| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2018-08-01 | |||
| 14:36:05 | sean-k-mooney | "sudo su -l nova" then "ssh nova@node-1" if that does not work you need to use ssh-copy-id to copy your key to node-1 | |
| 14:36:55 | sean-k-mooney | pooja_jadhav: ^ then just repeat for each node | |
| 14:38:15 | sean-k-mooney | pooja_jadhav: non node-1 you shoudl check by sshing to node-2 obvioulsy but in the general case you should ssh to all other node nodes from all nodes in your cloud | |
| 14:38:53 | pooja_jadhav | sean-k-mooney: I have already copied passwordless ssh keys still after hitting command "ssh nova@openstack02-VirtualBox" its asking me for password.. How come? I am really not understanding. | |
| 14:39:30 | sean-k-mooney | pooja_jadhav: did you copy your passwordless ssh key or nova's | |
| 14:40:53 | pooja_jadhav | sean-k-mooney: mine ssh key.. how to generate nova's ssh keys? I haven't done it before :( | |
| 14:41:07 | sean-k-mooney | you need to copy the key of whatever user nova-compute/libvirt are running as. | |
| 14:41:14 | sean-k-mooney | ssk-keygen | |
| 14:41:18 | sean-k-mooney | as the nova user | |
| 14:43:03 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: Ensure the order of AllocationRequestResources https://review.openstack.org/587700 | |
| 14:43:12 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: Fix the incorrect description and sample https://review.openstack.org/528180 | |
| 14:43:25 | sean-k-mooney | pooja_jadhav: by the way if you get that to work and you hit this error http://paste.openstack.org/show/726939/ for me it was caused because of iptables so i just flushed them with "sudo iptables -F" "sudo iptables -X". dont do that in production obviously but it works for devstack | |
| 14:44:16 | pooja_jadhav | 4)cat ~/.ssh/id_rsa.pub | |
| 14:44:16 | pooja_jadhav | sean-k-mooney: i have used this command to generate ssh keys : 3)ssh-keygen -t rsa -C "pooja.jadhav@nttdata.com" | |
| 14:45:35 | openstackgerrit | Vishakha Agarwal proposed openstack/nova master: 'Updated_at' is NULL when show aggregate info https://review.openstack.org/580271 | |
| 14:45:43 | sean-k-mooney | pooja_jadhav: that should work but the defaults will also work if you just hit enter 3-4 times when your the nova user | |
| 14:54:35 | tssurya | dansmith: after we moved to queens | |
| 14:54:44 | dansmith | okay | |
| 14:54:48 | tssurya | we only use custom resource_classes | |
| 14:55:06 | tssurya | for capabilities as well | |
| 15:05:40 | mriedem | bauzas: replied to you in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/584962/ | |
| 15:05:52 | lyarwood | mriedem: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bug/1784353 - nothing urgent, but if you have time this week would you mind taking a look at this BFV reschedule bug? | |
| 15:06:34 | bauzas | mriedem: well, I'm not really torn for your change | |
| 15:07:06 | mriedem | bauzas: you don't see the need for that cache? | |
| 15:07:12 | bauzas | mriedem: I mean, are we like calling a RPC API when we look at the bdms ? | |
| 15:07:18 | mriedem | yes | |
| 15:07:18 | mriedem | dude | |
| 15:07:35 | mriedem | we're getting all bdms for each instance to determine if it's volume-backed | |
| 15:07:44 | mriedem | that's a db query roundtrip through conductor | |
| 15:08:05 | bauzas | objects.BlockDeviceMappingList.get_by_instance_uuid() ? | |
| 15:08:06 | mriedem | and the bfv-ness of an instance isn't going to change | |
| 15:08:24 | bauzas | ah okay | |
| 15:08:27 | mriedem | yes https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/compute/utils.py#L215 | |
| 15:10:24 | bauzas | okay +2 then | |
| 15:11:33 | mriedem | thanks | |
| 15:11:49 | mriedem | lyarwood: sure | |
| 15:13:19 | lyarwood | mriedem: cheers, the actual bugfix is WIP as I'm not sure where the fix should land, any advice would be appreciated. | |
| 15:27:31 | gnuoy | Hi, I'm trying to understand this sentence from the cells layout doc: "The Neutron metadata API proxy should be global across all cells, and thus be configured as an API-level service with access to the [api_database]/connection information." | |
| 15:28:04 | openstackgerrit | Konstantinos Samaras-Tsakiris proposed openstack/nova master: Hide hypervisor id on windows guests https://review.openstack.org/579897 | |
| 15:28:10 | gnuoy | Is it honestly saying that the neutron metadata proxy needs access to the nova api db ? | |
| 15:28:39 | gnuoy | https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/user/cellsv2-layout.html#neutron-metadata-api-proxy | |
| 15:29:23 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Improve NeutronFixture and remove unncessary stubbing https://review.openstack.org/587412 | |
| 15:31:39 | kosamara | sean-k-mooney: updated https://review.openstack.org/#/c/579897 | |
| 15:42:40 | openstackgerrit | Chen proposed openstack/nova master: Make nova-manage db archive_delete_rows take --all-cells https://review.openstack.org/587858 | |
| 15:57:33 | sean-k-mooney | kosamara: +1 from me. its annoying that that is needed but ya the only other thing i can think of is to remove the os_type=windows from the glance image | |
| 15:58:23 | sean-k-mooney | dansmith: see the message form openstackgerrit above | |
| 15:58:41 | dansmith | sean-k-mooney: yeah I see :) | |
| 15:58:56 | sean-k-mooney | dansmith: i guess infra turned it on across the board do we want to keep it on? | |
| 15:59:07 | dansmith | not sure we have a choice | |
| 15:59:09 | kosamara | sean-k-mooney: thanks | |
| 15:59:18 | dansmith | I was just discussing with them | |
| 15:59:27 | dansmith | apparently the sniper doesn't work as well in all channels, for whatever reason, | |
| 15:59:29 | dansmith | but still, | |
| 15:59:56 | dansmith | like email, managing spam is just one of those things.. closing the door on an open community is a bad solution, IMHO, but whatever | |
| 16:00:00 | sean-k-mooney | ok well hopefully this is temporay | |
| 16:00:38 | dansmith | until they just automate the registration process? yeah:) | |
| 16:01:44 | sean-k-mooney | ya... then we will learn how recapha's work over irc... | |
| 16:05:52 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: Add shelve/unshelve wrinkle to volume-backed disk func test https://review.openstack.org/584931 | |
| 16:13:43 | jangutter | sean-k-mooney: you guys are OK, but I continually fail my Turing test. | |
| 16:14:57 | stephenfin | I always knew there was something fishy about jungleboyj | |
| 16:15:27 | stephenfin | (RE: "jungleboyj has quit (Killed (Sigyn (Spam is off topic on freenode.)))") | |
| 16:15:56 | tssurya | dansmith: are we having a cells meeting today? | |
| 16:16:19 | dansmith | tssurya: I don't have anything to discuss and am also focused on other things, you? | |
| 16:16:24 | dansmith | mriedem_afk: melwitt ^ | |
| 16:16:25 | tssurya | I don't have anything either | |
| 16:16:56 | melwitt | +1 to skip | |
| 16:16:59 | tbachman | /WHOIS Turing^H^H^H^H | |
| 16:29:34 | dansmith | gawd, the testing of resource tracker... ugh | |
| 16:32:38 | melwitt | the ol RT | |
| 16:38:11 | mriedem_afk | dansmith: i had some things posted on the agenda | |
| 16:38:31 | dansmith | mriedem: who looks at that? | |
| 16:38:36 | mriedem | https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaCellsv2#Agenda | |
| 16:38:49 | mriedem | i'll just dump them here | |
| 16:38:51 | mriedem | couple of new bugs | |
| 16:38:53 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1784074 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Instances end up with no cell assigned in instance_mappings" [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to Matt Riedemann (mriedem) | |
| 16:38:53 | mriedem | https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1784074 | |
| 16:39:10 | melwitt | gnuoy: yes, it does need access to the api database in order to 'get_metadata_by_instance_id' it looks at the api database to determine what cell the instance is in | |
| 16:39:17 | mriedem | i started https://review.openstack.org/#/c/586713/ for that but need to do more probably, like collapse those 2 for loops as we said a year ago | |
| 16:39:37 | dansmith | mriedem: yeah, I'm not really sure where we are on that.. there are several patches up | |
| 16:39:41 | mriedem | also, mnaser has a script in that bug for healing some of these types of faliures | |
| 16:39:46 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1784093 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Build requests can be orphaned without instance mappings" [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to Mohammed Naser (mnaser) | |
| 16:39:46 | mriedem | https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1784093 | |
| 16:39:59 | mriedem | ^ is about creating build requests, instance mappings and request specs in a single transaction | |
| 16:40:26 | mriedem | and then i was looking for a 2nd +2 on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/581910/ which is just documenting another up-call caveat | |
| 16:40:45 | dansmith | yeah, I think we also probably want a single transaction for converting a BR to a mapped mapping | |
| 16:41:04 | mriedem | i.e. create the instance in the cell + update the mapping? | |
| 16:41:14 | mriedem | how would that work across 2 dbs? | |
| 16:41:24 | melwitt | and destroying BR | |
| 16:41:27 | mnaser | my single transaction change, im not sure if it actually does it in a single transaction.. nor how to test it | |
| 16:41:45 | melwitt | mriedem: should be all api db, no? build request and instance mapping | |
| 16:41:46 | mnaser | i brought the requestspec, buildrequest and mapping to be a single transaction so that was a single db | |
| 16:42:25 | dansmith | mriedem: I mean the destroying the BR and setting cell_id on the instance mapping in one transaction | |
| 16:42:39 | dansmith | melwitt: right | |
| 16:43:26 | mnaser | i assume mriedem is concerned about updating instance mapping and creating instance in a single transaction | |
| 16:43:43 | mnaser | cause you can create but fail updating instance mapping | |
| 16:43:51 | mnaser | and end up with a listable but not retrievable instance | |
| 16:43:59 | mriedem | that's what https://review.openstack.org/#/c/586713/ is for | |
| 16:44:16 | mriedem | we update the mapping immediately after creating the instance, | |
| 16:44:25 | mriedem | but i'm not sure what should happen if we fail to update the mapping | |
| 16:44:32 | dansmith | destroy the instance | |