Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2018-10-31
14:26:10 dansmith WAT
14:26:13 ash_williams but yes you can't fumble a kick
14:26:15 ash_williams that's just dumb
14:26:27 ash_williams a fumble is when anyone carrying the ball drops it
14:26:36 cdent can't the ball holder fumble?
14:26:40 ash_williams yes
14:26:45 cdent (I mean when holding for the kick)
14:26:47 dansmith ash_williams: so lyarwood argued you could fumble the snap to the kicker during a FG
14:26:58 ash_williams you could botch the snap
14:27:07 dansmith is that a fumble though?
14:27:08 ash_williams which i guess technically could be a fumble
14:27:14 lyarwood \o/
14:27:18 artom These are just guttural noises to me
14:27:22 dansmith I thought fumble was like a terminal state for a play which determined what you could do next
14:27:25 artom Botch a snap? Fumble a run?
14:27:33 dansmith artom: yeah it's all BS :)
14:27:34 jangutter artom: you called?
14:27:52 artom jangutter, hah, no :D
14:28:18 artom jangutter, if you ever start a music career though, that's your name
14:28:21 artom Guttural Noises
14:28:30 jangutter artom: hehe, I collect pictures of plumbers ("Mr. Gutter", "Dr. Gutter")
14:29:01 jangutter artom: wide array of fall-back careers available to me :-p
14:29:48 artom You could also have "Initial Resting place of Edgar Allan Poe", but that doesn't scale
14:30:44 ash_williams https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fumble
14:31:06 ash_williams "A muff occurs where a player drops a ball that he does not have possession of, such as while attempting to catch a lateral pass or improperly fielding a kicking play such as a punt (you cannot "fumble" a loose ball)."
14:31:39 ash_williams so idk
14:31:48 ash_williams like most things in the nfl, the rules are confusing as hell
14:31:52 artom Oh great, more troglodyte gurglings
14:32:27 artom Muff the ball, punt the pass
14:33:16 cdent muff?
14:33:32 cdent where's gmann to bewilder us with cricket terms
14:34:44 jangutter yorker? googly?
14:37:31 ash_williams dansmith: and this one rounds out rocky i think so we can do a release https://review.openstack.org/#/c/614302/
14:37:35 artom Only one cricket term I know: zzzzz
14:38:58 gmann :) fumble can be used differently in every inning of cricket- batting or bowling or fielding.
14:48:49 ash_williams stable/rocky review needed here as well https://review.openstack.org/#/c/612293/
14:49:06 ash_williams lyarwood: i'm guessing you want these in stable yeah? https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bug/1784353+(status:open+OR+status:merged)
14:50:05 lyarwood ash_williams: yes please, I'll review later this afternoon
14:50:39 ash_williams johnthetubaguy: you should look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/609043/
14:50:41 ash_williams it's stable only
14:50:48 ash_williams related to ironic flavor migration for custom resource classes
14:51:04 ash_williams cern needs it and i'm assuming others will as well
14:53:32 ash_williams bauzas: can you get these backports? https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bug/1797580+(status:open+OR+status:merged)
14:54:00 bauzas ash_williams: sure I can take a look
14:56:58 openstackgerrit Maciej Jozefczyk proposed openstack/nova master: Force refresh instance info_cache during heal https://review.openstack.org/591607
14:56:59 openstackgerrit Maciej Jozefczyk proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Add fill_virtual_interface_list online_data_migration script https://review.openstack.org/614167
15:05:28 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/rocky: Explain cpu_model_extra_flags and nested guest support https://review.openstack.org/609789
15:08:07 tssurya mriedem: will my os_compute_api:servers:create:cell_down also need a microversion bump (of course if it needs I intend to put it in the same version as the API changes)? asking because I see you didn't bump for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/561284/ and you mention why you haven't in the commit, just that I don't understand it probably because I am not aware of the change history.
15:08:28 tssurya but just wanted to confirm if the down cell policy change needs a bump or not
15:10:24 ash_williams alex_xu: stephenfin: replied in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/613126/
15:11:04 ash_williams tssurya: the down cell stuff needs a new microversion yes
15:11:09 ash_williams https://review.openstack.org/#/c/561284/ is related to a cve bug fix
15:11:29 ash_williams a microversion isn't needed for that because a malicious user would just circumvent it by requesting v2.1
15:11:43 stephenfin ash_williams: It's not even Friday
15:11:50 ash_williams no but it's halloween
15:12:19 tssurya ash_williams: oh you are mriedem :) ?
15:12:26 ash_williams yes
15:12:35 tssurya ash_williams: heh but thanks for answering
15:20:33 ash_williams i need another core to +W a regression test for a bug https://review.openstack.org/#/c/608771/ - everything else stacked up on top is +W
15:29:59 bauzas ash_williams: on it
15:50:18 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova stable/rocky: Provide allocation_ratio/reserved amounts from update_provider_tree() https://review.openstack.org/614564
15:50:18 openstack bug 1799727 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "CPU_Allocation_Ratio from nova.conf doesn't update exisiting providers" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1799727 - Assigned to Matt Riedemann (mriedem)
15:50:18 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova stable/rocky: Add functional recreate test for bug 1799727 https://review.openstack.org/614563
15:51:28 jangutter ash_williams: groovy, I just got it.
15:52:45 ash_williams https://media.giphy.com/media/Q2LRWdJDq9xy8/giphy.gif
15:52:47 ash_williams it's efried
15:54:45 efried Indeeed
15:55:06 fghaas e only way to get vmx enabled.
15:55:06 fghaas ash_williams: on your comment re https://review.openstack.org/#/c/609790/5 (the Queens version of that nested virt doc patch), I just checked and despite the fact that pcid is no longer the *only* supported option for cpu_model_extra_flags, vmx still isn't a supported option. That's why I opted to just not talk about enabling vmx via cpu_model_extra_flags, and instead explain that in Queens cpu_mode=host-{model,passthrough} is th
15:55:54 fghaas Sorry, should have been cleared: vmx still isn't a supported option *in stable/queens* (it is in Rocky)
15:56:07 fghaas clearer. Damn, I can't type today.
15:57:01 ash_williams fghaas: if the content in the cherry pick is intentionally different from the source, that should be called out with a note in the commit message for reviewers
15:57:36 fghaas Can do
15:58:35 ash_williams lyarwood: fwiw, i think you can fast approve https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bug/1784353+branch:stable/rocky given they are a clean backport and since i'm stable core, you can consider that an implied +2
15:58:57 lyarwood ash_williams: yup sure, I'll do that now
15:59:09 ash_williams i'm pushing on rocky stuff since we're doing to do a release
15:59:13 ash_williams *going to do
16:02:48 openstackgerrit Florian Haas proposed openstack/nova stable/queens: Explain cpu_model_extra_flags and nested guest support https://review.openstack.org/609790
16:04:36 bauzas ash_williams: +W'd https://review.openstack.org/#/c/608771/
16:04:40 bauzas thanks for it
16:04:44 bauzas I wasn't knowing about the bug
16:04:56 ash_williams thanks
16:12:46 openstackgerrit Florian Haas proposed openstack/nova stable/queens: Explain cpu_model_extra_flags and nested guest support https://review.openstack.org/609790
16:14:29 fghaas ash_williams: there you go, hope the commit message now explains things better.
16:15:54 openstackgerrit Florian Haas proposed openstack/nova stable/queens: Explain nested guest support https://review.openstack.org/609790
16:18:20 melwitt cool, looks like the os-vif release situation got solved already
16:35:50 openstack bug 1800511 in OpenStack Compute (nova) rocky "VMs with vif_type bridge/tap started before Rocky upgrade cannot be live migrated" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1800511 - Assigned to Mohammed Naser (mnaser)
16:35:50 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/rocky: Add tests for bug #1800511 https://review.openstack.org/614040
16:41:21 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Pass request_spec from compute to cell conductor on reschedule https://review.openstack.org/582417
16:41:21 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Remove legacy request spec compat code from API https://review.openstack.org/614309
16:46:38 openstackgerrit Jack Ding proposed openstack/nova master: Add I/O Semaphore to limit concurrent disk ops https://review.openstack.org/609180
16:48:14 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova stable/rocky: Properly track local root disk usage during moves https://review.openstack.org/614588
16:48:14 openstack bug 1796737 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "resize: hypervisor local_gb_used still reports usage even with volume-backed instances after fix for bug 1469179" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1796737 - Assigned to Matt Riedemann (mriedem)
16:48:14 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova stable/rocky: Add regression test for bug 1796737 https://review.openstack.org/614587
16:50:56 ash_williams jackding: can you put https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/io-semaphore-for-concurrent-disk-ops on the nova meeting agenda for tomorrow please?
16:52:08 jackding ash_williams: ok
17:00:53 openstackgerrit Elod Illes proposed openstack/nova master: Reject interface attach with QoS aware port https://review.openstack.org/570078
17:01:54 openstackgerrit Elod Illes proposed openstack/nova master: Reject networks with QoS policy https://review.openstack.org/570079
18:16:37 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/rocky: libvirt: Avoid setting MTU during live migration if unset https://review.openstack.org/614041
18:16:43 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/rocky: Add nova-status upgrade check for consoles https://review.openstack.org/614302

Earlier   Later