Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2018-05-18
04:29:46 openstackgerrit Vishakha Agarwal proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: No requirement of –all-tenants while listing servers https://review.openstack.org/569090
04:33:54 openstackgerrit Vishakha Agarwal proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: No requirement of –all-tenants while listing servers https://review.openstack.org/569090
04:45:35 openstackgerrit jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: z/VM Driver: Initial change set of z/VM driver https://review.openstack.org/523387
04:45:36 openstackgerrit jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: z/VM Driver: Spawn and destroy function of z/VM driver https://review.openstack.org/527658
04:45:37 openstackgerrit jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: z/VM Driver: add snapshot function https://review.openstack.org/534240
04:45:38 openstackgerrit jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: z/VM Driver: add power actions https://review.openstack.org/543340
04:45:39 openstackgerrit jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: z/VM Driver: add get console output https://review.openstack.org/543344
06:01:30 openstackgerrit Tsuyoshi Nagata proposed openstack/nova master: nova improvement of maximum attach volumes more than 26 vols https://review.openstack.org/567472
06:54:58 openstackgerrit Robin Naundorf proposed openstack/nova master: Fix inconsistency in docs https://review.openstack.org/569348
07:32:31 openstackgerrit Yikun Jiang (Kero) proposed openstack/nova master: Microversion 2.63 - Use new format policy in server group https://review.openstack.org/567534
07:37:25 openstackgerrit Robin Naundorf proposed openstack/nova master: Fix inconsistency in docs https://review.openstack.org/569348
08:10:20 kashyap Hey folks, anyone got a Windows Nova guest XML? If so, mind posting it somewhere?
08:32:18 openstackgerrit sahid proposed openstack/nova master: pci: don't consider case when match tags specs https://review.openstack.org/565808
08:32:19 openstackgerrit sahid proposed openstack/nova master: network: update pci request spec to handle trusted tags https://review.openstack.org/458820
08:32:20 openstackgerrit sahid proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: configure trust mode for vfs https://review.openstack.org/458514
08:32:21 openstackgerrit sahid proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: add vf_trusted field for network metadata https://review.openstack.org/566343
08:32:22 openstackgerrit sahid proposed openstack/nova master: metadata: add vf_trusted field to device metadata https://review.openstack.org/566344
08:52:25 openstackgerrit sahid proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: place emulator threads on CONF.compute.cpu_shared_set https://review.openstack.org/510897
09:01:17 openstackgerrit Naichuan Sun proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: xenapi: drop deprecated vif_driver config option https://review.openstack.org/567877
09:08:02 openstackgerrit Naichuan Sun proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: xenapi: drop deprecated vif_driver config option https://review.openstack.org/567877
09:11:07 openstackgerrit Naichuan Sun proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: xenapi: drop deprecated vif_driver config option https://review.openstack.org/567877
09:22:21 lyarwood mdbooth: random question, do you recall if we have a fake block_device_info creating method somewhere in test_driver.py? I was sure we did but I can't seem to find the damn thing.
09:26:48 openstackgerrit Naichuan Sun proposed openstack/nova master: xenapi(N-R-P): Add API to support vgpu resource provider create https://review.openstack.org/520313
09:26:49 openstackgerrit Naichuan Sun proposed openstack/nova master: xenapi(N-R-P):Get vgpu info from `allocations` https://review.openstack.org/521717
09:26:50 openstackgerrit Naichuan Sun proposed openstack/nova master: xenapi(N-R-P): support compute node resource provider update https://review.openstack.org/521041
09:29:00 mdbooth lyarwood: There are a ton of tests which create block_device_info
09:29:31 mdbooth lyarwood: IIRC they usually create a BDM list and pass it to the relevant function in driver
09:30:14 mdbooth lyarwood: You can crib a BDM list from somewhere.
09:31:01 lyarwood mdbooth: ah right, that makes sense
09:33:09 openstackgerrit Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Configure multiple vGPU types https://review.openstack.org/564214
09:33:10 openstackgerrit Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: mdevs returning parent and vendor PCI info https://review.openstack.org/562304
09:33:11 openstackgerrit Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Get inventories per vGPU type https://review.openstack.org/564215
10:13:58 mdbooth lyarwood: Did you find something to crib, btw?
10:14:49 lyarwood mdbooth: yeah, trying to do a few things at once here but I'll push it in a mind.
10:14:51 lyarwood min*
10:15:25 mdbooth lyarwood: kk. Was going to dig out a specific if you hadn't found anything.
10:16:34 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Skip fetching the virtual size of block devices https://review.openstack.org/569062
10:16:41 lyarwood mdbooth: ^ for your reviewing pleasure if you have time
10:17:34 mdbooth lyarwood: hehe
10:17:59 lyarwood pep8-- it passed but missed something there
10:18:02 lyarwood quick respin
10:18:32 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Skip fetching the virtual size of block devices https://review.openstack.org/569062
10:19:22 mdbooth lyarwood: https://network-data-cabling.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/cable-spaghetti.jpg What do you mean you unplugged the wrong thing?
10:19:41 lyarwood ^_^
10:21:26 mdbooth I like to compare changing the libvirt driver to playing Mikado.
10:31:06 kashyap lyarwood: Oops: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/569062/
10:37:02 lyarwood kashyap: yeah, happens to us all :)
10:38:30 kashyap lyarwood: Of course; was just teasing :-)
12:33:44 bauzas efried: when you're up, got a sec ?
12:33:52 bauzas it's about https://review.openstack.org/#/c/560444/
13:37:13 Shilpa andreykurilin: Hi
13:37:21 andreykurilin hi
13:38:19 Shilpa andreykurilin: i am working on https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-novaclient/+bug/1744118
13:38:21 openstack Launchpad bug 1744118 in python-novaclient "Arguments not initialized if unsupported by keystoneauth plugin" [Medium,Confirmed]
13:39:15 Shilpa updated novaclient/shell.py, and further facing issue of 404
13:40:16 Shilpa ERROR (NotFound): (http://10.232.48.204/identity/tokens): The resource could not be found. (HTTP 404)
13:40:53 andreykurilin Shilpa: link to a patch? so I can see the modified code
13:41:50 Shilpa as of now not uploaded any patch
13:42:00 Shilpa will create paste docuemnt for you, wait
13:43:53 Shilpa http://paste.openstack.org/show/721234/, here diff is added
13:51:28 gibi mriedem: hi!, you marked https://bugs.launchpad.net/placement-osc-plugin/+bug/1771761 as affecting stable/queens but it seems that the trait tests does not existing there
13:51:29 openstack Launchpad bug 1771761 in placement-osc-plugin "trait functional tests fail due to changed error message from placement" [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to Balazs Gibizer (balazs-gibizer)
13:51:50 mriedem oh right, good point
13:51:54 mriedem removed
13:53:55 kashyap melwitt: Sorry, was occupied yesterday, I see you've sorted out the disk limit discussion with DanPB
13:54:03 kashyap 17:55 < kashyap> fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/cgit/*
13:54:03 kashyap 17:55 < kashyap> url = https://git.openstack.org/openstack/nova
13:54:03 kashyap 17:55 < kashyap> [remote "cgit"]
13:54:13 kashyap Urgh, wrong copy / paste
13:54:27 kashyap I meant this: https://rwmj.wordpress.com/2017/04/25/how-many-disks-can-you-add-to-a-virtual-linux-machine/
13:58:10 andreykurilin Shilpa: I never worked with custome auth plugins, so I can just guess what is happening. Possibly, you have keystone v2 disabled (it sounds ok), but your checks for auth_url contain error and instead of calling v3 endpoint, it tries to use v2. Another possible option is that https://github.com/openstack/python-novaclient/blob/master/novaclient/shell.py#L603-L604 returns the default auth plugin for some reason and not your custom one
13:58:40 dansmith kashyap: yeah, I think it's well-understood that you can technically attach a bunch
13:59:07 kashyap But I see we were looking for a sensible upper limit in Nova's context
13:59:25 dansmith kashyap: I'm kinda dubious on the reasoning for nova, and the current silly limitation _does_ prevent you from having a large tenant with a lot of volume quota attaching a large number to a single guest and completely killing the host machine
14:00:15 kashyap dansmith: Current limitation is 26, right?
14:00:18 Shilpa andreykurilin: Thank you for explaination here, will go through again and get back to you next week
14:00:33 dansmith mriedem: that skipping of the extra weigh/filter step is breaking a regression test in a strange way, because of the server group filter
14:00:36 kashyap dansmith: Yeah, I do agree with that; and I had a chuckle when I first saw a version of the upstream patch adding 2 billion as the limit!
14:00:40 dansmith mriedem: when I'm off my next call I'd like to discuss
14:02:24 mriedem ok, i'm on a call now too
14:14:21 openstackgerrit Eric Berglund proposed openstack/nova stable/pike: Stringify instance UUID https://review.openstack.org/569421
14:24:27 gibi stephenfin: would it be possible to do the refactoring in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/564444/ separately from the main implementation series? I would need to do something similar to resolve the uglyness of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/567268/5/nova/compute/api.py@811
14:26:46 mriedem dansmith: oh on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/569127/ i gotcha
14:27:07 dansmith yah
14:56:14 dansmith mriedem: yeah, so I removed the index>0 check and replaced it with a num_alts check,
14:56:32 dansmith which makes sense I think.. even if we have num_instances=3, if we aren't getting alts, we don't need to re-sort even if index=2
14:56:54 dansmith but if I do that, it breaks your reschedule regression test for server groups, only because the reschedule filters those out
14:57:08 mriedem s/your/mel's/
14:57:12 dansmith which I think means we had a bug already, but didn't notice it because we wouldn't re-sort the host list for that test where we only had one
14:57:13 mriedem but yeah, i just left some comments
14:57:16 mriedem and was looking at the failing test
14:57:18 dansmith oh, heh, I expected it was you
14:57:35 bauzas gibi: stephenfin is already traveling AFAIK
14:57:38 mriedem so that test doesn't do multi-create, and it doesn't mess with max attempts,
14:57:45 mriedem only triggers a reschedule
14:57:46 bauzas and me is about to disappear now
14:57:50 gibi bauzas: thanks for the info
14:58:03 mriedem dansmith: is this 100% fail or intermittent
14:58:18 bauzas folks visiting YVR, see you next week
14:58:41 dansmith mriedem: 100%

Earlier   Later