| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2018-06-14 | |||
| 13:59:06 | mriedem | jmlowe: link? | |
| 13:59:17 | jmlowe | karma 1, so it may never see the light of day | |
| 13:59:30 | mriedem | jmlowe: might still be good to put into our troubleshooting docs | |
| 13:59:47 | mriedem | since we probably don't leverage the fact we have those at all enough | |
| 13:59:51 | jmlowe | absolutely | |
| 14:00:16 | jmlowe | https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/114805/why-is-nova-ignoring-microvesions/#114806 | |
| 14:00:20 | mriedem | artom: i plan on getting to it eventually, just busy atm | |
| 14:00:24 | mriedem | jmlowe: thanks | |
| 14:00:31 | artom | mriedem, heh, no worries :) | |
| 14:00:46 | jmlowe | also the follow up https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/114808/why-is-nova-cli-not-using-https/#114809 | |
| 14:01:48 | mriedem | jmlowe: i keep getting a "Sorry, this content is not available" error on the first one, | |
| 14:01:55 | mriedem | maybe it has to go through screening first | |
| 14:02:00 | mriedem | to de-pence-ify it | |
| 14:02:03 | mriedem | i know you're in indiana | |
| 14:02:11 | jmlowe | right, awaiting moderator approval | |
| 14:02:20 | jmlowe | too soon | |
| 14:02:21 | sahid | artom: i don't want to make any troubles on your implementation, it's just if we can reuse what we already have that will limit the code introduced, | |
| 14:02:25 | jmlowe | :) | |
| 14:02:30 | sahid | also when it will be the time to drop claim, we could think of that in one step, everything will be grouped | |
| 14:02:57 | sahid | but if there is already a preferece for a new impl, i will remove my -1 | |
| 14:03:06 | artom | sahid, heh, I'm just trying to find the balance between doing it right and getting it merged | |
| 14:03:16 | sahid | artom: yes i guess :) | |
| 14:03:35 | artom | Given that https://review.openstack.org/#/c/244489/ has languished in review purgatory for literally *years*, maybe claims isn't the most mergeable way of doing it ;) | |
| 14:03:41 | sahid | artom: have a look at what i suggested, that should be really easy to implement | |
| 14:04:10 | sahid | artom: it's because it's all in one patch, if you can make it comprhensible i guess that will help | |
| 14:04:20 | artom | sahid, in the interest of good faith, I will :) | |
| 14:04:30 | sahid | so you can focus on updating the guest domain XML | |
| 14:04:52 | artom | But the argument of "it's all already a mess with no claims and resource tracking, so just making it suck less with NUMA" is pretty strong as wlel | |
| 14:05:21 | stephenfin | Random question: is there a way to rerun only the tests that failed on the last run? I recall this being a ((o)s)testr feature | |
| 14:05:27 | stephenfin | efried, mdbooth: ^ ? | |
| 14:05:49 | efried | stephenfin: You mean from gerrit or locally? | |
| 14:05:56 | efried | stephenfin: (In either case, I have no idea :) | |
| 14:06:01 | stephenfin | Locally | |
| 14:06:08 | jmlowe | mriedem: tossed out a request for an ask openstack moderator in #openstack, maybe I'll find one | |
| 14:06:10 | efried | stephenfin: If it's a *testr thing, mtreinish would be the SME I would call on. | |
| 14:06:13 | stephenfin | darn, where's mtreinish when you need him | |
| 14:06:16 | stephenfin | jinx | |
| 14:11:16 | mriedem | dansmith: see my comment on this pike backport for the build failure weigher - we'll need to handle the ironic host manager fallout there somehow https://review.openstack.org/#/c/573248/ | |
| 14:11:41 | dansmith | mriedem: we already merged something for that | |
| 14:12:02 | mriedem | i know, on queens | |
| 14:12:03 | dansmith | mriedem: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/574997/ | |
| 14:12:06 | mriedem | we just have to do the dance for pike | |
| 14:12:08 | dansmith | yep | |
| 14:12:08 | dansmith | oh kay | |
| 14:15:16 | mriedem | tssurya: we can also be fixing the instance list 500 error as a bug fix today | |
| 14:15:23 | mriedem | regardless of the handling a down cell spec | |
| 14:15:42 | mriedem | tssurya: if you haven't started a fix for that, maybe dansmith wants to take a crack at it? | |
| 14:16:13 | tssurya | mriedem: you mean this one ? -> https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1773945 | |
| 14:16:14 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1773945 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "nova client servers.list crashes with bad marker" [Medium,Triaged] - Assigned to Surya Seetharaman (tssurya) | |
| 14:16:48 | tssurya | or the general one as a part of handling down cell | |
| 14:16:49 | mriedem | tssurya: no | |
| 14:16:52 | mriedem | the general one | |
| 14:17:02 | dansmith | I'm confused, isn't tssurya working on the general one? | |
| 14:17:03 | mriedem | tssurya: if you don't have a patch for that ^ bug about the marker, i can push something for that | |
| 14:17:22 | mriedem | she's working on the handling a down cell alternative i thought | |
| 14:17:24 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Add notification support for trusted_certs https://review.openstack.org/563269 | |
| 14:17:25 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Add certificate validation docs https://review.openstack.org/560158 | |
| 14:17:26 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Add trusted certs to feature support matrix docs https://review.openstack.org/574890 | |
| 14:17:27 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Remove max_size parameter from fake_libvirt_utils.fetch_*image methods https://review.openstack.org/574911 | |
| 14:17:31 | mriedem | dansmith: you likely need to read the spec to get caught up | |
| 14:17:40 | tssurya | okay I am working on both :D | |
| 14:17:56 | dansmith | mriedem: shame accepted | |
| 14:18:02 | mriedem | ha | |
| 14:18:06 | mriedem | sorry | |
| 14:18:25 | mriedem | just trying to not get backed up | |
| 14:18:29 | dansmith | it's not like I'm twiddling my thumbs around here | |
| 14:18:55 | gibi | bauzas, mriedem: updated with the fixes https://review.openstack.org/563269 | |
| 14:19:10 | mriedem | my point is, if dansmith and/or i can help out with the other known things we know we can fix today, let's do that while tssurya works on the handling a down cell alternative poc | |
| 14:19:10 | tssurya | haha, :) I will try to put something up this week (after I finish some downstream work), sorry for the delay | |
| 14:19:29 | mriedem | gibi: acked, in the tab queue | |
| 14:21:25 | dansmith | cdent: new macbook pro keyboard failure? | |
| 14:21:33 | cdent | totes | |
| 14:21:36 | cdent | they suck | |
| 14:21:40 | dansmith | bummer :( | |
| 14:30:59 | artom | sahid, the claim would have to done on the destination once we're sure the migration is really happening (ie, after all the checks), right? | |
| 14:32:08 | openstackgerrit | Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova master: [placement] Add status and links fields to version document at / https://review.openstack.org/575117 | |
| 14:32:45 | sahid | artom: hum... which checks are you talking? the claim should be done just after that the scheduling find a destination | |
| 14:33:06 | sahid | scheduler | |
| 14:33:24 | artom | sahid, dammit, I need to find the actual functions how | |
| 14:33:25 | artom | ;) | |
| 14:33:36 | artom | The _check_can_live_migrate stuff | |
| 14:34:24 | artom | I'm asking because in the resource tracker, we do _claim_existing_migration if a Migration already exists, and set the dest node to "ourselves" | |
| 14:34:38 | artom | So, presumably, we have to be sure we're actually doing to receive the instance | |
| 14:35:02 | mtreinish | stephenfin, efried: is stestr run --failing what you're looking for? https://stestr.readthedocs.io/en/latest/MANUAL.html#running-previously-failed-tests | |
| 14:35:06 | artom | And that we're not going to fail a check right after claiming the existing migration | |
| 14:35:38 | openstackgerrit | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova stable/pike: Change consecutive build failure limit to a weigher https://review.openstack.org/573248 | |
| 14:35:46 | stephenfin | mtreinish: It would appear so. Excellent | |
| 14:35:54 | stephenfin | mtreinish: Thanks :) | |
| 14:36:53 | mtreinish | sure, np | |
| 14:38:49 | mriedem | well look who decides to show up | |
| 14:38:58 | mriedem | when testr talk is happening but not when the gate is burning down | |
| 14:39:40 | mtreinish | heh, well complain to my mgt I had to sit in a booth all day yesteday to talk about IBM cloud | |
| 14:40:18 | mtreinish | although, the funny thing is I only got questions about AIX and Z. no one cared about the cloud | |
| 14:40:26 | mriedem | AIX? | |
| 14:40:31 | mriedem | i could maybe understand Z | |
| 14:40:57 | mtreinish | apparently people are still using aix, I was very confused too | |
| 14:41:09 | mriedem | and as400, die hards | |
| 14:41:11 | efried | Because it is still awesome. | |
| 14:41:12 | dansmith | mtreinish: all those people that bought 25 year licenses | |
| 14:41:24 | cdent | second worst unix imp | |