| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2018-02-25 | |||
| 16:50:48 | bauzas | mriedem: well, bugfixes require bug reports, I wonder if a blueprint would be better for those caveats (like say the migrate case which is not available yet) | |
| 16:50:57 | bauzas | but I can open bugs | |
| 16:51:14 | bauzas | for the NUMA affinity, I think a spec is required anyway | |
| 16:51:30 | bauzas | at least for discussing on the design | |
| 16:51:41 | bauzas | okay, I think I have my answer :) | |
| 16:51:48 | bauzas | thanks | |
| 16:51:50 | mriedem | are you not in a room with a bunch of people that could answer this question? | |
| 16:52:32 | bauzas | heh, upstream is upstream, downstream is downstream :p | |
| 16:53:00 | bauzas | while those people could have an idea, I tend to ask upstream things related upstream :) | |
| 16:56:53 | openstackgerrit | Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova stable/queens: [placement] Add functional tests for traits API https://review.openstack.org/547843 | |
| 17:48:33 | openstackgerrit | Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Spec for Granular API policy https://review.openstack.org/547850 | |
| 18:04:54 | openstackgerrit | Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Spec for Granular API policy https://review.openstack.org/547850 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2018-02-26 | |||
| 09:17:25 | dansmith | melwitt: we really need to merge this before anyone else has a chance to propose something for compute RPC: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/543580/ | |
| 09:21:03 | mriedem | johnthetubaguy: are you in the unified limits room? | |
| 09:22:14 | hrw | who is on PTG? | |
| 09:22:18 | hrw | morning | |
| 09:25:35 | melwitt | dansmith: k, looking | |
| 09:34:01 | jaypipes | alex_xu, https://review.openstack.org/543805 | |
| 09:41:31 | johnthetubaguy | mriedem: yes | |
| 09:41:33 | johnthetubaguy | ttsiouts: are you in the limits room? | |
| 09:45:04 | ttsiouts | johnthetubaguy: no i'm in the public clouds | |
| 09:46:46 | johnthetubaguy | ttsiouts: I may be saying you are willing to work on quota | |
| 09:47:10 | ttsiouts | johnthetubaguy: yeap! | |
| 09:48:01 | jaypipes | johnthetubaguy, which is the "limits room"? | |
| 09:49:25 | TheJulia | jaypipes: level 4, right off the stairs | |
| 09:50:13 | johnthetubaguy | jaypipes: identity something Hogan Maezz 1 L4 | |
| 09:50:24 | johnthetubaguy | ah, what TheJulia said | |
| 10:09:21 | openstackgerrit | Tetiana Lashchova proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Allow modification of user-data via the server update https://review.openstack.org/547964 | |
| 10:14:04 | openstackgerrit | Tetiana Lashchova proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Allow modification of user-data via the server update https://review.openstack.org/547964 | |
| 10:14:29 | dayou | With a fresh devstack I get this: Host 'ubuntubox' is not mapped to any cell. | |
| 10:15:20 | dayou | After "enable_service n-cell" and "VIF_PLUGGING_TIMEOUT=0 VIF_PLUGGING_IS_FATAL=False ", I was able to start an instance. | |
| 10:15:46 | dayou | Somehow, I tried other serivces such as octavia, it failed to plug vip there, a 500 is back from nova-api | |
| 10:16:58 | dayou | https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/api/openstack/compute/attach_interfaces.py#L156 | |
| 10:17:04 | dayou | From the line above | |
| 10:17:40 | melwitt | dayou: you shouldn't be using the n-cell service, that's the legacy cells v1 that has an extremely crippled API functionality | |
| 10:17:52 | dayou | Here is my local.conf: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/520878/5/devstack/samples/l3a2/local.conf | |
| 10:19:29 | dayou | melwitt, Any idea why I get the Host 'xxx' is not mapped to any cell problem? | |
| 10:23:08 | melwitt | dayou: this is the step in devstack that should be mapping the compute host to the API database | |
| 10:23:10 | melwitt | https://github.com/openstack-dev/devstack/blob/83ecb97fec7efde09f543fb1f5ef65bd6d4f1011/stack.sh#L1421 | |
| 10:23:37 | melwitt | that should take care of avoiding the error 'host not mapped to any cell' | |
| 10:29:43 | dayou | https://github.com/openstack-dev/devstack/blob/master/stack.sh#L1394 | |
| 10:29:51 | dayou | Ok, maybe this is the problem | |
| 10:30:04 | dayou | I have a local.sh that is creating a server before that line | |
| 10:30:24 | dayou | Then it failed, so the cell mapping step running later is not executed | |
| 10:30:46 | dayou | melwitt, can we propose a fix to move loca.sh to the last? | |
| 10:31:02 | openstackgerrit | Tetiana Lashchova proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Allow modification of user-data via the server update https://review.openstack.org/547964 | |
| 10:33:14 | openstackgerrit | yuanyue proposed openstack/nova master: Whether to use config drive depends on instance.configdrive https://review.openstack.org/485930 | |
| 10:34:39 | bauzas | jianghuaw_: I could have like 30 mins available around 11am for discussing with you about vGPUs | |
| 10:36:32 | jianghuaw_ | bauzas, Great. Thanks. Where can we meet? | |
| 10:36:53 | jianghuaw_ | I'm now in Hogan Mezzanine L4. | |
| 10:39:01 | melwitt | dayou: what do you mean? run local.sh as the last step in devstack? | |
| 10:40:03 | dayou | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/547976/ | |
| 10:40:13 | dayou | I mean after cells are configured | |
| 10:40:41 | dayou | If no cells is created and user tries to create server in local.sh, then it will fail | |
| 10:42:54 | bauzas | jianghuaw_: I'm in L4 too, so let's meet up in the lobby there | |
| 10:43:23 | jianghuaw_ | bauzas, great. See you then:-) | |
| 10:50:21 | openstackgerrit | Tetiana Lashchova proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Allow modification of user-data via the server update https://review.openstack.org/547964 | |
| 10:53:27 | melwitt | dayou: yeah. so this is a matter of the devstack phases and ordering. to be honest, I'm not too familiar with that. trying to find the documentation. I thought there was a phase for plugin use that runs at the very end | |
| 10:56:07 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Update noVNC deployment docs to mention non-US keymap fix in 1.0.0 https://review.openstack.org/547985 | |
| 10:56:19 | mriedem | stephenfin: ^ | |
| 10:56:26 | mriedem | that came up in the public WG room today | |
| 10:57:16 | stephenfin | mriedem: I assume that is not tracked by global requirements? | |
| 10:57:24 | dayou | melwitt, thanks for you input and help, it is very useful | |
| 10:58:49 | mriedem | stephenfin: since it's a native package, no it's not | |
| 10:59:45 | stephenfin | mriedem: Fair. +2d | |
| 10:59:57 | mriedem | thanks | |
| 11:00:25 | mriedem | stephenfin: the notes from the denver ptg said that once the fix was released in novnc, we could move forward with your patch on deprecating the keymap config option | |
| 11:00:30 | mriedem | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/483994/ | |
| 11:00:35 | mriedem | so maybe you want to refresh that | |
| 11:00:58 | stephenfin | Will do | |
| 11:02:18 | vivsoni | Hi Matt | |
| 11:04:56 | openstackgerrit | Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Spec for Granular API policy https://review.openstack.org/547850 | |
| 11:05:13 | gmann_ | mriedem: alex_xu johnthetubaguy added spec for granular API policy - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/547850/ | |
| 11:06:17 | stephenfin | mriedem: If you haven't moved on too far, did OVH folks mention anything about the issue Tushar reported in that review? | |
| 11:06:27 | stephenfin | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/483994/6 | |
| 11:06:40 | stephenfin | I can fix it, but if they have it fixed already... | |
| 11:09:44 | mriedem | stephenfin: nope | |
| 11:10:36 | stephenfin | Lovely. Time to stack | |
| 11:12:48 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: Drop compute RPC 4.x compatibility https://review.openstack.org/543580 | |
| 11:18:48 | openstackgerrit | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Add aggregates list to Destination object https://review.openstack.org/544729 | |
| 11:18:48 | openstackgerrit | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Add AggregateList.get_by_metadata() query method https://review.openstack.org/544728 | |
| 11:18:49 | openstackgerrit | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Add require_tenant_aggregate request filter https://review.openstack.org/545002 | |
| 11:18:49 | openstackgerrit | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Add request filter functionality to scheduler https://review.openstack.org/544730 | |
| 11:18:50 | openstackgerrit | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Make get_allocation_candidates() honor aggregate restrictions https://review.openstack.org/547990 | |
| 11:18:50 | openstackgerrit | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Honor availability_zone hint via placement https://review.openstack.org/546282 | |
| 11:23:35 | vivsoni | mriedem: Hi | |
| 11:23:58 | mriedem | vivsoni: hi? | |
| 11:24:24 | vivsoni | one of my tempest Test case is failing | |
| 11:24:28 | vivsoni | http://54.201.44.218/45/539145/2/check/3par-iscsi-driver-master-client-pip-ssa02-dsvm/e43ca1d/logs/testr_results.html.gz | |
| 11:24:41 | vivsoni | mriedem: this is something to do with force dettach | |
| 11:25:07 | vivsoni | mriedem: connector is empty and driver is not implemented that case | |
| 11:25:13 | vivsoni | can you please guide me | |
| 11:25:29 | dansmith | edleafe: last week or something you said you might be interested in doing the member_of thing for allocation_candidates.. are you interested enough to commit there or did you want to look at what is required first? | |
| 11:25:30 | mriedem | vivsoni: no idea, i'm in sessions at the ptg right now | |
| 11:25:49 | vivsoni | mriedem: ok | |
| 11:26:29 | melwitt | dayou: based on the ordering of the phases in stack.sh, it looks like you could use the 'test-config' phase in your plugin.sh to run the steps in your local.sh. see this example: https://github.com/openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph/blob/master/devstack/plugin.sh#L95 | |
| 11:26:49 | mriedem | Feb 26 09:30:53.005199 d-p-c-p77-1659969 devstack@c-api.service[30317]: DEBUG cinder.api.openstack.wsgi [None req-f882bcca-b050-4909-afa9-95698a62c1c7 tempest-VolumesActionsTest-1767615534 tempest-VolumesActionsTest-1767615534] Action body: {"os-force_detach": {"attachment_id": "d8020aad-e1a5-4a24-8a93-764e2086100d", "connector": null}} {{(pid=30322) get_method /opt/stack/new/cinder/cinder/api/openstack/wsgi.py:986}} | |
| 11:26:49 | mriedem | vivsoni: i guess you're right | |
| 11:26:54 | mriedem | vivsoni: but force detach is purely a cinder API | |
| 11:26:59 | mriedem | it has nothing to do with nova | |