| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2018-01-29 | |||
| 19:29:26 | lbragstad | cfriesen: that sounds like new territory for service tokens, the first thing we started working on with them was the whole long running operation issue.. it'd be good to sync with jamielennox though | |
| 19:30:10 | lbragstad | cfriesen: he was one of the original people driving the effort, so i wouldn't be surprised if he's ventured down a couple different paths similar to what you're describing | |
| 19:31:53 | cfriesen | lbragstad: move it over to the keystone channel? | |
| 19:31:58 | lbragstad | cfriesen: sure | |
| 19:36:38 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova stable/ocata: Rollback instance.image_ref on failed rebuild https://review.openstack.org/539008 | |
| 19:51:41 | ameeda | is this error caused by me ? "http://logs.openstack.org/00/526900/26/check/openstack-tox-functional/c777a93/testr_results.html.gz" | |
| 19:51:47 | ameeda | from this gerrit "https://review.openstack.org/#/c/526900/" | |
| 19:51:57 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Remove redundant call to add_instance_fault_from_exc in rebuild_instance https://review.openstack.org/539011 | |
| 19:52:19 | ameeda | jaypipes: please check this for me when you available https://review.openstack.org/#/c/526900/ | |
| 19:56:55 | mriedem1 | ameeda: instance_system_metadata is a table where one row is a key/value pair for a single instance, and we can have a lot of sysmeta per instance, and a ton of instances, | |
| 19:57:09 | mriedem1 | in what world do we have a system metadata value that needs to be length TEXT? | |
| 19:58:56 | ameeda | mriedem: so I did something wrong ? | |
| 19:59:56 | mriedem | no, it's just, this is potentially a very large change in storage for that talbe | |
| 19:59:57 | mriedem | *Table | |
| 20:00:08 | mriedem | i see you're trying to match the nova table to glance https://github.com/openstack/glance/blob/master/glance/db/sqlalchemy/models.py#L159 | |
| 20:00:12 | mriedem | correct ^ ? | |
| 20:02:35 | mriedem | an alternative solution would be to add an image_props column to the instance_extra table and just store the serialized image properties in there, rather than the instance_system_metadata table | |
| 20:02:55 | mriedem | but then we could have n * TEXT entries in that json blob | |
| 20:03:39 | mriedem | jaypipes: TEXT is not preallocated right? | |
| 20:04:40 | ameeda | mriedem: I am new on openstack , I just follow the bug to fix it, I need to merge this bug. I worked on it a lot as you see :( | |
| 20:04:54 | jaypipes | mriedem: correct. | |
| 20:05:24 | mriedem | ameeda: do you have a customer hitting htis? | |
| 20:05:25 | mriedem | *this | |
| 20:06:54 | jaypipes | ameeda: reviewed. | |
| 20:07:37 | ameeda | I am working at local company here, and the customer ask us to fix bugs in openstack. so I have to get points | |
| 20:07:48 | ameeda | jaypipes: Thank you | |
| 20:08:42 | mriedem | ameeda: hmm, well, there are probably less controversial bugs to fix :) | |
| 20:08:48 | mriedem | if you're just looking for something to get into stackalytics | |
| 20:10:19 | mriedem | reading the history on this bug, from lbragstad - probably due to some issue with storing powervc configuration strategy xml in image metadata back in 2013 - it sounds like the 255 length restriction was from when the image service was passing properties as http headers | |
| 20:10:35 | ameeda | mriedem: I still learn about nova and try to find medium bugs to fix . if my current opened bugs not merged , they will fire me :( | |
| 20:10:48 | mriedem | ameeda: sounds like a terrible employer | |
| 20:11:53 | ameeda | mriedem: yes it was sending by header and now sending on body, so the limitation is gone | |
| 20:11:59 | ameeda | mriedem: no comments ... | |
| 20:12:46 | openstackgerrit | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova stable/ocata: Stop globally caching host states in scheduler HostManager https://review.openstack.org/539013 | |
| 20:21:21 | ameeda | mriedem: regarding to your last comment, is this something should I do ? | |
| 20:22:16 | mriedem | ameeda: up to you, it could be done in devstack if you use the nova fake virt driver ,and then just create 1000 instances | |
| 20:22:35 | mriedem | then apply your change and run the migration and see how long it takes | |
| 20:23:56 | ameeda | sure that will take long time for large data, but what I should I do after what I have done until now :( | |
| 20:27:31 | openstackgerrit | Ameed Ashour proposed openstack/nova master: change instance_system_metadata column type https://review.openstack.org/526900 | |
| 20:28:45 | ameeda | jaypipes: I uploaded the patch set | |
| 20:34:10 | ameeda | jaypipes mriedem, kindly, can you please review those also https://review.openstack.org/#/c/528069/ and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/528385/ | |
| 20:35:34 | ameeda | and please let me know what do you think about this bug "https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1737708" | |
| 20:35:37 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1737708 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "create instance failed when the userdata size is larger than 64k" [Undecided,New] - Assigned to Deepak Mourya (mourya007) | |
| 20:36:00 | ameeda | sorry for inconvenience, Thank you for your time | |
| 20:39:18 | mriedem | ameeda: melwitt has been working on a duplicate of one of those for a long time https://review.openstack.org/#/c/340614/ | |
| 20:41:09 | melwitt | yeah, took many iterations to get it right back when the earlier versions caused gate failures in the postgres job. looks like it needs another rebase | |
| 20:43:09 | melwitt | we still have customers that need a fix for it | |
| 20:43:13 | ameeda | mriedem: yes, but my bug scenario doesn't hit _local_delete, so we have to cover all the cases, right ? | |
| 20:44:04 | mriedem | melwitt's patch is fixing a local delete case | |
| 20:44:08 | mriedem | where the instance isn't on a compute host, | |
| 20:44:19 | mriedem | so it is either shelved offloaded or failed during scheduling | |
| 20:44:24 | melwitt | it is on a compute host, it's just in ERROR state | |
| 20:44:29 | mriedem | 'local delete' == delete from the API, not compute | |
| 20:45:07 | melwitt | there's code in compute manager that sets host = None while setting to ERROR state if something fails. IIRC | |
| 20:46:53 | melwitt | like this https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/compute/manager.py#L1941-L1943 | |
| 20:48:54 | ameeda | I am not sure about the case , but what about this fix https://review.openstack.org/#/c/528385/ | |
| 20:49:18 | ameeda | this detach volume when instance creation fails | |
| 20:51:22 | mriedem | ameeda: -1 on that one too | |
| 20:51:32 | mriedem | ameeda: we already attempt to detach volumes when deleting a server | |
| 20:51:41 | mriedem | so if that's failing, i don't think your patch is going to fix it | |
| 20:53:41 | ameeda | what is the case !, I just follow the bugs to fix them , after that I found that the bug is invalid ? | |
| 20:54:00 | mriedem | ameeda: well, you could be trying to fix a very old bug that's already been fixed | |
| 20:54:10 | mriedem | or the recreate scenario from the bug is not clear | |
| 20:55:44 | mriedem | so the thing to do here, is probably go through the recreate steps in the bug (which are pretty clear) and see if you can reproduce it | |
| 20:55:47 | mriedem | and if so, see where things are failing | |
| 20:56:24 | mriedem | the bug report was written over a year ago and doesn't say which version of nova they were using when they hit this, | |
| 20:56:26 | mriedem | so it might be fixed | |
| 20:56:37 | mriedem | i'm sorry that you invested time in a patch, but we need to make sure it's still a valid bug first | |
| 20:56:43 | ameeda | mriedem: but I reproduce the bug and fix it , then test it again to make sure that I fix the issue, and there are reviewers ask me to make changes on it :( | |
| 20:57:21 | ameeda | I am sure that the bug is still valid , I reproduce it | |
| 20:58:16 | mriedem | ok, so then why is the original detach failing in _shutdown_instance? | |
| 20:58:22 | mriedem | because that's what should be detaching the volume | |
| 21:02:15 | melwitt | mriedem: I think it's the same bug I'm fixing. I think he means volume quota was exceeded (it's checked in compute). compute catches the exceptions, nulls out the instance.host, then sets it to ERROR state | |
| 21:03:00 | melwitt | then when you go to delete the instance, because compute nulled out the host, the compute api thinks there's no resources to free up because it assumes instance.host = None means failed to schedule | |
| 21:03:44 | melwitt | so I think my patch will take care of it. I'm rebasing it now and rewriting the commit message to be clearer | |
| 21:03:46 | ameeda | my case when vm creations fails when there are no enough quota for volumes. as this https://review.openstack.org/#/c/528069/ scenario. | |
| 21:03:53 | melwitt | I know, that's what I just said | |
| 21:05:12 | ameeda | melwitt: you fix solve the issue when there is no hosts, my fix solve the issue in another case ! | |
| 21:05:29 | ameeda | mriedem: what do you think ? | |
| 21:05:56 | melwitt | it's not another case. compute will set instance.host = None because of the volume quota exceeded | |
| 21:07:28 | ameeda | ok great !! | |
| 21:08:59 | ameeda | duplicated bugs , and my work and time have gone in vain | |
| 21:29:39 | efried | mriedem: Any tips for how I can check in nova.tests.functional.test_servers that a particular exception got raised up from _update() ? | |
| 21:30:34 | efried | So far my mechanism for getting _update() to run is self._run_periodics() | |
| 21:37:09 | melwitt | efried: I think that's the usual way to run it | |
| 21:38:00 | efried | melwitt: I think I'm going to have to deconstruct it a bit and run rt.update_available_resource directly. | |
| 21:38:52 | melwitt | efried: any reason you're trying to verify that in a func test instead of a unit test? | |
| 21:39:17 | efried | melwitt: A reasonable question. | |
| 21:39:26 | melwitt | if there's no way to detect what you expect from the instance or other things you can inspect in the func test | |
| 21:39:29 | efried | melwitt: I was hoping to avoid unit test altogether. | |
| 21:39:56 | melwitt | so there's an existing func test and you want to add an assertion to it? | |
| 21:40:36 | efried | melwitt: I'm writing a new func suite. Stand by, I'll put up what I've got. | |
| 21:43:04 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Use update_provider_tree from resource tracker https://review.openstack.org/520246 | |
| 21:43:04 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: SchedulerReportClient.update_from_provider_tree https://review.openstack.org/533821 | |
| 21:43:04 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: New-style _set_inventory_for_provider https://review.openstack.org/537648 | |
| 21:43:05 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Fix nits in update_provider_tree series https://review.openstack.org/531260 | |
| 21:43:06 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Move refresh time from report client to prov tree https://review.openstack.org/535517 | |
| 21:44:06 | efried | melwitt: Right here is where I want to make sure that exception happened: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/520246/41/nova/tests/functional/test_servers.py@1615 | |
| 21:44:20 | efried | melwitt: And similar for other kinds of error conditions. | |
| 21:44:45 | efried | melwitt: I mean, I'm at least proving the whole thing doesn't blow up when I inject error conditions, which is good. | |