| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2018-10-04 | |||
| 06:43:23 | gmann | pooja_jadhav: you can write the tempest integration test where all actual services and their behaviour is being tested. but for sample tests you can simply stub the expected things from cinder and check nova expected response/behavior | |
| 06:50:13 | pooja_jadhav | gmann: yes, same point i am able to see that, I need to use Cinder Fixture for the same. Tried same thing which is done at [1]https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/tests/functional/api_sample_tests/test_block_device_mapping_boot.py#L23-L27 | |
| 06:51:31 | gmann | pooja_jadhav: yeah, any error you are getting? | |
| 06:51:35 | gmann | you have patch up | |
| 06:53:48 | pooja_jadhav | gmann: I have added same stubs in the https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/tests/functional/api_sample_tests/test_simple_tenant_usage.py and trying to add 4th as BFV instance. | |
| 06:55:34 | pooja_jadhav | gmann: here is the error log http://paste.openstack.org/show/731449/ | |
| 07:00:14 | gmann | pooja_jadhav: this is going on cinder call? did you use Cinder Fixture ? | |
| 07:00:36 | gmann | pooja_jadhav: if you can push your patch in gerrit (WIP though), i can take a look | |
| 07:01:07 | pooja_jadhav | self.useFixture(nova_fixtures.CinderFixtureNewAttachFlow(self)) | |
| 07:01:07 | pooja_jadhav | gmann: yes, In setup method, I have added this line : self.useFixture(nova_fixtures.CinderFixture(self)) | |
| 07:01:58 | gmann | pooja_jadhav: ok, and you are just calling server create with bdmv2 right | |
| 07:02:20 | pooja_jadhav | gmann: yes, right | |
| 07:04:24 | pooja_jadhav | gmann: Also I checked, v2.32 and v2.42, in https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/tests/functional/api_sample_tests/test_servers.py#L189-L196 they are created BFV instances. they are working perfectly fine. Same things trying to use. but not getting success | |
| 07:04:56 | bauzas | good morning nova | |
| 07:06:31 | pooja_jadhav | gmann: How to use this Cinder Fixture?? Am I using correctly in the setup method of the class where I need it ?? | |
| 07:07:10 | gibi | mriedem, efried: I've read back on yesterday's concurrent update. I think one of the goals of the consumer gen patches to make the concurrent update visible and not overwrite allocations so I feel what mriedem saw was a result of that | |
| 07:09:26 | gibi | mriedem, efried: also I agree with efried that if the last patch that updates claim_resources is merged then that parallel allocation request case will stop eariler in the claim_resources when the second claim_resources call for the same consumer fails on the assumption that the consumer does not exists | |
| 07:11:44 | gmann | pooja_jadhav: i think so. but somehow it is not considering it. | |
| 07:12:57 | gmann | pooja_jadhav can you paste the test_simple_tenant_usage.py or if you can push patch up in gerrit then it is easy to debug | |
| 07:22:30 | pooja_jadhav | gmann: http://paste.openstack.org/show/731450/ | |
| 07:29:17 | gmann | pooja_jadhav: you do not need to use both, use CinderFixture only | |
| 07:31:06 | pooja_jadhav | gmann: I have trued by using used CinderFixture only. But still no success L( | |
| 07:31:08 | pooja_jadhav | :( | |
| 07:31:15 | pooja_jadhav | tried* | |
| 07:38:00 | gmann | pooja_jadhav: and the sample file path you changed ? | |
| 07:39:38 | pooja_jadhav | gmann: I am adding sample files inside https://github.com/openstack/nova/tree/85b36cd2f82ccd740057c1bee08fc722209604ab/nova/tests/functional/api_sample_tests/api_samples/os-simple-tenant-usage/v2.40 | |
| 07:40:26 | pooja_jadhav | and passing use_common_server_api_samples=False to _post_server() method so that, It will get the samples from api_samples/os-simple-tenant-usage/v2.40 only. | |
| 07:43:33 | gmann | pooja_jadhav: that's all you are doing perfectly | |
| 07:44:51 | pooja_jadhav | gmann: yes, I will try my best for this. If anything u think I am missing something then please let me know. :) | |
| 07:46:07 | gmann | pooja_jadhav: ok, but if you can push WIP patch up then it will be easy otherwise, it is difficult to debug | |
| 07:50:28 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Ignore forcing of evacuation for nested instance https://review.openstack.org/606111 | |
| 07:50:28 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Consider nested allocations during allocation cleanup https://review.openstack.org/606050 | |
| 07:50:29 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Run negative server moving tests with nested RPs https://review.openstack.org/604125 | |
| 08:16:26 | openstackgerrit | Surya Seetharaman proposed openstack/nova master: Update --max-rows parameter description for archive_deleted_rows https://review.openstack.org/606995 | |
| 08:43:13 | openstackgerrit | Surya Seetharaman proposed openstack/nova master: Return a minimal construct for nova list when a cell is down https://review.openstack.org/567785 | |
| 08:43:13 | openstackgerrit | Surya Seetharaman proposed openstack/nova master: Modify get_by_cell_and_project() to get_not_qfd_by_cell_and_project() https://review.openstack.org/607663 | |
| 08:55:58 | tssurya | sean-k-mooney: good morning, around ? | |
| 08:58:11 | tssurya | its about the exception handling for the scatter utility stuff we discussed yesterday, would you be modifying your existing patch or should I put a new one for the simple approach ? asking just to rebase the series | |
| 09:08:56 | gmann | pooja_jadhav: seems like you need to override the nova.volume.cinder.create which is not in conderFixture | |
| 09:09:12 | gmann | t i tested with that and it worked fine | |
| 09:12:02 | gmann | pooja_jadhav: i mean stub | |
| 09:13:28 | tssurya | sean-k-mooney: nvm, my bad just saw http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-nova/%23openstack-nova.2018-10-03.log.html#t2018-10-03T19:17:25 | |
| 09:16:23 | sean-k-mooney | am i am actully im just making coffee | |
| 09:16:59 | sean-k-mooney | this is around the time in normally wake up and start being online | |
| 09:18:31 | sean-k-mooney | tssurya: for the simple approch we agreed to just retrun the exception by construction a new copy and leave a comment saying we are doing that because of https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0344/#open-issue-garbage-collection | |
| 09:19:13 | sean-k-mooney | tssurya: so expect execption e: retrun e.class(e.args) | |
| 09:19:44 | tssurya | sean-k-mooney:ack thanks :) sorry for the early ping then | |
| 09:19:56 | tssurya | I was calculating 1hr from behing here | |
| 09:20:19 | tssurya | 1hr behind the time in CEST I mean | |
| 09:20:33 | sean-k-mooney | haha no worries. i shift my day to give me more overlap with the us also im not a morning person :) | |
| 09:21:34 | tssurya | I'll put something up then for the spec's usecase and add you as a reviewer :) | |
| 09:21:37 | tssurya | thanks again | |
| 09:29:27 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: are you online? | |
| 09:33:05 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: I am, but I'll need to get my daughters in 10 mins | |
| 09:33:36 | sean-k-mooney | no worries we can chat when you get back its about vgpus | |
| 09:36:11 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: ok, for what ? | |
| 09:36:59 | sean-k-mooney | i want to know how libvirt/nova detect something is a gpu | |
| 09:37:15 | sean-k-mooney | also i have some good news for you | |
| 09:37:47 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: we don't really detect whether it's a gpu | |
| 09:38:07 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: we just say "heh, look, there are some pci devices that support mdevs" | |
| 09:38:10 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: mnaser: is amazing and is going to provide 1-2 vm instance with gpus for testing in the gate https://review.openstack.org/#/c/607686/ | |
| 09:38:22 | bauzas | cool | |
| 09:38:30 | bauzas | so I could write a functional test | |
| 09:38:42 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: ok that is a bug but also cool because i think i konw how to fake them in the gate also | |
| 09:38:54 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: what's a bug ? | |
| 09:39:03 | bauzas | to say a pci device supporting mdevs is a gpu ? | |
| 09:39:12 | sean-k-mooney | nic and acclerator can expose mdevs | |
| 09:39:13 | bauzas | sure, but we have a spec fixing this | |
| 09:40:03 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: in this spec, you explicitly say which PCI IDs *are* GPUs | |
| 09:40:06 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/602474/ | |
| 09:40:22 | bauzas | I need to go, bbiabn | |
| 09:40:33 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: cool that will work for the terible hack i want to do. ill let you know when you get back | |
| 09:51:10 | gmann | pooja_jadhav: hope that worked. | |
| 10:12:00 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: just able to discuss for 5 mins | |
| 10:12:20 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: but also, without the spec, it also only works for GPU devices | |
| 10:12:45 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: because libvirt provides us all the mdev capable devices, but we look at which supports the provided GPU type | |
| 10:12:51 | bauzas | say 'nvidia-11' | |
| 10:13:27 | bauzas | so, in case you have mdev capable devices that are not GPU devices (say a nic one), they don't support the type | |
| 10:13:33 | bauzas | so we don't use them | |
| 10:14:03 | bauzas | also, say you have an Intel GPU not supporting the 'nvidia-11' type, then we don't have inventory for it too | |
| 10:15:06 | sean-k-mooney | ok so your assumeing good nameing of the mdev types without the spec | |
| 10:15:16 | sean-k-mooney | e.g. not small medium large | |
| 10:15:28 | sean-k-mooney | but ya i think that is fine | |
| 10:15:59 | sean-k-mooney | basically i found out that in kernel 4.16 there is a new driver called netdevsim that simulates a nic | |
| 10:16:15 | sean-k-mooney | it supprots sriov without any hardware and mdevs | |
| 10:16:41 | sean-k-mooney | so i think i can use it to test pci passhtrouhg, sriov, and other things in the gate | |
| 10:17:00 | sean-k-mooney | i also may be able to use the mdev support to pretend to be a vgpu | |
| 10:17:32 | sean-k-mooney | not sure about the last point but i was planning to look into it more for sriov testing | |
| 10:22:34 | openstackgerrit | Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: api-ref: Move the evacuate action to admin action https://review.openstack.org/607896 | |
| 11:46:42 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: consumer gen: support claim_resources https://review.openstack.org/583667 | |
| 11:46:43 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Enable nested allocation candidates in scheduler https://review.openstack.org/585672 | |
| 11:46:44 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Use provider tree in virt FakeDriver https://review.openstack.org/604083 | |
| 11:49:34 | gibi | jaypipes, efried: I replied in https://review.openstack.org/583667 for both of you fixed your comments. The runway slot for this patch ends today so I appreciate any feedback | |
| 11:49:42 | openstackgerrit | Surya Seetharaman proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] Refactor scatter-gather utility to return exception objects https://review.openstack.org/607934 | |
| 11:52:29 | jaypipes | gibi: yup, on it. | |
| 11:52:41 | gibi | jaypipes: thanks a lot | |
| 11:54:17 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: back there | |
| 11:54:25 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: if you wanna continue to discuss... | |
| 11:54:54 | bauzas | gibi: don't worry about the runway slot, now that I'm done with the reshaper change, your series is my top prio | |
| 11:55:10 | gibi | bauzas: cool, thanks | |