| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2018-03-21 | |||
| 06:32:59 | yikun | gmann_, and for the things about policy name, I just think it's ok to me to change ``policy`` to ``name``, and do some convert in api to transfer this ``name`` to the ``policy`` in db. | |
| 06:34:43 | openstackgerrit | jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: Move placement test cases from db to placement https://review.openstack.org/553149 | |
| 06:38:45 | yikun | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/546925/2/specs/rocky/approved/allow-specifying-limit-for-affrinity-group.rst@49 | |
| 06:38:45 | yikun | gmann_, actually, the 'name/type' also as a alternative name for policy, as I mentioned, in PS2: | |
| 06:39:00 | yikun | But I thought it seems we need keep consist between api and db, so, in current PS, I use the 2 times policy which look like a bit redundant. | |
| 06:55:41 | openstackgerrit | zhufl proposed openstack/nova master: Fix api-ref: nova image-meta is deprecated from 2.39 https://review.openstack.org/554813 | |
| 06:59:08 | openstackgerrit | jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: Remove quota reserve/commit/rollback https://review.openstack.org/521470 | |
| 07:07:47 | openstackgerrit | jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: deprecate fping_path config option https://review.openstack.org/526602 | |
| 07:53:56 | openstackgerrit | jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: Add more functional test for placement.usage https://review.openstack.org/513264 | |
| 07:59:19 | openstackgerrit | Naichuan Sun proposed openstack/nova master: xenapi: Use XAPI pool instead of aggregate pool for shared SR migration https://review.openstack.org/554154 | |
| 08:05:37 | gmann_ | yikun: i see, just respond. changing to name looks ok to me. | |
| 08:06:22 | gmann_ | yikun: i will give try to test the schema in parallel but tomorrow as it is holiday in japan so not allowed to work much due to wife order :) | |
| 08:07:26 | openstackgerrit | jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: Remove translate and a TODO https://review.openstack.org/554827 | |
| 08:08:04 | yikun | ha, really thanks, and I also try it now, but it seems doesn't work, I'm trying to find the reason. | |
| 08:08:10 | yikun | gmann_, | |
| 08:08:13 | yikun | ^ | |
| 08:08:36 | gmann_ | ohk, sure | |
| 08:24:17 | yikun | gmann_, good msg, it works. | |
| 08:24:21 | yikun | it didn't work well before, the reason is a typo in "s/aditionalProperties/additionalProperties", | |
| 08:24:29 | yikun | sorry, I just copy from your comment and didn't find this tiny typo. | |
| 08:24:32 | yikun | and my result paste here: | |
| 08:24:37 | yikun | http://paste.openstack.org/show/707232/ | |
| 08:26:45 | gmann_ | yikun: ahhh, thanks that's my bad finger when editing on vim :) good to hear that worked | |
| 08:29:03 | yikun | gmann_, lol, I will update specs later, and have a good holiday. : ) | |
| 08:29:39 | gmann_ | yikun: thanks, ll review that once you push new version. | |
| 08:33:13 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova stable/ocata: Fix joins in instance_get_all_by_host https://review.openstack.org/511682 | |
| 09:12:02 | openstackgerrit | Yikun Jiang (Kero) proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Complex (Anti)-Affinity Policies https://review.openstack.org/546925 | |
| 09:37:26 | openstackgerrit | jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: z/VM Driver: Spawn and destroy function of z/VM driver https://review.openstack.org/527658 | |
| 09:37:26 | openstackgerrit | jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: z/VM Driver: Initial change set of z/VM driver https://review.openstack.org/523387 | |
| 09:37:27 | openstackgerrit | jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: z/VM Driver: add power actions https://review.openstack.org/543340 | |
| 09:37:27 | openstackgerrit | jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: z/VM Driver: add snapshot function https://review.openstack.org/534240 | |
| 09:37:28 | openstackgerrit | jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: z/VM Driver: add get console output https://review.openstack.org/543344 | |
| 09:41:03 | openstackgerrit | jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: z/VM Driver: Spawn and destroy function of z/VM driver https://review.openstack.org/527658 | |
| 09:41:04 | openstackgerrit | jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: z/VM Driver: add power actions https://review.openstack.org/543340 | |
| 09:41:04 | openstackgerrit | jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: z/VM Driver: add snapshot function https://review.openstack.org/534240 | |
| 09:41:05 | openstackgerrit | jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: z/VM Driver: add get console output https://review.openstack.org/543344 | |
| 09:42:59 | openstackgerrit | zhufl proposed openstack/nova master: Fix api-ref: nova image-meta is deprecated from 2.39 https://review.openstack.org/554813 | |
| 09:47:13 | openstackgerrit | sahid proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: move get_numa_memnode in designer module https://review.openstack.org/554850 | |
| 09:47:14 | openstackgerrit | sahid proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: move vpu_realtime_scheduler in designer https://review.openstack.org/554851 | |
| 09:58:12 | openstackgerrit | Naichuan Sun proposed openstack/nova master: xenapi: Use XAPI pool instead of aggregate pool for shared SR migration https://review.openstack.org/554154 | |
| 10:59:14 | lyarwood | quick sanity check if anyone has a second, rebuild is the only way to propagate changes to the metadata of an image into an instance previously created from that image right? | |
| 11:00:28 | lyarwood | say I wanted to enable the QEMU guest agent in an instance, I'd need to add hw_qemu_guest_agent=yes to the image and then rebuild? | |
| 11:03:52 | openstackgerrit | sahid proposed openstack/nova-specs master: libvirt: add support for virtio-net rx/tx queue sizes https://review.openstack.org/539605 | |
| 11:06:40 | lyarwood | stephenfin, mdbooth, sahid ^ quick sanity-check question above if you have time | |
| 11:08:11 | stephenfin | lyarwood: That sounds correct, yes. If you rebuild with an image specifying differing CPU policies, the newer policy will get applied | |
| 11:08:20 | stephenfin | I assume it's the same for other options | |
| 11:08:43 | mdbooth | lyarwood: Sounds correct to me, but I'd need to check to be sure. Do you need me to check code? | |
| 11:21:40 | lyarwood | stephenfin / mdbooth ; thanks, I've quickly scanned the compute code around this so no need to dive any deeper, just wanted to make sure I hadn't missed something obvious. | |
| 11:44:51 | gibi | melwitt, mriedem: reported a followup bug for the yestardays notification issue https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1757407 | |
| 11:44:52 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1757407 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Notification sending sometimes hits the keystone API to get glance endpoints" [Undecided,New] | |
| 12:03:12 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova stable/queens: Update the nova-manage db archive_deleted_rows description https://review.openstack.org/553733 | |
| 12:06:33 | jaypipes | morning supernovas | |
| 12:08:37 | cdent | jaypipes: you making steel? | |
| 12:08:53 | jaypipes | heh :) | |
| 12:09:10 | cdent | Because I would totally go for a "Sword by Jay" sword | |
| 12:09:50 | jaypipes | cdent: '"s"words', said in the voice of Sean Connery from Celebrity Jeopardy. | |
| 12:10:05 | cdent | bum cover! | |
| 12:10:18 | jaypipes | I'll play your game, you rogue. | |
| 12:10:41 | cdent | I rarely get the fits of laughing from thing on tv, but that skit kills me | |
| 12:11:04 | jaypipes | indeed. | |
| 12:11:37 | jaypipes | cdent: although I must say Keenan Thompson doing Steve Harvey on Family Feud over the last 5 years or so is also pretty hysterical. | |
| 12:12:22 | cdent | I'll have to check that out, as a foreigner these days I'm out of touch | |
| 12:12:29 | jaypipes | :) | |
| 12:30:02 | sahid | jaypipes: anychance you have a look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/511188/ ? | |
| 12:35:35 | jaypipes | sahid: yes, will do this morning. sorry for delay. yesterday was a lost day for me. | |
| 12:37:28 | openstackgerrit | Kashyap Chamarthy proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Allow to specify granular CPU feature flags https://review.openstack.org/534384 | |
| 12:37:56 | sahid | jaypipes: no worries :) thanks for looking at it | |
| 12:41:15 | tssurya | cfriesen: around ? | |
| 12:57:21 | sean-k-mooney | QQ is there any gate issues currently, the nova-tox-functional-py35 timed out on one of my patches so just wondering if i should recheck or is the gate under heavy load? | |
| 13:00:40 | jaypipes | sean-k-mooney: I've noticed the same... | |
| 13:01:17 | jaypipes | sean-k-mooney: not sure if it's temporary, though. I've seen a few patches get through, which indicates it probably is (plus all the failures I see have been POST_FAILURE) | |
| 13:02:00 | sean-k-mooney | jaypipes perhaps the timeout needs t obe raised over 90 mins that said the py27 fucntional tests only last 18 mins. ill look at the log | |
| 13:04:21 | jaypipes | sean-k-mooney: yeah, the func tests should *not* take more than around 20 minutes max. | |
| 13:04:33 | efried | bauzas: You around? | |
| 13:05:13 | gibi | jaypipes, sean-k-mooney: I think we had to increase the functional timeout recently due to slowness of the instances running the tests in CI | |
| 13:05:23 | sean-k-mooney | jaypipes: its stange i can see the func tests running fine until here http://logs.openstack.org/72/553072/3/check/nova-tox-functional-py35/6ccdce3/job-output.txt.gz#_2018-03-20_20_02_28_641084 and then it just stops outputing until it hits the time out | |
| 13:05:48 | gibi | jaypipes, sean-k-mooney: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/537933/ | |
| 13:06:06 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: perhaps but it looks like the func tests are haning after like 5 mins | |
| 13:06:17 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: OK then that is a different issue | |
| 13:06:32 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: anyhow the current func test timeout is 60 minutes | |
| 13:06:44 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: ya that should be more then enough | |
| 13:08:24 | jaypipes | indeed. | |
| 13:12:52 | openstackgerrit | Jon Schlueter proposed openstack/os-vif stable/queens: Fix VF-rep lookup routine to use parent PF number https://review.openstack.org/554917 | |
| 13:21:22 | openstackgerrit | Surya Seetharaman proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] Cleanup RP and HM records while deleting a compute service. https://review.openstack.org/554920 | |
| 13:23:39 | kashyap | sahid: Hey, thanks for the review here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/534384/ | |
| 13:24:01 | kashyap | Looking now... | |
| 13:37:06 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova stable/pike: Add regression test for BFV+IsolatedHostsFilter failure https://review.openstack.org/543602 | |
| 13:40:35 | efried | bauzas: I wanted to get some feedback on vGPU inventorying/reporting through the Nova API, when you've got a minute. | |
| 13:47:31 | bauzas | efried: sure ? | |
| 13:48:40 | efried | bauzas: What I'm wondering is: 1) Does the host's inventory of (v)GPUs show up in some nova API?; 2) Once you've created an instance with a vGPU, does that vGPU show up anywhere on the instance when you query it through the nova API? | |
| 13:48:50 | efried | ...and then assuming 'yes' to either/both, more details... | |
| 13:49:03 | bauzas | efried: 1) no | |
| 13:49:15 | bauzas | efried: 2) it's just a new PCI device | |
| 13:50:13 | efried | bauzas: Okay, cool. | |
| 13:51:58 | efried | edmondsw: ^ | |
| 13:52:57 | edmondsw | bauzas any plans to address that gap? | |
| 13:54:07 | efried | jaypipes, edleafe, cdent: Is there a Nova API (as opposed to a placement API) where I can see an instance's allocations? In particular, for an arbitrary resource class I sent through via flavor extra_specs. | |
| 13:54:36 | bauzas | edmondsw: you mean, how to know the vGPU inventory by the API ? | |
| 13:54:44 | bauzas | well, good question | |
| 13:54:49 | bauzas | I haven't planned it yet | |