| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2018-04-25 | |||
| 08:01:54 | gibi | Kevin_Zheng: and that will match with anything | |
| 08:02:31 | gibi | Kevin_Zheng: https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/d4504302c99715508ed8b9822bf50ad485d34c96/nova/tests/functional/notification_sample_tests/notification_sample_base.py#L128 | |
| 08:02:54 | Kevin_Zheng | cool， thanks for the info | |
| 08:06:25 | bauzas | morning stackers | |
| 08:26:40 | gibi | bauzas: morning | |
| 08:28:46 | openstackgerrit | Elod Illes proposed openstack/nova master: Functional test: cold migrate to compute down https://review.openstack.org/496280 | |
| 09:00:34 | openstackgerrit | Lei Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Add method to get cpu traits https://review.openstack.org/560317 | |
| 09:27:04 | openstackgerrit | zhangyangyang proposed openstack/nova master: Remove ExactCoreFilter ExactDiskFilter ExactRamFilter https://review.openstack.org/508886 | |
| 09:27:12 | openstackgerrit | Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Use os.rename, not mv. https://review.openstack.org/562463 | |
| 09:27:13 | openstackgerrit | Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Convert fping API to processutils.execute() https://review.openstack.org/564144 | |
| 09:27:14 | openstackgerrit | Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Convert xenapi's xvp console to processutils. https://review.openstack.org/564145 | |
| 09:27:15 | openstackgerrit | Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Convert certificate generation to processutils. https://review.openstack.org/564146 | |
| 10:07:29 | openstackgerrit | MultipleCrashes proposed openstack/nova master: NCP-2367-deallocate-network-retry https://review.openstack.org/563418 | |
| 10:48:19 | stephenfin | jaypipes, bauzas: Either of you any idea what I'm doing wrong here? https://github.com/stephenfin/nova/commit/73b9d061551067e393eb5bfec296c64623c72b7c | |
| 10:49:16 | stephenfin | jaypipes, bauzas: My migration seems to be working. I ran 'nova-manage db sync' and can see the column in the instance_extra table. However, I'm getting the following exception from the super conductor http://paste.openstack.org/show/719901/ | |
| 10:49:56 | bauzas | stephenfin: heh, welcome to cells v2 | |
| 10:50:16 | bauzas | stephenfin: AFAIR, and if I'm not wrong, superconductor runs on the top API cell | |
| 10:50:26 | bauzas | stephenfin: hence it checking the API DB | |
| 10:51:48 | stephenfin | bauzas: Right, that's what I was thinking so I ran 'nova-manage api_db sync' too, to be safe. However, there's no 'instance_extra' table in the nova_api database | |
| 10:51:51 | bauzas | stephenfin: are you sure you correctly target a cell ? | |
| 10:52:02 | stephenfin | What do you mean? | |
| 10:52:12 | bauzas | there is a contextmanager | |
| 10:52:50 | stephenfin | bauzas, jaypipes: As an aside, here's my DB schema for the cell0 table http://paste.openstack.org/show/719902/ | |
| 10:52:54 | stephenfin | bauzas: Let me check | |
| 10:53:08 | bauzas | stephenfin: I'll need to go out | |
| 10:53:10 | bauzas | for eating | |
| 10:53:18 | stephenfin | bauzas: No problem. Let's pick this up after lunch | |
| 10:53:19 | bauzas | but lemme find some explanations | |
| 10:57:20 | openstackgerrit | Kashyap Chamarthy proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Lift the restriction of choices for `cpu_model_extra_flags` https://review.openstack.org/563926 | |
| 10:57:21 | openstackgerrit | Kashyap Chamarthy proposed openstack/nova master: Do-Not-Merge: Test 1GB Huge Pages https://review.openstack.org/564161 | |
| 10:59:38 | bauzas | stephenfin: in https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/user/cellsv2-layout.html#multiple-cells you can see the top-level superconductor using multiple MQs | |
| 11:09:09 | kashyap | sean-k-mooney: Respun the patch above, if you get a minute to ACK it today... | |
| 11:20:54 | bhagyashris | DISK_GB used from the Compute Node resource provider. Expected that it should take the DISK_GB from the Shared Resource Provider and VCPU, MEMORY_MB from Compute Node resource provider. | |
| 11:20:54 | bhagyashris | kashyap: Hi, I am trying to write the functional test for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/560444/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/560459/ which related to libvirt change so can you guide me how should i write the test for the same. Basically this change is fixing related to scenario: As on current master, if user configured the shared resource provider along with the Compute Node resource providers on libvirt and boot the instance then the | |
| 11:27:46 | bhagyashris | kashyap: I have checked the existing functional test cases on master under /nova/tests/functional/libvirt/test_pci_sriov_servers.py but there they are directly building the instance using the post call but in my case i will need to resource provider to build the instance | |
| 11:28:32 | bhagyashris | kashyap: so can you guide? | |
| 11:29:49 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Transform instance.exists notification https://review.openstack.org/403660 | |
| 12:05:38 | openstackgerrit | wanghongtao proposed openstack/nova master: Fix the metadata re to match the unicode https://review.openstack.org/536236 | |
| 12:09:36 | kashyap | bhagyashris: Was AFK, reading the scrollback now | |
| 12:10:26 | bhagyashris | kashyap: ok | |
| 12:11:06 | kashyap | bhagyashris: I haven't had a chance yet to use Resource Providers, so wouldn't really have great advice. Still, reading the change | |
| 12:11:47 | kashyap | bhagyashris: I think you wanted to address Eric's feedback: | |
| 12:11:51 | kashyap | "...or even better, don't mock - create an actual ProviderTree instance and assert its actual contents on the other side of the update_provider_tree call." | |
| 12:14:50 | bhagyashris | kashyap: no no Actually I have address the unit test cases related comments | |
| 12:15:27 | bhagyashris | kashyap: now i am talking about the fuctional test case part | |
| 12:18:14 | openstackgerrit | Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova master: Optional separate database for placement API https://review.openstack.org/362766 | |
| 12:18:15 | openstackgerrit | Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Add PLACEMENT_DB_ENABLED=True to the nova-next job https://review.openstack.org/564067 | |
| 12:18:35 | kashyap | bhagyashris: Ah, right | |
| 12:19:06 | openstackgerrit | Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova master: Isolate placement database config https://review.openstack.org/541435 | |
| 12:19:20 | kashyap | bhagyashris: So you don't have a precedent for functional test that uses Resource Provider to build an instance | |
| 12:19:43 | openstackgerrit | Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Ensure that os-traits sync is attempted only at start of process https://review.openstack.org/553857 | |
| 12:24:15 | bhagyashris | kashyap: yeah as of now I haven't seen the functional like the resource providers are created and that are used to build the instance | |
| 12:24:57 | kashyap | bhagyashris: I'm afraid, I'm not really familiar with that area, so I can't help without extensive trial-and-error myself. Perhaps ask on the mailing list with [nova] tag? | |
| 12:25:45 | bhagyashris | kashyap: ok | |
| 12:27:00 | kashyap | bhagyashris: Since people are spread across time zones, you might get delayed (which is normal) responses on IRC. That's why I suggested the list. | |
| 12:28:35 | bhagyashris | kashyap: ok. currently i am struggling to write that so asking on IRC for quick response | |
| 12:28:49 | kashyap | Yeah, a combination is fine. bhagyashris How about this: | |
| 12:29:13 | kashyap | bhagyashris: Post what you have based on how far you've come, and then point that to a Resource Providers expert (maybe jaypipes) for more guidance? | |
| 12:30:16 | kashyap | Also, Zuul is still failing on your https://review.openstack.org/#/c/560459/. | |
| 12:30:31 | bhagyashris | kashyap: ok waiting for others will see | |
| 12:31:24 | bhagyashris | kashyap: yeah struggling for the same also randomly the tempest test are falling | |
| 12:32:58 | bhagyashris | kashyap: and all are failing with the error as No valid host is found. I have also checked the logs and at n-sch side it's showing that the Placement is returning allocation_candidates | |
| 12:33:05 | kashyap | I see | |
| 12:33:58 | bhagyashris | kashyap: I am not getting why the n-sch is not returning the allocation_candicates as my change is at nova compute side | |
| 12:34:29 | bhagyashris | kashyap: and on master evrthing is fine only on patch patches it's failing | |
| 12:35:08 | bhagyashris | kashyap: any idea/ | |
| 12:35:10 | bhagyashris | ? | |
| 12:35:58 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Escalate UUID validation warning to error in test https://review.openstack.org/540386 | |
| 12:35:59 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Fix invalid UUIDs in test https://review.openstack.org/564190 | |
| 12:37:25 | kashyap | bhagyashris: Not without delving too deep. Please go through the traces systematically to find the root cause. I'm a bit buried with a couple of urgent things | |
| 12:37:54 | bhagyashris | kashyap: ok np thank you :) | |
| 12:38:34 | bhagyashris | jaypipes: Hi, | |
| 12:47:35 | openstackgerrit | Martin Midolesov proposed openstack/nova master: Validating video ram against the max video ram allowed https://review.openstack.org/564193 | |
| 13:14:26 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Enhance service restart in functional env https://review.openstack.org/512552 | |
| 13:14:28 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: cleanup evacuated instances not on hypervisor https://review.openstack.org/512623 | |
| 13:14:28 | openstack | bug 1724172 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Allocation of an evacuated instance is not cleaned on the source host if instance is not defined on the hypervisor" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1724172 - Assigned to Balazs Gibizer (balazs-gibizer) | |
| 13:14:28 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Reproduce bug 1724172 in the functional test env https://review.openstack.org/512553 | |
| 13:29:29 | openstackgerrit | Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: mdevs returning parent and vendor PCI info https://review.openstack.org/562304 | |
| 13:29:30 | openstackgerrit | Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Configure multiple vGPU types https://review.openstack.org/564214 | |
| 13:29:31 | openstackgerrit | Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: libvirt: Get inventories per pGPU https://review.openstack.org/564215 | |
| 13:38:05 | mnaser | super unrelated but i feel like this might be something devs have had to deal with | |
| 13:38:21 | mnaser | is there some sort of 'tcpdump for rabbitmq' toolset available anywhere (or part of rabbitmq) | |
| 13:43:44 | stephenfin | bauzas: OK, looked at that and it does seem like it's targeted. See line 35 from the paste paste.openstack.org/show/719901/ | |
| 13:43:50 | stephenfin | and compare to https://github.com/stephenfin/nova/blob/bp/numa-aware-vswitches/nova/conductor/manager.py#L1172-L1175 | |
| 13:46:41 | stephenfin | But wait - the *cell1* table wasn't migrated. Well that's annoying. I would have expected 'nova-manage sync' to do all cell tables unless I explicitly said otherwise http://paste.openstack.org/show/719912/ | |
| 13:46:56 | openstackgerrit | Hamdy Khader proposed openstack/nova master: Adding NVMEoF for libvirt driver https://review.openstack.org/482640 | |
| 13:47:08 | stephenfin | dansmith: Any reason 'nova-manage db sync' doesn't sync all cell DBs at once? | |
| 13:47:35 | dansmith | stephenfin: yeah, because that would potentially lock down all of them at once (or nearly) and maybe you're upgrading one cell before another | |
| 13:48:12 | dansmith | db sync is/can be run at runtime before upgrading code and has a significant impact on the performance of the db while running | |
| 13:48:32 | dansmith | we have or had a --all-cells flag proposed for it | |
| 13:48:47 | stephenfin | Right, and the non upgraded cell would be using old code so you wouldn't see backtraces like I did above | |
| 13:49:14 | stephenfin | (my next question was going to be "wouldn't the older schema be invalid for newer code") | |
| 13:53:53 | mriedem | stephenfin: if you want to brush this off https://review.openstack.org/#/c/420973/ | |
| 13:55:07 | stephenfin | Um, so how do I upgrade the schema for the cell1 DB? It's an all-in-one deployment so cell0 and cell1 DB are on the same node | |
| 13:55:44 | stephenfin | The docs say " If --local_cell is specified, then only the main database in the current cell is upgraded." but my main database for an all in one is...both of them? | |
| 13:55:47 | stephenfin | mriedem: I can do that | |
| 13:55:54 | dansmith | use the config that the cell1 services use | |
| 13:58:09 | stephenfin | So change '[database] connection' in nova.conf to the cell1 DB? | |
| 13:58:10 | stephenfin | Wait | |
| 13:58:24 | stephenfin | There's a '--config-file'. That should show up when I do 'nova-manage db sync --help' | |