| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2018-12-19 | |||
| 15:41:36 | mriedem | eric convinced me to do something more targeted | |
| 15:41:40 | stephenfin | mriedem: Any idea why you changed? | |
| 15:41:41 | stephenfin | ah | |
| 15:42:13 | mriedem | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/587498/1/nova/network/os_vif_util.py | |
| 15:42:25 | mriedem | so your fix is just do the same pattern but for vif_type=unbound | |
| 15:42:35 | openstackgerrit | Martin Midolesov proposed openstack/nova master: vmware:add support for the hw_video_ram image property https://review.openstack.org/564193 | |
| 15:42:49 | stephenfin | yup | |
| 15:43:08 | canori01 | mriedem: Is it possible to force the resize of an instance to the same host? I have allow_resize_to_same_host, but it seems like it still tries to pick different hosts | |
| 15:43:31 | mriedem | stephenfin: btw it goes back to newton https://review.openstack.org/#/c/350595/ | |
| 15:44:31 | mriedem | canori01: i know you can force a cold migrate to a specific host with a newer microversion but i'm not sure if that applies to resize as well | |
| 15:44:35 | stephenfin | backporting fun \o/ | |
| 15:44:43 | mriedem | https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/compute/?expanded=migrate-server-migrate-action-detail#migrate-server-migrate-action | |
| 15:44:53 | mriedem | canori01: ^ host param was added in 2.56 | |
| 15:45:50 | mriedem | canori01: ah looks like that won't work for cold migrate at least https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/compute/api.py#L3542 | |
| 15:46:41 | mriedem | and you can't specify a host for resize https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/api/openstack/compute/servers.py#L806 | |
| 15:46:53 | mriedem | https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/compute/?expanded=migrate-server-migrate-action-detail,resize-server-resize-action-detail#resize-server-resize-action | |
| 15:47:27 | mriedem | canori01: so the answer is no, and the scheduler is likely picking another host because one is available even though you could use the original host, but maybe weighers or something is picking the other host | |
| 15:48:03 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1790204 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Allocations are "doubled up" on same host resize even though there is only 1 server on the host" [Medium,Triaged] | |
| 15:48:03 | mriedem | canori01: or the source host is filtered out because of bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1790204 | |
| 15:49:11 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Include requested_resources to allocation candidate query https://review.openstack.org/625942 | |
| 15:49:11 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Create RequestGroup from neutron port https://review.openstack.org/625941 | |
| 15:49:12 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Extend RequestGroup object for mapping https://review.openstack.org/619527 | |
| 15:49:12 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Transfer port.resource_request to the scheduler https://review.openstack.org/567268 | |
| 15:49:13 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Fill the RequestGroup mapping during schedule https://review.openstack.org/619528 | |
| 15:49:13 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Calculate RequestGroup resource provider mapping https://review.openstack.org/616239 | |
| 15:49:14 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Recalculate request group - RP mapping during re-schedule https://review.openstack.org/619529 | |
| 15:49:14 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Pass resource provider mapping to neutronv2 api https://review.openstack.org/616240 | |
| 15:49:15 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Test boot with more ports with bandwidth request https://review.openstack.org/573317 | |
| 15:49:15 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Send RP uuid in the port binding https://review.openstack.org/569459 | |
| 15:49:16 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Reject networks with QoS policy https://review.openstack.org/570079 | |
| 15:49:16 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Reject interface attach with QoS aware port https://review.openstack.org/570078 | |
| 15:49:17 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Refactor PortResourceRequestBasedSchedulingTestBase https://review.openstack.org/624080 | |
| 15:49:17 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Remove port allocation during detach https://review.openstack.org/622421 | |
| 15:49:18 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Add pf_interface_name tag to passthrough_whitelist https://review.openstack.org/625311 | |
| 15:49:18 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Record requester in the InstancePCIRequest https://review.openstack.org/625310 | |
| 15:49:19 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Ensure that bandwidth and VF are from the same PF https://review.openstack.org/623543 | |
| 15:49:31 | sean-k-mooney | damb that a long patch chain | |
| 15:50:28 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: sorry, it is "just" 17 patches long :) | |
| 15:51:08 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: and I have to do a rebase soon as the second half is in merge conflict :/ | |
| 15:51:08 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: no complait form me. its much better then one bing one. | |
| 15:51:17 | sean-k-mooney | im also looking forward to this feature too | |
| 15:51:19 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: yeah, I tried to make small steps | |
| 15:51:51 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: I've just posted a mail to the ML about the status and some summary about the implementation if you like long mails :) | |
| 15:51:56 | ShilpaSD | gibi: Hi | |
| 15:52:01 | gibi | ShilpaSD: hi | |
| 15:52:10 | mriedem | gibi: are you going to kill me? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/625942/2 | |
| 15:52:51 | ShilpaSD | gibi: one question, for notification, can we have multi-valued for driver in configuration file? | |
| 15:52:58 | gibi | mriedem: you are right, so I'm not going to kill anybody :) | |
| 15:53:32 | gibi | ShilpaSD: that is coming from oslo, let me dig the doc for it | |
| 15:54:33 | ShilpaSD | gibi: Are you talking about https://docs.openstack.org/oslo.messaging/latest/reference/notifier.html | |
| 15:54:45 | gibi | ShilpaSD: https://docs.openstack.org/oslo.messaging/ocata/opts.html#oslo_messaging_notifications.driver | |
| 15:54:49 | gibi | yes | |
| 15:55:06 | mriedem | funny the config options are not in the oslo.messaging docs | |
| 15:55:07 | gibi | it says multi-valued | |
| 15:55:09 | mriedem | bnemec: ^ | |
| 15:55:47 | mriedem | ooo but they're in our docs https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/configuration/config.html#oslo-messaging-notifications | |
| 15:58:20 | gibi | mriedem: I think it is in the official too https://docs.openstack.org/oslo.messaging/latest/configuration/opts.html#oslo_messaging_notifications.driver | |
| 16:01:47 | melwitt | mriedem: thanks, taking a look | |
| 16:02:18 | mriedem | gibi: ah yes good call | |
| 16:02:23 | ShilpaSD | gibi: thnaks, actually i want this config option to be set for masakari for notificatins as Default:'', so looking how to be declared this in conf | |
| 16:03:40 | mriedem | [oslo_messaging_notifications]/driver=x | |
| 16:04:08 | mriedem | see http://logs.openstack.org/44/603844/11/check/tempest-full/ee8b609/controller/logs/etc/nova/nova_conf.txt.gz | |
| 16:04:40 | mriedem | if you want multi-valued, you just specify additional driver entries | |
| 16:06:25 | ShilpaSD | mriedem: means as comma seperated? | |
| 16:09:13 | nicolasbock | Hi, good morning. I have a quick (hopefully) question: I am trying to find all key pairs. `openstack keypair list` only shows me keypairs associated with the current user. So I started digging through the Nova DB and stumbled upon a `key_pairs` table, which mysteriously is empty though. Where are those keypairs stored? | |
| 16:09:24 | nicolasbock | Thanks already! | |
| 16:13:01 | sahid | nicolasbock: are you sure to use the right database? | |
| 16:13:06 | mriedem | ShilpaSD: no i think separate lines | |
| 16:13:13 | mriedem | ListOpt is comma-separated | |
| 16:13:21 | mriedem | MultiOpt is multiple entries for the same key | |
| 16:13:25 | nicolasbock | sahid: Yes, that thought occurred to me as well | |
| 16:13:26 | mriedem | they are similar | |
| 16:13:28 | nicolasbock | I'll double check | |
| 16:13:34 | ShilpaSD | mriedem: ok, thnaks | |
| 16:13:47 | mriedem | nicolasbock: key pairs are in the api db | |
| 16:14:05 | mriedem | key pair info per instance is in the instance_extra table in the cell db | |
| 16:14:26 | nicolasbock | Thanks mriedem ! | |
| 16:14:37 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1784579 in OpenStack Compute (nova) queens "unable to live migrate instance after update to queens" [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to Matt Riedemann (mriedem) | |
| 16:14:37 | mriedem | stephenfin: sean-k-mooney; btw, i tried to summarize some stuff on that port binding failed bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1784579/comments/13 | |
| 16:15:04 | sean-k-mooney | mriedem: so i made the continue change and there were not unit test failures with tox -e py27 -- "pci|PCI|hvdevs|update_devices_from_hypervisor_resources" so im going to write a new one | |
| 16:15:11 | stephenfin | mriedem: :D https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1784579/comments/14 | |
| 16:15:31 | sean-k-mooney | ill run the full set to be sure but im guessing ther was not test code | |
| 16:15:38 | stephenfin | Probably should have agreed on who was doing that. Oh well | |
| 16:16:07 | mriedem | sean-k-mooney: i'm not at all surprised there was missing test coverage for that code | |
| 16:16:37 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Handle unbound vif plug errors on compute restart https://review.openstack.org/626228 | |
| 16:16:56 | stephenfin | mriedem: There's the fix for the latest issue | |
| 16:17:05 | sean-k-mooney | mriedem: look like ther are some test but none that assert that behavior | |
| 16:18:01 | sahid | nicolasbock: i just checked on my devstack i can list the keypairs, i used "nova_api" database | |
| 16:20:30 | melwitt | jackding: review runways are only for approved blueprint implementations, not spec reviews unfortuatnately (please see instructions on the etherpad), so I'm removing the specs from the queue FYI | |
| 16:20:52 | mriedem | stephenfin: comments inline | |
| 16:21:18 | nicolasbock | sahid: Thanks, I found them! | |
| 16:21:27 | nicolasbock | I was looking in the `nova` database before | |
| 16:21:41 | nicolasbock | Thanks for the help sahid and mriedem | |
| 16:21:43 | sean-k-mooney | melwitt: for blueprints/specs we are ment to list them for open discution in the nova team meeting instead right too highlight them | |
| 16:22:03 | mriedem | melwitt: before adding https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/handling-down-cell back into the runway, we should probably know if tssurya is even around | |
| 16:22:09 | mriedem | because i don't think she is and there are -1s on the api change | |
| 16:22:14 | mriedem | so there isn't much point in it being in a runway slot | |
| 16:22:19 | melwitt | mriedem: oh, right | |
| 16:24:04 | canori01 | mriedem: so pinning my flavors to the az's like you suggested yesterday worked fine. So instances don't leave their hypervisor's az if I give them a flavor that associates them to a host aggregate. My situation for the boot volumes is that they are ceph rbd backed. However, each az is backed by a different ceph cluster (because we didn't want a ceph problem in one az to affect the others). | |
| 16:24:18 | canori01 | Probnlem I had is that on resize operations, the scheduler sometimes picked a host in another az and the resize would subsequently fail because that host can't access the rbd volume if it's in a different az | |