migration_with_native_tls`
14:20:49 kashyap Or does it require a double back-tick?

Earlier   Later