Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2018-03-01
10:06:59 kashyap s/it a/isn't it a/
10:07:06 stephenfin kashyap: That's what I'm thinking hence the question :)
10:07:08 stephenfin It seems odd
10:10:31 openstackgerrit Claudiu Belu proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Adds spec for instance live resize https://review.openstack.org/141219
10:11:50 bauzas stephenfin: kashyap: yeah my concern is that I wonder if reusing a port is good or not
10:11:58 bauzas deleting and recreating a port is one thinh
10:12:07 bauzas reusing an existing one is a totally different story
10:12:23 stephenfin bauzas, kashyap, sean-k-mooney: Jackpot https://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/33cc64fb817
10:12:27 bauzas for a reboot, it's a reasonable assumption
10:12:37 bauzas for any other case, I don't think so
10:12:59 bauzas hah !
10:21:15 cdent stephenfin: you just +Ad the child of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/543262/ . Do you have thoughts on how/if/when/what needs to change on the parent (which is a much bigger change). Presumably unparent the child is the quickest option?
10:21:15 kashyap stephenfin: So upon every restart of Compute node the ports are deleted and re-created — know why is that the case?
10:21:52 openstackgerrit Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Update placement aggregates spec to clarify generation handling https://review.openstack.org/548237
10:22:02 stephenfin cdent: I'd just unparent it, aye. I avoided the parent as it was marked WIP
10:22:32 cdent stephenfin: cool, but at some point it would be good to work out how to approach the issues that the parent solves
10:22:43 stephenfin kashyap: Based on the commit message, if you don't then this happens https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1270973
10:22:45 openstack Launchpad bug 1270973 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Remove and recreate interface if already exists" [Medium,Fix released] - Assigned to Aaron Rosen (arosen)
10:23:00 stephenfin cdent: I can take a look
10:23:23 cdent stephenfin: I don't think there's any rush but the changes point out some interesting things about the "way we do stuff"
10:23:26 melwitt mriedem: do you know if there's a way in launchpad to see the date when something was approved? I'm keeping a spreadsheet for rocky
10:29:33 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Return Generation from Resource Provider Creation https://review.openstack.org/548903
10:29:39 efried jaypipes, cdent: ^
10:29:59 Spazmotic melwitt: does the full activity log not show the date for the status change?
10:30:16 Spazmotic n/m misread
10:30:20 Spazmotic you're talking about bluerprings :D
10:34:25 jaypipes efried, done
10:37:19 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Return Generation from Resource Provider Creation https://review.openstack.org/548903
10:37:29 efried jaypipes: ^ Dammit, how does that *happen* ??
10:38:26 Spazmotic Trailing Whitespace will uhh... find a way
10:40:11 mriedem melwitt: nope
10:40:15 mriedem melwitt: LP doesn't
10:40:21 mriedem only when it's completed,
10:40:45 mriedem so if it has a spec, you can see when the spec was approved; otherwise if i approve a bp, i leave a comment in the whiteboard saying when i approved it
10:41:46 melwitt yeah, okay. I noticed that, so I'll be sure to add whiteboard comment for that
10:46:35 jaypipes Spazmotic, done
10:50:07 openstackgerrit Dinesh Bhor proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Strict isolation of group of hosts for images https://review.openstack.org/381912
10:54:05 openstackgerrit Dinesh Bhor proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Strict isolation of group of hosts for images https://review.openstack.org/381912
10:58:04 Spazmotic Thanks Jay :)
10:58:30 openstackgerrit Jianle He proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Back up volume-backed-instance https://review.openstack.org/530214
11:00:15 hrw when/where nova group photo will be?
11:02:41 takashin hrw: "11:10 - 11:20 AM: nova team photo. Meet at registration at 11:10 sharp." in https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-ptg-rocky
11:04:15 hrw thx
11:05:24 openstackgerrit Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Express forbidden traits in placement API https://review.openstack.org/548915
11:09:47 openstackgerrit Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova master: Move db MAX constants to own file https://review.openstack.org/543469
11:15:26 openstackgerrit Brooks Kaminski proposed openstack/nova master: XenAPI: XCP2.1+ Swallow VDI_NOT_IN_MAP Exception https://review.openstack.org/538415
11:16:49 Spazmotic Thanks for taking the time Jay :)
11:23:27 Spazmotic Thanks for the review jaypipes, and for taking the time during the PTG
11:27:30 hrw are there nova stickers?
11:32:03 jaypipes hrw, you might ask one of the foundation folks. they may have extras somewhere... maybe diablo_rojo (Kendall)
11:32:14 hrw ok
11:32:40 melwitt I'm to pick up stickers on friday
11:33:06 jianghuaw_ Spazmotic: jfyi. I've put both of your patches in this priorities tracking page: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/rocky-nova-priorities-tracking
11:34:24 jianghuaw_ It's recommended from the PTG to use that page to tracking priority things.
11:34:31 Spazmotic Ah I see. Thanks jianghuaw_
11:34:48 jianghuaw_ np
11:35:51 Spazmotic I like this, will make for nicer organization
11:36:23 melwitt yep, thanks jianghuaw_
11:38:21 hrw jianghuaw_: thx. added entry ;D
11:43:21 jianghuaw_ Spazmotic and hrw: you are welcome. Actually I like the priority page. Very useful for tracking ready-for-review patches. Thanks melwitt for bring it back.
11:43:43 Spazmotic Yeah same here I really like it. Even for those not on the subteam it allows for me for instance to quickly see if any XenAPI fixes need at tention
11:43:47 Spazmotic well done melwitt
11:45:43 melwitt Spazmotic: glad you like it but it's not originally my idea :) we used to use the priorities etherpad in pike, just trying to go back to that and keep it top-of-mind for people
11:46:43 efried Whatever, melwitt, you get full credit. Deal.
11:46:51 melwitt heh
12:06:04 openstackgerrit Jianle He proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Back up volume-backed-instance https://review.openstack.org/530214
12:15:04 openstackgerrit Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Express forbidden traits in placement API https://review.openstack.org/548915
12:17:52 danpawlik Hello, I have small question about nova placement configuration. I see that in puppet openstack integration, nova placement DB connection goes to nova_placement DB (new DB created for placement), but in some manuals they write to use nova_api. What is the correct DB for Ocata release?
12:19:02 danpawlik I see that since pike (https://docs.openstack.org/nova/pike/user/placement.html) there is a plan to add speciall DB for placement. So it looks like there is a bug in puppet-openstack-integration for Ocata branch
12:19:04 danpawlik or?
12:22:12 cdent danpawlik: can you point me to the puppet code?
12:22:37 cdent danpawlik: the hope is that eventually there would be a different database, but at the moment it is usually the nova api_db
12:27:13 openstackgerrit Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Express forbidden traits in placement API https://review.openstack.org/548915
12:31:28 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: placement: Return new provider from POST /rps https://review.openstack.org/548934
12:31:55 efried jaypipes: cdent ^
12:55:33 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Remove unused LOG variables https://review.openstack.org/546097
12:55:42 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Check for leaked server resource allocations in post_test_hook https://review.openstack.org/538510
12:55:49 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Add check for redundant import aliases https://review.openstack.org/543995
12:56:00 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Address nits in change I7e01f95d7173d9217f76e838b3ea71555151ef56 https://review.openstack.org/532898
12:56:12 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Remove warning in feature support matrix page https://review.openstack.org/544017
12:56:23 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: [placement] api-ref: Fix a missing response code https://review.openstack.org/546494
13:09:35 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Enable native mode for ScaleIO volumes https://review.openstack.org/545304
13:15:20 danpawlik cdent: sure, https://github.com/openstack/puppet-openstack-integration/blob/stable/ocata/manifests/nova.pp#L111
13:43:14 stephenfin melwitt: I'm trying to organize accommodation for tomorrow night. Will be back in he room as soon as that's sorted
13:43:44 stephenfin melwitt: If you're starting on the neutron session, maybe do the other stuff first and I'll be back for the NUMA-aware vSwitch section, please :)
13:46:58 melwitt stephenfin: ack
13:48:14 melwitt stephenfin: we've been told the croke park hotel has rooms available that are not released to the public. did you ask there first?
14:02:28 danpawlik cdent: probably you didn't receive the url
14:02:45 danpawlik cdent: https://github.com/openstack/puppet-openstack-integration/blob/stable/ocata/manifests/nova.pp#L111
14:02:51 cdent danpawlik: yeah, sorry, left the network for lunch
14:02:58 cdent and now I'm on some horrible network
14:03:19 danpawlik xD
14:05:05 cdent interesting, I'm going to have to do some grepping
14:05:15 cdent which will mean some waiting on the network
14:09:10 danpawlik cdent: I can send you url for nova module if you want
14:09:40 cdent danpawlik: grepping done. looks like EmilienM did that change around about the time when we were recommending that a separate database was the way to go, but then we didn't quite make it there
14:10:00 cdent which probably means that though the puppet variable is set it may not be actually used
14:10:03 danpawlik cdent: so I can revert that change for Octa?
14:10:23 danpawlik ack
14:10:26 cdent danpawlik: I can't remember what you said before: is it breaking something, or did you just notice that the puppet was weird?

Earlier   Later