| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2018-03-20 | |||
| 06:15:04 | openstackgerrit | Jianghua Wang proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Improve 'qemu-img convert' performance https://review.openstack.org/522067 | |
| 07:45:51 | openstackgerrit | Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move xenapi partition copies to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/553605 | |
| 07:45:51 | openstackgerrit | Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move xenapi disk resizing to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/552242 | |
| 07:45:52 | openstackgerrit | Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: We no longer need rootwrap. https://review.openstack.org/554438 | |
| 07:45:52 | openstackgerrit | Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move image conversion to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/554437 | |
| 07:45:53 | openstackgerrit | Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: We don't need utils.trycmd any more. https://review.openstack.org/554439 | |
| 08:08:45 | openstackgerrit | Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Allow abort live migrations in queued status https://review.openstack.org/536722 | |
| 08:22:44 | openstackgerrit | sahid proposed openstack/nova master: Revert "[libvirt] Add _get_vcpu_realtime_scheduler()" https://review.openstack.org/554448 | |
| 08:22:55 | openstackgerrit | sahid proposed openstack/nova master: Revert "[libvirt] Add _get_numa_memnode()" https://review.openstack.org/554449 | |
| 08:30:42 | sahid | jaypipes: can you have a look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/511188/ | |
| 08:30:58 | openstackgerrit | licanwei proposed openstack/nova master: Make nova-manage capable of syncing all cell databases https://review.openstack.org/519275 | |
| 08:31:31 | sahid | i mean it would be nice if you cn cut on it we can make some progress, basically you brought that idea and we never see you again :) | |
| 08:35:01 | kaisers1 | efried: ping | |
| 08:37:27 | openstackgerrit | Silvan Kaiser proposed openstack/nova master: Exec systemd-run with privileges in Quobyte driver https://review.openstack.org/554195 | |
| 08:46:24 | openstackgerrit | jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: Move placement test cases from db to placement https://review.openstack.org/553149 | |
| 08:51:42 | fanzhang | hi, nova team. Can I add some specified parameter to control boot --min-count instances within one request on different hosts? Like forcing instances launched on different hosts? | |
| 08:52:17 | fanzhang | I think there may be not functions like this, right? | |
| 08:54:10 | openstackgerrit | Yikun Jiang (Kero) proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Complex (Anti)-Affinity Policies https://review.openstack.org/546925 | |
| 08:58:29 | openstackgerrit | jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: Avoid raise InstanceNotFound exception https://review.openstack.org/541152 | |
| 09:02:29 | bauzas | good morning folks | |
| 09:02:54 | Kevin_Zheng | fanzhang, maybe you should try anti-affinity filter | |
| 09:03:33 | fanzhang | Kevin_Zheng: thanks so much. Reading docs about anti-affinity filter now :) | |
| 09:05:16 | openstackgerrit | John Garbutt proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add PENDING vm state https://review.openstack.org/554212 | |
| 09:13:52 | Kevin_Zheng | fanzhang yw | |
| 09:33:44 | jianghuaw_ | bauzas, good morning:-) | |
| 09:34:00 | bauzas | just catching up emails this morning | |
| 09:34:02 | jianghuaw_ | hope you enjoyed the time in the magic kingdom | |
| 09:34:25 | bauzas | well, my daughters did at least :) | |
| 09:34:59 | jianghuaw_ | good enough:-) | |
| 09:53:06 | openstackgerrit | Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova master: Provide framework for setting placement error codes https://review.openstack.org/546177 | |
| 10:02:46 | gibi | morning nova | |
| 10:29:20 | openstackgerrit | Silvan Kaiser proposed openstack/nova master: Exec systemd-run with privileges in Quobyte driver https://review.openstack.org/554195 | |
| 10:41:00 | openstackgerrit | Pranab proposed openstack/os-vif master: Add native implementation OVSDB API https://review.openstack.org/482226 | |
| 10:41:50 | gibi | melwitt: I left a comment and a question in https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-runways-rocky with '[gibi]' prefix. But overall I'm OK with the proposal. | |
| 10:42:30 | gibi | melwitt: I think we have to start doing it to gather real experience and then we can improve the process iteratively | |
| 11:03:12 | openstackgerrit | Surya Seetharaman proposed openstack/nova master: Add disabled field to CellMapping object https://review.openstack.org/550090 | |
| 11:05:50 | Kevin_Zheng | gibi, Hi, I might need some suggestion on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/553288/ about tests | |
| 11:37:08 | openstackgerrit | Surya Seetharaman proposed openstack/nova master: Add disabled field to CellMapping object https://review.openstack.org/550090 | |
| 11:46:00 | openstackgerrit | Surya Seetharaman proposed openstack/nova master: Add CellMappingList.get_all_enabled() query method https://review.openstack.org/550188 | |
| 12:14:02 | gibi | Kevin_Zheng: I shortly checked your test, functionally it looks OK. Do you feel that adding the request_id everywhere in the test is too much? | |
| 12:16:07 | sean-k-mooney[m] | bauzas: o/ i believe you reviewed this last cycle would you mind taking a look at the re-proposal of the nic feature based scheduling spec when you have time. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/545951/ | |
| 12:16:08 | Kevin_Zheng | gibi, sort of, but I'm not be afraid to add them, just don't know whether we have a better way to do that, in the latest patchset, I did some nodification for test test_create_server_error, but somehow the req id is different, I will dig into it latter | |
| 12:17:03 | Kevin_Zheng | gibi for those tests that tested multiple actions in one test, it seems a little bit complicated, so I wonder we have a better way to do it. | |
| 12:17:29 | sean-k-mooney[m] | bauzas: i have 1 or two nits to adress in the corresponding code but should have the series rebased and uploaded by the end of the week. im hoping we can get this all merged before milestone 1 | |
| 12:19:27 | openstackgerrit | sahid proposed openstack/nova master: only increment disk address unit for scsi devices https://review.openstack.org/538310 | |
| 12:22:08 | sean-k-mooney[m] | dansmith: just saw your comment on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/449257/59 you last comment on this topic was before i took this over from rodolfo. ill try and adress this when i do the rebase later this week. | |
| 12:22:12 | openstackgerrit | Jan Zerebecki proposed openstack/os-vif stable/ocata: Check if interface belongs to a Linux Bridge before removing https://review.openstack.org/554523 | |
| 12:23:01 | sean-k-mooney[m] | dansmith: looking at your old comment you would like us to add a spec_object field in addtion to the spec field correct? | |
| 12:23:36 | gibi | Kevin_Zheng: thanks for describing your concerns, I have to think about a bit. I will reply in the review | |
| 12:23:58 | Kevin_Zheng | gibi thanks alot | |
| 12:24:10 | openstackgerrit | Jan Zerebecki proposed openstack/os-vif stable/ocata: Check if interface belongs to a Linux Bridge before removing https://review.openstack.org/554523 | |
| 12:28:34 | efried | kaisers1: Howdy | |
| 12:28:52 | efried | kaisers1: /me US Central time :) | |
| 12:29:02 | openstackgerrit | sahid proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: handle DiskNotFound during update_available_resource https://review.openstack.org/553067 | |
| 12:37:41 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: Fix message for unexpected external event https://review.openstack.org/554380 | |
| 12:40:34 | jaypipes | alex_xu_: still around? not sure what you were asking about preferred_traits... I have no issue with decorating traits in flavors as being preferred. I wouldn't send them to placement, though... just allow the scheduler weighers to use them in their sorting. is that what you were thinking of? | |
| 12:50:25 | openstackgerrit | sahid proposed openstack/nova-specs master: virt: allow instances to be booted with trusted VFs https://review.openstack.org/485522 | |
| 12:54:51 | jaypipes | was say that individual providers needed within the tree needed to satisfy each quantitative resource request and then *collectively* the tree needed to satisfy the traits request. do you think that's wrong as well? | |
| 12:54:51 | jaypipes | efried, cdent: so based on you guys' and tetsuro's feedback on the "nested providers allocation candidates" series, I'm wondering if there's *any* reason to use non-granular request groups when nested providers are present. I spent all day reworking that series yesterday to get things working so that a non-granular request group could work against a tree of providers (but not by summing inventories across the entire tree). Instead, what I did | |
| 12:55:00 | jaypipes | lemme push what I have.. one se.c | |
| 12:55:26 | efried | jaypipes: That sounds correct to me. | |
| 12:57:03 | efried | Within the request, one resource_class:amount needs to be satisfied by one provider in the tree, or one associated via aggregate with any provider in the tree. And collectively, the RPs satisfying the resource request (which may in fact *exclude* some of the RPs in the tree) must satisfy the traits. | |
| 12:57:14 | efried | Not sure if that last thing is what you did. | |
| 12:58:03 | efried | jaypipes: But I think that's important. I don't think we want to say traits are satisfied by a provider that's not providing any resource to the request. | |
| 12:58:41 | efried | ...and we do need to make sure agg-associated RPs (but only ones providing resource) are included in the traits calculation. | |
| 12:58:51 | jaypipes | efried: what about when a trait is applied to the NUMA node that is the parent of a provider satisfying some part of the resource request? | |
| 12:59:08 | jaypipes | efried: forget the shared stuff for right now... | |
| 13:00:32 | efried | jaypipes: Hmmm, the NUMA thing... I said something yesterday, I think in a spec comment, related to this. I'll dig it up, but I think taking that into account, the answer to the above will be "that will depend on different syntax". | |
| 13:02:42 | efried | jaypipes: The gist was that (what I recall from PTG discussions, early Wednesday) we want to support the NUMA subtree business (and cdent this may also play into the vmware cluster thing) via a syntax that expresses: "Get all the resources in this group from a subtree whose (sub)root is marked with trait X" | |
| 13:03:19 | efried | jaypipes: So if the NUMA node is marked with trait I_AM_A_NUMA_NODE, the syntax would be like GET /a_c?resources4=...&subtree_trait4=I_AM_A_NUMA_NODE | |
| 13:03:56 | openstackgerrit | Jim Rollenhagen proposed openstack/nova master: ironic: stop lying to the RT when ironic is down https://review.openstack.org/545479 | |
| 13:04:48 | efried | That would affect the calculation of which providers in the tree are eligible to provide resources - i.e. just the subtree rooted at a provider marked I_AM_A_NUMA_NODE - and that trait gets special treatment such that the NUMA root RP itself doesn't actually need to provide resources. | |
| 13:04:52 | openstackgerrit | Ed Leafe proposed openstack/nova master: Address issues raised in adding member_of to GET /a-c https://review.openstack.org/554357 | |
| 13:05:40 | openstackgerrit | Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: tests for alloc candidates with nested and traits https://review.openstack.org/531899 | |
| 13:05:41 | openstackgerrit | Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: placement: resource requests for nested providers https://review.openstack.org/554529 | |
| 13:06:03 | jaypipes | efried, cdent: please see above (different series, forked from the base of the old one) | |
| 13:08:12 | gibi | efried, jaypipes: I agree that a single resource request need to be satisfied from a single RP but in case of traits I think the trait needs to be satisfied by the RPs on the path from the root (or subroot) to the RPs that are providing resources to that request | |
| 13:08:16 | sean-k-mooney[m] | efried: thanks for your review on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/449257/59 you spotted my **{} sed hack which is fair i was just hopping i would not need to manually convert them all. ill fix it in the next respin. i answered some of your other questions inline | |
| 13:10:12 | gibi | efried, jaypipes: where the path can be defined also by taking the RPs that providing resources and collecting all the ancestors for those RPs and then checking that the traits are satisfied in the set of RPs or not | |
| 13:11:36 | mdbooth | Could somebody take a look at this live migration bugfix for me: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/551302/ . It's got a bunch of +1s and I hacked a CI run to ensure coverage. | |
| 13:12:02 | jaypipes | gibi, efried: ok, understood. which gets back to my original question... if nested providers are present, is there really any point in *not* requiring granular request groups? | |
| 13:13:56 | gibi | jaypipes, efried: do I remember correctly that a granular numbered request group means that both the resources and the traits needs to be fulfilled from a single RP? | |
| 13:14:15 | efried | gibi: I don't think I agree that we should collect traits from "tree paths". That seems excessively complicated. What use case does it satisfy? (Hint: I don't think it satisfies the NUMA thing without further semantic work) | |
| 13:14:22 | efried | gibi: Correct. | |
| 13:15:07 | efried | jaypipes: Trying to think through whether it's always possible to express an un-numbered request group as one or more numbered groups. | |
| 13:15:26 | efried | I think there's some cases you can't express - but it's actually a good thing that you can't. | |
| 13:15:40 | gibi | jaypipes, efried: I've started thinking about the same | |
| 13:15:56 | efried | Like getting the a trait from a provider you weren't expecting. | |
| 13:16:07 | gibi | jaypipes, efried: i.e. trait is on the compute RP, resource inventory is on the PF | |
| 13:16:32 | gibi | that would need two separate numbered group | |
| 13:16:41 | efried | gibi: Yeah. It *should* be the case that traits on the one aren't applicable to the other. But who knows? | |
| 13:17:59 | openstackgerrit | sahid proposed openstack/nova-specs master: libvirt: add support for virtio-net rx/tx queue sizes https://review.openstack.org/539605 | |
| 13:18:20 | jaypipes | efried, gibi: yeah, that's been my dilemma :) | |
| 13:18:39 | gibi | jaypipes: you successfully shared your pain :) | |
| 13:18:50 | efried | jaypipes: I'm not opposed to this idea in principle - it makes a couple of things simpler, which is good. | |
| 13:18:52 | jaypipes | gibi: you're welcome. ;) | |
| 13:19:04 | efried | jaypipes: My concern is how we express this to operators. | |
| 13:19:19 | jaypipes | efried: agree with you. I'm hunting for ideas. | |
| 13:19:30 | efried | jaypipes: They need to have, what, separate flavors for nested-modeled hosts than for non? | |
| 13:19:46 | efried | I mean, even a non-nested host you can express requests with granular. | |