Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2018-02-05
22:02:38 mriedem scheduling?
22:02:41 mriedem like it said
22:02:42 edmondsw we can't say "schedule", because we only talk to the scheduler once.
22:03:26 melwitt it's still scheduling though, isn't it? trying alternate hosts *shrug*
22:03:42 edmondsw I guess
22:03:58 edmondsw at least the "for a chosen host" bit from the old help text is wrong, right?
22:04:09 edleafe mriedem: I think the problematic wording is "for a chosen host". But that was wrong before, too.
22:04:14 edleafe jinx
22:04:28 edmondsw edleafe yeah that is what first caught my eye
22:04:42 mriedem yes 'for a chosen host' is wrong
22:04:46 edmondsw I can change it back to scheduling and correct that part
22:05:27 edleafe "for a given VM build/move operation"
22:06:07 edmondsw I like that...
22:06:09 mriedem can we somehow make this about ironic and say, 'for a given bm movement'
22:06:32 edleafe nah, that sounds kinda crappy
22:06:33 edmondsw lol
22:07:43 openstackgerrit Matthew Edmonds proposed openstack/nova master: Clarify CONF.scheduler.max_attempts https://review.openstack.org/541031
22:08:15 efried mriedem: I have returned. Any update on the glance image snafu?
22:08:45 mriedem efried: debug patch is still running
22:08:53 jroll edleafe: "for a given VM b/m operation" :P
22:09:49 mriedem i can't wait to be in the vm bm room for 2 days in dublin
22:10:12 mriedem talking about...keystone
22:10:21 mriedem i came for the bm, stayed for the keystone
22:10:35 openstackgerrit Matthew Edmonds proposed openstack/nova master: Clarify CONF.scheduler.max_attempts https://review.openstack.org/541031
22:11:23 edleafe I'm SO glad I made it out of third grade
22:11:56 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Bump compute RPC API to version 5.0 https://review.openstack.org/541005
22:11:57 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Compute RPC client bump to 5.0 https://review.openstack.org/541035
22:12:06 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova stable/pike: Query all cells for service version in _validate_bdm https://review.openstack.org/541036
22:13:23 mriedem efried: results http://logs.openstack.org/08/541008/2/check/legacy-tempest-dsvm-neutron-nova-next-full/f24c9d2/logs/screen-n-api.txt.gz?level=TRACE
22:15:02 efried mriedem: Looks to me like neither of your glance.py messages hit.
22:15:09 efried which is... weird.
22:15:53 openstackgerrit Matthew Edmonds proposed openstack/nova master: Clarify CONF.scheduler.max_attempts https://review.openstack.org/541031
22:16:49 mriedem http://logs.openstack.org/08/541008/2/check/legacy-tempest-dsvm-neutron-nova-next-full/f24c9d2/logs/screen-n-api.txt.gz#_Feb_05_21_46_51_455934
22:16:53 mriedem Using glance API servers: [u'http://158.69.92.100/image/v2/']
22:17:49 efried mriedem: http://logs.openstack.org/08/541008/2/check/legacy-tempest-dsvm-neutron-nova-next-full/f24c9d2/logs/screen-g-api.txt.gz#_Feb_05_21_46_51_651885
22:17:55 mriedem efried: maybe the image exists but the context doesn't have auth to GET it?
22:18:06 efried mriedem: This is https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-glanceclient/+bug/1707995
22:18:07 openstack Launchpad bug 1707995 in Glance Client "Can't use versioned endpoints" [Undecided,New]
22:18:18 mriedem shazbot!
22:18:27 efried Though I thought we weren't subject to that with this set of changes.
22:18:58 mriedem not sure why the other jobs wouldn't be failing though
22:19:23 efried Also checked this through the CI six ways from sunday before we merged it.
22:19:46 mriedem devstack doesn't run nova-next
22:19:52 efried So some weird combo of environments - or possibly a recent "fix" in ksa? - is exposing this.
22:20:13 mriedem i can try to nuke the usage of the service_user in this debug patch and see if things start magically passing
22:20:20 efried mriedem: No, but I made DNM nova patches with Depends-On the devstack change, exactly to validate this.
22:20:28 mriedem nova-next is also non-voting
22:20:37 mriedem so might not have noticed
22:20:42 efried oh, so maybe it failed and I neve.. yeah
22:21:05 jroll so GET /servers has a "created_at" query parameter to filter by created date... but sounds like that's an "equal to" filter, is there a way to communicate that I want before or after there?
22:21:46 efried mriedem: Could also do as I suggested above, put up a reversion of the devstack patch with an empty nova patch that Depends-On it, see if adding back the explicit endpoint also fixes it.
22:23:10 mriedem jroll: don't thin kso
22:23:36 jroll mriedem: that is so useful, lol
22:24:33 mriedem jroll: i don't even see a created_at filter for listing nodes https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/baremetal/#id4
22:24:35 mriedem so shut up!
22:24:53 jroll heh, I'm not sure which is worse
22:25:33 efried created_at=<exact timestamp> ??
22:25:40 efried Wheee
22:25:43 jroll :)
22:25:48 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Doc: Nix os-traits link from POST resource_classes https://review.openstack.org/540559
22:26:04 mriedem jroll: add a created_before/created_after param
22:26:32 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/pike: add "--until-complete" option for nova-manage db archive_deleted_rows. https://review.openstack.org/540871
22:26:33 jroll mriedem: that doesn't help the guy that's trying to use it today :P
22:26:33 mriedem there is changes-since...
22:26:37 jroll thanks though
22:26:39 mriedem but that's updated_at>=changes-since
22:27:06 mriedem let me hop in the old delorean real quick
22:27:10 jroll right
22:27:12 jroll ok great thanks
22:27:47 mriedem i have multiple bosses, so good luck
22:27:49 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Make InstanceGroup.get_hosts query all cells https://review.openstack.org/540258
22:30:27 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: debug nova-api service version check during boot from volume https://review.openstack.org/540992
22:32:59 efried Anyone proposed (or planning to propose) a Vancouver presentation about what we've done / are doing in placement/scheduler-land?
22:34:22 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Query all cells for service version in _validate_bdm https://review.openstack.org/539755
22:34:31 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/pike: Import user-data page from openstack-manuals https://review.openstack.org/515054
22:36:28 efried jaypipes_: Any plans for a Vancouver presentation about what we've done / are doing in placement/scheduler-land?
22:58:52 edleafe efried: you should do one. They're probably tired of seeing Jay's ugly mug
22:59:33 efried They need a new ugly mug to stare at, is what you're sayin.
23:00:07 edleafe zactly
23:01:03 efried I haven't done this before; how much flexibility is there to edit the proposal later, add presenters, change the abstract, etc.?
23:05:16 edmondsw efried I think you can change presenters later if need be. Not sure about the abstract. They probably don't want that changing too much
23:34:56 efried edleafe: Can you see this? https://www.openstack.org/summit/vancouver-2018/call-for-presentations/manage/20813/summary
23:35:14 efried I have no way of NOT going to the edit page, so I don't know if this is visible to people who aren't logged in as me.
23:36:02 edleafe efried: See my comment?
23:36:14 efried edleafe: Where?
23:36:16 edleafe or do I have to save it first?
23:36:27 edleafe yeah, not an etherpad :)
23:36:47 edleafe ok, in the abstaract
23:36:47 efried I'm not even sure how I would view it.
23:36:52 edleafe abstract, even
23:37:16 efried oh, jeez, so like anyone can edit it?
23:37:25 jroll looks like it
23:37:30 edleafe I guess so, if they know the URL
23:37:42 efried And now everybody does, since I put it in IRC.
23:38:04 efried But I imagine your openID is attached to your edits.
23:38:17 edleafe I removed my silly comment
23:38:37 efried Okay. But seem reasonable in terms of scope, taggage, etc.?
23:38:41 jroll efried: assuming edits are tracked
23:38:49 efried ye gods, I hope they are.
23:39:02 efried Otherwise anyone could register for an openID and cause havoc

Earlier   Later