| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2018-09-17 | |||
| 09:01:55 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: consumer gen: move_allocations https://review.openstack.org/591810 | |
| 09:01:56 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: consumer gen: support claim_resources https://review.openstack.org/583667 | |
| 09:01:56 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: consumer gen: more tests for delete allocation cases https://review.openstack.org/591811 | |
| 09:02:48 | kashyap | johnthetubaguy: Is there an Etherpad discusion about SEV at the PTG? | |
| 09:03:15 | gibi | bauzas: rebase for the consumer gen support is up ^^ | |
| 09:03:17 | johnthetubaguy | kashyap: nothing much of interest, its in the main etherpad, I think it was clear non of us really know how to expose it yet | |
| 09:03:26 | kashyap | johnthetubaguy: On this I presume? -- https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-ptg-stein | |
| 09:03:33 | gibi | bauzas: I continue with the nested a_c support rebase | |
| 09:03:35 | johnthetubaguy | kashyap: yeah, thats the one | |
| 09:04:09 | kashyap | johnthetubaguy: Damned if I can find the relevant line (`grep`ed for "SEV", "secure") | |
| 09:04:15 | kashyap | Ah, it's line-848 | |
| 09:04:25 | kashyap | "Exposing encrypted virtualization to operators" | |
| 09:04:31 | bauzas | gibi: oh cool | |
| 09:04:39 | johnthetubaguy | kashyap: that sounds correct | |
| 09:04:42 | bauzas | gibi: don't worry with the a_c rebase | |
| 09:04:48 | bauzas | I'd like to upload it | |
| 09:04:57 | kashyap | johnthetubaguy: Is that aimed at "Stein" release? | |
| 09:05:26 | gibi | bauzas: I need the a_c rebase to rebase the bandwidht series top of it :) | |
| 09:05:32 | johnthetubaguy | well, only in the same way everything new is sort of aimed at stein | |
| 09:05:48 | gibi | bauzas: but if you working on that that is fine then I will wait | |
| 09:06:14 | johnthetubaguy | kashyap: is the intel SGX version going in soon, do you know? | |
| 09:06:57 | kashyap | johnthetubaguy: Afraid, I don't know. | |
| 09:07:13 | gibi | bauzas: just to be on the safe side. are you rebasing a_c on top of consumer gen support? | |
| 09:07:15 | kashyap | johnthetubaguy: I think what you're getting at is we need to take both Intel and AMD into consideration, obviously | |
| 09:07:31 | johnthetubaguy | kashyap: no worries, based on a blog I am reading, it sounds like SGX isn't that usable yet https://lwn.net/Articles/686808/ | |
| 09:07:35 | kashyap | johnthetubaguy: (Assuming Intel is going to come up w/ a similar thing 'soon') | |
| 09:08:11 | kashyap | Ah, the venerable LWN | |
| 09:08:27 | johnthetubaguy | kashyap: FWIW, our customer's medical data processing probably needs this at some point, although per host allocation works in the meantime | |
| 09:08:33 | kashyap | johnthetubaguy: Seems to be from 2 years ago; wonder what's the state today. But anyway, I don't see this merging anytime soon in Nova | |
| 09:08:44 | johnthetubaguy | kashyap: yeah, totally | |
| 09:08:50 | bauzas | gibi: I was indeed | |
| 09:08:52 | kashyap | Given the complexity of it, and the "head-wrapping" required | |
| 09:08:59 | johnthetubaguy | +1 | |
| 09:09:28 | bauzas | gibi: now I need to rebase on top of your last update, but that should be fine | |
| 09:09:40 | gibi | bauzas: cool | |
| 09:10:12 | bauzas | gibi: well, sorry I wasn't clear | |
| 09:10:14 | johnthetubaguy | kashyap: feels like it should work a bit like volume encryption, once its working correctly, but want to get my hands on it first, which is hard given my customer is an Intel only shop right now, this might change things I guess! | |
| 09:10:25 | johnthetubaguy | kashyap: will let you know if I hear any more | |
| 09:10:26 | bauzas | I was working on rebasing tetsuro's branch on top of master | |
| 09:11:01 | kashyap | johnthetubaguy: Sure. (And yeah, the use cases are definitely critical.) | |
| 09:11:24 | bauzas | gibi: most of the conflicts were due to the 1.30 microversion for reshapes | |
| 09:12:45 | gibi | bauzas: no problem. If nested a_c support ends up top of top of consumer_gen support then I'm OK. | |
| 09:13:07 | bauzas | gibi: yup, I just rebased the whole series | |
| 09:13:13 | gibi | bauzas: coolio | |
| 09:13:27 | bauzas | gibi: now, rebasing on top of your latest rev should be trivial hopefully | |
| 09:14:31 | bauzas | gibi: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/583667/ is the top patch of your series, right? | |
| 09:14:57 | openstackgerrit | Kashyap Chamarthy proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Use 'virt' as the default machine type for ARMv7 https://review.openstack.org/602592 | |
| 09:15:15 | kashyap | bauzas: ^ If you want to put it out of its misery :-) | |
| 09:18:55 | gibi | bauzas: yes, it is | |
| 09:21:03 | openstackgerrit | Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Enable nested allocation candidates in scheduler https://review.openstack.org/585672 | |
| 09:23:38 | bauzas | gibi: ^ | |
| 09:23:44 | gibi | bauzas: awesome | |
| 09:24:15 | gibi | bauzas: shall I rebase the functional tests for the change or you will do that too? | |
| 09:24:24 | bauzas | gibi: I can try | |
| 09:24:41 | gibi | bauzas: if you haven't started yet, then I can continue with the functionals | |
| 09:24:56 | bauzas | gibi: fair enough | |
| 09:25:05 | bauzas | I'll have to bail out by 11:35 | |
| 09:25:15 | gibi | bauzas: then I will jump on the functionals | |
| 09:25:17 | bauzas | so I won't have time to fix this | |
| 09:25:31 | bauzas | wait a sec, I'll amend tetsuro's change based on your good commebnt | |
| 09:25:35 | bauzas | gibi: ^ | |
| 09:25:38 | gibi | bauzas: sure | |
| 09:30:03 | bauzas | gibi: good news is that I checked the unittests with the rebase and they're good | |
| 09:32:04 | kashyap | Lately, I've begun doing this when running `git-review`, others too? | |
| 09:32:08 | kashyap | $ git review -R --no-custom-script | |
| 09:32:13 | openstackgerrit | Yikun Jiang (Kero) proposed openstack/nova master: Remove the allocation ratios adjusting logic https://review.openstack.org/602805 | |
| 09:33:26 | openstackgerrit | Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Enable nested allocation candidates in scheduler https://review.openstack.org/585672 | |
| 09:33:38 | bauzas | gibi: updated change ^ | |
| 09:33:47 | bauzas | gibi: you can rebase functional tests on top of this | |
| 09:33:56 | gibi | bauzas: thanks, I will do that | |
| 09:47:36 | openstackgerrit | Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Resource retrieving: add changes-before filter https://review.openstack.org/599276 | |
| 10:05:48 | bauzas | naichuans_: sorry, just saw your reply on the ML | |
| 10:06:15 | bauzas | naichuans_: I'm back but I'm off until 1140UTC | |
| 10:06:31 | bauzas | naichuans_: after that, I think you should be off too | |
| 10:06:42 | bauzas | naichuans_: so let's discuss tomorrow if you want | |
| 10:10:28 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Functional test for booting with nested resources https://review.openstack.org/527728 | |
| 10:10:29 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Functional test for moving with nested resources https://review.openstack.org/587350 | |
| 10:12:35 | bauzas | gibi: just saw ^ | |
| 10:12:50 | bauzas | coolio, that will allow me to add a new functional test | |
| 10:13:13 | gibi | bauzas: functional tests passes, but I have to think about what we can consider as enough test coverage | |
| 10:16:05 | bauzas | gibi: we need allocation candidates for creating a new instance | |
| 10:16:08 | bauzas | needed* | |
| 10:16:13 | bauzas | anyway, me is off now | |
| 10:39:40 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Add bandwidth related standard resource classes https://review.openstack.org/570847 | |
| 10:39:40 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Add requested_resources field to RequestSpec https://review.openstack.org/567267 | |
| 10:39:40 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Add request_spec.RequestGroup versioned object https://review.openstack.org/568840 | |
| 10:39:41 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Transfer port.resource_request to the scheduler https://review.openstack.org/567268 | |
| 10:39:43 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Test boot with more ports with bandwidth request https://review.openstack.org/573317 | |
| 10:39:43 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Send resource allocations in the port binding https://review.openstack.org/569459 | |
| 11:08:25 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Deprecate the unversioned notifications https://review.openstack.org/603079 | |
| 11:16:45 | openstackgerrit | Yikun Jiang (Kero) proposed openstack/nova master: Remove the allocation ratios adjusting logic https://review.openstack.org/602805 | |
| 11:29:37 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Refactor NeutronFixture https://review.openstack.org/588338 | |
| 11:31:16 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: Fix docs and add functional test for AggregateMultiTenancyIsolation https://review.openstack.org/601835 | |
| 11:31:42 | openstackgerrit | John Garbutt proposed openstack/nova master: Deprecate ComputeCapabilitiesFilter https://review.openstack.org/603102 | |
| 11:45:26 | openstackgerrit | huanhongda proposed openstack/nova stable/pike: Fix bug case by none token context https://review.openstack.org/603044 | |
| 12:23:03 | Roamer` | hi, possibly stupid question incoming :) If a company has two different physical datacenters, and an OpenStack setup in each of them, how would it be best to make it possible to (cold-)migrate instances (with attached volumes) between them? Is there a way to migrate an instance between two regions of the same cluster? The two options I've found so far is "openstack server image create" (which | |
| 12:23:09 | Roamer` | creates a zero-byte image for a volume-backed instance, though maybe I've configured something wrong) and cinder backup/restore; are there other options? | |
| 12:45:51 | bauzas | gibi: thanks for the updates | |
| 12:46:17 | gibi | bauzas: you are welcome | |
| 12:47:05 | gibi | bauzas: I think the series works as my bandwidth functional tests worked on top. But I wouldn't be surprised if migrate or evacuate would eventually be found broken | |