Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2018-08-24
17:36:32 melwitt I can't remember if that was one of those wonky directories that get created during test runs, to put temp files in for tests
17:37:08 melwitt like, what is that instances/ directory, I can't remember
17:37:59 melwitt oh wait, it's that the actual code is trying to write that file in a real life scenario and in the test env there is no nova/instances dir. but I don't know how that used to be working if it was working before
17:38:29 melwitt in func test land
17:46:38 melwitt CONF.instances_path
18:05:36 jrock_cfdg could someone please help out? Trying to add a serial port with source mode='connect' to do low-level kernel debugging in windows instance; everytime i add device to instance it shuts down - is this even possible with nova? i can do this in libvirt w/out issue
18:08:20 Sundar_ fried_rice, efried: Do you have a moment?
18:08:41 fried_rice Sundar_: sure.
18:08:51 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Make CELL_TIMEOUT a constant https://review.openstack.org/594570
18:08:55 fried_rice Sundar_: I *am* trying to get to reviewing your spec really soon
18:09:09 fried_rice Sundar_: I've just been inundated with other things.
18:09:21 Sundar_ In the scheduling spec, we defined a way to extend the granular resource request syntax to support Cyborg: https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/cyborg/tree/doc/specs/rocky/cyborg-nova-sched.rst?h=refs/changes/17/554717/18#n315
18:09:43 Sundar_ Just want to make sure you have reviewed it.
18:10:30 Sundar_ fied_rice: NP :) I understand. We all have to roll on different tracks at the same time.
18:11:18 Sundar_ And I may have added yet another track for you to roll on.
18:12:36 fried_rice Sundar_: I remember seeing this and being okay with it, but I would have to do a major context switch to be able to discuss it intelligently at this point.
18:14:16 fried_rice I noticed you said the extended keys aren't interpreted by nova. Presumably that means they're interpreted by cyborg. How does that information get to cyborg? And does it translate to some new/different placement syntax? I assume not, that it just tells cyborg how to do certain things.
18:17:32 Sundar_ fried_rice: Good to know that it is accepted. Yes, they will be interpreted by Cyborg (not sure if os-acc will also interpret it). The extra specs in the request are passed from Nova virt to os-acc to Cyborg.
18:17:44 Sundar_ No new placement APIs needed.
18:19:18 melwitt I have to run to an appointment, will be back later
18:34:16 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Merge security groups extension response into server view builder https://review.openstack.org/585475
18:35:49 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Merge extended_status extension response into server view builder https://review.openstack.org/592092
18:41:41 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: tests: Create functional libvirt test base class https://review.openstack.org/407055
18:50:31 mriedem dansmith: i haven't seen that functional test failure
19:00:55 mriedem dansmith: umm, could https://review.openstack.org/#/c/407055/ that just merged be a regression?
19:02:44 mriedem or the change below it
19:02:55 mriedem http://logstash.openstack.org/#dashboard/file/logstash.json?query=message%3A%5C%22FileNotFoundError%3A%20%5BErrno%202%5D%20No%20such%20file%20or%20directory%3A%20'%2Fhome%2Fzuul%2Fsrc%2Fgit.openstack.org%2Fopenstack%2Fnova%2Finstances%2F.directio.test'%5C%22%20AND%20tags%3A%5C%22console%5C%22&from=7d
19:03:28 mriedem just started
19:03:32 mriedem so those are probably it
19:05:16 mriedem https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1788922
19:05:17 openstack Launchpad bug 1788922 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "SRIOVServersTest.test_create_server_with_VF intermittently fails due to "FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/home/zuul/src/git.openstack.org/openstack/nova/instances/.directio.test'"" [Undecided,New]
19:07:15 mriedem -1ed https://review.openstack.org/#/c/564978/ which it looks like you and melwitt were talking about - the change has no context
19:07:20 mriedem "this fixes something"
19:14:40 mriedem oh you know, this func test might only be failing on one node provider
19:14:52 mriedem but that means we aren't mocking something out properly and accidentally passing on other hosts
19:14:55 mriedem maybe
19:23:52 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: [placement] split gigantor SQL query, add logging https://review.openstack.org/590041
19:49:35 mriedem melwitt: question in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/540258/
20:09:30 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Stash the cell uuid on the context when targeting https://review.openstack.org/594571
20:11:44 mriedem melwitt: have you thought about an agenda/schedule for the ptg? just thought of it since gorka was asking in the thread on cross-cell migration
20:23:53 mriedem dansmith: i must not be understanding this comment https://review.openstack.org/#/c/592698/12/nova/tests/unit/compute/test_multi_cell_list.py@118
20:24:34 dansmith mriedem: copied from L89 above, and yes
20:25:35 dansmith it means that since key0 is the same on both it should actually sort the two instances by key1
20:25:49 dansmith but since I copied it for this test and only have one instance it obviously doesn't need to be htere
20:26:01 mriedem yeah...
20:26:02 mriedem i was like,
20:26:07 mriedem but it's only 1 record...
20:26:37 mriedem cleanup patch on top of the series?
20:27:15 dansmith whatever you want
20:28:17 dansmith if we're blocked on that functional test, I might as well just fix it
20:29:56 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Batch results per cell when doing cross-cell listing https://review.openstack.org/592698
20:29:57 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: List instances from all cells explicitly https://review.openstack.org/593717
20:29:58 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Make instance_list perform per-cell batching https://review.openstack.org/593131
20:29:59 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Record cell success/failure/timeout in CrossCellLister https://review.openstack.org/594265
20:30:00 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Optimize global marker re-lookup in multi_cell_list https://review.openstack.org/594577
20:36:11 mriedem shouldn't be blocked http://status.openstack.org/elastic-recheck/#1788922
20:36:17 mriedem but logstash might be behind
20:36:39 dansmith I had both functional jobs fail in one thing so it seemed like it was high frequency but okay
20:40:48 mriedem yeah it might be higher fail rate than logstash/e-r is seeing right now
20:40:52 mriedem or my query is missing something
20:41:38 mriedem hmm, looking at this i think my query is only going to hit py27 jobs
20:42:57 mriedem no i guess its hitting the opposite, only py35
20:57:18 mriedem +2s up the board
21:13:49 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Report client: Real get_allocs_for_consumer https://review.openstack.org/584599
21:13:50 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Report client: get_allocations_for_provider_tree https://review.openstack.org/584648
21:13:51 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Report client: _reshape helper, placement min bump https://review.openstack.org/585034
21:13:52 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Report client: update_from_provider_tree w/reshape https://review.openstack.org/585049
21:13:53 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Compute: Handle reshaped provider trees https://review.openstack.org/576236
21:29:16 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: api-ref: fix volume attachment update policy note https://review.openstack.org/596489
21:47:32 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: api-ref: add a warning about calling swap volume directly https://review.openstack.org/596492
21:49:34 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Document no content on POST /reshaper 204 https://review.openstack.org/596494
21:53:15 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Compute: Handle reshaped provider trees https://review.openstack.org/576236
21:53:52 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add functional test for live migrate with anti-affinity group https://review.openstack.org/588935
22:07:44 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Fix race condition in reshaper handler https://review.openstack.org/596497
22:15:23 melwitt mriedem: thanks. I was going to make a similar comment on the devstack change but now I don't have to
22:16:07 mriedem troll proxy
22:16:21 melwitt haha
22:17:09 melwitt mriedem: yeah, thinking monday I'll try and schedule some times slots for nova/cinder, nova/ironic, nova/neutron (assuming we need that to)
22:17:11 melwitt *too
22:18:11 melwitt originally had in mind to figure it out this week, but this week was too busy with RC3 and other things
22:18:40 mriedem i didn't think we had any nova/ironic stuff except finalizing on resource classes and dropping the old flavor stuff, but that seems to have hit a fan so will probably be a bigger discussion i guess
22:18:44 mriedem i thought we could just drop a lot of code
22:19:31 mriedem jroll: btw do you have that tripleo bug handy? i want to throw it in the ptg etherpad
22:19:48 melwitt I was thinking we'd do thursday as cross project meet day again but I need to find out if mlavalle and jungleboyj are ok with thursday. TheJulia said thursday afternoon is ok for ironic. she told me they have a thing where they want to discuss the possibility of being able to configure subsets of ironic nodes per nova-compute
22:20:07 melwitt failure domain type stuff
22:20:29 mlavalle melwitt: yes, Thursday works for us, as usual
22:20:39 melwitt cool, thanks
22:21:06 melwitt we'll tune what time of day. I haven't scheduled the nova team photo yet
22:21:13 mriedem subsets of ironic nodes per compute...
22:21:28 mriedem so like a mini az?
22:21:41 openstack Launchpad bug 1787910 in tripleo "OVB overcloud deploy fails on nova placement errors" [Critical,Triaged] - Assigned to Marios Andreou (marios-b)
22:21:41 jroll mriedem: https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1787910/
22:22:06 jroll mriedem: I don't think it's a problem for master, as people should be dropping those filters anyway
22:23:17 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Repropose reshaper spec for Stein https://review.openstack.org/592650
22:23:24 jungleboyj melwitt: hey. Thanks for bringing this up. Then to follow up with you today in the day got away from me.
22:23:25 mriedem jroll: ok, added the bug anyway - would be nice to know what the summary of that issue was
22:23:49 jungleboyj melwitt: Thursday is fine for us. In the past we've done it in the morning but can be flexible.
22:23:51 jroll mriedem: agree, I think the override is fine but the filter is doing something funky
22:23:52 mriedem jroll: was tripleo still using the Exact* filters?
22:24:02 jroll mriedem: I think just regular RamFilter

Earlier   Later