Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2018-04-13
10:49:24 kashyap (Post-successful rebase)
10:50:42 odyssey4me kashyap it already does, assuming the only thing changing in the rebase is the parent commit and date/time
10:51:05 kashyap lyarwood: Seems like 'pep8' failures on that Ocata backport; will look post meetings
10:51:16 kashyap odyssey4me: Ah, I meant +W
10:51:21 lyarwood kashyap: yeah sorting it out now
10:51:27 odyssey4me ah no, workflow is lost
10:57:22 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova stable/ocata: libvirt: Allow to specify granular CPU feature flags https://review.openstack.org/561168
10:57:43 lyarwood kashyap: ^ just a missing _LW
10:58:13 kashyap lyarwood: Ah-ha; /me quickly takes a peek
11:08:44 openstackgerrit sahid proposed openstack/nova stable/queens: only increment disk address unit for scsi devices https://review.openstack.org/561196
11:47:07 openstackgerrit Yikun Jiang (Kero) proposed openstack/nova master: Record the host info in EventReporter https://review.openstack.org/556746
11:47:08 openstackgerrit Yikun Jiang (Kero) proposed openstack/nova master: Extract generate_hostid method into utils.py https://review.openstack.org/555282
11:47:09 openstackgerrit Yikun Jiang (Kero) proposed openstack/nova master: Add host/hostId to instance action events API https://review.openstack.org/557145
12:03:24 sahid dansmith: in case you have a moment to look at this today https://review.openstack.org/#/c/484997/
12:14:06 openstackgerrit Yikun Jiang (Kero) proposed openstack/nova master: Address nits in Idf57fb5fbc611abb83943bd7e36d3cebf03b3977 https://review.openstack.org/561205
12:15:29 openstackgerrit Yikun Jiang (Kero) proposed openstack/nova master: Address nits in Idf57fb5fbc611abb83943bd7e36d3cebf03b3977 https://review.openstack.org/561205
12:23:34 bhujay Hello everybody , would be grateful if someone can give me a hint why my openstack environment timestamp is not showing localtime that is set in operating system /etc/timezone
12:24:56 bhujay nova vm create , key create or any such creation date is showing utc time and i cant figure out how to change this to localtime
12:55:40 fried_rice ö/
12:59:16 fried_rice stephenfin: is https://review.openstack.org/561190 intended to fix test_non_ami?
12:59:24 fried_rice (Which is French for "No, friend")
12:59:43 stephenfin fried_rice: That's the intention, yup
13:04:31 fried_rice finucannot: +A (which is French for "Oui, ami")
13:22:35 Spaz-Home Happy friday folks.. time for me to call it an ight
13:34:03 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/queens: libvirt: Block swapping to an encrypted volume when using QEMU to decrypt https://review.openstack.org/559987
13:42:14 mriedem finucannot: thanks for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/561190/
13:44:44 finucannot mriedem: np
13:52:47 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: doc: cleanup API guide about instance faults https://review.openstack.org/560178
13:54:23 mriedem that would have been merged by now except with the zuulv3 reswizzle on irrelevant_files we're running tempest jobs on unit test only changes still
13:55:41 mriedem finucannot: can't we define our own nova-tox-py27 and then define our own irrelevant-files list?
13:55:43 mriedem gmann: ^?
13:55:50 mriedem i remember gibi asking about this in the ML
13:56:07 finucannot mriedem: IIRC, we can't override the global state
13:56:12 finucannot for that one anyway
13:57:29 mriedem we can't just define our own job that doesn't extend openstack-tox-py27?
13:57:40 mriedem like, copy openstack-tox-py27 and tweak but not extend
13:57:51 finucannot Ohh, I guess we could do that, yeah
13:58:58 finucannot I think openstack-tox-py27 is run by default though. I'm not sure how/if we can disable that
13:59:11 mriedem it's run because of the "openstack-python-jobs" usage in project-config
13:59:17 finucannot i.e. it's defined in openstack/project-config or the likes
13:59:18 finucannot yup
13:59:47 finucannot *openstack-infra/project-config
13:59:47 mriedem which runs:
13:59:48 mriedem - openstack-tox-py27
13:59:48 mriedem - openstack-tox-pep8
14:00:17 mriedem yeah so if we defined our own job, we'd have to list openstack-tox-pep8 in our own .zuul.yaml along with nova-tox-py27, but that seems ok,
14:00:30 mriedem and we'd have to backport it to all stable branches before removing the template usage from project-config
14:00:54 mriedem trivial but time consuming
14:01:10 finucannot Hmm. Can zuulv3 not support this use case?
14:01:32 mriedem i don't know why you can't extend an existing job and override attributes of it, like irrelevant-files
14:01:36 mriedem if we could do that, we'd be set
14:02:14 finucannot That sounds like a more effective use of time, if we can do it. I wonder if mordred is around?
14:02:25 mriedem i'm asking again in -infra,
14:02:32 mriedem but last time this came up there were lots of words in the ML
14:02:45 mriedem my head exploded, and i moved on
14:03:58 mriedem just sucks that we have to wait 2+ hours for a 15 min job
14:04:22 mriedem heh, maybe i should be asking, why is this taking nearly 2 hours
14:04:23 mriedem tempest-full-py3SUCCESS in 1h 50m 17s
14:04:49 fried_rice mriedem: How long does it take when you run it locally? Did you say you can run the whole thing in 15m?
14:05:07 mriedem fried_rice: i just mean the unit test job takes 15 minutes
14:05:17 mriedem and that's all we care about in this unit test only patch
14:05:25 fried_rice ah, I see.
14:05:46 fried_rice Well, I know I've seen special cases where what you've changed influences which jobs are run.
14:05:59 fried_rice Can't remember specifically for sure, but I think e.g. if you only change docs, only docs jobs are run.
14:06:05 fried_rice So there's a precedent for it.
14:06:32 mriedem yes that's how things used to all work when the jobs were centralized in project-config, pre-zuulv3
14:06:46 mriedem looking at http://logs.openstack.org/90/561190/1/check/tempest-full-py3/41adeca/controller/logs/stackviz/#/stdin/timeline some of the tempest tests are taking over 7 minutes
14:07:18 mriedem maybe that's all related to meltdown/spectre fallout...
14:07:19 mriedem slow nodes
14:07:37 mriedem alright, i'll take my cup o coffee and go back into my old man hole now
14:25:49 mordred finucannot: uhoh
14:25:53 mordred finucannot: what did I do this time?
14:26:04 mriedem alex_xu: bauzas: per https://review.openstack.org/#/c/554159/ - this is doing the same thing that 2.47 does with showing embedded flavors with extra specs in GET /servers/{server_id}
14:26:48 fried_rice mordred: Da boyz were noodling whether/how we could make certain jobs conditional.
14:27:01 finucannot mordred: It's mriedem you've to worry about. He's mad about not being able to override 'irrelevant-files' on our tox-py27 job
14:27:22 fried_rice mordred: E.g. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/561190/ changed only a UT file, so it would be nice if we didn't bother running all the tempest suites, and we could merge the sucker in 15 minutes instead of 2h.
14:27:38 mordred totallly understand
14:27:57 bauzas mriedem: so it's using a same policy rule for that ?
14:28:19 mriedem bauzas: see my reply to alex_xu in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/554159/ just now
14:28:27 bauzas lemme check the code but I need to disappear in like 2 mins
14:29:06 bauzas mriedem: okay, lemme change my vote, but it'll require a docfix
14:29:29 bauzas that's the other option I had in mind, so it was a soft -1
14:29:37 mordred I would actually think that just adding a nova-specific openstack-tox-py35 variant with some additional irrelevant-files added would work
14:29:51 mordred I'm assuming y'all have tried that already?
14:30:41 bauzas mriedem: +W'd with a comment asking for a followup
14:32:58 mriedem bauzas: thanks
14:33:03 mriedem i replied to more of the inline stuff too
14:38:51 mriedem mordred: already talked about that above, and the implications of doing so
14:39:01 mriedem mordred: tl;dr is i know it's trivial to do, just time consuming
14:39:07 mriedem given backports to stable and changes to project-config
14:39:40 mriedem it would help e-r to have project-specific tox jobs again http://status.openstack.org/elastic-recheck/data/integrated_gate.html#openstack-tox-py35
14:42:57 Shilpa mriedem: Hi, i was going thorugh https://review.openstack.org/#/c/511965/1 >> Spec for volume-backed flavors, any reason why workflow is -1 here
14:43:17 mordred mriedem: I tink we're collecting enough metadata so that elastic recheck could know job + project - we sohuld probably update it to use the data
14:46:39 mriedem Shilpa: because it's complicated and mostly a brain dump to docs for something we've talked about sporadically when we have meetups (PTG, Forum, etc)
14:46:50 mriedem it's not something i'm actively pursuing for Rocky
14:47:21 leakypipes mriedem, mdbooth, superdan: so, question coming from one of our ops teams... is it possible to (live) migrate from a host using ceph for ephemeral disk storage to a host that uses local disk storage (this is temporarily during an upgrade procedure)
14:47:50 superdan leakypipes: with block migration maybe
14:48:05 superdan I'm not an expert there, I'd ask mdbooth when he gets off a call in 13 mins
14:48:12 leakypipes superdan: cool, thx
14:48:28 superdan leakypipes: also please see channel topic

Earlier   Later