| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2018-07-11 | |||
| 22:32:33 | edmondsw | that's what I'd expect | |
| 22:32:36 | mriedem | which is that bug fix | |
| 22:33:08 | melwitt | k, that makes sense | |
| 22:36:45 | mriedem | edmondsw: ok updated comments in your bug | |
| 22:36:50 | edmondsw | mriedem tx | |
| 22:37:15 | mriedem | hmm, | |
| 22:37:34 | mriedem | so we could put the az on the Selection object for a given host while we're in the controller and pass that down to the cell, | |
| 22:37:53 | mriedem | but there would be a window of time where the host could be moved into / out of an aggregate / AZ during the reschedule loop | |
| 22:37:59 | mriedem | not likely, and kind of tough luck if that happens... | |
| 22:38:29 | mriedem | this might also help us resolve up-call #5 at https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/user/cellsv2-layout.html#operations-requiring-upcalls | |
| 22:38:37 | mriedem | when [cinder]/cross_az_attach=False | |
| 22:38:45 | mriedem | because the compute could get the host az off the Selection object | |
| 22:41:15 | mriedem | we really need a way to do split mq fixturization in our functional testes | |
| 22:41:17 | mriedem | *tests | |
| 22:41:42 | edmondsw | why does the AZ have to be set if the user didn't specify one? I assume it's to fill that on a later GET, but couldn't it just be populated dynamically there? | |
| 22:41:59 | mriedem | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/446053/ | |
| 22:43:07 | edmondsw | so that's what caused it | |
| 22:43:11 | mriedem | yes, | |
| 22:43:13 | mriedem | i believe the reason is, | |
| 22:43:29 | mriedem | set the az on the instance at the top where we can reach aggregates in the api db, | |
| 22:43:32 | mriedem | so we don't need to do that in the computes | |
| 22:43:36 | mriedem | where we can't reach the api db | |
| 22:43:45 | mriedem | but dansmith would have to confirm that | |
| 22:44:08 | mriedem | "which isn't as useful to the things that need to consider what AZ the instance is actually in (without doing all the aggregate math to determine it on the fly)." | |
| 22:44:13 | mriedem | that reads "up call" to me ^ | |
| 22:44:17 | edmondsw | but what needs to consider the AZ if the user didn't specify? | |
| 22:44:48 | edmondsw | e.g. we just said migrate wouldn't care about the AZ in that case | |
| 22:45:13 | mriedem | not sure off the top of my head honestly | |
| 22:46:10 | mriedem | maybe [cinder]/cross_az_attach=False ? | |
| 22:47:13 | mriedem | but as far as i know that is still broken | |
| 22:49:05 | mriedem | ugh, so we have a cache in nova.availability_zones, | |
| 22:49:15 | mriedem | but we don't populate it when calling get_host_availability_zone at the top | |
| 22:49:46 | mriedem | so when we get to the compute and check the instance.az (set at the top) against the host az from the cache, the latter is None and we say, 'the cache is invalid, so fetch the host az again' | |
| 22:49:47 | edmondsw | mriedem, actually git blame shows this was introduced with https://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/03b4c67b22f49d325386bc3ebd2ade79b44fa699 | |
| 22:49:50 | mriedem | which is the up-call that fails | |
| 22:50:10 | mriedem | edmondsw: that's the same change | |
| 22:50:52 | mriedem | oh but the cache on the compute won't have the az set in it anyway | |
| 22:50:55 | edmondsw | oh, dang it it is... I saw "Updated 9 weeks ago" in that review and thought it was new, whereas the commit was old, and assumed they were different | |
| 22:51:00 | mriedem | b/c we get the host az at in a different process | |
| 22:51:14 | mriedem | unless you have a distributed cache... | |
| 23:14:36 | mriedem | edmondsw: fyi, your bug is also a problem for resize reschedules | |
| 23:23:40 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add another up-call to the cells v2 caveats list https://review.openstack.org/581910 | |
| 23:24:46 | openstackgerrit | Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: Remove mox in unit/network/test_neutronv2.py (6) https://review.openstack.org/574113 | |
| 23:24:52 | oomichi | takashin: hi, can you check my comment on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/570842 ? | |
| 23:25:01 | openstackgerrit | Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: Remove mox in unit/network/test_neutronv2.py (7) https://review.openstack.org/574974 | |
| 23:25:56 | takashin | oomichi: okay. Thanks. | |
| 23:26:47 | mriedem | ha, just found another one | |
| 23:27:01 | mriedem | during a resize reschedule, compute casts to cell conductor's migrate_server method, | |
| 23:27:13 | mriedem | which has the targets_cell decorator on it which gets an instance mapping, | |
| 23:27:20 | mriedem | if you don't have access to the api db, kablammo | |
| 23:27:34 | mriedem | http://logs.openstack.org/27/581727/1/check/tempest-full-py3/15d7fdc/controller/logs/screen-n-cpu.txt#_Jul_11_13_32_54_822996 | |
| 23:29:15 | openstackgerrit | Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: Remove mox in libvirt/test_driver.py (5) https://review.openstack.org/570842 | |
| 23:31:31 | mriedem | https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1781300 | |
| 23:31:32 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1781300 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "resize reschedule results in CantStartEngineError during up-call to InstanceMappings table" [Medium,Triaged] | |
| 23:57:17 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Short-circuit targets_cell if already targeted https://review.openstack.org/581912 | |
| 23:57:18 | mriedem | melwitt: dansmith: ^ | |
| 23:59:00 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Short-circuit targets_cell if already targeted https://review.openstack.org/581912 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2018-07-12 | |||
| 00:11:19 | openstackgerrit | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add a script for counting blueprints https://review.openstack.org/581914 | |
| 00:22:33 | anupn | Hi mriedem: I have a problem while launching instance on my baremetal instance inside Devstack. | |
| 00:22:59 | anupn | mriedem: I see a error message of "Failure prepping block device" | |
| 00:23:42 | anupn | when I ran "openstack server show". Any idea, what this could be? | |
| 00:24:45 | anupn | I checked few things like 1. inside n-sch logs is the respective host getting selected (it is). 2. hypervisor stats show, show correct information 3. resource provider are matching | |
| 00:42:33 | mriedem | attaching volumes in compute failed, check cinder and nova-compute logs | |
| 00:48:18 | gmann | mriedem: dansmith alex_xu yikun I agree with point of keeping consistency between API, Object layer. I am ok with 'policy' & 'rules' also. My vote it - "policy_*" is better. "policy & rules" are good (not bad) | |
| 01:12:43 | arvindn05 | mriedem: I updated the glance documentation to reflect the glance-image-traits spec functionality https://review.openstack.org/#/c/581920/ | |
| 01:13:35 | arvindn05 | i will try to get the glance core's to approve it...but wanted to make sure you are fine with the amount of detail | |
| 01:45:29 | mriedem | gmann: arvindn05: ack, thanks | |
| 02:00:56 | openstackgerrit | Yikun Jiang (Kero) proposed openstack/nova master: Add policy to InstanceGroup object https://review.openstack.org/563375 | |
| 02:00:57 | openstackgerrit | Yikun Jiang (Kero) proposed openstack/nova master: Add policy field to ServerGroup notification object https://review.openstack.org/563401 | |
| 02:01:51 | yikun | gmann: OK, ack~ | |
| 02:05:36 | openstackgerrit | lei zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Replace ZeroMQ URL with Qpid URL https://review.openstack.org/581926 | |
| 02:34:03 | openstackgerrit | Yikun Jiang (Kero) proposed openstack/nova master: Change the ServerGroupAntiAffinityFilter to adapt to new policy https://review.openstack.org/571166 | |
| 02:34:04 | openstackgerrit | Yikun Jiang (Kero) proposed openstack/nova master: Adapt _validate_instance_group_policy to new policy model https://review.openstack.org/571465 | |
| 02:59:21 | openstackgerrit | Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: Remove mox in unit/network/test_neutronv2.py (8) https://review.openstack.org/575311 | |
| 02:59:35 | openstackgerrit | Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: Remove mox in unit/network/test_neutronv2.py (9) https://review.openstack.org/575581 | |
| 02:59:53 | openstackgerrit | Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: Remove mox in unit/network/test_neutronv2.py (10) https://review.openstack.org/576017 | |
| 03:11:28 | openstackgerrit | Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: Transform libvirt.error notification https://review.openstack.org/484851 | |
| 03:14:31 | openstackgerrit | Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: Transform libvirt.error notification https://review.openstack.org/484851 | |
| 03:55:53 | openstackgerrit | Chen proposed openstack/nova master: Clean up group members in db when delete https://review.openstack.org/581403 | |
| 06:43:27 | openstackgerrit | jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: z/VM Driver: Initial change set of z/VM driver https://review.openstack.org/523387 | |
| 06:43:28 | openstackgerrit | jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: z/VM Driver: Spawn and destroy function of z/VM driver https://review.openstack.org/527658 | |
| 06:43:29 | openstackgerrit | jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: z/VM Driver: add snapshot function https://review.openstack.org/534240 | |
| 06:43:30 | openstackgerrit | jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: z/VM Driver: add power actions https://review.openstack.org/543340 | |
| 06:43:31 | openstackgerrit | jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: z/VM Driver: add get console output https://review.openstack.org/543344 | |
| 06:46:15 | openstackgerrit | Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: Transform volume.usage notification https://review.openstack.org/580345 | |
| 06:49:48 | unclok | hello, can I ask a question? | |
| 06:50:37 | unclok | I'm installing 1 controller + 2 computes node openstack using packstack, from centos-openstack-queens repo | |
| 06:51:35 | unclok | but after I finished the installation, my nova service can't find hypervisors | |
| 06:51:53 | unclok | and I'm getting this error from nova-compute.log | |
| 06:52:15 | unclok | 2018-07-12 06:46:57.580 6044 ERROR nova.compute.manager [req-cc06eb6a-0d3e-4224-a82c-2affb187d6b7 - - - - -] No compute node record for host compute1.packstack.spark: ComputeHostNotFound_Remote: Compute host compute1.packstack.spark could not be found. | |
| 06:52:49 | openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/nova master: Imported Translations from Zanata https://review.openstack.org/578019 | |
| 06:52:50 | unclok | it's a whole nova-compute.log file | |
| 06:52:54 | unclok | https://files.fm/f/83ypewsn#_ | |
| 06:55:20 | unclok | I can find my nova cell from "nova-manage cell_v2 list_cells" command, and I can find it's configuration is alright | |
| 06:55:36 | unclok | | Name | UUID | Transport URL | Database Connection | | |
| 06:55:41 | unclok | | cell0 | 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 | none:/ | mysql+pymysql://nova:****@172.17.17.226/nova_cell0 | | |
| 06:55:47 | unclok | | default | 87da9bc1-34d0-4a99-ae1e-d60a7b606df7 | rabbit://guest:****@172.17.17.226:5672/ | mysql+pymysql://nova:****@172.17.17.226/nova | | |
| 06:56:27 | unclok | "default" cell is an auto-created cell by packstack | |
| 06:56:58 | unclok | even I tried to remove default cell, | |
| 06:57:41 | unclok | and modified cell0 configurations using right transport_url and database_connection settings | |