| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2018-08-14 | |||
| 09:21:53 | mdbooth | mriedem: It's so simple they even drew a picture about it. | |
| 09:22:52 | sean-k-mooney | mdbooth: gryf so yes looking at https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/0502b0ffaf20ef3735e633715ba0f9dda976cb7a/nova/virt/libvirt/driver.py#L6774 | |
| 09:23:17 | sean-k-mooney | i do not see the disk allocation ratio being used in that check | |
| 09:24:36 | sean-k-mooney | so would that not imply we have to take account of it when we first calulate disk_avaiable_mb | |
| 09:25:03 | mdbooth | sean-k-mooney: So this code isn't related to DiskFilter | |
| 09:25:07 | gryf | sean-k-mooney, possibly, but that's another thing, isn't it? | |
| 09:25:19 | sean-k-mooney | mdbooth: yes i know | |
| 09:26:02 | sean-k-mooney | gryf: well the bug is fixing how we calulate the available diskspace. if it does so by not allowing over allocation of disk when its turned on that jsut creates another bug | |
| 09:26:33 | gryf | hm. | |
| 09:26:36 | mdbooth | I would hope that disk_available_mb would be calculated as the amount of available disk, in mb. | |
| 09:27:02 | mdbooth | If anybody makes it anything else, I want to know where they live. | |
| 09:27:19 | mdbooth | If we need to take disk allocation ratio into account, we should do that at the point of use. | |
| 09:27:26 | mdbooth | Or call it something else. | |
| 09:27:32 | sean-k-mooney | it should be eitehr available disk = ((total diskspcae - reserved disk space) * disk allocation ratio) - used disk space or available disk = ((total diskspcae - reserved disk space)) - used disk space | |
| 09:28:01 | sean-k-mooney | if its the later then we never take account of disk overcomit when live migrating | |
| 09:28:38 | mdbooth | I'd argue that overcommit has always been a job for the scheduler, anyway. | |
| 09:28:41 | gryf | sean-k-mooney, i'd move out reserved disk space out of equation | |
| 09:28:45 | openstackgerrit | Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova stable/pike: [placement] Retry allocation writes server side https://review.openstack.org/590745 | |
| 09:29:07 | mdbooth | I think live migration should fail only if there aren't physically enough bits on the destination to hold the source bits. | |
| 09:29:08 | gryf | we don;t want to change that by allocation ratio if it's something else from 1 | |
| 09:29:40 | sean-k-mooney | gryf: why not | |
| 09:30:07 | sean-k-mooney | the allocation ratio should only be applied to the portion of the disk that is not reserved | |
| 09:32:15 | gryf | so, isn't it be (total disk space - used disk space - reserved disk space) * allocation ratio? | |
| 09:33:09 | gryf | or even (total disk space - used disk space) * allocation ratio - reserved disk space | |
| 09:33:09 | cdent | "If we need to take disk allocation ratio into account, we should do that at the point of use." yes | |
| 09:33:58 | sean-k-mooney | actully gryf no we dont want to multiple the used disk space by the allocation ratio | |
| 09:34:04 | sean-k-mooney | but its not needed in either case | |
| 09:34:08 | sean-k-mooney | i just realised https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/0502b0ffaf20ef3735e633715ba0f9dda976cb7a/nova/virt/libvirt/driver.py#L6768 | |
| 09:34:11 | mdbooth | There are 2 ways to get a live migration destination: | |
| 09:34:22 | mdbooth | 1. From the scheduler, which will take this stuff into account | |
| 09:34:27 | sean-k-mooney | is using the actul size of the disk not the virtual size | |
| 09:34:54 | mdbooth | 2. From the admin, who doesn't care about your pesky artificial resource constraints. | |
| 09:35:26 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Consumer gen support for delete instance allocations https://review.openstack.org/591597 | |
| 09:35:53 | sean-k-mooney | in the overcomit case that is so the driver only compares bytes need to copy the disk to actul bytes free on the dest and the schduler/placement operates on teh virtual disk size with allocation ratios taken into account | |
| 09:36:24 | mdbooth | sean-k-mooney: That's the only thing it should ever compare. Anything else is legacy. | |
| 09:37:01 | sean-k-mooney | mdbooth: yes just trying to get the full end to end effect of this change right in my head to make sure there was no edge case missed | |
| 09:37:45 | mdbooth | Right. If an admin wants to move a workload to compute X, the only reason we should say no is if it physically won't fit. Any future problems caused by that are the admin's to deal with. | |
| 09:39:33 | mdbooth | But hopefully the admin only does that if they really, really need to, and usually they ask the scheduler. | |
| 09:39:33 | gryf | mdbooth, by "phisically fit" do you mean current src image size, or the maximum one? | |
| 09:39:46 | mdbooth | gryf: I mean current, allocated disk. | |
| 09:39:50 | gryf | ack | |
| 09:39:57 | sean-k-mooney | mdbooth: gryf cool im much happier this this change then. its sutle but makes sense in context | |
| 09:44:49 | openstackgerrit | Surya Seetharaman proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: [WIP/POC] Client changes for down cell https://review.openstack.org/579563 | |
| 09:54:43 | gryf | sean-k-mooney, do you want me to rebase and correct typo on commit message? | |
| 09:54:49 | gryf | typos* | |
| 09:54:59 | sean-k-mooney | gryf: they are just nits so no its fine | |
| 09:55:12 | gryf | cool. thanks | |
| 09:55:46 | sean-k-mooney | gryf: if you have to respin the patch for some other reason then sure but no need to respin just for that. that said my spelling is terrible so other may have a different view | |
| 09:56:52 | gryf | sean-k-mooney, I'd just like to have it merged :) | |
| 09:57:15 | sean-k-mooney | gryf: by the way im not sure if johnthetubaguy is around at the moment to review this or not | |
| 09:57:53 | gryf | I guess he is not | |
| 09:58:00 | sean-k-mooney | gryf: his time upstream has been limited this cycle i belive given his current positon | |
| 09:59:09 | gryf | Right. | |
| 10:02:18 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Force refresh instance info_cache during heal https://review.openstack.org/591607 | |
| 10:02:53 | sean-k-mooney | mriedem: i dont know if your still about but your pretty familar with the livemigration code perhaps you could take a look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/536351/3 in johnthetubaguy absence. that said not sure this is high enough prority to make it into RC2 so maybe it will have to wait till stein in anycase | |
| 10:03:19 | mriedem | Kevin_Zheng: see https://review.openstack.org/591607 | |
| 10:03:25 | mriedem | sean-k-mooney: just going to dinner | |
| 10:03:37 | mriedem | sean-k-mooney: oh that one, idk | |
| 10:04:23 | sean-k-mooney | mriedem: no worries i was just trying to think who was about to take a look at it. | |
| 10:05:55 | openstackgerrit | Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: placement: order multi-row INSERT by PK https://review.openstack.org/591609 | |
| 10:15:24 | openstackgerrit | Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: placement: order multi-row INSERT by PK https://review.openstack.org/591609 | |
| 10:58:56 | openstackgerrit | Chen proposed openstack/nova master: Typo fixes on notifications doc https://review.openstack.org/591621 | |
| 12:14:33 | sean-k-mooney | mriedem: so far i have found 3 neutron bugs and 1 nova bug in my livemigration testing :( im taking notes and will open them later. ovs-ovs and lb-lb migration seam to be fine however | |
| 12:15:00 | tssurya | gmann: around ? | |
| 12:16:24 | kosamara | efried: Hi! You say that pci subsys_vendor_id etc should appear in libvirt. I checked what libvirt.Host.device_lookup_by_name returns (calls libvirt) and it doesn't report those properties. | |
| 12:19:29 | sean-k-mooney | kosamara: if you do virsh nodedev-list and then virsh nodedev-dumpxml pci_0000_00_00_0 you will see the xml fragment that nova parses form libvirt | |
| 12:21:10 | sean-k-mooney | kosamara: if you do a nodedev-dumpxml on a network device it will also return the feature supported by that nic http://paste.openstack.org/show/728005/ | |
| 12:21:51 | sean-k-mooney | kosamara: we currently store does as netwrok_capablites in the pci_devcice table and they will need to be translated to traits in the future | |
| 12:28:11 | sean-k-mooney | kosamara: this is where we currently parse all the pcidevice info in the libvirt driver https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/virt/libvirt/driver.py#L5855-L5935 | |
| 12:29:09 | sean-k-mooney | kosamara: we invoke that in _get_pcidev_info which is called in get_available_resource | |
| 12:33:35 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Consumer gen support for put allocations https://review.openstack.org/591647 | |
| 12:35:14 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Consumer gen support for put allocations https://review.openstack.org/591647 | |
| 12:49:55 | kosamara | sean-k-mooney: Still, it doesn't show the subsystem vendor/prod, rev id or class. | |
| 12:50:42 | kosamara | sean-k-mooney but maybe this is just missing from libvirt and should be there, because it makes sense. | |
| 12:52:50 | sean-k-mooney | kosamara: the vendor id is in the parent pci device | |
| 12:53:43 | sean-k-mooney | kosamara: http://paste.openstack.org/show/728011/ | |
| 12:55:48 | kosamara | sean-k-mooney: subsystem vendor (SVendor in lspci) is a separate property. Eg an Evga-made GPU might have a different SVendor than a Gigabyte one. | |
| 12:56:20 | kosamara | but the same "vendor_id" (nvidia) | |
| 12:56:50 | sean-k-mooney | hum perhaps. we dont track that difference in nova | |
| 12:57:35 | sean-k-mooney | from a driver/guest perspective we would not be able to tell the differecne really provided its the same model number. | |
| 12:58:13 | sean-k-mooney | yes i know evga may have the same part running at a different clockrate then gagabyte or asusu but we are not that detailed in our tracking | |
| 13:00:15 | openstackgerrit | Surya Seetharaman proposed openstack/nova master: Return a minimal construct for nova list when a cell is down https://review.openstack.org/567785 | |
| 13:00:17 | openstackgerrit | Surya Seetharaman proposed openstack/nova master: Add get_by_cell_and_project() method to InstanceMappingList https://review.openstack.org/591656 | |
| 13:00:17 | openstackgerrit | Surya Seetharaman proposed openstack/nova master: Return a minimal construct for nova service-list when a cell is down https://review.openstack.org/584829 | |
| 13:00:18 | openstackgerrit | Surya Seetharaman proposed openstack/nova master: API microversion bump for handling-down-cell https://review.openstack.org/591657 | |
| 13:00:20 | openstackgerrit | Surya Seetharaman proposed openstack/nova master: Return a minimal construct for nova show when a cell is down https://review.openstack.org/591658 | |
| 13:02:43 | kosamara | sean-k-mooney efried: so in the end, does it make sense to leave that open in the inventory yaml spec? maybe for a future use? | |
| 13:08:02 | sean-k-mooney | kosamara: i dont think so. i think that might be leaking too much host specific info to the enduser. we could leave a comment but i dont think we should whoudl consider 2 GTX1080s form differend ODMs to be different | |
| 13:11:10 | sean-k-mooney | kosamara: your other option is to modify libvirt. the reaosn we get the nic feature flags from libvirt instead of ethtool is because we were not allow to bypass libvirt to look this up form ethool or sysfs in the past so going to sysfs to get the subvendor will likely not be allow nor is lspci likely to be accepted but you could document those approches. | |
| 13:12:08 | gmann | tssurya: hi | |
| 13:12:26 | sean-k-mooney | anyway im really goint to lunch now. | |
| 13:14:10 | kosamara | sean-k-mooney: I agree, just mentioning the possibilities | |
| 13:29:13 | tssurya | gmann: nothing urgent, was just wondering if https://review.openstack.org/#/c/502859/ - this series could be rebased | |
| 13:30:25 | tssurya | also thanks for https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/api-extensions-merge-rocky+(status:open) in general, for the handling-down-cell, I guess the two more dependencies are that of extended status and extended volumes part | |
| 13:30:41 | gmann | tssurya: ack, ll do. i am waiting to do policy removal first. anyways will check it tomorrow. | |
| 13:30:55 | tssurya | gmann: np, thanks! | |
| 13:51:34 | openstackgerrit | Surya Seetharaman proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Client changes for handling-down-cell with microversion bump https://review.openstack.org/579563 | |
| 13:58:12 | efried | kosamara: I think I would like to converge on an approach where the schema allows the union of what's recognized by all the drivers, for identification. And then each driver documents which fields it pays attention to. | |
| 13:58:46 | efried | kosamara: I haven't caught up yet, in case you've responded to the comments I left last night, but how do you feel about making the spec address both libvirt and powervm? | |
| 13:59:57 | sean-k-mooney | still eating lunch but +1 on a single schema that could be used for any virt dirver | |