Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2018-04-24
01:44:16 gmann alex_xu: testing in tempest too - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/563801/
02:22:23 openstackgerrit Yikun Jiang (Kero) proposed openstack/nova master: Address nits in Iac23a574a05e62a99aab20ffce4265f4fb5a44d9 https://review.openstack.org/563802
02:46:25 openstackgerrit jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: z/VM Driver: add snapshot function https://review.openstack.org/534240
02:46:26 openstackgerrit jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: z/VM Driver: add power actions https://review.openstack.org/543340
02:46:27 openstackgerrit jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: z/VM Driver: add get console output https://review.openstack.org/543344
02:47:43 openstackgerrit Yikun Jiang (Kero) proposed openstack/nova master: Address nits in Iac23a574a05e62a99aab20ffce4265f4fb5a44d9 https://review.openstack.org/563802
03:36:15 openstackgerrit Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Use os.rename, not mv. https://review.openstack.org/562463
04:45:50 openstackgerrit Julia Kreger proposed openstack/nova master: Ironic: Lock the instance if early vif plug https://review.openstack.org/563714
06:16:11 pratik deletion of snapshot created from volume attached to an instance is getting stuck in 'deleting' state with NFS backend. can anyone help? https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/compute/#delete-assisted-volume-snapshot this API returns 204 response but not sure why it gets stuck
06:26:37 openstackgerrit XiaojueGuan proposed openstack/nova master: reduce complex if clause to nice or clause https://review.openstack.org/563834
06:29:06 kashyap stephenfin: Morning
06:29:31 kashyap stephenfin: It's in the commit message :-)
06:30:51 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Record the host info in EventReporter https://review.openstack.org/556746
06:31:33 kashyap stephenfin: IOW:
06:31:36 kashyap The advertized NEXT_MIN_{LIBVIRT,QEMU} versions during
06:31:36 kashyap [quote]
06:31:37 kashyap weren't actually bumped for "Queens". So let's actually bump them for
06:31:37 kashyap "Pike" release were set to: libvirt 1.3.1 and QEMU 2.5.0 -- but they
06:31:40 kashyap the "Rocky" release.
06:31:42 kashyap [/quote]
06:31:45 kashyap (From the commit message)
07:10:58 alex_xu jaypipes, ericyoung, we miss this case in this thread http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-April/129763.html
07:15:10 kashyap stephenfin: And for "Stein", we've picked the NEXT_MIN versions here (this is merged): https://review.openstack.org/#/c/558171/
07:53:27 ygl anyone here can help me with my issue please
07:54:01 ygl i have created a vm using a heat stack. when I delete that stack, I want a user script to be trigerred automatically in the VM before its deltion
07:54:16 ygl is that possible in openstack as of now ?
08:06:54 bauzas ygl: looks like it's not a Nova feature
08:07:36 bauzas ygl: AFAIK
08:16:02 stephenfin kashyap: Ah, so it was a different commit. That's what caught me out :)
08:16:18 kashyap stephenfin: Maybe I should've mentioned it
08:16:26 kashyap stephenfin: Because it requires discussion on the Operators / Dev list
08:17:39 stephenfin kashyap: Ah, it's fine. +Wd now
08:18:01 kashyap stephenfin: Most excellent. I can build other clean-up patches on top of it
08:18:04 kashyap Thanks
08:18:21 stephenfin kashyap: Cool. Feel free to add me as a reviewer to those when you do
08:18:38 openstackgerrit sahid proposed openstack/nova master: hardware: only take into account small pages https://review.openstack.org/532168
08:18:45 openstack Launchpad bug 1766208 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Lift the restriction on choices for `cpu_model_extra_flags` config attribute" [Undecided,New] - Assigned to Kashyap Chamarthy (kashyapc)
08:18:45 kashyap Definitely. But before that I'm trying to get this out of the way: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1766208
08:25:01 openstackgerrit sahid proposed openstack/nova master: remove IVS plug/unplug as they're moved to separate plugin https://review.openstack.org/534371
09:19:59 Kevin_Zheng alex_xu Thanks for the review, but Error instances could also have Ip, so I guess we should not skip cell0?
09:28:54 alex_xu Kevin_Zheng: cell0 means the instance didn't get right scheduling, so they shouldn't have IP I think
09:29:25 Kevin_Zheng let me think
09:29:32 alex_xu even if they go to a cell and fail, the IP should be released?
09:29:34 Kevin_Zheng error instance will still be cell1?
09:29:46 alex_xu Kevin_Zheng: yes
09:29:55 Kevin_Zheng No, Ip will still be on instances records
09:30:04 alex_xu Kevin_Zheng: one of case I'm sure is the pre-created ported
09:30:55 Kevin_Zheng then you should comment erlier :)
09:30:58 alex_xu Kevin_Zheng: if the instance turn to error after booting, they shouldn't be in cell0, and yes they has IP
09:31:10 Kevin_Zheng yeah, I got that
09:31:14 alex_xu Kevin_Zheng: yea, but i'm not -1 :)
09:32:00 alex_xu Kevin_Zheng: if that makes sense, I still think they should be separated patch
09:40:41 Kevin_Zheng alex_xu I will consider it :)
09:50:59 openstackgerrit XiaojueGuan proposed openstack/nova master: change complex if clause to nice or clause https://review.openstack.org/563872
09:53:43 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: libvirt: Bump MIN_{LIBVIRT,QEMU}_VERSION for "Rocky" https://review.openstack.org/558783
10:17:21 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Drop MIN_LIBVIRT_SET_ADMIN_PASSWD https://review.openstack.org/562312
10:17:28 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Remove vestigial system_metadata param from info_from_instance() https://review.openstack.org/561724
10:56:45 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Improve performance when list instances with IP filter https://review.openstack.org/539469
11:23:33 openstackgerrit Naichuan Sun proposed openstack/nova master: xenapi(N-R-P): Add API to support vgpu resource provider create https://review.openstack.org/520313
12:08:40 jaypipes alex_xu: will respond on the ML thread, ok?
12:12:05 kashyap Goddamnit
12:12:09 kashyap The Gerrit UI
12:12:33 kashyap It _keeps_ jumping around.
12:13:37 kashyap No wonder I still like the blazing fast e-mail workflow. /me whips up the 'ncurses'-based 'Gertty' tool to see if it has gotten a bit less crashy
12:13:41 sean-k-mooney kashyap: matt found a workaround for that. in your preferences set render mode to slow
12:13:57 kashyap sean-k-mooney: Oh really? /me goes to look
12:13:59 jaypipes kashyap: I know. It's infuriating.
12:14:11 kashyap This just makes the throw the laptop out the fucking window
12:14:19 jaypipes sean-k-mooney: I have that set in my prefs and still happens occasionally.
12:14:28 cdent sean-k-mooney, kashyap the slow render mode helps some, but not all of it
12:14:32 cdent jinx
12:14:47 sean-k-mooney jaypipes: ya it seams to depend on gerrit version
12:15:19 sean-k-mooney there is a new gerrit ui based on javascitp on the latest realease called polygerrit
12:15:24 kashyap sean-k-mooney: Okay, so in Diff Preferences --> Render --> "Slow", yes?
12:15:31 sean-k-mooney kashyap: yes
12:16:07 kashyap sean-k-mooney: Any other preferences that you "can't live without"?
12:16:19 kashyap Maybe I'm "missing out" something
12:16:25 sean-k-mooney kashyap: not that come to mind
12:16:25 kashyap cdent: Noted
12:16:31 kashyap Cool; thanks
12:18:13 sean-k-mooney kashyap: if we ever update the openstack gerrit to support polygerrit ui then that should solve this permently but im sure that has its own bugs
12:18:18 jaypipes kashyap: oh, I'm pretty sure you're missing out on lots of things :P
12:18:50 kashyap jaypipes: I just maintain my sanity (from Gerrit) by spending a portion of time on mailing list based projects :P
12:18:56 kashyap sean-k-mooney: What does "polygerrit" do?
12:19:42 jaypipes kashyap: it's gerrit that simply repeats stuff back to you.
12:19:51 jaypipes kashyap: oh wait, no, that's PollyGerrit.
12:20:20 sean-k-mooney kashyap: its a complete reimplementaiton of the entire gerrit ui in plomer.js and html5 so no more java/gwt
12:20:35 kashyap Unrelated "taste" question -- is it bad taste to write a small clarifying comment in a unit test?
12:20:38 kashyap E.g.:
12:20:40 kashyap + # For 'host-model', it is now valid to use 'extra_flags';
12:20:43 kashyap + # so warning should not be thrown
12:20:45 kashyap + self.assertFalse(mock_warn.called)
12:20:54 jaypipes kashyap: that is good taste, IMHO.
12:20:55 kashyap There are multiple unit tests, but the "asserts" won't speak for themselves, if you're not reading code carefully around
12:21:19 kashyap jaypipes: Thanks. It is subtle, and this helps. So I'll add it in
12:21:42 kashyap sean-k-mooney: My single biggest feature request is: if I can reply from Gerrit mail, that'll solve "everything" for me with Gerrit
12:21:46 sean-k-mooney kashyap: the only time i would consider that bad taste is if it is done instead of splitting a test that is too complex. adding comments to explain clearly what your testing is good
12:21:58 kashyap As long as I don't have to deal with the clickety-clicky, RSI-inducing GUI
12:22:33 openstack Launchpad bug 1766208 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Lift the restriction on choices for `cpu_model_extra_flags` config attribute" [Undecided,New] - Assigned to Kashyap Chamarthy (kashyapc)
12:22:33 kashyap sean-k-mooney: Good point; I did split the test. I'm lifting the restriction we added here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1766208

Earlier   Later