Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2018-10-25
21:58:53 mriedem metadata api can be run from the nova api service
21:58:54 efried but that may implicitly incorporate the metadata API.
21:58:59 efried Yeah, that.
21:59:40 melwitt yeah, the all-in-one metadata API does from nova api service
22:00:15 efried so an aside, should we be moving [DEFAULT]metadata_* into [api]?
22:00:31 efried or... creating a [metadata_api] section?
22:00:49 mriedem probably the former, but moving 100 options every release gets tiresome
22:00:53 mriedem both for us and i'm sure for deployers
22:01:28 efried k, shrug, I've got no skin in the game.
#openstack-nova - 2018-10-26
00:30:22 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/osc-placement stable/queens: Do not depend on jenkins user in devstack gate https://review.openstack.org/556666
01:02:38 openstack bug 1799727 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "CPU_Allocation_Ratio from nova.conf doesn't update exisiting providers" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1799727 - Assigned to Matt Riedemann (mriedem)
01:02:38 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Add functional recreate test for bug 1799727 https://review.openstack.org/613115
01:05:16 sean-k-mooney melwitt: sorry i needed to go lie down for a bit as i was feeling off (just a headache)
01:05:30 sean-k-mooney melwitt: i commented on the os-vif release patch
01:06:19 sean-k-mooney i think its fine but there are two patches i would like to incude in the release if we have time or do a 1.12.1 release before the end of the year if they need future work before november 1st
01:08:23 sean-k-mooney efried: ill review your provider config yaml spec https://review.openstack.org/#/c/612497 tomorow if i can. i have abandon mine in favor of your for this release
01:08:58 sean-k-mooney but with that siad im going to go back to sleep talk to everyone in the morning o/
01:38:29 cervigni hello everyone, we have a very odd problem in our environment. lauching an instance stucks on scheduling / building. But if I launch more than one from web interface, the first instance always fails, while the other instances (other than the first one) always succeed
01:38:42 cervigni any idea where I should start looking? I though it was a placement problem but no errors whatsoever
01:38:42 openstackgerrit Yongli He proposed openstack/nova-specs master: add 'show-server-group' spec https://review.openstack.org/612255
01:38:43 openstackgerrit Yongli He proposed openstack/nova-specs master: add spec "show-server-numa-topology" https://review.openstack.org/612256
01:51:56 openstackgerrit Yongli He proposed openstack/nova-specs master: add spec "show-server-numa-topology" https://review.openstack.org/612256
02:06:47 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Fixes Python3 issue in decoding password https://review.openstack.org/604870
02:13:05 openstackgerrit Yongli He proposed openstack/nova-specs master: add 'show-server-group' spec https://review.openstack.org/612255
02:13:06 openstackgerrit Yongli He proposed openstack/nova-specs master: add spec "show-server-numa-topology" https://review.openstack.org/612256
02:34:24 openstackgerrit Yikun Jiang proposed openstack/nova master: Add compute_node ratio online data migration https://review.openstack.org/609995
03:52:00 openstackgerrit Yikun Jiang proposed openstack/nova master: Add ratio online data migration when load compute node https://review.openstack.org/613499
04:34:56 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add nova-status upgrade check for consoles https://review.openstack.org/611214
07:00:58 openstackgerrit Yikun Jiang proposed openstack/nova master: Use new ``initial_xxx_allocation_ratio`` CONF https://review.openstack.org/602804
07:00:59 openstackgerrit Yikun Jiang proposed openstack/nova master: Add ratio online data migration when load compute node https://review.openstack.org/613499
07:06:03 openstackgerrit Yikun Jiang proposed openstack/nova master: Add compute_node ratio online data migration https://review.openstack.org/609995
07:42:20 openstackgerrit Tetsuro Nakamura proposed openstack/nova master: Consider root id is None in the database case https://review.openstack.org/613305
07:42:20 openstack bug 1799892 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Placement API crashes with 500s in Rocky upgrade with downed compute nodes" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1799892
07:42:20 openstackgerrit Tetsuro Nakamura proposed openstack/nova master: Add recreate test for bug 1799892 https://review.openstack.org/613304
07:46:38 openstackgerrit mashuting proposed openstack/nova master: VMware: Support volumes backed by VStorageObject https://review.openstack.org/521690
08:52:04 openstackgerrit Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Integration tests using gabbi-tempest https://review.openstack.org/613386
09:19:50 openstackgerrit Yikun Jiang proposed openstack/nova master: Add ratio online data migration when load compute node https://review.openstack.org/613499
10:49:14 openstackgerrit Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Integration tests using gabbi-tempest https://review.openstack.org/613386
10:52:43 openstackgerrit Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Integration tests using gabbi-tempest https://review.openstack.org/613386
10:53:59 openstackgerrit Yikun Jiang proposed openstack/nova master: Add compute_node ratio online data migration script https://review.openstack.org/609995
10:53:59 openstackgerrit Yikun Jiang proposed openstack/nova master: Add ratio online data migration when load compute node https://review.openstack.org/613499
12:39:10 jaypipes aspiers: +2 from me.
13:02:48 jaypipes efried: done
13:18:51 mpasserini Hi, what is the service which has the task of creating the ephemeral volumes on the compute nodes? Nova-compute?
13:34:56 mriedem dansmith: i'd ping tssurya, but she's not around and it seems you're updating the down cell series. i've gone up through https://review.openstack.org/#/c/584829/
13:35:14 dansmith mriedem: just going through my gerrit mail right now
13:35:37 mriedem i've got comments/questions in the changes with +1s too, so you could look at those as well. like wondering about applying limits when listing from down cells.
13:35:43 mriedem seems we could do that, but we don't.
13:36:11 dansmith roger
13:48:39 mriedem cdent: requests.GET question for you, if i have a call like GET /servers?all_tenants=1&project_id=1&project_id=2, does that result in {'project_id': [1,2]} ?
13:49:00 mriedem with the all_tenants key in the dict as well, but i care about the double project_id
13:49:37 cdent mriedem: I think it depends on how you are making the call. let me refresh my memory
13:50:23 cdent mriedem: looks like you need getall to get what you want: https://docs.pylonsproject.org/projects/webob/en/stable/reference.html#query-post-variables
13:51:03 cdent GET() will get you both, in tuples
13:51:44 cdent GET[key] gets the second, getall(key) gets both
13:51:50 mriedem ok i forgot about getall(), i think i found the list of tuples while digging through requests code yesterday
13:53:20 mriedem ok and looking at the list servers code, the only param we do getall on is 'status' so you can filter the list of servers on multiple status values, anything else would just be whatever the last entry is in the query string
13:53:30 mriedem we don't document that of course, but that's what i'm seeing
13:53:52 mriedem i just wasn't sure how search_opts.update(req.GET) would work
13:55:54 cdent there are lots of things about the nova-api that are "unique"
14:09:37 openstackgerrit Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Standardize CPU resource tracking https://review.openstack.org/555081
14:10:21 jaypipes fried_rice, stephenfin, artom, alex_xu: thx for the reviews. I think I got all of your comments. please check it again. thanks in advance! mriedem, I added a bunch more to the upgrade impact section. ^^
14:10:41 fried_rice ack
14:25:57 finucannot mriedem: This is another one of those changes that I thought would require a microversion but apparently does not. The output is wrong but it doesn't raise a HTTP 5xx https://review.openstack.org/#/c/608685/
14:26:48 finucannot What distinguishes a fix from this from, say, modifying the output of os-hypervisor to respect (cpu|ram)_allocation_ratio. Both are currently giving "wrong" output
14:29:03 mriedem i don't have a good answer for that except the os-hypervisors stuff has been around forever and i don't know if including allocation ratios in that calculation would be considered by all to be "right"
14:30:33 finucannot Yeah, probably not the best example
14:30:51 finucannot mriedem: Would it be fair to ask for 'bug'-type reno for these kind of changes, in that case?
14:30:59 finucannot I'm thinking of the case where different clouds would give different results for what's supposed to be the same version
14:31:33 mriedem i wouldn't say it's unfair, although this simple tenant usage thing lpetrut is fixing is admin-only by default
14:31:39 mriedem non-admins can't list usage across all tenants
14:31:51 mriedem so that's not really an interop concern
14:32:11 finucannot Ohh, I didn't know that. In that case, not an issue here
14:32:55 mriedem well,
14:33:05 mriedem his change isn't specific to list (admin), it's also show (non-admin)
14:33:17 mriedem so idk, if you want a "fixes" release note then ask for one
14:33:26 mriedem "paging was broken, now it's fixed"
14:34:00 finucannot Yeah, I think I will. Probably makes sense assuming we want to backport this too (and to alert folks who'd want this downstream)
14:35:10 mriedem in general, we don't have a great formula for when a microversion is required. obviously major behavior changes that people need to opt into. and request/response schema changes. but there are so many other behavior-ish and bug fix type things that could be argued require a microversion we'd never do anything
14:35:17 mriedem or we'd have a thousand microversions by now
14:35:32 mriedem e.g. the trusted VFs thing from sahid technically could have required a microversion
14:36:19 mriedem and your requested networks physnet stuff
14:37:16 finucannot All good points
14:37:38 finucannot Clearly my "must raise HTTP 5xx" rule is too rigid
14:37:47 openstackgerrit Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Integration tests using gabbi-tempest https://review.openstack.org/613386
14:45:37 openstackgerrit Lucian Petrut proposed openstack/nova master: Fix os-simple-tenant-usage result order https://review.openstack.org/608685
14:47:55 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Fix os-simple-tenant-usage result order https://review.openstack.org/608685
14:50:39 mriedem i can't figure out for the life of me why i can't send a RequestSpec object to prep_resize over rpc https://gist.github.com/mriedem/9fce3c68336f8abb5d4753c156d8f96f but we pass RequestSpec objects over rpc in several other places, like build_and_run_instance and select_destinations
14:51:14 mriedem there is an old oslo.messaging bug for the fake impl rpc driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.messaging/+bug/1529084 but how does that not break on those other calls?
14:51:15 openstack Launchpad bug 1529084 in oslo.messaging "RPC fake driver should accept datetime items for data" [Undecided,Invalid]
15:22:44 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Kill @safe_connect in _get_provider_traits https://review.openstack.org/613613
15:22:59 fried_rice edmondsw: ^ (and leakypipes and other haters of @safe_connect)
15:24:29 edmondsw fried_rice thanks
15:24:47 cdent fried_rice: where does the exception go, now?
15:25:11 fried_rice cdent: up
15:25:13 fried_rice as it should
15:25:16 cdent indeed
15:25:19 cdent but then what?
15:25:32 fried_rice well, it will go the same place as the AttributeError did.
15:25:37 fried_rice http://184.172.12.213/04/602804/8/check/nova-in-tree-pvm/9a0e925/logs/n-cpu.txt.gz#_Oct_26_02_24_17_490196

Earlier   Later