| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2018-08-09 | |||
| 20:47:12 | dansmith | oh sweet baby jesus thank you for this day | |
| 20:47:17 | mriedem | and enable this waiter in nova on master, | |
| 20:47:40 | mriedem | and we'd have to probably turn the vif plugging timeout way down to actually see if we hit a timeout | |
| 20:47:53 | mriedem | otherwise i'd expect in the gate, live migration with a tiny cirros guest not doing anything transfers pretty fast | |
| 20:48:03 | dansmith | yeah | |
| 20:48:17 | mriedem | heh, and i was just going to start mowing and packing | |
| 20:48:37 | dansmith | melwitt: so, honestly, reverting sahid's thing for rocky needs to be high prio I think | |
| 20:48:47 | dansmith | melwitt: live migration with LB is completely broken I expect | |
| 20:48:55 | mriedem | i'll update that ci patch | |
| 20:49:02 | melwitt | ok, so is this a RC1 thing or a RC2 thing? | |
| 20:49:06 | dansmith | melwitt: and it probably needs to be reverted out of the older releases too | |
| 20:49:13 | dansmith | melwitt: your call but RCsomething, IMHO | |
| 20:49:36 | prometheanfire | back | |
| 20:49:41 | prometheanfire | but leaving soonish | |
| 20:49:42 | dansmith | I would think we could do something like what mriedem did in rocky for those releases | |
| 20:50:05 | melwitt | ok, definitely RC2. trying to do it by the end of today will be hard unless it gets approved, stat | |
| 20:50:20 | melwitt | *definitely RC2, at least | |
| 20:50:54 | dansmith | well, maybe not since he needed a signal from the remote machine that it was going to do the wait ... | |
| 20:51:02 | prometheanfire | mriedem: I'll try to get a bug reported if you think that's the next step | |
| 20:51:04 | dansmith | although the event should still trigger | |
| 20:51:07 | mriedem | prometheanfire: yes please | |
| 20:51:09 | dansmith | prometheanfire: yes | |
| 20:51:10 | mriedem | we'll track that for rc2 | |
| 20:51:27 | prometheanfire | rc2? | |
| 20:51:29 | mriedem | was going to try and see how long a guest transfer takes in the gate | |
| 20:51:37 | mriedem | prometheanfire: today is release candidate 1 day | |
| 20:51:43 | prometheanfire | I thought this didn't hit rocky | |
| 20:51:50 | prometheanfire | but I'll leave that to you | |
| 20:51:53 | mriedem | prometheanfire: new wrinkle | |
| 20:51:57 | prometheanfire | oh, nice | |
| 20:52:00 | dansmith | worse wrinkle | |
| 20:52:02 | mriedem | (1) probably race fail on pike | |
| 20:52:05 | prometheanfire | happy to help :P | |
| 20:52:06 | mriedem | (2) totes broken on master | |
| 20:52:13 | prometheanfire | even better | |
| 20:53:40 | dansmith | prometheanfire: hook me up with a bug number and I'll propose the revert | |
| 20:53:41 | dansmith | and I can comment on the bug with all the deets | |
| 20:53:50 | dansmith | since mriedem will be busy with the ci patch and packing for da nang | |
| 20:53:59 | mriedem | isn't da nang vietnam? | |
| 20:54:02 | dansmith | yes | |
| 20:54:18 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: placement: ignore policy scope check failures if not enforcing scope https://review.openstack.org/590445 | |
| 20:54:33 | prometheanfire | I'm hoping to get the user to report, but I will if he went home | |
| 20:55:16 | dansmith | the revert is complete conflict | |
| 20:55:19 | dansmith | wonderful. | |
| 20:56:33 | dansmith | the other benefit of doing this in the manager is that we don't need the silly artificial speed limit | |
| 20:56:48 | dansmith | although we probably need sahid and libvirt people to confirm that there's not something we're missing here | |
| 20:57:32 | dansmith | because I asked him specifically about doing this early on in his patch and he said it wasn't possible, but I believed that qemu/libvirt on the dest machine were responsible for the plugging at the time | |
| 20:57:34 | dansmith | and maybe he did too | |
| 21:00:46 | mriedem | meanwhile, our granite seller is being an ass and i have to get back to our plumber | |
| 21:01:37 | dansmith | #firstworldrichpersonproblems | |
| 21:06:47 | mriedem | ok so looking at a job, we register waiting for events starting here http://logs.openstack.org/98/587498/1/check/nova-live-migration/5ff805a/logs/screen-n-cpu.txt.gz#_Jul_31_17_18_19_562999 | |
| 21:06:52 | mriedem | ent /opt/stack/new/nova/nova/compute/manager.py:328}} | |
| 21:06:52 | mriedem | Jul 31 17:18:19.562999 ubuntu-xenial-inap-mtl01-0001077052 nova-compute[2320]: DEBUG nova.compute.manager [None req-942f438c-3cbb-4ce7-8afb-ecd250c98f75 tempest-LiveAutoBlockMigrationV225Test-1515676049 tempest-LiveAutoBlockMigrationV225Test-1515676049] [instance: 7f68c430-f565-433a-8f87-27b9a00d29a0] Preparing to wait for external event network-vif-plugged-6b030652-5fe6-471a-b7ec-0b70e95159a4 {{(pid=2320) prepare_for_instanc | |
| 21:07:51 | mriedem | Jul 31 17:18:26.178239 ubuntu-xenial-inap-mtl01-0001077052 nova-compute[2320]: INFO nova.compute.manager [None req-994d9893-545f-47b9-b93e-1e21cb439db7 tempest-LiveMigrationTest-233418614 tempest-LiveMigrationTest-233418614] [instance: 7f68c430-f565-433a-8f87-27b9a00d29a0] Took 6.61 seconds for pre_live_migration on destination host ubuntu-xenial-inap-mtl01-0001077053. | |
| 21:07:51 | mriedem | pre_live_migration takes about 7 seconds | |
| 21:09:09 | mriedem | Jul 31 17:18:26.237174 ubuntu-xenial-inap-mtl01-0001077052 nova-compute[2320]: DEBUG nova.virt.libvirt.driver [None req-994d9893-545f-47b9-b93e-1e21cb439db7 tempest-LiveMigrationTest-233418614 tempest-LiveMigrationTest-233418614] [instance: 7f68c430-f565-433a-8f87-27b9a00d29a0] Starting monitoring of live migration {{(pid=2320) _live_migration /opt/stack/new/nova/nova/virt/libvirt/driver.py:7555}} | |
| 21:09:15 | mriedem | start monitoring the live migration there ^ | |
| 21:09:59 | mriedem | Jul 31 17:18:27.486275 ubuntu-xenial-inap-mtl01-0001077052 nova-compute[2320]: INFO nova.compute.manager [None req-14ccce2e-8610-47b7-aba2-77f6fc468b61 tempest-LiveMigrationRemoteConsolesV26Test-255629851 tempest-LiveMigrationRemoteConsolesV26Test-255629851] [instance: 7f68c430-f565-433a-8f87-27b9a00d29a0] VM Migration completed (Lifecycle Event) | |
| 21:09:59 | mriedem | live migration complete: | |
| 21:10:12 | mriedem | heh 1 second? | |
| 21:10:52 | dansmith | makes sense.. I doubt a cirros guest has more than a hundred meg of dirty ram | |
| 21:11:02 | dansmith | which is 1 second at gigE | |
| 21:11:13 | mriedem | i never see "VIF events received, continuing migration" | |
| 21:11:32 | dansmith | it's not LB | |
| 21:11:35 | dansmith | right? | |
| 21:11:39 | mriedem | oh right duh | |
| 21:11:41 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1786346 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "live migrations slow" [Undecided,New] | |
| 21:11:41 | prometheanfire | you'll probably want to retitle the bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1786346 | |
| 21:11:44 | prometheanfire | mriedem: dansmith ^ | |
| 21:11:49 | dansmith | prometheanfire: thanks | |
| 21:11:59 | prometheanfire | if you can let me know when you update the bug with details I'd appreciate it | |
| 21:12:20 | dansmith | I'm trying to get the revert to even pass tests and then I will | |
| 21:14:03 | prometheanfire | thanks | |
| 21:18:25 | mriedem | dansmith: ok so https://review.openstack.org/553608 should do the wait in compute now | |
| 21:19:09 | dansmith | mriedem: cool, updating the bug now and working on the revert in parallel, so we can make that depend on the revert to be sure we don't get the timeout message at least right? | |
| 21:19:39 | mriedem | well, that's why i was looking at timings, | |
| 21:20:02 | mriedem | because this means we'll consume the network-vif-plugged event from pre_live_migration before we call driver.live_migration which does the bw stuff, | |
| 21:20:10 | mriedem | the event won't come for that waiter, | |
| 21:20:27 | mriedem | but the guest transfer is so fast, won't we just finish the operatoin before we ever had a chance to timeout? | |
| 21:20:41 | mriedem | like, do i need a patch that puts a fake sleep in the driver's live migratoin metohd? | |
| 21:20:42 | mriedem | *method | |
| 21:21:15 | dansmith | even at 1MB/s? | |
| 21:21:19 | mriedem | could set the vif_plugging_timeout to like 1 minute, and add a 30 second sleep in the driver | |
| 21:21:28 | mriedem | well, | |
| 21:21:39 | dansmith | should go slower there, but I guess it won't take long enough | |
| 21:21:41 | mriedem | maybe not, but the test will timeout before the 5 minute vif_plugging_timeout i think | |
| 21:21:56 | dansmith | yeah okay so we'll have to force it down I guess | |
| 21:22:00 | mriedem | just wondering if i should set the vif_plugging_timeout to like 1 minute | |
| 21:23:15 | dansmith | 30sec but yeah | |
| 21:23:44 | jaypipes | melwitt, dansmith: regarding https://review.openstack.org/#/c/540258, even if we fix the scheduler/top-level issues around server group affinity and multiple cells, that's still not going to fix the eleventh-hour on-the-compute-node checks that currently run just for affinity groups, though, right? I mean, the computes can't talk cross-cell anyway so there would be no way for those on-compute-node checks to run... | |
| 21:23:44 | mriedem | ok updated; hopefully my zuul fu is strong enough | |
| 21:24:58 | mriedem | jaypipes: yes https://review.openstack.org/#/c/540258/8/nova/scheduler/utils.py@738 | |
| 21:25:11 | mriedem | "Also note that we could be racing if we have multiple server create requests for the same affinity group and the scheduler decides to put them each in different cells - the late affinity check in the compute won't resolve that because the upcall check is targeted to the cell the compute is in, and won't see any other hosts for other members in other cells. Separate bug though..." | |
| 21:26:42 | jaypipes | mriedem: ack, ok, just wanted to verify I wasn't crazypants. | |
| 21:26:58 | mriedem | good to have more than just me thinking that | |
| 21:27:03 | mriedem | *that it's an issue.. | |
| 21:27:13 | mriedem | not that you're (not?) crazy | |
| 21:27:50 | dansmith | prometheanfire: commented on the bug | |
| 21:28:18 | melwitt | yeah, it makes sense. I was re-thinking about the upcalls described in https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/user/cellsv2-layout.html#operations-requiring-upcalls and it's true that they can only work if you're single cell | |
| 21:28:49 | melwitt | once you're multi-cell/split-MQ I think none of them can work | |