Posted	Nick	Remark
#openstack-nova - 2018-09-18
18:02:07	mriedem	dansmith: we should get this into ocata given it's a regression in ocata https://review.openstack.org/#/c/588077/
18:02:39	mriedem	that and the one below it. at this rate, we're going to have to start doing the old "stable core backport proxies as a +2" thing
18:08:45	dansmith	mriedem: okay just got back, give me a few and I'll look
18:23:36	openstackgerrit	Surya Seetharaman proposed openstack/nova master: Return a minimal construct for nova list when a cell is down https://review.openstack.org/567785
18:26:47	openstackgerrit	Surya Seetharaman proposed openstack/nova master: Add scatter-gather-single-cell utility https://review.openstack.org/594947
18:30:34	openstack	Launchpad bug 1793159 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "no signature check for cached images" [Undecided,New]
18:30:34	mhen	mriedem, I replied to your question on https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1793159 - I hope this clarifies our reasoning a bit more
18:37:38	dansmith	mriedem: were you implying I should slam this? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/588077/2
18:38:35	mriedem	dansmith: yes and the one below it
18:39:49	dansmith	are we actually going to release any of this? :)
19:00:25	mriedem	oh for ocata...
19:00:26	mriedem	good question
19:00:54	mriedem	i guess that's something we need to sort out with the STABLE MAINT SIG!!! https://releases.openstack.org/
19:01:06	mriedem	ocata was supposed to go into extended maintenance on aug 27
19:03:59	dansmith	mriedem: I actually meant on any of our branches, re: previous discussion :)
19:04:32	mriedem	i have release patches up for rocky and queens
19:04:35	mriedem	WIPs while things merge
19:04:42	mriedem	and one for pike stacked on top of that
19:04:55	mriedem	https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:nova-stable-releases-sept-2018+(status:open+OR+status:merged)
20:13:37	openstackgerrit	Merged openstack/nova master: libvirt: Use os.stat and os.path.getsize for RAW disk inspection https://review.openstack.org/589567
20:13:43	openstackgerrit	Merged openstack/nova master: Add functional test for live migrate with anti-affinity group https://review.openstack.org/588935
20:13:54	openstackgerrit	Merged openstack/nova master: Explicitly fail if trying to attach SR-IOV port https://review.openstack.org/591898
20:15:22	openstackgerrit	Vlad Gusev proposed openstack/nova stable/rocky: libvirt: Use os.stat and os.path.getsize for RAW disk inspection https://review.openstack.org/603488
20:19:26	openstackgerrit	Vlad Gusev proposed openstack/nova stable/queens: WIP libvirt: Reduce calls to qemu-img during update_available_resource https://review.openstack.org/603358
20:46:35	openstackgerrit	Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Making instance/migration listing skipping down cells configurable https://review.openstack.org/592428
20:46:35	openstackgerrit	Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Merge extended_volumes extension response into server view builder https://review.openstack.org/596285
20:46:36	openstackgerrit	Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Return a minimal construct for nova list when a cell is down https://review.openstack.org/567785
20:46:36	openstackgerrit	Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add get_by_cell_and_project() method to InstanceMappingList https://review.openstack.org/591656
20:46:37	openstackgerrit	Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add scatter-gather-single-cell utility https://review.openstack.org/594947
20:46:53	tssurya	mriedem: was just about to change the nits
20:46:56	tssurya	thanks
20:47:31	mriedem	you're supposed to be sleeping or something
20:48:49	tssurya	mriedem: hehe still living in denver TZ
20:58:09	openstackgerrit	Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Merge extended_volumes extension response into server view builder https://review.openstack.org/596285
20:58:10	openstackgerrit	Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add get_by_cell_and_project() method to InstanceMappingList https://review.openstack.org/591656
20:58:10	openstackgerrit	Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Making instance/migration listing skipping down cells configurable https://review.openstack.org/592428
20:58:11	openstackgerrit	Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add scatter-gather-single-cell utility https://review.openstack.org/594947
20:58:11	openstackgerrit	Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Return a minimal construct for nova list when a cell is down https://review.openstack.org/567785
20:58:39	mriedem	tssurya: can we abandon https://review.openstack.org/#/c/594947/ ? i don't think anything is using it now
20:59:11	tssurya	mriedem: originally it was created for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/591658/
20:59:21	tssurya	so let's keep it (see the comments from dan there)
20:59:27	mriedem	oh, ok
20:59:31	tssurya	I am currently updating the test cases for this one
20:59:37	tssurya	it will come on top
21:15:33	mriedem	dansmith: so if i want to kick the tires on your db migration script in a devstack env, i should be able to just create an empty placement db (but with schema) and then just create some instances and do the migration?
21:16:21	dansmith	mriedem: if you have a devstack, easiest thing is to just create some instances, then create an empty placement db and then point it at the server with root/$pass
21:16:40	dansmith	if not, you
21:16:50	dansmith	will need a nova db with all the right tables, plus something in inventories
21:17:51	mriedem	yeah i was thinking of creating a stable/rocky devstack, creating some instances so there is data (allocations), and then create a placement db and run the script
21:18:05	mriedem	essentially what grenade is going to have to do
21:18:45	dansmith	yup
21:19:06	dansmith	run --mkconfig and then put root and the DATABASE_PASSWORD from your localrc in there
21:19:53	dansmith	I should probably have mkconfig assume placement and nova_api as db names.. dunno why I didn't
21:26:00	dansmith	done
21:29:15	openstackgerrit	Ben Nemec proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Migrade upgrade checks to oslo.upgradecheck https://review.openstack.org/603499
21:34:56	openstackgerrit	Ben Nemec proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Migrade upgrade checks to oslo.upgradecheck https://review.openstack.org/603499
21:35:55	mriedem	bnemec: fancy
21:36:12	mriedem	is that library in the openstack/requirements repo yet?
21:36:27	mriedem	nope https://github.com/openstack/requirements/blob/master/upper-constraints.txt
21:36:29	bnemec	No, the repo just got created.
21:36:41	bnemec	There is a release on pypi from when I reserved the name though.
21:37:15	bnemec	I'm also wondering if we want to rename the UpgradeCheck* classes to just Code and Result for the sake of brevity.
21:37:30	bnemec	When used from the lib they'll be upgradecheck.Code and upgradecheck.Result anyway.
21:37:43	dansmith	gdi, mriedem already got my -1
21:38:05	bnemec	lol
21:39:36	mriedem	i didn't -1 b/c i'm too nice
21:40:08	mriedem	bnemec: that works for me - i named them that way in nova b/c we have the whole subcommand thing
21:40:13	bnemec	dansmith: If you want, you could -1 for the flagrant pep8 violations. ;-)
21:40:18	mriedem	so theoretically we could have nova-status foo bar
21:40:24	mriedem	nova-status upgrade baz
21:40:28	dansmith	nah, now I'm demotivated
21:41:35	bnemec	mriedem: Yeah, makes sense. Since the library is specialized we should be able to use the more generic names.
21:41:44	bnemec	I'll get that proposed and update the Nova patch.
21:56:23	openstackgerrit	Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Resource retrieving: add changes-before filter https://review.openstack.org/599276
22:05:35	mriedem	wah wah https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-forum-stein
22:05:45	mriedem	we have 8 days to submit forum sessions
22:18:58	dansmith	this always confuses me,
22:19:07	dansmith	but you mean non-presentation forum sessions I guess?
22:19:20	dansmith	like projecty design summity topics
22:19:22	dansmith	right?
22:23:02	mriedem	i guess so yeah,
22:23:04	openstackgerrit	Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Resource retrieving: add changes-before filter https://review.openstack.org/599276
22:23:12	mriedem	although they changed to not use the old forum submission tool,
22:23:25	mriedem	and instead use something that looks like the normal call for presentations thing for the big recorded rooms
22:23:40	mriedem	https://www.openstack.org/summit/berlin-2018/call-for-presentations
22:24:01	dansmith	yeah, which .. seems weird, since those are all picked already, AFAIK
22:24:36	mriedem	right, and the one thing i did submit as a presentation has somehow carried over to the forum review i think,
22:24:38	mriedem	which is not what i wanted
22:25:11	dansmith	meaning, didn't get accepted as a presentation so they made it a forum session instead?
22:25:12	mriedem	because i'm pretty sure you all don't want to hear me talking about nfv at the edge in fusionsphere during the forum...
22:25:35	dansmith	I think jaypipes would
22:25:41	dansmith	he <3's edge
22:25:49	mriedem	it would be on jay's top 4 watch list
22:25:51	mriedem	or whatever
22:25:58	dansmith	Pipes' Picks
22:26:50	mriedem	so my thing wasn't accepted as a forum session,
22:26:55	mriedem	but i don't want it to be a candidate i guess
22:30:08	mriedem	asking for clarification
22:38:14	mriedem	dansmith: maybe you want to do a session on oschown
22:38:25	mriedem	s/want/should/

Earlier   Later