| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2018-04-19 | |||
| 17:32:46 | edleafe | The Foundation doesn't think that developer productivity is worth spending money on | |
| 17:33:01 | jaypipes | apparently the train honking situation has been fixed. | |
| 17:33:31 | mriedem | "All aboard! Next stop Denver!" is pretty funny though | |
| 17:33:38 | jaypipes | indeed. | |
| 17:37:55 | mriedem | well this doesn't look good http://grafana.openstack.org/dashboard/db/zuul-status?panelId=19&fullscreen | |
| 17:38:46 | efried | if you say so | |
| 17:38:59 | mriedem | is the total drop out normal? maybe it is. | |
| 17:39:02 | melwitt | what does taht mean | |
| 17:39:13 | mriedem | i've just been noticing that stuff is sitting in the queue for awhile | |
| 17:39:36 | mriedem | i'm watching lee's revert on ocata | |
| 17:41:51 | melwitt | yeah, online vs accepting. I would have thought online means "has the ability to accept" so the drop means things no longer being accepted. but why | |
| 17:42:45 | efried | Oh, I would have thought 0 means "we're all busy doing stuff right now" and the worrisome part would be when the line is all the way at the top ("there's nothing in the gate at the moment" - which does that ever happen, ever??) | |
| 17:48:50 | melwitt | asking in -infra. inquiring minds want to know | |
| 17:57:44 | efried | dansmith: Not sure if you've been following the ML thread, but you're one likely to have a strong opinion, so can I pester you for the second nod? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/562687/ | |
| 17:58:36 | dansmith | efried: honestly I'm a little worn out on that stuff | |
| 17:59:36 | efried | dansmith: Aren't we all | |
| 18:10:00 | mriedem | arvindn05: done https://review.openstack.org/#/c/560718/ | |
| 18:11:31 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova stable/pike: ironic: Get correct inventory for deployed node https://review.openstack.org/561925 | |
| 18:17:52 | melwitt | this looks like something we might want to get in before novaclient release https://review.openstack.org/#/c/424256 | |
| 18:19:12 | melwitt | not sure if all the concerns from the -1 got answered, but it was updated this morning | |
| 18:33:31 | melwitt | mriedem: wanna double check this osc-placement release patch pls? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/56278 | |
| 18:35:41 | mriedem | melwitt: wrong patch | |
| 18:35:47 | mriedem | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/562787/ | |
| 18:35:54 | mriedem | RIP hartsocks | |
| 18:36:07 | melwitt | aw | |
| 18:36:29 | melwitt | I failed at copy-pate | |
| 18:36:32 | melwitt | *paste | |
| 18:36:34 | melwitt | and typing | |
| 18:37:54 | melwitt | efried, jaypipes: did y'all want to get these two things in before os-traits release today? https://review.openstack.org/546713 and https://review.openstack.org/553277 | |
| 18:38:21 | melwitt | or is it cool to just go ahead | |
| 18:38:56 | efried | It looks like we want gibi to sign off on the former | |
| 18:43:48 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: [CLI] Fix token auth type https://review.openstack.org/424256 | |
| 18:44:01 | mriedem | melwitt: +2 on ^ | |
| 18:44:23 | melwitt | ack | |
| 18:47:18 | jaypipes | melwitt: can't merge https://review.openstack.org/#/c/546713/ until mriedem signs off in. The proposed supports_recreate capability would be changed to supports_evacuate by mdbooth's patch. | |
| 18:47:48 | mriedem | there is no supports_recreate capability in that os-traits patch | |
| 18:47:49 | jaypipes | melwitt: never mind... I forgot I didn't put supports_recreate in there. | |
| 18:48:39 | jaypipes | melwitt: either way, since I proposed the patch, someone else needs to +2. | |
| 18:49:17 | jaypipes | melwitt: as for the CPU max display heads one, I'm already +2 on it. | |
| 18:49:21 | jaypipes | GPU... | |
| 18:49:56 | melwitt | yeah, I mean, were those two things important for the release today or are they fine to wait till a future release | |
| 18:50:27 | jaypipes | melwitt: I wouldn't mind having them merged. | |
| 18:50:58 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Move some tests into nova.tests.unit.notifications.objects.test_instance https://review.openstack.org/562793 | |
| 18:55:46 | mriedem | jroll: does https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1765334 sound familiar to you as something we might have fixed already outside of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/518294/ ? | |
| 18:55:47 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1765334 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Ironic resource class may not be put into inventory in Pike" [Undecided,New] | |
| 18:55:51 | mriedem | johnthetubaguy_: ^ | |
| 19:02:41 | mriedem | looks like https://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/9ed692bf8c84e0a702536101cd6cb084d33e1c26#diff-6243ddf138dd43ec84fc716722531cb8 | |
| 19:06:19 | jroll | mriedem: sounds like 518294 might need a backport to pike? | |
| 19:07:12 | mriedem | eh, idk | |
| 19:07:23 | jroll | mriedem: or it's a race against the resource tracker | |
| 19:07:36 | melwitt | mriedem: novaclient release patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/562804 | |
| 19:07:45 | mriedem | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/518294/ is specifically about resource inventory that's not in the compute node, only placement | |
| 19:08:00 | jroll | ah | |
| 19:08:04 | mriedem | in the case of this ironic bug on pike, it's a custom resource class that gets proxied into the node later | |
| 19:08:27 | mriedem | so rather than create the ironic node with a custom resource class, they create the node, then add the resource class, and that doesn't get reported, via nova (RT) into placement | |
| 19:08:55 | jroll | mriedem: don't think it's the commit you linked, though, that one is about nodes with instances, the bug is before an instance is places | |
| 19:08:56 | mriedem | because nova doesn't think that custom resource classes are something worth reporting for inventory i guess, unless a *known* inventory class changes, like VCPU, MEMORY_MB and DISK_GB | |
| 19:09:20 | mriedem | ah yeah | |
| 19:09:36 | mriedem | that's what i asked in the bug, is the node deployed or not which might make it different from dtantsur|pto's patch | |
| 19:09:52 | mriedem | "1. Always reporting the custom resource class for deployed nodes, if present." | |
| 19:10:08 | mriedem | so they need to always report custom resource class inventory regardless of node state | |
| 19:10:22 | mriedem | bleh, yay proxy fun | |
| 19:14:39 | mriedem | melwitt: was there something specifically in the novaclient changelog that made you think we should do a major version bump? | |
| 19:15:10 | melwitt | mriedem: the addition of the 2.61 microversion support. is that not necessarily a major version? | |
| 19:15:16 | mriedem | no, that's a feature | |
| 19:15:21 | mriedem | minor version bump | |
| 19:16:00 | melwitt | oh, guh. okay. | |
| 19:19:58 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1765144 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "[keystone_authtoken] auth_url = http://controller:35357 port error, it should be 5000" [Undecided,New] | |
| 19:19:58 | mriedem | lbragstad: is this right? https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1765144 | |
| 19:20:39 | lbragstad | mriedem: yes and no | |
| 19:20:55 | lbragstad | technically we removed the legacy v2.0 app in queens, so we no longer require two ports | |
| 19:21:04 | lbragstad | but it certainly don't have to be port 5000, or 35357 | |
| 19:21:23 | mriedem | yeah looking in http://logs.openstack.org/20/554920/12/check/tempest-full/df42a0d/controller/logs/etc/nova/nova_conf.txt.gz | |
| 19:21:27 | mriedem | we don't specify a port at all | |
| 19:21:50 | lbragstad | oh - sure v | |
| 19:21:52 | lbragstad | https://github.com/openstack/releases/blob/master/deliverables/queens/keystoneauth.yaml#L17 | |
| 19:22:07 | lbragstad | auth_url = https://198.72.124.213/identity | |
| 19:22:16 | mriedem | and auth_uri isn't specified at all | |
| 19:22:44 | mriedem | was auth_uri keystone v1/v2 only? | |
| 19:23:38 | lbragstad | you should use auth_url | |
| 19:23:52 | lbragstad | auth_url and auth_uri was causing a lot of confusion | |
| 19:23:56 | lbragstad | so we renamed it https://github.com/openstack/keystonemiddleware/commit/409b482253dec248ed828e92e52b09d4c02e51dd | |
| 19:24:32 | lbragstad | it was ultimately a side-effect of integrating keystoneauth into keystonemiddleware | |
| 19:27:01 | mriedem | ok so the note at step 5 here https://docs.openstack.org/keystone/latest/install/keystone-install-ubuntu.html#install-and-configure-components | |
| 19:27:09 | mriedem | "Before the Queens release, keystone needed to be run on two separate ports to accommodate the Identity v2 API which ran a separate admin-only service commonly on port 35357. With the removal of the v2 API, keystone can be run on the same port for all interfaces." | |
| 19:28:28 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova stable/ocata: Clean up volumes on boot failure https://review.openstack.org/545086 | |
| 19:28:42 | mriedem | lbragstad: and i'm assuming that keystone-manage bootstrap creates the identity service endpoint in the catalog? | |
| 19:28:50 | lbragstad | it does | |
| 19:29:01 | mriedem | so if hte docs say "--bootstrap-public-url http://controller:5000/v3/" | |
| 19:29:12 | mriedem | then that's probably what the nova docs should use | |
| 19:29:25 | mriedem | or internal url i guess, but they are the same in the docs | |
| 19:30:16 | mriedem | ok i'll push a change to fix the nova install guide docs to remove auth_uri and change auth_url to use port 5000 | |
| 19:30:20 | mriedem | thanks | |
| 19:32:11 | lbragstad | mriedem: cool - that's a good idea.. | |
| 19:32:16 | lbragstad | i just left a comment on that bug | |
| 19:32:51 | lbragstad | the only things is that people started noticing this when moving from one installation guide to another (and different services were referencing different ports) | |
| 19:38:06 | mriedem | yeah. i've also always been confused by auth_uri and auth_url, glad i wasn't the only one | |
| 19:38:25 | melwitt | mriedem: nova queens 17.0.3 release patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/562806 | |
| 19:40:40 | mriedem | lgtm | |
| 19:48:10 | jaypipes | lol. turning off @safe_connect blows up unit tests but functional tests work just fine... | |