| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2018-04-09 | |||
| 13:32:03 | efried | lyarwood: Yeah, I'm sure there's a reason we've got those peps switched off - it must be because the ptb don't care. | |
| 13:32:03 | lyarwood | urgh sorry that's not good | |
| 13:33:29 | efried | # extra line breaks. Updating code to enforce these will be a hard sell. | |
| 13:33:29 | efried | # them ends up causing some really odd code formatting and forced | |
| 13:33:29 | efried | # because while they are often useful guidelines, strict adherence to | |
| 13:33:29 | efried | # Most of the whitespace related rules (E12* and E131) are excluded | |
| 13:33:29 | efried | lyarwood: FYI, this excerpt from tox.ini explains to some extent: | |
| 13:34:07 | efried | If I may paraphrase: "Follow these rules unless it results in really odd code formatting or forced extra line breaks" | |
| 13:34:24 | efried | ...which is of course difficult without OCD reviewers (or being OCD yourself) | |
| 13:34:32 | efried | ...which is why the peps exist. | |
| 13:41:35 | efried | mikal: yt? | |
| 13:42:13 | openstackgerrit | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Block swapping to an encrypted volume when using QEMU to decrypt https://review.openstack.org/544238 | |
| 13:42:14 | mriedem | tblakes: if jgwentworth says she can't reproduce the problem on master then i guess it's not an issue, especially if we can't recreate with a test | |
| 13:44:10 | efried | mriedem: Quick re-approval for lyarwood: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/544238/ | |
| 13:44:29 | tblakes | mriedem: Thanks! I'll abandon https://review.openstack.org/#/c/559169/ and recheck https://review.openstack.org/#/c/559158/. | |
| 13:45:21 | openstackgerrit | Raoul Hidalgo Charman proposed openstack/nova master: Expose shutdown retry interval as config setting https://review.openstack.org/552483 | |
| 13:52:37 | dansmith | mriedem: were you going to look at this? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/558059/ | |
| 13:55:56 | mriedem | dansmith: yes, i now have an excellent sized queue after starting about 20 minutes ago | |
| 13:56:36 | edleafe | Scheduler subteam meeting in 4 minutes in #openstack-meeting-alt | |
| 13:59:09 | dansmith | mriedem: you're welcome | |
| 14:00:33 | openstackgerrit | Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: Fix comments at the 'save' method of objects.Instance https://review.openstack.org/559743 | |
| 14:01:31 | jaypipes | 4/join #openstack-meeting-alt | |
| 14:01:35 | jaypipes | ffs | |
| 14:13:19 | mriedem | efried: lyarwood: +W | |
| 14:13:55 | openstackgerrit | Kashyap Chamarthy proposed openstack/nova master: [RFC] Pick next minimum libvirt / QEMU versions for "Stein" https://review.openstack.org/558171 | |
| 14:13:56 | openstackgerrit | Kashyap Chamarthy proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Bump MIN_{LIBVIRT,QEMU}_VERSION for "Rocky" https://review.openstack.org/558783 | |
| 14:14:34 | openstackgerrit | Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova-specs master: mirror nova host aggregates to placement API https://review.openstack.org/545057 | |
| 14:14:48 | jaypipes | mriedem: ^ done. | |
| 14:20:28 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova-specs master: mirror nova host aggregates to placement API https://review.openstack.org/545057 | |
| 14:20:54 | mriedem | thanks | |
| 14:20:54 | mriedem | jaypipes: tweaked the alternative section, but +2 | |
| 14:23:40 | jaypipes | mriedem: thx | |
| 14:29:07 | openstackgerrit | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Avoid dumping stack on BuildAbortException https://review.openstack.org/559751 | |
| 14:29:16 | dansmith | mriedem: ^ | |
| 14:29:47 | openstackgerrit | Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova master: Isolate placement database config https://review.openstack.org/541435 | |
| 14:29:47 | openstackgerrit | Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova master: Optional separate database for placement API https://review.openstack.org/362766 | |
| 14:29:48 | openstackgerrit | Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Ensure that os-traits sync is attempted only at start of process https://review.openstack.org/553857 | |
| 14:32:10 | kashyap | alex_xu: Hi, when you're around -- maybe you'd know the answer to my question on `enabled_pef_events`: | |
| 14:32:38 | kashyap | alex_xu: As it stands, seems like Nova accepts far beyond three events (cmt, mbmt, mbml). Isn't it? | |
| 14:33:07 | kashyap | alex_xu: Because the source for that config attributes shows it accepts a string list -- so all values that are supported by libvirt are accepted by Nova | |
| 14:33:13 | kashyap | (At least that's what the doc says) | |
| 14:36:42 | kashyap | alex_xu: Disregard me, answered my question -- yes, it supports broader set of events besides those tree | |
| 14:36:45 | kashyap | s/tree/three/ | |
| 14:37:47 | mriedem | esberglu: why is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/554688/ in the runways etherpad? | |
| 14:37:57 | mriedem | it's not tied to a blueprint, but is just powervm driver specific, | |
| 14:38:13 | mriedem | if it's not a bp, please just include it in the powervm driver section of the other priority review etherpad https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/rocky-nova-priorities-tracking | |
| 14:38:26 | esberglu | mriedem: Will do | |
| 14:38:35 | mriedem | thanks | |
| 14:45:20 | openstackgerrit | Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova master: Use nova.db.api directly https://review.openstack.org/543262 | |
| 14:46:52 | mriedem | sahid: bauzas: this spec tracking is really odd https://review.openstack.org/#/c/511188/ - that's for rocky, for a blueprint which is closed | |
| 14:47:29 | mriedem | why isn't there a "overhead-pin-set" spec for rocky? | |
| 14:48:03 | bauzas | mriedem: shit, you're right | |
| 14:48:09 | bauzas | mriedem: the URL is wrong | |
| 14:49:01 | mriedem | and the name of the spec is wrong | |
| 14:49:05 | openstackgerrit | Eric Berglund proposed openstack/nova master: PowerVM Driver: Localdisk https://review.openstack.org/549300 | |
| 14:49:06 | bauzas | I haven't looked at the related BP, my bad | |
| 14:49:13 | mriedem | sahid: can you fix that up please? | |
| 14:49:46 | bauzas | I think sahid didn't changed the spec when we asked him to create that BP | |
| 14:50:12 | mriedem | finucannot: you can remove the -2 on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/510897/ - the spec is approved | |
| 14:50:18 | bauzas | mriedem: thanks for that btw. | |
| 14:50:26 | bauzas | honestly, I should also look at the BP | |
| 14:58:18 | sahid | mriedem: at the beginning it was just an update of the already approved spec, that is why we did not have really noticed the issue | |
| 14:59:25 | bauzas | sahid: ping me when you're done with the new change and I'll +2 | |
| 14:59:33 | bauzas | for renaming I mean | |
| 14:59:58 | sahid | yes i will | |
| 15:11:41 | mriedem | dansmith: replied in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/558059/ | |
| 15:17:37 | jaypipes | cdent: ok, everyone gone | |
| 15:17:55 | cdent | roger | |
| 15:18:24 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: Support extending attached ScaleIO volumes https://review.openstack.org/554679 | |
| 15:20:20 | mriedem | jaypipes: efried: -1 on tetsuro's spec https://review.openstack.org/#/c/559466/ - the bp link is wrong for one, but i'm also wondering if this is just to enable out of tree filters/weighters, or if he actually wants to add a vGPU weighter to nova | |
| 15:20:24 | mriedem | i'd be supportive of that if so | |
| 15:20:52 | mriedem | question inline about the slippery slope of including provider trees in the response also | |
| 15:21:32 | mriedem | bauzas: you would probably be interested in that idea ^ | |
| 15:24:22 | mriedem | jgwentworth: dansmith: i guess we were supposed to be actively brainstorming for the forum https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/YVR-nova-brainstorming | |
| 15:25:51 | mriedem | efried: jaypipes: cdent: edleafe: i'm sure there are placement things that could be at the forum | |
| 15:26:02 | mriedem | e.g. cinder talking about maybe leveraging it in their scheduler | |
| 15:26:15 | cdent | mriedem: yes, it's on y list | |
| 15:26:30 | cdent | got a couple things, including the cinder thing | |
| 15:26:35 | mriedem | efried: design sessions at the summit | |
| 15:26:51 | bauzas | mriedem: ack, I'll look | |
| 15:27:18 | bauzas | -ETOOMANYPLACEMENTSPECS | |
| 15:27:51 | bauzas | should we stop feeding the placement mogwaï after midnight ? | |
| 15:28:11 | openstackgerrit | Ed Leafe proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add Generation to Consumers https://review.openstack.org/556971 | |
| 15:29:14 | efried | bauzas: It's water that makes 'em multiply. Feeding after midnight turns 'em evil. | |
| 15:29:19 | edleafe | efried: ^^ addressed your concerns | |
| 15:30:50 | bauzas | efried: ha, right. So, people, stop hydrating your specs | |
| 15:31:14 | jaypipes | mriedem: it's not to enable anything in particular. it's just to remove a restriction in the returned results of allocation candidates' provider_summaries section that wasn't necessary to restrict. | |
| 15:31:25 | bauzas | and don't give'em a review after midnight or they'll turn into something bad | |
| 15:31:54 | bauzas | efried: technically, growing mogwais is good | |
| 15:32:11 | bauzas | if you respect the 3 rules | |
| 15:33:15 | bauzas | jaypipes: what's up with the placement channel ? can I rejoin it ? | |
| 15:33:24 | cdent | bauzas: yes, it's ready | |
| 15:33:34 | bauzas | :'( | |
| 15:34:09 | jaypipes | bauzas: I warned you to leave the channel :) | |
| 15:34:49 | bauzas | jaypipes: well, you kick after the first warning, I hope your pugs behave correctly :p | |
| 15:39:12 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Return all resources in provider_summaries spec https://review.openstack.org/559466 | |
| 15:39:20 | efried | mriedem, jaypipes: I went ahead and made those edits ^ | |
| 15:39:26 | efried | tetsuro ^ | |
| 15:42:24 | bauzas | efried: see my comment on the spec | |
| 15:42:33 | bauzas | efried: about interop | |