| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2018-08-29 | |||
| 20:44:56 | mriedem | dansmith: need to recheck https://review.openstack.org/#/c/597566/ ? | |
| 20:44:57 | dansmith | just because I don't want to run it locally | |
| 20:45:08 | dansmith | mriedem: no, it's about to pass soon too | |
| 20:45:12 | mriedem | ok | |
| 20:45:53 | zigo | mriedem: As I told you, if you wish, I can push your patches into the packages... | |
| 20:45:54 | zigo | Package is building with the patch... | |
| 20:46:19 | mriedem | zigo: sure, but that's not something you'll release is it? with the debug log patch? | |
| 20:46:38 | mriedem | i'm just hoping to debug a recreate with ci logs | |
| 20:47:00 | zigo | mriedem: It just lives in my Stretch backport, until I remove the patch. | |
| 20:47:12 | zigo | I don't have the intention to push that to Debian Sid / Experimental, no. | |
| 20:48:18 | zigo | mriedem: once the package is built by my jenkins (you can see the build process there: https://stretch-queens.infomaniak.ch/job/nova/) then we just need to re-trigger the puppet-openstack CI. | |
| 20:50:18 | zigo | mriedem: Otherwise, I can teach you how to re-produce it on a local Stretch VM. It's very easy . | |
| 20:53:44 | mriedem | that's ok, looks like we have a recreate again in the xen ci https://review.openstack.org/#/c/597613/ | |
| 20:56:29 | mriedem | that doesn't have the logging i need though, so rechecking the xenserver ci job | |
| 20:57:57 | zigo | Silly me, wrong jenkins ... | |
| 20:59:23 | melwitt | dansmith: are you intentionally not checking for DISK_GB in the verify inventory step? | |
| 20:59:49 | dansmith | melwitt: um, duh, of course I'm not | |
| 20:59:50 | dansmith | I mean | |
| 20:59:55 | dansmith | who would verify DISK_GB | |
| 21:00:00 | dansmith | that'd be kinda, like, really stupid right? | |
| 21:00:38 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add encrypted volume support to feature matrix docs https://review.openstack.org/570255 | |
| 21:00:45 | melwitt | lol | |
| 21:02:19 | dansmith | melwitt: like six of those patchsets were me getting resource classes wrong | |
| 21:02:24 | dansmith | melwitt: just pushed to use a central list | |
| 21:02:45 | melwitt | heh. central list = good | |
| 21:03:20 | dansmith | since it takes about 90 minutes to test each one, I've been trying to make minimal change | |
| 21:03:40 | dansmith | you better hope this one works and I don't have to spend another couple days throwing things at the wall :) | |
| 21:04:08 | melwitt | it's gotta work | |
| 21:18:03 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Default AZ for instance if cross_az_attach=False and checking from API https://review.openstack.org/469675 | |
| 21:23:10 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Time how long select_destinations() takes in conductor https://review.openstack.org/517108 | |
| 21:24:42 | zigo | mriedem: Package built, waiting for recheck now. | |
| 21:25:03 | zigo | It probably will end when I'll be sleeping ... | |
| 21:31:29 | mriedem | yeah i'm t-15 minutes from parenting duties | |
| 21:40:21 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Combine error handling blocks in _do_build_and_run_instance https://review.openstack.org/545960 | |
| 21:50:50 | Sundar | efried: Please ping me | |
| 22:07:10 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: doc: add info how to troubleshoot vmware specific problems https://review.openstack.org/597446 | |
| 23:09:50 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Document differences and similaries between extra specs and hints https://review.openstack.org/581410 | |
| 23:51:23 | openstackgerrit | Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: Add TODO note for mox removal https://review.openstack.org/576758 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2018-08-30 | |||
| 00:52:29 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: [placement] Make _ensure_aggregate context not independent https://review.openstack.org/597486 | |
| 01:05:06 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: Add explanatory prefix to post_test_perf output https://review.openstack.org/591850 | |
| 01:12:36 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: Add trait query to placement perf check https://review.openstack.org/592624 | |
| 01:12:42 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: Restart scheduler in TestNovaManagePlacementHealAllocations https://review.openstack.org/597571 | |
| 01:12:52 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: reshaper: Look up provider if not in inventories https://review.openstack.org/585033 | |
| 03:28:25 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: Make get_allocations_for_resource_provider raise https://review.openstack.org/584598 | |
| 03:28:35 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: api-ref: fix volume attachment update policy note https://review.openstack.org/596489 | |
| 04:00:51 | moshele | melwitt: hi | |
| 04:02:51 | moshele | melwitt: did I answer you question on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/595592? It an old legacy bug that was revealed because tripleo started to config th rx/tx queues be default | |
| 05:08:53 | openstackgerrit | Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: Fix a failure to format config sample https://review.openstack.org/597986 | |
| 05:20:16 | openstackgerrit | Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova stable/rocky: Fix a broken conf file description in networking doc https://review.openstack.org/597987 | |
| 06:21:13 | openstackgerrit | huanhongda proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP]Forbidden non-admin user to list deleted instances https://review.openstack.org/598012 | |
| 07:56:01 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova stable/rocky: Fix a broken conf file description in networking doc https://review.openstack.org/597987 | |
| 08:18:14 | bauzas | good morning Nova | |
| 08:24:43 | openstackgerrit | huanhongda proposed openstack/nova master: Fix instance delete stuck in deleting task_state https://review.openstack.org/598084 | |
| 08:29:39 | gibi | bauzas: welcome back | |
| 08:29:56 | bauzas | gibi: thanks | |
| 08:42:17 | openstackgerrit | Rong Han proposed openstack/nova master: Reset global variable after unit test is completed. https://review.openstack.org/598088 | |
| 08:55:06 | lyarwood | bauzas: welcome back o/ | |
| 08:55:15 | bauzas | lyarwood: thanks | |
| 08:55:59 | lyarwood | bauzas: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bug/1787606 - would you mind sticking that on your review queue if you have time today or tomorrow? | |
| 08:56:12 | dpawlik | Hello, which rules from policy.json are used by placement api? I have an another role for admin and its raising me an error on compute host that "ailed to retrieve resource provider tree from placement API for UUID 573c492d-7387-4a3a-b21c-20ce531eb483. Got 403: {"errors": [{"status": 403, "request_id": "req-50ecb39c-8bea-4f52-85f2-7b92db9ae9cf", "detail": "Access was denied to this resource.\n\n admin required ", "title" | |
| 08:56:13 | dpawlik | : "Forbidden"}]}. | |
| 08:56:18 | lyarwood | after rm -rf'ing all of your emails obviously | |
| 08:56:19 | bauzas | lyarwood: today could be difficult but I can try | |
| 08:56:25 | lyarwood | bauzas: yeah no rush | |
| 08:56:38 | bauzas | lyarwood: rm -rf is one option, the other involves reading | |
| 08:56:43 | gibi | sean-k-mooney, melwitt: fyi, we are planning to show some demo on the PTG about the state of the bandwidth work http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-August/134015.html | |
| 08:56:46 | lyarwood | bauzas: both are WIP I just wanted to get some input on the bug and potential fix | |
| 08:56:48 | dpawlik | problem is that I changed in policy.json file that admin_api is role:my_role | |
| 08:56:51 | bauzas | lyarwood: I'm not sure which one is the best | |
| 08:56:54 | dpawlik | but its not working on queens | |
| 08:57:02 | lyarwood | bauzas: ^_^ rm -rf every time | |
| 08:57:16 | lyarwood | bauzas: if it's that important people will send another email | |
| 08:57:24 | bauzas | and wait for others yelling at you that you haven't replied them ? That could work | |
| 09:01:10 | kashyap | Yeah, "selective reading" is the way to taming e-mail. | |
| 09:01:53 | kashyap | The more meandering a message, the faster it gets marked as read. | |
| 09:15:58 | openstackgerrit | huanhongda proposed openstack/nova master: Fix instance delete stuck in deleting task_state https://review.openstack.org/598084 | |
| 09:51:50 | stephenfin | bauzas: Welcome back. Here's a nice, easy (low priority) review to get you started https://review.openstack.org/#/c/530924/ | |
| 09:52:47 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: oh cool i look forward to seeing it | |
| 10:04:01 | Dinesh_Bhor | sean-k-mooney: Hi, May I have your 5 min? | |
| 10:04:22 | sean-k-mooney | Dinesh_Bhor: hi am sure what can i help with? | |
| 10:06:29 | Dinesh_Bhor | sean-k-mooney: we have a quota for instances currently. Actually we have some hypervisors which are specifically dedicated for "Rich VM" so we want to have separate quota for normal VM's and Rich VM's per project. | |
| 10:07:04 | Dinesh_Bhor | sean-k-mooney: do you think its a good idea to submit a blueprint for this? Or can it be managed somehow with metadata's? | |
| 10:07:37 | Dinesh_Bhor | Or something else may be | |
| 10:08:01 | sean-k-mooney | Dinesh_Bhor: this is similar to premptiable instances. in that case we also had the idea of two classes of instance that may have different sla's | |
| 10:09:10 | sean-k-mooney | Dinesh_Bhor: so if you were to submit a blueprint for this it may be worth trying to adress that usecase also so its a more general solution. | |
| 10:09:20 | sean-k-mooney | Dinesh_Bhor: that said the rich vms | |
| 10:09:42 | sean-k-mooney | is there richness determined by the host they land on or is it an aspect of the flavor | |
| 10:10:07 | sean-k-mooney | e.g. certin flavor you would like to have a seperate quota for. | |
| 10:11:27 | sean-k-mooney | Dinesh_Bhor: submitting a blueprint that clearly states what your usecase is and the constraits is never a bad idea but that highlevel usecase is what we would like it to capture rather then i think it should be done X way | |
| 10:12:36 | Dinesh_Bhor | sean-k-mooney: we have dedicated rich flavors which land on predefined hypervisors. Its like giving bare metal kind of experience with Rich-VMs | |
| 10:14:23 | Dinesh_Bhor | sean-k-mooney: hosts are high in memory, cpus to give bare metal kind of performance. So we want Rich-Flavors to be deployed on those hosts and want to manage quota for them. | |
| 10:14:41 | Dinesh_Bhor | sean-k-mooney: similar to normal vms per project | |
| 10:14:42 | sean-k-mooney | Dinesh_Bhor: right in that case rather then an instance quota the abblity to set a flavor qouta for a speific flavor would be enough to suit your partcalar usecase correct? | |
| 10:15:17 | sean-k-mooney | you could then use flavor to host affinity to ensure those flavor got shceduled to the correct hosts | |
| 10:15:33 | Dinesh_Bhor | A project can have normal as well as rich vms | |
| 10:16:03 | Dinesh_Bhor | sean-k-mooney: yes, we are managing that with AggregateInstanceExtraSpecFilter | |
| 10:16:26 | Dinesh_Bhor | sean-k-mooney: we are on Mitaka so can not use placement. | |
| 10:16:45 | sean-k-mooney | Dinesh_Bhor: yes when i said flavor quota i ment can have 10 instances of flavor X and any number of flavors without a qota provided they dont exceed other qoutas such as cpus | |
| 10:18:38 | sean-k-mooney | Dinesh_Bhor: the only non invasive way i can consive of to achive this i mitaka would be to write a schduler filter that would check you usage of the rich vms and fail all hosts if you exceed a qouta | |
| 10:21:38 | Dinesh_Bhor | sean-k-mooney: yes, but for that I thought of storing "no of rich-vms allowed" metadata in host-aggregate for per project but that will again degrade the performance of scheduler I think If we have 1000+ projects. | |