Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2018-06-06
21:52:49 mriedem weight_of_unavailable...
21:53:25 dansmith that's a bit different
21:54:02 dansmith and the iops one can be positive or negative with useful meaning
21:54:10 melwitt do the other negative ones ever make sense as positive values? k
21:54:52 dansmith yes, ops defaults negative, but changing it to positive means something useful
21:55:07 dansmith soft_anti_affinity and soft_affinity are both positive, but have opposite meanings
21:55:38 dansmith https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/scheduler/weights/affinity.py#L93-L96
21:55:39 melwitt so if it auto negates ... to make build fails even less likely to schedule toward, you would increase the positive value. that is, make build failures heavier
21:55:42 dansmith Just like I do ^
21:56:19 dansmith melwitt: right, if it auto-negates (as it does now) then you raise the number to make build failures more significant (i.e. less likely to be chosen)
21:56:31 dansmith I think that anti-affinity one is my proof that I'm okay
21:56:33 melwitt yeah, that makes sense to me
21:56:45 dansmith it auto-negates because it makes more sense to have a positive value for significance
21:56:55 melwitt yeah it's like a coefficient I guess
21:57:10 mriedem i left a question in there, but should we put a min value on the multiplier?
21:57:14 melwitt I think either way is find, both make sense in their own way
21:57:17 mriedem otherwise anything negative weighs failed hosts higher right?
21:57:19 melwitt *fine
21:57:45 dansmith mriedem: I dunno, if somene wanted to actually select recent fails, they could set it to -BIG, which ... maybe?
21:57:50 dansmith if they do auto-disable on their own,
21:57:59 dansmith they may want recently-fixed hosts to be super important or something?
21:58:00 mriedem via notifications or something
21:58:04 melwitt although allowing negative and positive values could make you favor build failures if you mess up, so maybe that is worse
21:58:10 dansmith I wouldn't document that, but if you remove the ability, then they can't
21:58:19 mriedem sure
21:58:24 mriedem anywho
21:58:24 dansmith melwitt: right but if you do ^ then maybe you want that
21:58:41 mriedem watcher could have it's own super awesome auto-disabler
21:58:43 dansmith I think I'm going to leave it as-is, I convinced myself with the anti-affinity precedent
21:59:30 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Block swap volume on volumes with >1 rw attachment https://review.openstack.org/572790
22:01:28 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Change consecutive build failure limit to a weigher https://review.openstack.org/572195
22:14:39 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Block swap volume on volumes with >1 rw attachment https://review.openstack.org/572790
22:15:58 dansmith mriedem: oh, those were all in default previously I guess? we should update that doc
22:17:47 mriedem i'm sure they are old yeah
22:17:52 mriedem but we can cleanup the rest in a follow up
22:17:57 mriedem they likely have a rename alias
22:18:19 dansmith yeah they do
22:18:28 dansmith I didn't even process that as the config section,
22:18:37 dansmith I just copied a block and changed the names
22:19:12 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Change consecutive build failure limit to a weigher https://review.openstack.org/572195
22:25:49 mriedem in trumps america, i process it for you
22:26:20 mriedem i think i'll just fast approve given sylvain was +2
22:26:22 mriedem is that ok?
22:26:42 melwitt I was going to +2 it once you were okay with it
22:27:05 mriedem ok all yours
22:28:20 melwitt en route to the sarlacc put
22:28:29 melwitt *pit
22:28:46 mriedem i hope you get that reference
22:28:49 mriedem otherwise, for shame
22:29:11 mriedem oh btw,
22:29:13 melwitt of course I do! I'm hip like that
22:29:19 mriedem dansmith didn't like evil dead 2
22:29:22 mriedem as expected
22:29:30 dansmith correction
22:29:33 melwitt lol
22:29:37 dansmith I didn't like the first 45 minutes of it
22:29:44 dansmith I have no idea about the second 45 minutes
22:30:04 mriedem did you at least see where he fights his own hand?
22:30:12 dansmith yeah
22:30:17 mriedem well alright then
22:30:20 mriedem also,
22:30:29 mriedem efried sorta looks like bruce from evil dead
22:30:40 mriedem efried: you should take advantage of that on halloween
22:30:42 melwitt *mind blown*
22:30:43 mriedem or really any day
22:30:44 efried I've actually heard that before.
22:31:10 mriedem do you frequently say to your wife, "gimme some sugar, baby"?
22:31:31 mriedem if so, you might be ash
22:31:42 efried I may have seen those movies once, 20 years ago. They're not auto-memes that just spring forth from my head, I'm afraid.
22:32:06 mriedem i saw the first one between slitted fingers when i was probably <10
22:32:10 mriedem so it's burned in there
22:32:12 mriedem the granny in the basement
22:32:15 melwitt lol
22:33:03 efried I can totally quote Finding Nemo, though.
22:33:10 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Block swap volume on volumes with >1 rw attachment https://review.openstack.org/572790
22:33:14 efried dansmith sorta looks like Marlin
22:33:30 dansmith isn't that an animated fish?
22:33:44 efried Aren't you an animated fish?
22:33:51 dansmith don't make me fight you
22:33:53 melwitt lol
22:33:55 dansmith I know car-ah-tay
22:34:00 efried With what, your FINS?
22:34:13 mriedem hey, fish are people too
23:44:17 Sundar @edleafe, @efried: Please review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/554717/. Hope to get a +1 from any/both of you, or any other Nova expert for that matter.
#openstack-nova - 2018-06-07
00:53:29 openstackgerrit Steve Kowalik proposed openstack/nova master: Switch to oslo_messaging.ConfFixture.transport_url https://review.openstack.org/573046
01:52:46 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: Update admin/flavors document https://review.openstack.org/573063
01:55:30 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Re-base placement object unit tests on NoDBTestCase https://review.openstack.org/572279
01:58:38 openstackgerrit Tsuyoshi Nagata proposed openstack/nova master: Fix nova can handle device name length more widly for universally. https://review.openstack.org/573066
02:02:45 openstackgerrit Tsuyoshi Nagata proposed openstack/nova master: Fix nova can handle device name length more widly for universally. https://review.openstack.org/573066
02:10:56 openstackgerrit jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: z/VM Driver: Initial change set of z/VM driver https://review.openstack.org/523387
02:10:57 openstackgerrit jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: z/VM Driver: Spawn and destroy function of z/VM driver https://review.openstack.org/527658
02:10:58 openstackgerrit jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: z/VM Driver: add snapshot function https://review.openstack.org/534240
02:10:59 openstackgerrit jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: z/VM Driver: add power actions https://review.openstack.org/543340
02:11:00 openstackgerrit jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: z/VM Driver: add get console output https://review.openstack.org/543344
02:11:53 mriedem we have a gate failure at a pretty high rate now, see bug 1775491
02:11:55 openstack bug 1775491 in tempest "test_tagged_attachment randomly fails with: sequence or collection is not empty: [{u'type': u'disk', u'bus': u'pci', u'address': u'0000:00:07.0', u'serial': u'56e9a4a0-51fc-4319-845b-02c6a21d5b16', u'tags': [u'volume-tag']}]" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1775491
02:12:01 mriedem need to hit artom in the morning
02:15:13 openstackgerrit Tsuyoshi Nagata proposed openstack/nova master: Define nova's max number of devices by each bus-type. https://review.openstack.org/567472
02:24:07 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Fix nits in nested provider allocation candidates https://review.openstack.org/572673
02:38:25 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Fix a logic error in network_request https://review.openstack.org/573073

Earlier   Later