| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2018-02-13 | |||
| 09:19:22 | stephenfin | It's probably good for jaypipes' mental health | |
| 09:19:53 | stephenfin | Indeed. They're very much against configuring any defaults at all in libvirt | |
| 09:20:24 | stephenfin | besides legacy stuff (as hrw discovered with the USB tablet under ARM issue) | |
| 09:22:48 | gibi | I totally for jaypipes' mental well being | |
| 09:23:49 | gibi | stephenfin: if you summarize your view on the spec then I can second that based on this short chat and then we can call in jaypipes for a review | |
| 09:25:20 | ameeda | Hi, just a question about gerrit review, I have 3 nova reviews waiting for reviewers (both of them got +2c, waiting for +2w) , do you follow scheduler to check them or I have to ask you to check them ? | |
| 09:28:14 | openstackgerrit | Rong Han proposed openstack/nova master: Clean up ports and volumes when deleting ERROR instance https://review.openstack.org/340614 | |
| 09:46:01 | stephenfin | gibi: ALL the comments left :) | |
| 09:46:52 | openstackgerrit | jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: add zvm document into https://review.openstack.org/532720 | |
| 09:46:53 | openstackgerrit | jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Add zvm CI information https://review.openstack.org/533512 | |
| 09:46:53 | openstackgerrit | jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Add zvm admin doc https://review.openstack.org/533125 | |
| 09:48:43 | hrw | stephenfin: I will get some next stuff around libvirt soon ;D | |
| 09:49:45 | gibi | stephenfin: thanks | |
| 10:16:19 | openstackgerrit | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: Test LM with encrypted volumes https://review.openstack.org/536350 | |
| 10:40:29 | gibi | stephenfin: I think we are on the same page about https://review.openstack.org/#/c/539605 | |
| 10:40:45 | gibi | stephenfin: thanks for the reply, I seconded it | |
| 10:45:05 | bauzas | I haven't started to review specs yet :) | |
| 10:45:16 | bauzas | for the moment, bug triaging, my lobe | |
| 10:45:18 | bauzas | love | |
| 10:50:01 | bauzas | stephenfin: sahid: not sure it's a bug, needing more details but still FYI https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1749045 | |
| 10:50:02 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1749045 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Used mem in numa_topology do not include mem used by instance which is not fix mem_page_size" [Undecided,Incomplete] | |
| 10:50:52 | stephenfin | bauzas: Yup, that's a known issue. There's an issue in RH Bugzilla about it alright. sahid was working on it | |
| 10:51:16 | bauzas | stephenfin: okay, could you please mark it as Confirmed then, unless it's a duplicate ? | |
| 10:52:44 | stephenfin | bauzas: Yup, #1689753 looks pretty much the same | |
| 10:53:01 | stephenfin | That's something that (hopefully) placement will solve for us | |
| 10:53:38 | bauzas | stephenfin: ok, marking 1749045 as duplicate of 1689753 | |
| 10:53:45 | stephenfin | bauzas: Already done :P | |
| 10:53:52 | bauzas | cool | |
| 10:54:22 | bauzas | stephenfin: known issue too here https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1748799 | |
| 10:54:23 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1748799 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "cpu binding conflict when multiple VMs execute unshelve at the same time" [Undecided,New] - Assigned to tangxing (tang-xing) | |
| 10:54:48 | stephenfin | bauzas: Yup. That's the "we don't recalculate CPU pinning" issue | |
| 10:55:02 | stephenfin | That's on the agenda for the PTG | |
| 10:56:11 | bauzas | stephenfin: I know, any upstream bug I could say it's duplicate ? | |
| 10:56:37 | stephenfin | bauzas: 1417667 ? | |
| 10:57:11 | stephenfin | Maybe update the title if shelve is also affected | |
| 10:59:11 | bauzas | stephenfin: yep, that's actually a problem for *any* move ops | |
| 11:32:28 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add 'numa-aware-vswitches' spec https://review.openstack.org/541290 | |
| 11:37:11 | stephenfin | sean-k-mooney: When you're about, could you have a look at that to make sure the "problem description" section actually makes sense now? Still trying to configure a machine to evaluate this myself https://review.openstack.org/#/c/541290/2/specs/rocky/approved/numa-aware-vswitches.rst | |
| 11:49:58 | openstackgerrit | Tetsuro Nakamura proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Enable NUMA Features for Libvirt/QEMU Driver https://review.openstack.org/533077 | |
| 11:50:45 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: Move the nova-next job in-tree and update it https://review.openstack.org/541474 | |
| 13:54:54 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Test websocketproxy with TLS in the nova-next job https://review.openstack.org/513160 | |
| 14:00:21 | esberglu | #startmeeting powervm_driver_meeting | |
| 14:00:22 | openstack | Meeting started Tue Feb 13 14:00:21 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is esberglu. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | |
| 14:00:23 | openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | |
| 14:00:25 | openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'powervm_driver_meeting' | |
| 14:00:44 | esberglu | #topic In-tree Driver | |
| 14:01:15 | esberglu | #endmeeting | |
| 14:01:18 | openstack | Meeting ended Tue Feb 13 14:01:15 2018 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | |
| 14:01:19 | openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/powervm_driver_meeting/2018/powervm_driver_meeting.2018-02-13-14.00.html | |
| 14:01:20 | openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/powervm_driver_meeting/2018/powervm_driver_meeting.2018-02-13-14.00.txt | |
| 14:01:21 | openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/powervm_driver_meeting/2018/powervm_driver_meeting.2018-02-13-14.00.log.html | |
| 14:01:24 | esberglu | Sorry thought I was in a different channel | |
| 14:19:10 | bauzas | mriedem: some possible race when trying to delete a BuildRequest instance https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1749167 | |
| 14:19:11 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1749167 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "nova show can not get an instance information, and this instance can be queried from nova list." [Undecided,New] | |
| 14:19:20 | bauzas | dansmith: when you're up, see above $ | |
| 14:19:54 | bauzas | what I'm confused is that I can see a "too many connections'" SQL exception | |
| 14:26:42 | openstackgerrit | Jiri Suchomel proposed openstack/nova master: Retry few times when creating the initial connection to libvirtd. https://review.openstack.org/416928 | |
| 14:34:06 | dansmith | bauzas: why is that confusing? I think it means there are too many connections :) | |
| 14:34:33 | dansmith | I can also imagine that we hit that while trying to do the BR->RS->IM dance and thus it's in the cell and not mapped | |
| 14:35:16 | bauzas | dansmith: yeah, I actually provided a comment | |
| 14:35:23 | dansmith | I saw :) | |
| 14:35:27 | bauzas | it impacted the scheduler call | |
| 14:35:36 | dansmith | and probably other things | |
| 14:35:51 | bauzas | so, yeah, let's ask to reproduce and if not, close it | |
| 14:36:11 | bauzas | dansmith: unrelated, other evacuate thing https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1745977 | |
| 14:36:12 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1745977 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "When source compute service up, will not destroy and clean up those instances which be evacuated then be deleted." [Undecided,New] | |
| 14:38:35 | dansmith | okay | |
| 14:57:47 | mriedem | lyarwood: want to get this pike backport? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/537811/ | |
| 14:57:54 | mriedem | i'm going to push a pike release today | |
| 14:58:41 | mriedem | dansmith: can you get this one? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/541036/ | |
| 14:58:55 | lyarwood | mriedem: ack looking | |
| 14:59:37 | mriedem | i can't remember if you guys needed this for product either https://review.openstack.org/#/c/539003/ | |
| 15:00:43 | dansmith | erm, not sure I've looked at that one in depth, we should ask her when she's around | |
| 15:02:46 | mriedem | lyarwood: i'm not sure about this one https://review.openstack.org/#/c/533733/ - i suppose it's ok since it fails fast in the api rather than silently on the compute, | |
| 15:02:56 | mriedem | the problem with swap volume is that i don't think anyone uses it directly, | |
| 15:03:07 | mriedem | it happens as a result of a cinder volume retype or migration | |
| 15:03:30 | lyarwood | mriedem: right but wouldn't this result in a cleaner failure in that case as well? | |
| 15:03:32 | mriedem | so really, the doc updates should be in the cinder api-ref for retype saying that you can't retype an attached volume where the server instance is in one of those states | |
| 15:04:03 | mriedem | i don't know if/how cinder handles a 409 from swap volume, and if it rolls back the retype | |
| 15:04:31 | lyarwood | mriedem: that was an assumption on my part, we'd actually return a 409 to cinder now at least. | |
| 15:04:36 | mriedem | it is better to get a 409 though so cinder at least has a chance to do some kind of rollback | |
| 15:06:25 | mriedem | looks like cinder will delete the new volume (for a retype), and then set the old volume.migration_status='error' | |
| 15:06:49 | mriedem | and set the old volume status back to in-use | |
| 15:06:54 | mriedem | (i think) | |
| 15:10:14 | mriedem | lyarwood: ok +2 on that one; want to get https://review.openstack.org/#/c/541036/ and then i'll cut the release? | |
| 15:11:47 | lyarwood | mriedem: yup will do, thanks | |
| 15:23:03 | mriedem | lyarwood: this is re-introducing a regression from queens https://review.openstack.org/#/c/543569/ | |
| 15:23:06 | mriedem | i'm pretty sure anyway | |
| 15:24:13 | lyarwood | mriedem: How so? We also block swap_volume for encrypted volumes when using native LUKS in >=Queens | |
| 15:24:26 | mriedem | lyarwood: https://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/cafe3d066ef7021c18961d4b239a10f61db23f2d#diff-f4019782d93a196a0d026479e6aa61b1 | |
| 15:24:41 | mriedem | you're not backporting that regression fix, introduced by the native luks support patch | |
| 15:24:46 | mriedem | that broke several cinder backends | |
| 15:25:16 | openstackgerrit | Boris Bobrov proposed openstack/python-novaclient stable/queens: Fix listing of instances above API max_limit https://review.openstack.org/543968 | |
| 15:26:13 | lyarwood | mriedem: crap, yeah my bad | |
| 15:31:52 | mriedem | stephenfin: you would probably enjoy the honors here https://review.openstack.org/#/c/513160/ | |
| 15:31:58 | mriedem | nova-next job + tls proxy enabled | |
| 15:32:14 | stephenfin | mriedem: Ooh, snazzy | |
| 15:32:57 | openstackgerrit | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Lazy-load instance attributes with read_deleted=yes https://review.openstack.org/543970 | |
| 15:33:11 | mriedem | i think once we drop the legacy nova-next job that's defined in openstack-zuul-jobs, we should look at making nova-next (defined in tree) voting and gating | |
| 15:33:25 | mriedem | and we should probably also make it run with py3 | |