Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2018-01-26
15:33:38 kashyap applications tolerate incorrect time settings, use this approach with
15:33:41 kashyap caution.
15:34:44 kashyap superdan: So your guess seems right
15:35:17 superdan kashyap: it wasn't really a guess, but ... okay :)
15:35:30 kashyap superdan: I like how you're a stickler for words.
15:47:05 openstackgerrit Claudiu Belu proposed openstack/nova master: tests: fixes mock autospec usage https://review.openstack.org/447505
16:06:57 mriedem figleaf: ooo alternate hosts for resize is finally in the gate queue
16:06:58 mriedem progress
16:08:53 lpetrut mriedem: hi, quick question about nova docs: do you know by any chance if config option tables are still being used? e.g. https://github.com/openstack/openstack-manuals/blob/stable/newton/doc/config-reference/source/tables/nova-vnc.rst
16:09:02 mriedem yes
16:09:12 mriedem https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/configuration/sample-config.html
16:09:18 mriedem https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/configuration/config.html
16:09:38 mriedem lpetrut: those docs are auto-generated from the config options in code
16:09:59 lpetrut got it, the only "issue" with that is that you no longer have separate tables that you may reference throughout the docs
16:10:13 mriedem so like linking directly to hyperv options?
16:10:20 lpetrut yeah, for example
16:10:24 leakypipes sahid: I see you are assigned to https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1729584. Did you have in-progress code on that? Seems like a trivial fix (from sileht)
16:10:25 openstack Launchpad bug 1729584 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "boot from volume + configdrive broken" [Undecided,Confirmed] - Assigned to sahid (sahid-ferdjaoui)
16:10:37 mriedem lpetrut: https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/configuration/config.html#hyperv
16:10:40 mriedem tada!
16:12:01 lpetrut hmm, I guess that works as well. Previously, you could've embedded the tables on other doc pages, e.g. https://docs.openstack.org/cinder/latest/configuration/block-storage/drivers/lvm-volume-driver.html
16:13:48 figleaf mriedem: 11 hours and still just sitting there. Maybe it will get through by the end of Rocky :)
16:14:43 fried_rice figleaf Based on the past few days, it'll take another 12h or so to fail.
16:14:53 giblet figleaf: I have patches in gate queue for more than 17 hours without any job being executed on them
16:15:04 mriedem patience,
16:15:10 mriedem at least the volume backup thing is fixed (again)
16:15:20 superdan heh top nova change has been there for 20h
16:15:25 sahid leakypipes: nothing so far
16:15:25 fried_rice figleaf When you're asleep, so it's another 8h before you can recheck if nobody else gets to it.
16:18:20 leakypipes sahid: k. mind if I take it?
16:18:37 sahid leakypipes: please do
16:18:42 mriedem that community-wide mox goal will kill us with test_neutronv2.py alone
16:18:43 leakypipes sahid: k, cheers
16:22:26 figleaf fried_rice: oh, no, I'm planning on staying up all night staring at the Zuul status page
16:23:03 fried_rice figleaf Tonight and Saturday night? Thanks!
16:23:36 figleaf fried_rice: All weekend!!
16:26:15 fried_rice mriedem So does http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-January/126621.html mean we can continue approving new function?
16:26:53 mriedem not in my opinion
16:27:16 mriedem http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-January/126600.html
16:27:41 mriedem personally i'm spent, we have a bunch of stuff already approved,
16:27:43 mriedem and 2 weeks to FF
16:27:45 mriedem *RC1
16:27:55 mriedem so we're going to have bugs creep up from what gets merged over the weekend
16:28:02 fried_rice Swhat I figured, and I probably would have said the same in your position, but it was worth a shot :)
16:28:14 mriedem i don't want to be busting ass to merge more stuff that will add more bugs
16:28:15 mriedem ack
16:28:44 mriedem i've already deferred several bps this morning anyway
16:39:04 sean-k-mooney mriedem: oh on that am is it ok to propose the feature bases schduling spec for rocky since its defered or would you like me to hold off until ater the release to re propose the spec
16:39:41 mriedem re-proposing specs for rocky right now is fine
16:46:20 sean-k-mooney mriedem: cool will do i know we need to focus on getting queens out the door so dont want to cause un needed churn. ill upoald the latest version fo the code too and set a -1 on it unill master reopens for rocky after the PTG thanks :)
17:03:50 mriedem python-pcre must be new?
17:06:52 mriedem not sure what's pulling that in, but now i need libpcre3-dev installed
17:10:50 leakypipes mriedem: just noticed that too...
17:12:13 fried_rice Not something I ever thought I would be happy to say, but my patches are now failing in a couple of hours.
17:12:33 figleaf fried_rice: efficient!
17:12:52 fried_rice The gate is officially giving me the finger: build-openstack-sphinx-docs finger://ze05.openstack.org/c5b1d14f3fa944388c1e6d0979203466 : POST_FAILURE in 6m 55s
17:25:11 openstackgerrit Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: only increment disk address unit for scsi devices https://review.openstack.org/538310
17:27:09 cfriesen is anyone doing performance testing release-over-release? We just did a test where launching an instance took over 3x as long on Pike as it did on Newton. Still working to characterize.
17:32:56 leakypipes cfriesen: nope, not that I know of.
17:33:40 leakypipes cfriesen: just make sure you're accounting for all the many things that may have changed, including versions of libvirt/QEMU, operating system, etvc
17:50:36 openstackgerrit James E. Blair proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: test if tempest-full is triggered or not https://review.openstack.org/537936
17:59:30 openstackgerrit Sen Yang proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Implement hypervisor hostname exact patten match for server cold migrate https://review.openstack.org/520187
18:29:49 jgwentworth leakypipes: we've got a scheduler host manager bug fix up at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/533371 which would much appreciate your review
18:30:29 leakypipes jgwentworth: on it.
18:30:59 leakypipes jgwentworth: trade ya for https://review.openstack.org/538310
18:31:13 jgwentworth leakypipes: sure thing
18:33:08 jgwentworth leakypipes: I'm wondering if there's more to do on that one, see comment 2 on the bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1729584
18:33:09 openstack Launchpad bug 1729584 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "boot from volume + configdrive broken (regression)" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Jay Pipes (jaypipes)
18:34:34 jgwentworth I don't quite understand it yet. saying that the secondary volumes can end up as LUN 0 which results in an unbootable instance. IIUC that's even after applying the patch mentioned in comment 0
18:39:08 jgwentworth maybe that's just residual from before the patch was applied
18:39:52 jgwentworth logan-: hey, are you around?
19:05:29 mriedem wtf now i'm getting this
19:05:30 mriedem OverflowError: Python int too large to convert to C long
19:05:30 mriedem enum_member = __new__(enum_class, *args)
19:05:30 mriedem File "/home/user/git/nova/.tox/py27/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/enum/__init__.py", line 230, in __new__
19:05:35 mriedem with unit tests
19:05:41 mriedem cfriesen: figure out the performance issue?
19:08:09 cfriesen mriedem: not yet. we're going to do a comparison of right before/after the OpenStack version switch to remove as many factors as possible.
19:08:43 cfriesen mriedem: things as basic as nova-compute downloading an image from glance take more than twice as long
19:09:04 sean-k-mooney mriedem: damb you are overflowing a long in a enum that is bizar
19:09:29 mriedem sean-k-mooney: wasn't a problem until i had to install libpcre3-dev
19:10:43 sean-k-mooney maybe they chaged the type form a long long but still why would you ever need an enum that high or with that many values. there must be something else going on
19:11:01 mriedem i haven't done any other apt-get updates either
19:11:09 mriedem so shouldn't be pulling in the new python2.7 for xenial
19:12:11 sean-k-mooney mriedem: you didnt install any new pip pakages or downgrade them did you. pip really does not handel downgrades well so i have seen random issue in the past becase of that
19:12:25 mriedem no, only thing was a tox -r -e py27
19:12:35 mriedem and then it was trying to install python-pcre
19:12:54 mriedem and i had to install libpcre3-dev for that to work
19:15:00 sean-k-mooney mriedem: were you looking at a partcalar patch. can an try pulling it donw in a vm i dont care too much about and see if i get teh same issue
19:15:27 mriedem Collecting python-pcre===0.7 (from -c https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/requirements/plain/upper-constraints.txt (line 440))
19:15:28 sean-k-mooney that said ill be heading home in 45 mins to an hour so wont be arround too much longer
19:15:35 mriedem sean-k-mooney: no i'm trying to write unit tests for something
19:16:57 sean-k-mooney hum strange looks like there has not been an u-c bump to that for 2 months
19:17:06 mriedem i don't know what's pulling it in
19:19:28 mriedem aha!
19:19:36 mriedem dhellmann's whereto thing
19:19:43 mriedem http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/whereto/tree/requirements.txt#n6
19:20:35 sean-k-mooney so it got pulled in form https://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/cec0faa7111ce93b5f99622b8e6174d66b25b6d0
19:20:41 Roamer` mriedem, yeah, yesterday something started depending on python-pcre and it caused some problems for most third-party CI systems that didn't have libpcre3-dev installed (although it had been in requirements/bindep.txt for quite some time), but now it's really being used
19:21:23 mriedem yes it's that whereto change

Earlier   Later